games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


When the pot calls the kettle black: 3D Realms and Duke Nukem Forever photo

There was a point in my life where I was willing to be satisfied with the “when it’s done” line in reference to the completion of Duke Nukem Forever. Duke Nukem has always meant something special to me. The original Playstation incarnation, Time to Kill, was the beginning of my personal exploration into the shooter genre. The title’s irreverent social commentary and gore piqued my interest enough to continue to pursue other games like it.

I was willing to excuse the decades of delays by developer 3D Realms because of the special little gap in my heart filled by Time to Kill. Yet, the latest debacle in a series of debacles, idiocy, and delays has destroyed the patience that I once possessed. It is time for me to finally admit that 3D Realms is completely, irreversibly out of touch and incapable of putting Duke Nukem Forever out into consumers’ hands in any reasonable or decent capacity.

Duke Nukem has reared his flat-topped, ugly mug several times in the news of late. Considering Duke Nukem Forever’s decade-long development cycle, this is quite a feat. The first tidbit came in the form of a few seconds of footage on the Jace Hall Show debut. The footage was exciting, considering no one outside of 3D Realms has seen Forever in any playable context since 2001. The short clip displayed a dated FPS with little flair outside of hallways, uninspired guns, and large aliens.

The second story came after 3D Realms posted yet another job offering. It was a call for level designers with the “talent and passion” that the developers of Forever have obviously lacked. Accompanying the ad was a tiny picture of the title, which has apparently become standard when trying to lure developers into the black hole of developing that 3D Realms must be. The ad cited the need for speed, with this very professional line stating “Must go faster. Scotty, we need more powah!”

Duke Nukem, cracking his knuckles for no reason.

It was the story from two days ago that was backbreaker for my patience.  A rumor was drifting around that Forever would yet again not make it to E3. While not a surprise, it was allowed to float for a day until 3D Realms owner Scott Miller confirmed it with this quote.

It's just that we view E3 as irrelevant nowadays. In fact, I wasn't even aware it was coming up.

That statement is complete and utter bullshit, and every prospective Forever consumer and industry journalist knows it. Unaware of the largest computer and video game trade show on the planet was around the corner? That statement is especially ridiculous considering how 3D Realms danced Prey around on the E3 floors before its release, and even showed off Forever back in 2001. Although, that was when 3D Realms actually had something worth showing off, when they possessed developers that had talent instead of excuses. Even if Miller was not lying and just fishing for more excuses, is this not a sign of just how out of touch everyone at 3D Realms is? Forgetting about E3 (or not setting up your own trade show in lieu of) is like walking past the biggest, brightest, and tastiest fucking Krispy Kreme store everyday and not thinking about a donut.

He feels my pain.

The one crucial thing that 3D Realms is “unaware” of is how they have strung along the entire process making Forever. The news is practically cyclical. First, post a video to excite the few fans that are still willing to be patient. Then, release a job ad with a tiny picture.  Also, regularly refuse to comment on the progress, innovation, or the reason as to why Forever has been delayed for so long. At least this time, they added the new twist of calling E3, a trade show that could be a potential launching pad for any game, irrelevant.

In actuality, it is 3D Realms and Duke Nukem Forever that is irrelevant. The game was officially announced in 1997 and was slated for a 1998 release, the same year that Unreal, Thief: The Dark Project, and Baldur’s Gate were released. Since 1998, Forever has gone through at least two engine changes, lost staffers, and become the laughing stock of the videogames industry. All the while, the above games all had successful sequels and won awards. But of course, the development process of Forever “is swimming along nicely.” It has just simply been too long of a wait.

Big scary alien

Forever’s future is not a scenario that we should even have to consider. After more than a decade, you would figure that 3D Realms would have actually addressed the delays and changes made to the title in full. Let’s suppose that the developer actually has staff meetings that address the progress a game is making. What can they even say to each other at this point? I would be willing to bet that all the staff walk into a room and just stare at the wall. Perhaps they have an internal “weekly excuses” meeting that goes over the plethora of reasons why no one bothered to touch Forever. The reasons would probably include World of Warcraft, indigestion, grandparent dying, or dog ate my keyboard.

I think we all reach this point with a game that we were excited about when initially announced. Perhaps some of you tired of Denis Dyack’s Too Human delays, or id Software’s mum stance on details of the next Wolfenstein. For me, it is not so much about time. As long as the game is great, I will consume. The real problem here is that the same things Scott Miller said about E3 can be directly turn around on 3D Realms as a company. The lies and fiasco that is Duke Nukem Forever is dead to me.


Continue: More Editorial stories





prev
next 50 comments

60 comments | showing # 1 to 50

covah's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:43
covah
I don't even know why this game is relevant anymore? It has so much crap around it that it's just going to be a failure in people's minds if it isn't the absolute best game ever.
iwontusemyname's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:43
iwontusemyname
if released, it's going to have to be one of the biggest games...ahem...EVAHHH. which, it won't be. nothing can live up to the bullshit hype hurricane this has created.




although this is pretty funny:

the duke nukem forever list
jdub28's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:44
jdub28
i cant believe people are still looking forward to this game. Duke Nukem was great in the early 90's but today he is just lame. Excuse me for using old internet lexicon but the only reason I would play it is "for the lulz"
scottoid's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:44
scottoid
its a legend. kinda like the Bigfoot of gaming. you hope its real but there is no defenative proof.
mattattaxx's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:46
mattattaxx
This article is so true, I don't see how the developers at this company can excuse themselves, they've released games between this franchise, they have a few fatass nerds working on it who seem to have income rolling in while they create nothing, meanwhile games like Crysis and Unreal come out with stunning graphics and gameplay, with a production cycle of what, 2, 3 years max? This game seems to take 11+ years, and now thinks E3 is irrelevant? What bullshit.
Volomon's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:47
Volomon
All I know is they better cram alot of titties into this game to make up for the lateness.
jdub28's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:48
jdub28
from the list:

"over 75 Megaman games have been released since Forever was announced"

:0
CryingTheAnnualKingo's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:51
CryingTheAnnualKingo
I just don't get posts like this. 3D Realms doesn't owe you anything, Brad, despite the special place in your heart that you have given over to their mascot.
On a different note, Time to Kill was not a FPS. It was a third-person acknowledged rip off of Tomb Raider. No where close to the FPS genre.
AKK's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:54
AKK
E3 is becoming LESS relevent, that's surely true, even if it's not irrelevent. Did anything big happen at last year's E3? No Everyone had their own trade show or went to TGS or Leipzig or wherever. This year may fair somewhat better, but regardless, after E3 06 the show has become a shell of what it used to be, and it's certainly far less relevent. Various outlets have been saying that this will probably be the last E3 for this very reason. IGN among them. And I know IGN harbors a bit of hatred, but they have clout in the gaming industry nonetheless.
Brad Nicholson's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 14:56
Brad Nicholson
@CryingTheAnnualKingo - Whoops, totally meant shooter. Edited and thank you very much.
Zanch's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:07
Zanch
I can certainly agree with this article. I was an avid fan of Duke 3D and even the little sidescroller that came before. The fact of the matter is that there's no logical, conceivable reason for ANY game to spend 10 years in development. I work in the industry myself and it shows an overall lack of dedication, enthusiasm, skill or interest. I'm not even sure they realise that a game with 10 years of expectations behind it will pretty much have to be the grestest thing ever in order to NOT be considered a massive failure and a waste of time. How they didn't run out of funding for the game years ago is beyond me.
DynamicSheep's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:08
DynamicSheep
"Britney Spears' entire musical career as a pop star has taken place during Duke Nukem Forever's development."

lol
dephect's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:08
dephect
Remember snakes on a plane (haha).
Thats what this has turned into... but all of you STILL watched it.. dont lie.

I for one.. will STILL play this, sad I know... but Duke Nukem (Taking forever XD)... you still have a place in my heart. See you in 2013!
DynamicSheep's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:11
DynamicSheep
oooh... HAD to pass this along too, again from the list:

World War II and the entire Manhattan Project. Yes, even the complete development of the atomic bomb took less time to develop than DNF.
Conrad Zimmerman's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:12
Conrad Zimmerman
I'm perfectly willing to believe 3D Realms when they say E3 is no longer relevant, particularly after the poor management of the show last year. Granted, I don't think Duke Nukem Forever is ever going to arrive and, if it does, it certainly won't have been worth the wait for anyone who actually gave a damn about such an uninteresting, uninspired and dull series of games.

But the dude's right. E3 is dead, long live E3.
Vitamin Awesome's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:13
Vitamin Awesome
What I don't get is why people think that Duke Nukem is the only franchise that 3D Realms has to work with. What about other games that they've been a part of over the years, are you too quick to forget about Max Payne? And what about Prey? I personally liked it.

What I see are a lot of cool concepts and Ideas that were originally thought of for duke, but in the end it doesn't fit too well, and the concepts are just too good to scrap, so another game is made. Nothing wrong with that, after all, would anyone bash StarCraft because it hindered progress of WarCraft III?

I'm still looking forward to Duke Nukem, whether it's just the chance to play as a sunglass-wearing, cigar-smoking ball of testosterone that will more than likely blow everything up; or just to see if the edgy social commentary is just as edgy as the 1996 game. After playing other games that 3D Realms have been involved with, I'm sure it will be a hit.
manasteel88's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:21
manasteel88
@cryingtheannual...

I agree nobody owes us anything at 3d Realms. Realistically though if I had said to somebody that I'm going to do something and don't, well that makes me a bit of an ass. I don't owe that person anything and I don't have to do what I said I would, but in that case I should just stop saying I will do something. Its been a decade since they said this game would come out, and saying that e3 isn't relevant is like saying Duke Nukem is relevant. Its not. They have made their mascot a joke and they have no idea how to make up for that.

I don't care about the game personally its just defending 3d Realms against criticism is rediculous. They have been touting this game for a decade and have nothing to show for it.
Foe's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:25
Foe
Good games don't take forever to develop. There have been so many really stellar products lately and they have taken a fraction of the time Duke Nukem' Forever has taken thus far. The simple fact is that Duke Nukem' has a very big hill to crest if it hopes to not let the few fans it has left down.
TheRemedy's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:29
TheRemedy
They took 10 years to release prey too, but they got it done and it was a fun lil game. They aren't the only company not showing stuff at e3, so why specifically shit on them?
manasteel88's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:36
manasteel88
@theremedy

Prey had a little help from Producers 2k games (Take-Two) and developers Human Head Studios.
TheRemedy's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:44
TheRemedy
@manasteel88

Still, it took 10 years. I could also say Spore has taken about 8 years as well and no one seems angry about it. Every Blizzard game takes over 5 years as well. I just don't see the purpose of the article.
Ceallach's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:46
Ceallach
In all fairness E3 is absolutely irrelevant these days. And really, the ESA itself.

If they were to show it anywhere, it should be E for all, or really PAX is probably the biggest thing in the states now.
Jetsetlemming's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 15:54
Jetsetlemming
3dR has gone through some... weird times.
But every time I begin to doubt I watch the 2001 E3 trailer again. Holy shit, man.
Blackhat's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:00
Blackhat
I have to agree the article is a little focussed and oddly angry at something like this. Games constantly take forever, this one just happens to be doing it the.. best? Most? Whatever.

I think people forget that 'being in development' is different from 'announced on, then abandoned, then re-acquired, etc.'

Look at Team Fortress 2. I think the extra long cycle really helped the game.
DaedHead8's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:11
DaedHead8
I'm with you Brad, this shit is taking too long. I'm not one to pay much attention to games that aren't anywhere near release but DNF is becoming impossible to ignore.

You're quickly becoming one of my favorite writters on Destructoid, keep up the good work. =)
MechaMonkey's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:12
MechaMonkey
Preaching to the choir, Brad. At this point, it amazes me that they're still actually in development. Most other projects would have been canceled over half a decade ago, and saved the capital required for other projects.
Brocklesocks's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:14
Brocklesocks
Stop whining. Play something else in the meantime -- that's what I do.
Mxyzptlk's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:15
Mxyzptlk
Duke as a character was always lame. The only reason we liked it is because most of us were in middle school at the time.
bip's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:22
bip
Go buy some paper towel rolls. You'll need them to wipe the egg of your face when Duke 4 drops.
Dr Milkdad's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:25
Dr Milkdad
I've been waiting just as long as anyone has, and patiently. But they are going to have to show something soon or finally just kill the game. Once masters of their craft, now they are a fucking joke.
Cowboy TTop's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:47
Cowboy TTop
I understand the frustration. However, do you guys n galls know that upcoming game known as Too Human? You might not be aware of it, but Too Human was originally a PS1 project.

Too Human was showed off in 1999, then got moved to GC. Next year, Too Human will also be ten years in the pipe, so pray it gets out the gate this year. Either way, you'll find many games are in development for years before work actually begins, for the to become products.

Sure, Duke Nukem is as cliched as fuck. Its become a target more than most games because of this, and this is why no one has mentioned Too Human yet.

Personally, I fancy seeing Prey 2 more. Prey was a cool game many overlooked. Duke Nukem though, would have to do something special for me to buy and play. Unfortunately, I just don't see it, but I'm open to my mind being changed.
bip's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 16:53
bip
E3 has shrank considerably, i don't have the stats but I remember reading on Gamespot after the last one that many devs/pubs are shrugging it off as being not worth it anymore. I cannot cite the article but if you were to look up attendance you would likely see numbers to reflect that.

Secondly, let them take however long they wan't. It's not going to be the apocalypse if it isn't the best game ever made. They're just taking their time. There are some freaking amazing games that dropped this year already, more than enough to keep anyone busy until more great games come out. Why get irritable because it's taking long. Is duke the only game you want to play? Let's just ask 3drealms to realise it tomorrow, unfinished, so we can all have closure, maybe that will satiate you.

One dude called the "Duke Series" uninspired. I think other people alluded to it as well. These people probably played duke on the ps like our friendly article writer. You people don't get duke. You did not walk into a computer store to see it on display on their new 486 machines. If you did, you would have been witnessing a pant-shittingly awesome realisation of how interactive games could REALLY be. This was western development at its finest, freedom, excitement, SURPRISES. You never knew what kind of crazy shit was going to happen next. Many games today have still not reached the same level of environmental interactivity in Duke 3D. So if you think duke is uninspired, please go play Super Ultra Mega Fantasy 9: The Haunted Curse of The Sword of Butzenwald and marvel at how in this version, the menu cursor makes an exciting new sound! Oh, and the characters look even more androgynous in this version! Yaaaay!
JavTheGreat's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 17:47
JavTheGreat
I just want to kickass and chew bubblegum :(
jesusofwales's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 18:03
jesusofwales
At this point, whenever I think of 3D Realms the de-rez 'documentary' always seems disturbingly plausible, more so following their E3 comment.
Cowzilla3's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 18:59
Cowzilla3
I demand a return to the true original incarnation of Duke Nukem which was crappy side scrolling shooters.
DeusPayne's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 19:23
DeusPayne
John Romero's About To Make You His Bitch....Suck it down

At this point, it's up for biggest disappointment in gaming history, with it's only competition being the game the above ad campaign was for.
-PL-'s Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 19:40
-PL-
Psh. You guys are still waiting for this game?
manasteel88's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 20:02
manasteel88
its funny people bring up Too Human and Spore and other types of games that had long development times. The difference between this and those games is the fact that they are all original games and concepts. Their development has completely original ideas and no set design. If Duke Nukem Forever is anywhere near as interesting in concept as either these two titles (and in spores case as progressive) I'll admit I was wrong.

Duke Nukem Forever will be a shooter. It will have Pig Cops and a hero named Duke. They don't have to test out what Duke will look like to see if people like his design. This means that they already have an idea of what the game is. that takes out some of the development time.
vonrichter's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 20:23
vonrichter
You can't always force art out on a deadline.

Sometimes you have to struggle.

I would rather have them delay it until the end of time rather than release a sub-standard game that would tarnish the name of a classic.
Foe's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 20:52
Foe
@ TheRemedy:

Just to be clear, spore hasn't been in real production for 8 years, I used to work at maxis and it only went into full production 3 years ago. And I think Prey is a bad example, because while it was a fun game, it wasn't 10 years of development fun. That same game could have been churned out in 3 to 4 years by a good studio and still be just as good. This Duke Nukem crap is straight retarded, and they treat fans like you like crap.
Vitamin Awesome's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 20:57
Vitamin Awesome
@Manasteel

What about the 10 year development cycle for Team Fortress 2?

I remember seeing screenshots for that thing in Issues of PC Accelerator , but nobody's seemed to mind when that finally came out. Matter of fact, it's a pretty big title. Just like DNF, it was a sequel and already had an established concept.

All I see here is a game that's privately funded, that's run into quite a few roadblocks such as complications with the game engines they were using (too human comes to mind, except it's happened thrice with DNF), Trading hands with Publishers, and a few minigames of 'scrap and restart' (Remember Resident Evil 2?). Daikatana was pretty much rushed in development and that turned to be a heinous crime of extreme ass. TF2 had a long development cycle and it's a very popular game. I can only hope that the same can be said for DNF, and even if it lives up to a quarter of the hype it should be enough to be an excellent game.
notdryad's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 21:02
notdryad
People still care about Duke Nukem Forever? Even if it comes out it'll be terrible; the game looks so god damn dated. Go back to 1998 you piece of trash.
Sharpless's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 21:22
Sharpless
Mxyzptlk is right. There's very little excuse for a title such as this to take as long as it has, or even for it to be as anticipated as it is. It will never, NEVER be as good as anyone hopes it will be. Frankly, I just wish the world would forget about this inevitable piece of shit. We're giving the developers far more credit than their actions deserve.

@Brad
Dude, I'm loving your writings. I'm a hard one to win over, too. :) Keep it up.
Sinnix's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 22:20
Sinnix
They should have canceled this game a long time ago. There is no way that it's going to live up to the hype now.
Burnt Meatloaf's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/29/2008 23:20
Burnt Meatloaf
What hype? Almost everyone expects it to suck at this point

The reason why the developers had no idea E3 was coming is because all their clocks are broken. Duh.
hpv's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/30/2008 00:18
hpv
Isn't E3 meaningless now? I know I certainly don't care.

And how can I get a job "developing" Duke Nukem Forever? Do they want a portfolio and shit or do I just have to show them my passion and they'll let me slide on the talent test? Because that DNF development blackhole sounds like the perfect job.
stevesan's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/30/2008 00:38
stevesan
Maybe this is just a genius marketing ploy? It certain keeps 3D Realms in the public view.
Skribble's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/30/2008 01:17
Skribble
Like I said before, if it has a plethora of weapons, levels, aliens, babes, cheesy catchphrases ripped from evil dead and Duke kicking some alien scums ass, then it will be enough to make the wait worth while.
Mr Jonson's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/30/2008 01:46
Mr Jonson
This whole rant is pretty lame. Why should anyone be 'waiting' for, of all games, Duke Nukem Forever?
PeZ's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/30/2008 02:52
PeZ
I really don't care about the actuall game any more, but I really do hope it comes out some day, so that we can finally hear what the fuck was going on for a decade (or longer). The post mortem should be an epic story.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos


    Win this!
    Dive in! meetup+play for a chance to win a PC

    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Assassin's Creed 2 review
    Crossfire Remote Pistol review
    Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles review
    Left 4 Dead 2 review
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reflex review
    more reviews
    Driver
    Avatar
    GT Racing Motor Academy
    Bad Company 2 beta dishes out meaningful experiences
    Legend of Zelda Spirit Tracks
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 51012 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Chad Concelmo: The tragic history of the videogame turkey





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more






















    Team Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Colette Bennett
    Tom Fronczak Brad Nicholson
    Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
    Conrad
    Zimmerman
    Chad Concelmo
    Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Will Maddock Matthew Razak
    Dyson Joseph Leray
    Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
         
      Dexter
    Adam Dork
    Daniel Lingen
    Hollie Bennett
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Stella Wong

    Josh Tolentino




     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006