Video Game News



 
The Scientist blog header photo
The Scientist

The basis of all things not given thought in an opinionated website\\\'s blog application.

Posts 0Blogs 3Following 3Followers 2


 
 








On Destructoid:
Most Comments

more notable stories

FAQ

Who updates the homepage?
Our Staff
What is Destructoid?
Long story
Can I submit a story?
#BloggersWanted
Dark theme?
Yep
Site rules?
Douche lightly
Ethics much?
Read this
Privacy?
Common sense
Who owns my posts?
You do


Get in touch

Editorial contacts
Meet our staff
Ask a question
Community@
Get support
Support@
Story idea?
Tips@
Everything else
Get in touch

LONG BLOG

Why we need places like GAF.

   0
Playing devils advocate can be a real bitch sometimes, this isn't one of those times. I'm not naming any names, but a certain few people have a hard time appreciating what these gaming forums do for them. Forums give them a general consensus of how their related product is viewed, which can be detrimental to how a game or product is received by we, the consumers.

Forums like GAF takes this whole concept (possibly inadvertently) and push and voice concerns that could be well put. It's folly to think that a haughty developer of a product would care so less about their "masterpiece" not to listen to a negative opinion as long as it holds some perceptive merit to it. Not paying attention to their audience and critics alike is what holds back a work from being as good as it could be.

I encourage developing and producing companies to look more into the range of opinions we call these series of tubes. We of the internet may not be certified in any way to professionally preview your piece of soft/hardware, but as humans we have the same thought process as any who are in the practice. Workers of the trade are to scrutinize the product to prevent it from being an impotent piece of shit (pardon), but the people tend to see the big picture and the whole of those parts. I don't know why I do it, but I tend to simplify my thoughts on something into a single sentence.

Example: "Crysis is a good game, but I can't run it on my computer"
I could put more effort into talking about how badly optimized the game was, but thinking about it get's me confused since there so many damn games these days.

As the makers of our entertainment, the developers need to take a step back from the "enormous depth" and see if it is even fun, or if it even plays well. Both of those can observed in motion and subsequently judged upon by the viewer.

In conclusion, no matter how callous a remark or concern is to your product, embrace it and don't ignore it. God forbid you challenge an opinion on the grounds of someone else's more "qualified" opinion. Gamers are just looking out for ya'.

Well, that's that. This is merely what I think of the current situation of how developers should view the public as a useful companion and not a throwaway. Fee; free to post yours as well.
Login to vote this up!


 
 

  0 COMMENTS

Please login (or) make a quick account (free)
to view and post comments.



 Login with Twitter

 Login with Dtoid

Three day old threads are only visible to verified humans - this helps our small community management team stay on top of spam

Sorry for the extra step!

 

About The Scientistone of us since 7:09 PM on 05.14.2008

Xbox LIVE:Stuffed Tiger


 

Around the Community

Featured

Posts

Blogs

Support

 



Read Huge: Top Stories

Destructoid