Quantcast


Who uses Creative Labs sound cards? No one, apparently ... photo

Creative Labs has been the market leader in the sound card industry for almost two decades now, and with that kind of utter dominance comes what one would call "criminal disregard (bordering on harmful malevolence) for the needs of its customers".

If I seem bitter toward Creative Labs, it's because I am. In 1998, I purchased a Soundblaster Live! sound card, and after spending the entire ride back to my house dreaming about the aural bliss I was to experience, I opened the box, installed the card, and turned on my speakers. What happened next was like something out of a Clive Barker novel (or a Halloween-themed John Allison comic ). First my speakers issued forth the cries of a million damned souls, then, moments later, hungry swarms of bees poured from the subwoofer and enveloped most of my family. I lost a brother that day and my dog is still terrified of bass tones. To read the article I saw today on X-bit Labs was my sweet golden moment of revenge, and my brother's soul can finally know peace.

According to Valve's customer hardware survey (the largest automated hardware survey ever), gamers just don't use seperate, specific sound cards much anymore. While Creative Labs is still the leader in that field, only 15% of gamers polled actually use the cards. The rest use the audio hardware built into their motherboards. Personally, I haven't used a seperate sound card in years, and I don't believe I know anyone who does. It's roughly on par with the Ageia PhysX card in terms of utility at this point, and that's a fact that I email the President of Creative Labs on a daily basis (along with a picture of my dead brother). 








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

40 comments | showing # 1 to 40
prev next

Varsity's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:00
Varsity
I had an X-Fi in my desktop and it was pretty damn good, especially in EAX games. Sounds like it's not a coincidence that X-bit don't cite anything for their last paragraph.
ArrestedDeveloper's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:06
ArrestedDeveloper
I have and X-Fi as well but I only got it because I wasn't sure i could get surround sound on my computer without a card. And a little off topic, ever time I think about Sound Blaster I just remember myself as a 12 year old installing new games and trying to guess my proper IRQ channel and all that other crap so I could hear Indiana Jones' voice in fate of atlantis. At 12 I was smart enough to rummage around Dos but not smart enough to write down my soundcard settings, go figure.
vampireblood's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:14
vampireblood
Sound cards are being fazed out because onboard sound has and is taking over. Although for enthusiasts there is still Pro sound cards out there for the audiophile needs.

I wonder if the new next next gen graphics cards will be the same? inbuilt GPUs to faze out cards?
Disjunto's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:21
Disjunto
i use a seperate soundcard, mainly cause the ones built into motherboards are crappy and actually slow games down and cause sound problems (you know, hl2 stutter, no1 with an actual soundcard experienced that problem that i know of). sound cards are important.... people will learn one day
Bluefusion's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:26
Bluefusion
Well how about that? I thought I was alone in this onboard soundcard world.

My first sound card purchase was a wonderful sound blaster audigy 2 pro, or something like that. I was so happy about the possibility of hearing high quality sounds, and actually being able to checkmark those boxes next to EAX and the like. It was fine...until the thing just stopped working shortly after the warranty expired. Now I'm back to my onboard and I'm A.OK. :-)
David Boring's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:29
David Boring
i grew up playing games on the c64 andn then amiga when i switched to a pc i was shocked to pay about 100$ extra for a soundcard (with very crappy soundquality compared to the amiga)
Cruds's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:33
Cruds
I got a sound cart, not for games but to have something a little more decent than minijacks and some midi in and outs. It's also great that I can call with Skype using the onboard sound while playing music over the speakers. I should say was great because that sound cart I have hasn't any Win XP mediacenter drivers and that is what I have on my comp now. Thats right I bought a sound cart that works with XP but not the media center edition.
backdrop's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:37
backdrop
I'm using a Terratec Phase X24 Firewire "card", which is actually an external box aimed at low-mid-level music producers. The only good things I can think of in terms of on-board sound is the ease of use + the broad user base = relatively good support in games and apps.

To date though, I have not heard a single on-board chip that actually sounds as good as the mb blurb claims. In games you'll rarely hear much of a difference though, since most of the sounds are very loud and constant. But if you listen to music which can go from very loud to very soft and whispery, you'll probably hear the noisy sound of the AC-97 (or whatever chip you have) as it has a very limited dynamic range.

But I guess Im a little anal when it comes to sounds... Hmm, this post was completely pointless, I had no real point to make - just an observation i suppose.
ExceptionOE's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:42
ExceptionOE
As a games developer i find the fact no one uses sound cards troubling. The sound chips they put on motherboards are dire. At one point we were getting a 40% fps drop if hardware acceleration was enabled on certain onboard sound chips, turning it to software increased to acceptable levels.

We were caused so many problems by this certain type of chip. Buy a soundcard. They cost < £20 and will stop games crashing and running like a bitch if developers don't take crappy onboard sound chips into account or miss the issue.
Churchhills Dog's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:45
Churchhills Dog
AC-97 sounds like shit.
Yayoo's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 08:48
Yayoo
Slow Day?
thegame4ever's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 09:08
thegame4ever
X-Fi is the shit, i can hear 3d all around me using headphones in counter strike source, and know exactly where enemies are coming from in any direction. As well as entertainment and audio creation mode, this is the best soundcard ever.
Dot's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 09:11
Dot
Hmm...I have an X-Fi and I am quite happy with it. EAX plus high quality sound output plus 7.1 speakers(outputting just 5.1 for most games sadly though) equals awesomeness. Especially in games like BF2142 where you can determine the position of your enemy just by sound.
wintermute's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 09:12
wintermute
I have used sound cards, onboard and neither in the past and have never experienced any difference in frame rate. If you buy a decent motherboard, not some $40 wonder, then you can get decent sound out of it.

@ Arrested Developer - I hoped never to see the letters IRQ together again. In my old Win 95 PC i had the option of either Network card or Sound Card. Not both! Which made LAN games real fun!
Aetsen's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 09:17
Aetsen
I had an Audigy 2 ZS, but now i just use the Intel HD Audio codec.
djnexus911's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 09:45
djnexus911
The only reason I see the need to have that seperate sound card like sound blaster live, is for studui music making perhaps, or if you just wanna have that little bit of extra in your pc for sound.
iliketuna's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 09:46
iliketuna
i've been anti-creative labs ever since they blackmailed id software in to crippling the quake4 sound system. (apparently, creative owned the patent to some programming code that john carmack used in the doom3 engine) in order to hear quake4 properly, you have to buy an x-fi sound card and enable open al.

that said, i dont use my onboard sound. i still use my ancient soundblaster live! value because my mp3s sound much, much better with it using kx drivers.
fuege's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 09:56
fuege
HAving a sound card does make a difference, to those who actually care to notice. It allows for more simultaneous sounds, and better sound quality. And also some decreased load on your CPU

But, this isn't a computer enthusiast or hardware site... so I wouldnt expect too many ppl here to know too much about hardware.

Check this out... for a proper review Maximum PC. (They actually compared it to the inferior Intel HD audio)

And reffering to ANY computer experience in the 90's is pretty worthless... OMG i used to use brand X's 2800 modems, and they were soooo slow.... come on

I got x-fi, and am a happy customer
ultrantoday's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 10:10
ultrantoday
x-fi here as well. It sounds considerably better than my onboard. Makes my cpu happy too.
hardwareguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 10:38
hardwareguy
Last time I used an onboard soundcard I would have crackling sounds when there were lots of sounds going on at once in games. When I bought a discrete soundcard (Audigy 2 ZS) the problem went away. I'm not exactly an audiophile so I probably couldn't notice any difference while listening to MP3s, but the performance of onboard sound in games just doesn't compare to a discrete soundcard.

I do wish there were other choices than Creative for sound in games (I know there are others but they consistently use more cpu cycles/ lower framerates in benchmarks I've seen) because they have draconian policies about drivers and software they include on the install cd. Basically if you lose the CD you're boned. I don't know if they've changed it with the X-Fi, but on my live and then Audigy 2 you can't get any of the software of their website.
thegame4ever's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 10:41
thegame4ever
i remember reading one time about this guy, who had a far beyond the sun pc (crossfire atix1900xtx, 2gb g.skill ddr2 ram, amd dual core) except it alwayed stuttered whenever a wolf barked at him in oblivion, cause he was using onboard audio, which couldnt handle it. he bought an x-fi and that fixed his problem. so there IS a use.

P.S. Quake 4 sounded absolutely wonderful with OpenAL. ;)
CaffeinePowered's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 11:12
CaffeinePowered
Ever since my Asus boards have been coming with onboard sound, Ive never bought a sound card, just a worthless expense to me, especially because I usually use headphones.

Ive never noticed stuttering issues using onboard sound, maybe the Asus chipsets are better?
LarkOhiya's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 11:14
LarkOhiya
Oh Nex, i though we where in the same boat, but now I see you where just making fun of a VERY serious problem. spontaneous speaker bee ejaculation is curse that has plagued many Hardware geeks darkest hours. For you to use this in your satirically articles is very disappointing. Maybe next time you will think before you submit any more original contENT to Destructoid.com
diversionmary's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 11:23
diversionmary
@Disjunto
I use a Hercules Fortissmo II, and I get hl2 stuttering.

I used to have a Live! value and later a Live! gamer, but I don't know what happened to either of those. When I build I generally just use onboard audio. Especillay on nv chipset mobos.
loquax's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 11:51
loquax
I can't be bothered to get a good sound card. Unless you have amazing speakers or headphones, you'll just bottleneck the technology.
Varsity's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 11:57
Varsity
People think that loquax, but it isn't true. To get <em>everything</em> out of the card you'll need decent output, but the difference can be remarkable even with bog standard stuff.
falsoman's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 12:13
falsoman
I kinda like soundblasters, i used to use them, but i hated that Creative support is shit. So i kept using the same old live card until my next motherboard came with better sound. Now i've been seeing that decent motherboars come with 7.1 sound and SP-DIF, so they've got good enough for people in general to care to add anything extra. They do have a hit on your system, but at this point is minimal.
I try to justify a creative card as a good option if you study music, but it is not that much cheaper or better solution than semiprofesional stuff if you do recording. It has the advantage that doesn't take a more space since is inside of your computer, but aside of that i can't see the real advantages just yet.

Back to the games, i do think that those are a good choice if you want the real deal with the sound of games and you like those 4 fps extra.
Rosseh's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 12:14
Rosseh
You suck at computers, go buy a Dell :P

Really though, Onboard sound seems to suck ass and I need my soundcard for upmixing to 5.1 seeing as I have my consoles' sound plugged into my soundcard. Sure, I've had problems with them before but who doesn't have problems with computers?
ultrantoday's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 12:21
ultrantoday
a lot of people seem to be overlooking what a separate sound card is best for.... Freeing your cpu up for other things.

If you want to squeeze the most out of your rig, a separate card is a must.

On top of all that, it does sound better..
Sederien's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 12:49
Sederien
Are you serious Nex?!?

I absolutely hate onboard sound from both an aural and hardware perspective.

Aural - It sounds like shit. Seriously. Perhaps you aren't using top of the line speakers (which is understandable given how expensive they are. Buy Klipsch if you have too much money), but even with decent speakers there's a noticeable difference in quality.

Hardware - As many people have already noted, there's a slight performance hit and it's really worth the less than $20 you can get sound cards for on ebay if you're really hurting for cash.

Basically, the only reason I would use onboard sound nowadays is if I was stuck with cheap 2.0 / 2.1 speakers that come with just about every store-bought PC or if I was using cheap headphones. Since I own a decent pair of Sennheisers, however (quality headphones at a decent price), and have a cheap 5.1 system that works as well as any other so long as you don't crank up the volume (at which point it begins to crack), I couldn't imagine life without a sound card.

Tell you what, if someone finds me a driver for basic onboard sound that supports full 3D positioning management (check your old Live! drivers) and THX-like (doesn't have to be fully certified) sound capabilities without taking noticable memory/cycles away from other motherboard operations, I'll reneg on my position. Until then, I'm a hardwired sound card user and I'll keep my (3!) sound blaster cards. (I have sound cards in my Linux machine... Sound Blaster Live! for a $1 and fully supported. Why wouldn't you?)

(Top sentence was emboldened to draw attention to such a low post.)
iliketuna's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 12:54
iliketuna
thegame4ever>> quake4 w/ open al doesnt sound any better than quake3 with regular stereo sound

- for the price of an x-fi, you can just buy a better cpu. especially now in the age of dual core cpus, offloading sound processing for better frames in games is a ridiculous reason to buy an expensive sound card

- if you really want to upgrade your sound, you're better off upgrading your crappy computer speakers or ghetto plantronics headphones. if you're already sporting those sennheiser 580s, then get a worthy soundcard like the emu 0404 http://www.emu.com/products/product.asp?category=610&subcategory=611&product=15185&nav=technicalSpecifications
Sederien's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 13:05
Sederien
Oh! One more thing I forgot to mention:

When you really want to get into games (and yes, this is still an opinion and not fact), sound can make a world of difference.

You can always keep up with graphics, processors, etc. and have you system feel and look great. But would you watch a movie on your gaming system? That's a really important question.

People go to the theater for a reason and it's not always just the bigger screen. Take a movie like The Last Samurai. Not the best movie in the world, but entertaining and I happen to like it.

I've seen it three times in different theaters (because I saw it once and liked it enough to sit through it twice with other groups of friends). The first theater was so-so for the screen and the sound was tinny. The second theater had an amazing picture quality and the sound was decent. But it was the third time watching that really did it.

The third theater, which I now return to for summer blockbusters and the like, had the worst screen in terms of size. I mean, this thing was literally 3/4th the size of next one up... but the picture was clear and the seats were comfy enough. So why do I return? The sound quality was @#^#$% fantastic. It was like hearing the movie for the first time. Bass was butt-shaking, but not overamped. Midrandge was clear. And the high end not once sounded shrill. (And think of all the flute-like instruments in that movie that really go high. That's a good theater!)

Sound can make a world of difference when done right. Doom 3's an awful game with amazing environmental effects - sound included. Did you play through far enough to get to the spiders? When the spiders were introduced what happened?

Did your headphones/speakers go tika-tek-tik-tik-tik as they scittered along and you just keep walking? Or did you look up as the sound that is used to introduce them in the hallway slowly faded from the back and literally ran over your head because you took the time to setup your speakers right?

So... crap this long. I'll shutup now.

Buy a sound card and some decent speakers Nex! ^^
Sederien's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 13:06
Sederien
Disclaimer:

The above isn't actually directed at Nex. (His piece was satire.) However, it's fun to use him as a target.
Sederien's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 13:11
Sederien
@ Disjunto:

The stuttering in HL2 was a memory/processor issue. It had very little if anything to do with the sound card. I might chalk it up to the fact that people who have extra cash to throw at a sound card usually buy top of the line processors, etc. Not me though. I'm an audiophile who throws a sound card in everything. (Whether it needs it or not. Have you seen my Linksys wireless router? ^^)
wintermute's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 13:49
wintermute
I have a nice Creative 5.1 set of speakers and they sound just fine plugged in to my Asus onboard sound.
Harvey's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/20/2007 15:42
Harvey
I used to use onboard sound myself, and had noticed a crackling noise at random intervals. It wasn't until I bought Guild Wars when I started thinking about buying a sound card, though - using Vent introduced a horrendous echo effect, one which drivers did not fix. So I bought an Audigy. Problems solved.

Onboard sound is fine if your system is just for office use, but for gaming? Jesus, spend the cash and get a card.
Aequitas's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/21/2007 00:10
Aequitas
I've been happy with my Audigy 2. I hear the X-Fi has actually made some significant improvements. I'll pick one up after I build a new system; my Audigy 2 can migrate in the meantime.

I'm all about dedicated hardware, though. Hoping to get a 3ware SATA RAID card soon. Mmm.

Integrated peripherals are for 1) noobs who know nothing, or 2) users who simply don't need the highest level of performance.
Aequitas's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/21/2007 00:24
Aequitas
@hardwareguy -
There are drivers up for my Audigy 2, at least, and I expect for all models of it. They don't include the fancy Creative software, but I just use ctpanel.exe to configure the options anyway. Take a look again; I remember the time you refer to, but I didn't need anything already installed to make this driver package work.
Burnt Meatloaf's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/21/2007 03:14
Burnt Meatloaf
As an audiophile who uses headphones, I only accept the clear, highly adjustable signal possible from a dedicated sound card. Everything else sounds muddy, and most on-board solutions cause terrible clipping when too many sounds are playing at the same time. I'm thinking about the infamous audio clipping you get in Flash cartoons.

Normally, I don't worry about performance, but I've also had problems with on-board audio causing crackling and other buffering issues.
Dymaxion's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/21/2007 10:48
Dymaxion
my 5.1 creative sound card works fine *cough*
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!