What has happened to gamers these days? Have we really stooped as low as the movie industry? I made three consecutive articles a while back (two of which are reviews) and all three of them revolve around gaming related media which has recieved negative backlash from either fans or critics over something stupid like "why does this girl wear such huge underwear?" or "this movie sucks because it's based on a series which I haven't a clue about because I don't play videogames so I don't understand the story" or "Why do the character models look so ugly? This game sucks because the character models are ugly!"
Now I think one of my biggest flaws as a blogger is that I haven't stayed true to my persona as a "cynical gamer" and hopefully this blog post will help you interpret its meaning. I'm cynical towards the industry, yes because publishers are ruining it (that's a rant for another day go watch this video if you want the gist of it because this guy sums it up in a nutshell) but I'm becoming even more cynical of the gaming community. Why? Because we let it happen, it is us gamers that let all the industry bullshit happen because we buy the games that cause the issues in the first place.
You just bought Overwatch? You're the heart of the problem. I wonder how long it will take before they implement microtransactions... oh, wait they already did? Brilliant, one small step for man, one large step for the industry's downfall. Lets see how long our beloved games last shall we? Gaming may be on the up now but considering how much backlash Star Ocean 5 has received by so-called fans, can we honestly expect that it will last?
Perhaps you were disappointed by Star Ocean 5 and while that is cool and all, it doesn't make it a bad game just because you set your expectations too high, it has too many merits to be a bad game and I have described those merits in my review. That's why I write reviews, because reviews are all about finding both the merits and the flaws of a game and weighing them up. The problem is that most gamers, sometimes even critics focus way too much on either the positives or the negatives that they contradict their statements completely. I try not to be one of those people. Whilst I won't deny that I have written reviews that are absolutely terrible (my Star Ocean 2 review which written ages ago was appaling) I can definite say that I have improved over the years and I have enough experience to understand what makes a good review.
However many may be led to believe that my points are invalid due to the fact that I'm not a paid professional. Journalism goes beyond what I do, they get where they are because they have qualities which I don't and I am aware of those qualities. That doesn't mean that their points are any better than mine, I've seen some absolutely terrible reviews from critics that don't know what they're talking about, go look at Warcraft movie reviews if you want proof of that.
As a result, I only read/watch reviews from independent sources such as myself because believe it or not, they do a far better job than professional critics do. This is mainly due to the amount of workload they are given whilst we independent critics have all the time in the world to make a detailed and complete review, it is something which I aspire to do, to cover everything a game has to offer and whilst I don't always get it the first time (AKA Valkyrie Profile 2) I try my hardest to cover as much as I can about the game and even then it's not enough. I could re-write half of my reviews and apply so much more information but I'd rather look to the future rather than look to the past. Maybe if I received requests I would go back but until then, I will move forward (unless I really feel the urge to re-write a review).
You see, most paid professionals are given deadlines and a lot of games to review. As such they can only briefly cover each one because they have to be resourceful with their time. How can you trust someone who does half a job? Don't you want to hear the whole thing? I'm not telling you that you have to read my content and only my content because that's absurd, so many people do a better job of reviewing videogames than I do, here's some examples of reviewers that I watch, those guys do a far better job than I do when it comes to making reviews and you should watch them.
That little rant aside, let's get into the meat of the topic, perfection in videogames. What does perfection mean exactly? I'll show you exactly what perfection means:
Ok, ok I don't mean to be so big-headed to state that F-Zero GX is a perfect game as a fact but personally in my opinion, I think it is. Why do you think we haven't seen a sequel yet? Because what else could they do with it? Shigeru Miyamoto asked this very question and to be honest I can't deny that he is right F-Zero GX perfected the gameplay formula, it perfected the world, the feeling.
Even the terrible voice acting and over the top choreography invokes the perfect style of campy charm that was intentionally designed to act as a parody of comic book tropes, an underline agenda that the game never openly admits to but as the player, you can just tell by playing the game that the developers wanted to create a comic book inspired world and rather than trying to come up with something serious, they decided to make it funny, this is made even more evident by the character bio video's which show each character in a funny situation. The game was intended to be camp and as such the flamboyant and misplaced voice acting was added specifically to add humor to the game.
Add to that the incredible music, visuals, 60 FPS and the countless features which exist purely to add more to the experience and you have what I consider to be a perfect game. Even Valkyrie Profile 2 couldn't surpass it in this department but my cognitive bias puts it 1 place above F-Zero GX because I love RPG's.
However to expect every game to be as incredible as F-Zero GX is simply outrageous. That game was a masterpiece in every single way, though it may be possible to top it, doing so would be an insane task, a challenge and a huge risk. People seem to forget that videogames are made by people. The goal of a videogame director is not to come up with as many ideas as possible because that would be foolish, their job is to be resourceful. Why do you think Star Ocean 5 was so short? It's not because the developers are lazy, not by a long shot.
The reason why is simple. They want to filter out all of the filler in order to improve the pacing of the game. Shuichi Kobayashi (I swear I spell his name wrong every time) openly mentioned this in an interview. How can you say that's not a good decision? He is surely giving us what we want by removing the needless filler that many games have these days and even if you enjoy filler, can you honestly say that this decision ultimately made the entire game terrible? Surely not because I refuse to believe that anybody could be that foolish.
One thing that I would like to mention before wrapping this up is that the things that matter to me in game design are the little things. Whether or not you pay attention to these things or not is irrelevant, it is important to pay attention to the small intricacies if you want your opinion to hold any value. If you aren't capable of accounting for every single little detail a game has to offer then your opinion is worthless. I'm not saying that having a biased opinion is wrong, I'm saying that you shouldn't use your opinions to give false advice.
By analyzing the minor intricacies you are able to decide more thoroughly who the game is for and who should avoid it. If you fail to do so, you obviously don't show enough respect for the game, so why should other people respect your opinion? I don't care if you're a reviewer, if you have an opinion, don't spread biased propaganda if you aren't able to respect the game enough to give it a thorough analysis.
This however doesn't mean you have to look at every single feature a game has to offer. Like I said, the small things matter but the big things aren't as important when discussing a review because they are a lot easier for the consumer to see and as such they can easily judge whether or not the game is for them by just looking at it or watching a lets play on Youtube. This doesn't mean that you shouldn't cover these points however. Big things do matter, just not as much, if a game has a unique feature that separates itself from the crowd then it is definitely worth a mention. However most games use features that are set in stone.
Like for example, most FPS have horde survival modes now. You don't have to break down every single game mode to get your point across unless that game mode has issues... and if it does you have to find the problem... and thus you must delve into the small intricacies once again. Instead you evaluate the bulk of the game and judge it based off of that because if the cogs don't work properly, you aren't going to have a working machine, no matter what it does.
If people only looked at the big, we would only see the same thing time and time again. If you go back to my "What a rip off" article, I mention the qualities of ripping off other games. It is these small intricacies that differentiate those games from their original concepts.
As such, the tools of making a great game are applying the right tools for the player to enjoy a functional, yet enjoyable gameplay experience, you don't have to make the gameplay spectacular to pull that off. The reason why I gave Star Ocean 5 a "great" rating was for that very reason. I had fun playing through the game despite the lack of move options and the inability to stagger enemies simply because the game was designed well enough to add an element of challenge, something which in all honesty may well be the most executed out of all of the games in the series in my opinion. Is it perfect? Perhaps not.
If we look at Valkyrie Profile 2 for example, that game uses break mode to allow unlimited attacks for a short period of time, perhaps Star Ocean needs to do the same thing with staggering, they tried it with Star Ocean 4 but I find that they will need to do the opposite in order to succeed. Add a gauge that when filled allows enemies to stagger or do what Valkyrie Profile 2 did and make it so that when you break off an enemy's body part, you can make them stagger for a short period of time allowing you to combo them.
However that alone wouldn't make the game perfect. I wrote another article before talking about how we could theoretically create the perfect action game and since Star Ocean 5 is an action RPG, this is relevant. One of the games I brought up is one of Star Ocean 5's competitor's, Tales Of Xillia which by holding a certain button, it changes the moveset of the character on the fly allowing for a more varied moveset. This is what the Star Ocean series needs in my opinion, however I cannot deny that Star Ocean 5 was a step in the right direction and you shouldn't either, removing the stagger-lock was the first step to creating a better game... but it's not a complete step. People need to realize that these things take time, tri-Ace are probably trying to find some new way to improve this as we speak. Instead of complaining about it we should see the merits of its intentions and move on.
I'm not just saying this because I'm a Star Ocean/tri-Ace fanboy (which I am). Tri-Ace have made mistakes just like any other developer. In my opinion, that mistake was teaming up with SEGA and making Resonance Of Fate but as a fan of tri-Ace, I'm not going to discredit them just for one game because I know that they are capable of more than that, plus I know that they're all human beings and human beings make mistakes. This is an undeniable fact, game developers aren't gods, they are people just like me and you, so appreciate the effort they put into the game by showing a level of respect worthy of that effort but to truly respect the game, you have to look at the small intricacies that make the game so good/bad in the first place because believe it or not while most of us gamers don't pay attention to these things, developers do, there is a reason for every single little thing they add to a game and you may or may not understand those reasons, nor will you even notice all the things they add to the game.
As someone who knows very little about the intricacies of game development, I cannot say I can completely understand everything, however I consider myself a theorist. It makes things more fun that way. I don't need to know the exact reason, I just need to know what works and what doesn't. That is what I do. Though I do want to explore the theory behind why certain game design decisions were made and why certain intricacies and features were included. It's something I've wanted to do for a while but I haven't found a good enough format in which to do so. Hopefully one of these days, I will be able to get face to face with these developers and learn the truth but the chances of that happening are very low.
So remember, games are supposed to be as good as they can be for what they are. You can't expect everybody to be as accomplished as Arnold Schwarzenegger and the same applies to videogames. Learn to appreciate things more rather than nitpicking about every little thing and calling it out as bad.