The Question: Would you pay $60 for a 2D platformer?

Recommended Videos

In our El Shaddai review this week, it was noted that quite a few comments expressed doubt that the game could be worth $60, due to the fact that it contained 2D platforming sections. This has confirmed a fear I’ve had that there’s just no respect for classic platformers anymore, no matter how much time, effort and content went into them. 

I was considering this when playing the Sonic Generations demo. It felt great to play, and I couldn’t help thinking how much I’d enjoy a game that was nothing but 2D levels, without the “Modern Sonic” stuff. Unfortunately, publishers don’t seem to have any faith in a retail-bound platformer, relegating such gameplay to bonus levels or downloadable games. 

So what do you think? Are you against ever paying $60 for a 2D platformer, regardless of how replayable it is, how long it is, and whether or not it’s any fun? Do you consider such games fit only for handhelds and digital platforms? Conversely, do you think a 2D platformer can deserve to charge full price, provided it’s good enough?


Destructoid is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article MCW JAK Raven kit takes over Warzone meta after DG-58 LSW nerf
MCW
Read Article Warzone devs provide update on auto tac-sprint reload glitch
Warzone
Read Article The Hades 2 soundtrack is available to stick into your ears on YouTube
Scylla Portrait
Related Content
Read Article MCW JAK Raven kit takes over Warzone meta after DG-58 LSW nerf
MCW
Read Article Warzone devs provide update on auto tac-sprint reload glitch
Warzone
Read Article The Hades 2 soundtrack is available to stick into your ears on YouTube
Scylla Portrait