surf dtoid with 
Rising (10+)
People you follow
Days? According to Tecmo's twitter, the XBL version is coming 3 months later.
Still, nice to be able to pick it up on PSN too. As a crazy-hardcore DOA fan, it was hard picking which system to initially buy for. Kind of hard to justify paying full retail price twice for the same game. Hopefully this PSN version will be at least slightly cheaper and I can be kicking faces in on both soon enough.
Still, nice to be able to pick it up on PSN too. As a crazy-hardcore DOA fan, it was hard picking which system to initially buy for. Kind of hard to justify paying full retail price twice for the same game. Hopefully this PSN version will be at least slightly cheaper and I can be kicking faces in on both soon enough.
@bengalinha: shush!! Tis near blasphemy to talk about the solid fighting game mechanics in a DoA post!! The only thing allowed are crude jokes about mammaries and a few superficial remarks on the look of the game
@CormactheMac87
What does the fact that they're "digital" have to do with anything? They're still nice to look at.
What does the fact that they're "digital" have to do with anything? They're still nice to look at.
heh. now, no one has to exchange awkward looks with a cashier and do thee walk of shame out of their local gamestop.
why wait to get it digital... when you can by it on the 25th in a physical copy? its not like digital will be cheaper, they'll still charge $60. I honestly dont see the point in digital releases unless theyre half the price of a physical release. But when theyre the same price... I just dont see the logic. in 10-15 years when we're on new systems and EVENTUALLY digital content wont carry over to new systems, what will digital purchasers do? in 10-15 years, my physical copy will still be good whether my system breaks or whatever. there will always be used 360s floating around. But digital content wont last forever. tell that to my old cell phone games i paid for that couldnt transfer to my smart phone. money wasted.
@CormactheMac87
What's the difference between computer-generated tits and footage of real ones on a computer monitor? They're still just "pixels". What about on the pages of a magazine? That's just ink on paper.
My point is that if they look like boobs, your brain sees boobs, and so it's natural to still like them (if you like boobs) even if they aren't physically there in front of you. I genuinely don't understand why so many people still scoff at the idea at being attracted to drawn, animated, or digitally rendered sexual imagery, especially when the digitally rendered looks realistic.
What's the difference between computer-generated tits and footage of real ones on a computer monitor? They're still just "pixels". What about on the pages of a magazine? That's just ink on paper.
My point is that if they look like boobs, your brain sees boobs, and so it's natural to still like them (if you like boobs) even if they aren't physically there in front of you. I genuinely don't understand why so many people still scoff at the idea at being attracted to drawn, animated, or digitally rendered sexual imagery, especially when the digitally rendered looks realistic.
Yeah, what is so hard to understand liking character aesthetics? That is the point of character design.
follow
