Call of Duty is headed back to court yet again, this time over the word 'Warzone'


Trademarks blocked by similarly named mobile game

Activision is once again in a legal tangle over matters concerning its billion-dollar shooter, Call of Duty. This latest courtroom soiree revolves around the publisher's use of the word "Warzone" in the title of its uber-successful battle royale release Call of Duty: Warzone.

The problem began back in June 2020, when Activision filed trademarks with the U.S. patent office for "Warzone" and "Call of Duty: Warzone" as applied to its free-to-play shooter. As reported by PC Gamer, Warzone - a tabletop-style strategy title that has been using the name since 2017 - has continuously blocked these trademarks. Warzone's holding company, Warzone.com, proposes that allowing Activision to secure the word "Warzone" will hinder the former's efforts to effectively market its wares.

Activision has denied Warzone.com's claim that the trademark would cause "consumer confusion," calling the potential mix-up "inconceivable." Activision notes that both Warzone and Call of Duty: Warzone are entirely different games in entirely different genres. Activision also states that the word "Warzone" is featured in the titles of at least 15 other mobile games, asking why Warzone.com has not taken the same fight up with any of these other, similarly named releases.

Activision was supposed to complete its trademark process in December of 2020 but has received numerous extensions in order to tackle this dispute. Last week, Activision filed a new suit in efforts to bring the situation to a close, requesting that the U.S. patent office be allowed to complete Activision's trademark applications, while demanding Warzone.com recoup Activision's "reasonable" legal costs.


You are logged out. Login | Sign up


Chris Moyse
Chris MoyseSenior Editor   gamer profile

Chris has been playing video games since video games began... still terrible at them. Former Saturday Night Slam Master, rambles nostalgically like Abe Simpson. I ain't here to fight, so let's no... more + disclosures



Also on Destructoid: Call of Duty: Warzone   (34)   From our database:

  • New 4/20 'Stoner' bundle shows Call of Duty knows its audience - Chris Moyse
  • Call of Duty: Warzone is preparing to nuke Verdansk/Cheaters - Chris Moyse
  • Call of Duty is headed back to court yet again, this time over the word 'Warzone' - Chris Moyse
  • Call of Duty: Cold War & Warzone reveal contents of tomorrow's Reloaded Season 2 update - Chris Moyse
  • Call of Duty: Warzone bans a further 30,000 players, while Mara actor takes down cheaters - Chris Moyse
  • Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War & Warzone reveal full Season 2 content - Chris Moyse
  • Call of Duty: Warzone leak points to incoming new map 'Zoo' - Chris Moyse
  • Fear not, Call of Duty: Warzone players, the dominance of DMR 14 is almost over - Chris Moyse
  • You might see the Saw puppet and Leatherface running wild in Call of Duty - Jordan Devore
  • More related stories
    Filed under... #Activision #Call of Duty #Free-to-play #Indie #Legal System #Mobile gaming #PC #PS4 #trademarks #Xbox One



    You're not expected to always agree, but do please keep cool and never make it personal. Report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our community team. Also, on the right side of a comment you can flag nasty comments anonymously (we ban users dishing bad karma). For everything else, contact us!