If I want a chuckle, I'll go watch his videos. If I want to play a decent old-school ish game, I'll probably just play cave story again.
And the bad down talking he makes is not bad, but common for critics. Sadly Game Reviewers don't commit "Opinions" but just "Buy or don't Buy" tests. With a number rating at the end, so everyone knows what they have to think about the game.
You guys maybe should read a book critic from time to time.
@Ninja Cameraman
If you're wondering whether he put effort into it or not, thanks to his choice of music, I can tell you there's a shit ton of effort he put into this game. Imagine, every sprite and animation you see and every level is done by hand. I bet drawing sprites took him at least six months, then he had to programm all of this stuff to make it work. I think it took him about a year to make all of the stuff we see in this trailer.
@Cudgeon
Except Yahtzee isn't serious 90% of the time and uses hyperbole in his act. It would be like if Zach G.'s character from "Between Two Ferns" reviewed movies - he's not a real critic.
So, not really like Jim Sterling. Both are low rent Charlie Brooker wanna-be's though, if that counts.
I'd agree that Yahtzee literally stole Charlie Brooker's nuances to the point where it's almost criminal, but Jim is very different. Most comedians cite other comedic influences (and there's nothing wrong with that), but if you watch most of Jim's stuff it's nothing like Brooker (Jimquisition, VGSWID).
If you are wondering who Jim rips off, look no further than Stewart Lee. He has at least admitted as much though.
I know that he has made some text-based adventure games which I think would be an area he would shine in that it truly is the writing that propels the game.
I know that he's not trying to be like "check this shit out, it's gonna be better than everything, it just seems like this game is putting a big glass house around himself. But like I said, maybe that's the point and he doesn't care.
Haha maybe I'm just still grumpy that he poo poo'ed on CoD and Battlefield needlessly on his end of the year list.
He doesn't care for multiplayer, so a game that relies heavily on multiplayer will be judged solely on the single-player content. That's how he rolls.
I'll stop there given it's someone else making a claim on Sterling's behalf and not Sterling himself. I don't dislike the guy, but I'm not a fan of his style of humor.
THAT SAID, I'm looking forward to this game, as I do to all Yahtzee's projects in the last few years.
Haha oh I'm well aware of his philosophy of interacting with others. I guess I'm a self loathing misanthrope in that I play both of those games online (I just have auto mute set). While Battlefield's SP was genuinely terrible, I felt that MW3's SP was quite entertaining despite the whole "hurry the fuck up to the next explosions, marine" pacing mechanic.
However, both of them deliver a very fun "paintball where you stay out of the sun and you don't get welts" experience online. I don't think it's fair to pick and choose what part of a game represents a game. I realize he is an entertainer and not a proper critic, it just seems he was baiting/trolling with those two games as there are much, much worse games that got realeased this year (with shitty SP AND MP) and going after these two just kinda seemed like low-hanging fruit.
I mean, at the end of the day, I watch Sir Ben to laugh at what kind of vulgar metaphors he can come up with and not where my $60 will be best spent. So this may be getting off on the ol' tangent.
My observation is just that the man has gained attention by pooping all over everyone else's games and that has put a huge powder keg of schadenfreude under his games.
Again, he probably doesn't care and neither do the people who play his games. It is just interesting to me to see someone so aggressively negative be so willing to put out media that could fall into the realm of his own criticism.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow


