dark        

Review: Bleeding Edge

0

Short-lived thrills

As a four-on-four team fighter with limited content, Bleeding Edge has its work cut out for it.

Ninja Theory's third-person PvP brawler has drawn a lot of comparisons – and also a lot of skepticism. It's the kind of game you can download with Xbox Game Pass and enjoy for a week, without question, but does it stand any real chance of sticking around long-term? I'm already expecting the worst given the scope of the game, the release timing, and all the other projects Ninja Theory has coming up next.

In the meantime, though, it's neat. The hero roster is surprisingly out-there and versatile, the melee focus is a pleasant change of pace for people who are burned out on Overwatch, and the hazard-filled maps can lead to brutal trap setups involving high-speed trains, electric walls, and missile barrages.

Bleeding Edge review

Bleeding Edge (PC, Xbox One [reviewed])
Developer: Ninja Theory
Publisher: Xbox Game Studios
Released: March 24, 2020
MSRP: $29.99

I'm in a weird place with Bleeding Edge. Many of you probably will be too.

I like this kooky game more than I expected given the premise (and my growing hero-shooter fatigue), yet I'm torn about the overall package. In some areas, the development team is clearly punching above its weight. In others, it feels like the creators had to scale back their vision. It's pretty bare-bones.

Let me set the scene. You're ideally going to play through a few quick but crucial tutorials to grasp the controls, watch a video that vaguely sets up Bleeding Edge's quirky cyberpunk world, maybe read a character bio or two, and then practice your bestie's abilities against programmable AI bots in the dojo. After that, you're looking at matchmaking with two modes across five maps, minor progression unlocks involving equippable mods that alter each hero's ability stats, and rudimentary alternate outfits.

That's the reality of the situation. You have to fall in love with at least a few characters on the eclectic roster, most if not all of the arcadey arenas, and both game modes if you're ever going to stick with Bleeding Edge. There are 11 heroes at launch, with one more – Mekko the dolphin – coming soon.

My favorite character, Kulev, is a dead voodoo-loving Cambridge professor whose "soul was digitized" and inserted into a poisonous robot snake – or something like that. It's a blast to toss last-second shields on a teammate (or myself), throw down an area-of-effect healing/damaging ward, and curse a high-priority foe so we can quickly take them out of the equation. Hey, someone's gotta pick Support.

My next-favorite fighter – to play as, not to look at! – is El Bastardo. I can't stand his aesthetic (a complaint that extends to a few other Bleeding Edge inhabitants), but it's so much guilty fun to leap-stun and tornado spin with dual machetes to accumulate lots of self-shielding in a chaotic crowd.

Did I mention there's a cyber-witch who can cage enemies and siphon their life force? Well, there is!

Bleeding Edge's brawler combat can be hit-or-(literally)-miss depending on the match-up, and I can't over-stress how important synergies are to not only winning, but your enjoyment. If your team doesn't work as a group, the opposition is going to wipe the floor with you. It'll seem absurdly one-sided.

Both of the modes are objective-based. Objective Control involves capturing control points that activate and deactivate at regular intervals, and some of them are placed near devious environmental traps, which I adore. Power Collection is similar, to an extent, but it has a different flow and far more tense vibe. This mode is all about grabbing, hoarding, and finally depositing nodes on a strict timetable.

Generally speaking, you'll need to stick with your group to survive at any given moment, and that goes double for contested objectives. Most of the melee-centric heroes have simple multi-tap combo strings, and ranged heroes rely on holding down the attack button to fire off shots. In both cases, there's auto-aim (to the nearest opponent), though you can manually lock-on with the left trigger and swap targets.

If you aren't the best shot in hero shooters but you enjoy juggling ability cooldowns, working out team positioning, and prioritizing threats, you might dig Bleeding Edge. In the heat of battle, I sometimes struggled to switch my lock-on target as intended or hit the wrong teammate with a life-saving support buff, so it's not totally foolproof, but it works pretty well. Combat abilities are flashy and just chaotic enough that you can usually grasp exactly who's doing what, and when, and who's affected.

Movement also plays a major role. You can dodge using a stamina bar that refills its "charges" over time, and dodging – along with a very basic parry mechanic that I'm not super into – is the main way to escape combo attacks. You can also "mount up," MOBA-style, and zip to objectives on a hoverboard.

The maps are reasonable – not too big, not too small – so there isn't much downtime after respawns.

Bleeding Edge

If anything I'm describing sounds cool, it is – or it can be. Bleeding Edge isn't some throwaway game.

I just wish it had way more depth. I have nitpicks here and there with balancing, good-but-not-great netcode, uneven matchmaking, a lack of matchmaking options, a poor sense of progression, and wishy-washy targeting, but the main criticism – the thing that kills it for me – is a lack of longevity. I genuinely think most players are going to have their fill of the arena brawls in five hours or less. I know I have.

There's a decent multiplayer action game concept buried in here, absolutely. Some of these characters deserve to live on in future projects. At the same time, it feels like there are only so many team dynamics to experience. It's all too fleeting. Once you've hit that point of no return, there's no real motivation to continue. I'd like to pick this back up one day, but realistically, I don't see that happening.

If you're even remotely interested in Bleeding Edge, play it now while the matchmaking is still lively.

[This review is based on a retail build of the game provided by the publisher.]

You are logged out. Login | Sign up

 
 

 

Bleeding Edge reviewed by Jordan Devore

6.5

ALL RIGHT

Slightly above average or simply inoffensive. Fans of the genre should enjoy it a bit, but a fair few will be left unfulfilled.
How we score:  The Destructoid reviews guide

 
 
 

TwitterRedditEmailFacebook
 
Jordan Devore
Jordan DevoreCo-EIC   gamer profile

Jordan is a founding member of Destructoid and poster of seemingly random pictures. They are anything but random. Disclosure: I backed Double Fine Adventure and Awesomenauts: Starstorm on Kickst... more + disclosures


 


 


Also on Destructoid: Bleeding Edge   (6)   From our database:

  • Review: Bleeding Edge - Jordan Devore
  • Bleeding Edge tips: Here are the best starter characters for each class - Chris Carter
  • Bleeding Edge is running one last beta on March 13 - Jordan Devore
  • The Bleeding Edge beta is this weekend on Xbox One and PC - Jordan Devore
  • Ninja Theory's Bleeding Edge wants a piece of the March 2020 pie - Jordan Devore
  • Ninja Theory discuss character individuality in new Bleeding Edge gameplay video - Chris Moyse
  • Ninja Theory's next game is Bleeding Edge and you can play it soon - Jordan Devore
  • More related stories
    Filed under... #Action #multiplayer #Ninja Theory #PC #reviews #Top Stories #Xbox One

    READER COMMENTS LOADING BELOW...


    LET'S KEEP THE COMMUNITY GREAT


    You're not expected to always agree, but do please keep cool and never make it personal. Report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our community team. Also, on the right side of a comment you can flag nasty comments anonymously (we ban users dishing bad karma). For everything else, contact us!



     
     
  •