Gaming News, Game Reviews, Game Trailers, Tech News

POPULAR:   SWITCH   |   PS4   |   XBOX ONE   |   PC   |   3DS   |   VR   |   JP   |   FILM   |   TOYS

Josh Tolentino blog header photo
Josh Tolentino
Fronts 482Posts 3Blogs 126Following 41Followers 103


On Destructoid:
Most Comments

more notable stories


Who updates the homepage?
Our Staff
What is Destructoid?
Long story
Can I submit a story?
Dark theme?
Site rules?
Douche lightly
Ethics much?
Read this
Common sense
Who owns my posts?
You do

Get in touch

Editorial contacts
Meet our staff
Ask a question
Get support
Story idea?
Everything else
Get in touch


Sega Wants To Use Metacritic More, Also FFFFFFUUUUUU-


As above, Sega Europe COO Mike Hayes declared that Metacritic helps "business objectivity, and that it would be using Metacritic scores of studios to judge development deals and influence business decisions.

Reacting to Splash Damage head Paul Wedgwood's comments that Metacritic-based publisher-developer pressure was "ridiculous", Hayes said:

"We're a creative business, and how do you put objectivity into it? But at the end of the day publishers will always want to do that, particularly if you're spending $20 million - you have to try and find that objectivity, and it's going to come from how much it costs, when it's coming out, and how good the game is. I don't think you can get away from that, and Metacritic provides a service that gives you a part of that,"

He did of course clarify that not all games and franchises lend themselves as easily to statistically-based evaluation, and that the tool wouldn't be applied across the board uniformly.

My reaction, after the OH SHI- NOT METACRITIC AGAIN rage subsided, was actually a bit hopeful. After all, dangerous as Metacritic is, it remains a workable barometer for critical reception, and can bear at least some weight in the judgment of a game's perceived quality.

The hope came from this notion: if Sega intends to use reviews and critical reception to influence which games and franchises they're going to spend money on promoting and continuing, games like Valkyria Chronicles, Sakura Taisen, Yakuza, and the Total War games are inevitably going to rise to the surface, getting marketing dollars and time appropriate to their quality. Sega would then then start climbing out of the pit of ridicule they'd thrown themselves into with Sonic game after terrible Sonic game.

Of course, as is characteristic of Sega's consistently disappointing behavior, Hayes torpedoed my hopes with this caveat (emphasis mine):

However, there are other genres and other platforms where we wouldn't put a developer against that score, because it's more about the brand, the license, the release timing - it's probably something that in the Metacritic basket of reviews, they're not going to look at the same things that we're going to look for when making a game."

That, of course, is code for "We don't care if Sonic games are terrible, we're going to keep making them because Sonic is our core brand, so you can go to hell."

Sigh. So can you, Sega, so can you.
#Community    #PS3   
Login to vote this up!



Please login (or) make a quick account (free)
to view and post comments.

 Login with Twitter

 Login with Dtoid

Three day old threads are only visible to verified humans - this helps our small community management team stay on top of spam

Sorry for the extra step!


About Josh Tolentinoone of us since 9:23 PM on 02.07.2007

When not posting about Japanese games or Star Trek, Josh serves as Managing Editor for Japanator, Dtoid's sister site for the best in anime, manga, and cool news from Glorious Nippon.

Crowdfunded games backed:
Pillars of Eternity
Star Citizen
Xbox LIVE:unangbangkay
PSN ID:unangbangkay
Steam ID:unangbangkay
Mii code:6258-3610-4242-3684


Around the Community






Read Huge: Top Stories