Gaming News, Game Reviews, Game Trailers, Tech News

dtoid   |   japanator   |   flixist   |   tomopop   |   store



The Question: Would you pay $60 for a 2D platformer?


In our El Shaddai review this week, it was noted that quite a few comments expressed doubt that the game could be worth $60, due to the fact that it contained 2D platforming sections. This has confirmed a fear I've had that there's just no respect for classic platformers anymore, no matter how much time, effort and content went into them. 

I was considering this when playing the Sonic Generations demo. It felt great to play, and I couldn't help thinking how much I'd enjoy a game that was nothing but 2D levels, without the "Modern Sonic" stuff. Unfortunately, publishers don't seem to have any faith in a retail-bound platformer, relegating such gameplay to bonus levels or downloadable games. 

So what do you think? Are you against ever paying $60 for a 2D platformer, regardless of how replayable it is, how long it is, and whether or not it's any fun? Do you consider such games fit only for handhelds and digital platforms? Conversely, do you think a 2D platformer can deserve to charge full price, provided it's good enough?

The article continues below. Login to skip ads, get faster mobile, and dibs on betas


Jim SterlingThank God // Profile & Disclosures
Fronts12537Blogs 194Following42Followers1569


#El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron #Ignition #Platform games #Sonic #The Question


Please login (or) make a quick account (free)
to view and post comments.

 Login with Twitter

 Login with Dtoid

Three day old threads are only visible to verified humans - this helps our small community management team stay on top of spam

Sorry for the extra step!