Gaming News, Game Reviews, Game Trailers, Tech News

dtoid   |   japanator   |   flixist   |   tomopop   |   store



Artist files suit against pet toy company over Angry Birds trademark

2014-08-06 13:45:00·  2 minute read   ·  Brittany Vincent

Welcome to the confusing world of copyrights and trademarks

Years before the Angry Birds videogame franchise took the world by storm, pet accessory maker Hartz partnered with Seattle artist Juli Adams to release a line of cat toys going by the name of Angry Birds. A lawsuit filed by Adams this week accuses Hartz of unlawfully taking her trademarked designs and turning them into a licensing partnership with the developer of the Angry Birds videogame line, Rovio.

According to a statement issued today by the attorneys representing Ms. Adams, Hartz Mountain Corporation approached Adams after discovering her work at a Pacific Northwest art fair in the mid-2000s. Adams was asked to create a line of pet toys based on her unique style. The result was a line of toys that looked roughed up and angry with the knowledge that they were going to be dragged around by the cats. The name she came up with for the line was "Angry Birds."

The lawsuit dictates that Hartz entered into an agreement in 2006 that there would be no transfer of ownership of the Angry Birds property from Adams to Hartz. In March 2007, Hartz filed a trademark for the "Angry Birds" name as pertaining to pet toys which still stands today. The lawsuit claims that Hartz used its trademark to enter into a licensing deal with Rovio for an line of toys based on the Angry Birds game franchise in 2011. Adams's designs were swapped out with characters from the Rovio game and no further royalty checks were sent to her.

In addition to unceremoniously discontinuing her designs, Hartz also told her that she could no longer use the name "Angry Birds" due to the existing copyright Hartz had on the name used for pet toys. Adams is now seeking compensation based on the revenue generated via the trademark.

Adams' lawsuit only targets Hartz and she has no quandaries with the use of the name "Angry Birds" associated with the videogame franchise from Rovio. Her issue lies with the use by Hartz of her intellectual property to sign a deal with Rovio without her consideration and without giving her compensation.

Artist Sues Pet Toy Company Over Angry Birds Trademark [Kotaku]

The article continues below. Login to skip ads, get faster mobile, and dibs on betas


Brittany VincentFormer Associate Editor // Profile & Disclosures
Fronts648Posts3Blogs 13Following71Followers65

play witcha, I been busy workin', more


On Destructoid: Angry Birds   (14)   From our game database:

  • Artist files suit against pet toy company over Angry Birds trademark - Brittany Vincent
  • Apple counts down to 50 billion downloads, lists top apps - Allistair Pinsof
  • Miyamoto loves Angry Birds, wishes he'd made it - Jim Sterling
  • Ladies and gents, the tackiest dress ever made - Tony Ponce
  • Copyright infringement is alright with Angry Birds - Brock Janikowski
  • Angry Birds gets ready for Halloween by playing dress-up - Victoria Medina
  • You might start seeing Angry Birds in your Starbucks soon - Brett Zeidler
  • Angry Birds are on your feet - Victoria Medina
  • Angry Birds surpasses 250 million downloads - Jim Sterling
  • More related stories
    #Android #Angry Birds #Apple #iPad #iPhone #iPod #Sales


    Please login (or) make a quick account (free)
    to view and post comments.

     Login with Twitter

     Login with Dtoid

    Three day old threads are only visible to verified humans - this helps our small community management team stay on top of spam

    Sorry for the extra step!