I'm in that percentage. I'm never getting a Microsoft Console again. I might even try to replace my windows with linux at some point, or a Mac.
On a semi-related note, i never quite could enjoy my 360, because everytime i turned it on, it sounded like a freakin' plane engine. All the time i was waiting for it to get the red lights of doom.
It's hard to just drop a system that many people have already dumped hundreds, even thousands of dollars into in terms of software, peripherals, Xbox Live, DLC, etc. Factor in also the amount of time many people have invested in saved games, and it's clear that it isn't simply an addiction, but instead a loss of the resources invested. If your computer broke, would you never buy another one? What if all the programs and files you had used over the years could only be compatible with that particular make of computer? Had a lot of people known that the 360 would be this problematic, they probably wouldn't have bought the console in the first place, or at least I wouldn't have.
I do have a hard time believing though that 10% of PS3s don't work.
It's a little bit hard to believe but unlike Microsoft Sony acutally fixes the problem.
However, next time MS rolls out a console, there will be considerable skepticism, especially when the company is expecting those loyal early adopters. I know I won't be buying a new MS console within the first year of launch. Not after how poorly the 360 has done. Plus, with price drops and (mostly) improved hardware over time, early adopters get fucked each time. What was their reward? Getting to play Perfect Dark a year before everyone else?
If Sony was smart, they would have done a price cut long ago. For those who were outside their warranty, a $300 PS3 vs. $100 to fix a system that has brought you a lot of frustration and that you don't particularly trust to work correctly is a much harder choice.
I've got a 360 from 2006 that gets used quite a lot and it's still mostly working. The disc drive sticks and needs a tap to get it to open when I first switch the console on, which is annoying and reminds how the 360 is a cheap piece of shit but I guess it's better than the problems some people experience.
I won't be buying another if it breaks.
But hey, look, they have not! And they are not.
I think maybe one of the worst things about this is that 10 years or so down the line, when 360s are no longer manufactured, there will come a point where there are no working 360s left and no way of getting them replaced. Hopefully Microsoft makes their next console fully backwards compatible or we're all screwed.
Could you imagine how successful the 360 would have been (Long-term), if MS actually did some thermal testing and hardware burn in (not burn-out) before pushing consoles to the consumers?
Either way you slice it, I'm willing to say that quite a few 360 owners will take a little more time, before scooping up that Day 1, next console release from MS.
I picked up a 360 in Winter of '07 and I've loved the games, just not the hardware. *knock on wood* I'm on my 2nd console. I really was going to get a Ps3, but the game selection (note the date) was not what I was looking for at that time.
Sony also had it's failures, and I feel the Hardware price, advertising, and Dev kits are their bane. If the game selection was up to snuff (Dec '07), the hardware was priced like a game console and advertised as such from the start, I have a feeling the PSN would be a bit larger. The lack of backwards compatitbiliy working across all models was also a personal turn-off.
I feel that the over-confidence Sony got from the Ps2, damned them on the Ps3. While the seemingly limitless finances of Microsoft, bit them in the ass, as they rushed their product to market, then tried to obscure the issues of RROD.
That concludes my pre-coffee rant. Maybe in the next console generation, they will go back to letting the customer define what they want, and not some marketing asshole. Backwards Compatibility, Stable Hardware?!?!? If you want to earn that console retail price, but some work into it.
But it is a shocking blight on the history of the 360, and I can only imagine the supreme dominance they'd now be enjoying in the HD console market, as opposed to the comfortable dominance, had this issue not existed...
Though I must say, I'm a little suprised at how everyone seems to be treating these statistics as totally reliable, seeing as how it's every PS3 fanboy's mission statement to exclaim the failure-rate of 360 at any given oppurtunity, and that would have to include lying about owning one and it failing x-many times, for a survey.
I mean my launch model PS3's Blu-ray drive died a while back - Sony picked up and fixed for free, but if it happened again I would consider buying a 360, but with a WORSE failure rate i wouldn't actually buy one!
What's happened is this...
1) People can't afford / refuse to pay for a PS3 - spout "360 is better" to ease their butthurt.
2) Same people's 360 dies, maybe 2 or 3 times.
3) Pride won't allow them to buy a PS3 because they've spent the last 4 years lying about how the "360 is the best".
4) They buy another 360 / get theirs repaired.
5) 50% return to number 1).
6) Microsoft sees massive 360 sales, despite legal action which leads to an extended warrantee.
7) Microsoft are rewarded for making a shit console, get so much cash from sales, even sales of replacements that they can afford exclusives and exclusive DLC - drawing in more sales.
Rinse repeat, rinse repeat, rinse repeat.
In a true free market, without monopolies and where people actually voted with their purchase and didn't buy borked hardware simply because they've spent years spouting lies about it and don't want more butthurt, the 360 sales would have plummeted by now and they would all be buying the FAR BETTER console, the PS3. - Then maybe Sony would have more cash to spend on bringing us more superb exclusives. Not only that but M$ would HAVE to make a more reliable, better constructed, probably more expensive console next time.
you can thank M$ for securing the welfare parents market for your broken 360, if they'd spent another $50 making the 360's they would have charged $70/$80 more and sold less to the welfare parents but supplied those who deserve a console a better machine.
It's completely wrong - they've hijacked the very workings of capitalism.
No doubt the RROD is a bad, bad thing, But Sony should be thankful - had it not of happened, their share of the market would be even more disappointing than it is now.
Plus, when all is said and done, despite the hardware failures, the xbox360 is a fucking great games machine - you know games? - what these consoles are supposed to be? Anyone who honestly thinks that the 360 as a games machine is shit, is a deluded penis.
No-one said the 360 or the PS3 weren't games machines, they're both games machines, except one of them is also a blu-ray player, DVD player, media centre, internet browser, Digital TV recorder too. The other has a >50% failure rate.
Yet stupid people keep buying the cheap one that breaks a lot and the expensive one that works as described and does SHIT LOADS more than it has to is suffering because, people are stupid, people are tight and a massive amount of console sales are made by parents, for little kids, who don't want to spend what a PS3 costs.
Any ADULT buying a console should look at the features vs costs and choose the PS3 - it's a fucking no brainer. Surely Halo and Gears of wank aren't worth having a console with a 1:2 failure rate? or are they worth not being able to watch High Def movies? Or are they really worth paying for your online? Or are they really worth having your online games filled with little kids screaming ghey?
Really? - If you really think that - you must be fucking retarded.
and
in the black corner.... Seeeeeeexual Choccccolate
i gotta support welfare basher on this one!
At least here in the UK, I do not pay tax so it can be given to those who don't want to work to buy their KIDS 360's.
BLACK CORNER ALL THE WAY!
Shit. That's probably the angriest post I've ever made. I don't know why I got so wound up by your crackpot bullshit. I feel slightly silly now.
Man you riled me there.
You're missing my point dickhead. Sure the 360 and Gears of War look popular, but like i say with MILLIONS of their sales being welfare parents, little kids and replacement consoles, quality cannot be judged by mass appeal when we live in a world such as ours.
If the 360 and the PS3 cost the same amount then the number of sales / popularity could be used as a scale to judge which is best. Not the cheapest one is most popular (during a fucking recession!!!!) so it's clearly better.
The PS3 gives me and Millions of others everything we want from a games console, plus much much more. Whereas the 360 gives millions of people an error message and a kick in the balls for spending money on it.
Microshaft have been fucking over consumers since the early 90's, limiting what works with their software, cornering consumers into buying overprices perhipherals and generally fucking people like you in the ass while you ask for more.
Sony have been known for quality since the days of the Walkman, even today it's a well know fact that for sound quality in an audia device you go to Sony, despite the ipod selling in it's millions to the sheep of the world who want something pretty with a well known buzz-name that their friends have.
Being older doesn't make you wiser fuckwit. i think you've clearly relinquished any Wisdom you might have by so blindly ranting on behalf of a company who has been fucking you in the arse since day one.
Capitalism should work by products like the 360 losing sales due to problems like this, forcing them to fix the problem, not by them cutting corners on production and selling a borked product, only to be REWARDED with high sales of people replacing their cheap, shit consoles.
People's tightness / stupidness / bias and bullshit is destroying the basic fundamentals of capitalism.
This is a games forum full of overblown opinions - not real life.
Chill the fuck out. You're nothing but a funny name and a little avatar to me.
I don't really give a fuck what you think, as long as i keep getting sick games, awesome features and the superb support without having to buy a 360 or 4.
Jeesus, Sonychocs. I'm not sucking Ms's cock - I'm defending my right to enjoy the games I play on the system that happens to be theirs. I shouldn't have to put up with being told by - and might I add that when it comes to sucking the corporate cock, you, dear chocs, are by far the most eager to open up your mouth and give Sony's rifle a good old shining - somebody that I'm a retard because I happen to love the games that I can play on my 360. I didn't really bash the PS3 in this discussion - I don't go around like some little prick on PSN/Live procaliming that everything apart from what I love is crap, and the world ends there. You frequently slate the 360 - infact the only other thing you do on here apart from sucking Sony's member is raise the same tired old points about exxbawks fail, blahh, Cheapskates, blahh, welfare parents, blahhh... Every post is the same tired shit, but with different wording. Your welfare/dole theory is offensive, and downright stupid.
Your i-pod comment is damn right, and it's slightly ironic you use Sony's player as a good example. Whilst certainly having better sound than the i-pod (no real feat there), the build quality of the Sony players is not great, with crackly-jack inserts after less than a year of use. But they remain popular because the sound quality, and fairly cheap price means that you can put up with some stuff to get the benefits of other stuff. See what I'm getting at here?
You have a kid on the way, right? I'm happy for you, sincerely. I have a little girl of 7. She means the world to me. Your life is going to change, and you will discover a new cost to living, then perhaps your filthy little diatribes aimed at tight-of-wealth parents will ring in a different tone? I hope so. I will find your "God, why are all these cheapskates spending their money on cheap unecessary gadgets? Go out and spend lots of real money on unecessary gadgets" rhetoric even more offensive if babychocs is having to go without so that you can spunk money on the most expensive shit. Not that I can imagine you will feel that way, because like I say, as soon as that little bundle of magic breathes his/her first sip of oxygen, your life is going to change.
Yeah I'm stupid for getting mad and ranting. But coming from you it's a little rich to berate me for it, when I've read countless Sexualchcolate posts full of rant, and extra care to ADD CAPS where you are making your most antagonistic points.
Perhaps I don't get it? I'm more than my silly name and my avatar *weeps into keyboard* I'm not an avatar, I'm a man. A real life person, goddammit...
Time to shut the hell up.
Peace.
We're as bad as each other hey?!
I logged on AT HOME to check out your response. You're way more than just an avater to me dude. And yeah, we found out last week it's gonna be a little boy! Over the moon!
Anyways, you enjoy your xbox, I'm off to play some Socom.
Until next time Chaos, until next time.
Then you say the replacements sales also contributed to the sales total. Ok, my 360 has RROD'd twice, I haven't replaced it with another 360, I was a patient little gamer and waited 2 weeks. I hate the Red Ring of Death as much as the next guy but I don't use it to make the 360 look like a bad gaming system. Me and my friend said the other week that the RROD is simply a way to tell you you've been playing too much and need a break. Any normal person should be fine taking their console away to be repaired, it's not like you live for games, you can do other activities.
Oh, about the whole "PS3 is the ultimate media machine" thing, I don't give a damn about what other shit my PS3 does, other than gaming. I bought my PS3 for the exclusive games, not the shitty gimmicks on the side. I don't need HOME, if it wasn't for the fact that PS3 games play on Blu-ray, I wouldn't bother with that either (I've only seen 2 films on Blu-ray, looks pretty but DVDs do the job for me).
To me, the 360 is a great gaming machine, it's worth it's price and the failure rate is the only problem I have with it. I enjoy some of the exclusives on the 360, Gears of War is pretty good if you actually play it, Halo 3's multiplayer is a blast with friends, and the tons of exclusive XBLA games are fun (especially Splosion' Man).
Sexualchocolate, give the 360 a break, Sony has made mistakes too. In fact, the Wii failure rate is the lowest out of all 3. Sexualchocolate, defending Sony every waking second isn't doing you any favours, just making you delusional that Sony can do no wrong. /rant
Peace out y'all!
"the RROD is simply a way to tell you you've been playing too much and need a break"
pretty stupid gimmick if you ask me. they would have been better off putting an alarm in it.
When you think about it is even 1% an acceptable failure rate?
Take film for example: Kodak sells 20million containers of film and only 1% is faulty. You all think that's pretty good but how is 200,000 failures a good number?
Now turn over to $300 plus a unit and things start to get serious.
We as consumers need to speak with our wallet. Not buy whatever piece of shit hardware is pushed on us first. My big fear for the next generation of consoles is that Sony and MS seeing as faulty hardware isn't an issue among sales, means they will both be racing to push their console out first and we are going to have two console with unacceptability high failure rates.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow