Game database:   #ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ         ALL     Xbox One     PS4     360     PS3     WiiU     Wii     PC     3DS     DS     PS Vita     PSP     iOS     Android

Weekend Reading: Pen and paper versus console RPGs, part 3

8:51 PM on 07.08.2007
Weekend Reading: Pen and paper versus console RPGs, part 3 photo

Yes, this is The Haloing of this Weekend Reading arc of mine. Finally, the comparison between console RPGs and pen & paper RPGs will come to a close. The two will duel it out in epic combat, mostly fuelled by your comments and the ones that existed on Digg.

First, I want to take a minute to reflect back on this a bit myself. When I started this, I never really had the mindset to say that one was better than the other. I've always considered them two very different things, sharing the common gene of triumphing story above all else. I've certainly got fond memories of both systems -- although, in the end, I guess I'm a little biased towards pen and paper games.

Well, enough of this before I start blubbering into tears or making you sit through long monologues about my memories. Hit the jump, and check out the previous two in case you haven't already.

A lot of people mentioned in the first part that they avoided pen and paper games because of the high learning curve of the systems. Now, I really can't deny this. So, my suggestion for this is instead to try something like GURPS (surprise), or just find a group of more experienced people who are willing to show you the ropes. At most local hobby stores, they'll have social nights, where people will RP. If you just ask, one group or another will gladly take you in and explain things as they go. 

Grumbel on digg commented:

How does having a character basically be just a collection of numbers increases your attachment to it? I have heard that point a lot, but I just don't get it. Character creation right at the start of the game is among the things I hate in western RPGs, since it means you have to choose between things you don't know anything about. How will more intelligence influence the game, what will more strength do, etc.? Is +1 good or is +2 just right? How much is a +2 to begin with, can I fix it up later in the game? It just isn't fun to decide those before you have even seen the actual game.

Stats aren't the end-all be-all to characters. Rather, they help you form an idea of what your character's strengths and weaknesses are. Just because you've got a 13 skill in diplomacy doesn't mean that it'll prevent you, the player, from making bad decisions. It's just a way for the GM or the computer to determine how well you'll succeed/fail at a task. It's more of a guideline than anything.

Masterthiefster on digg:

I don't think anyone who truly understands what a P&P RPG actually is would ever consider "console RPGs" to be RPGs by any stretch of the word.

While "computer-style"/"western-style" RPGs also fall short of the mark, they don't fall as far short as these Japanese games that are basically action-adventures with levelling.

Having turn-based combat and a fantasy setting does not make a game an RPG.

Hm, this brings about an interesting question: what do you think makes an RPG, at this point? I'll leave this up to you to discuss, and it'll get visited in another Weekend Reading.

I guess some of you are asking what the point of all this is. I think what I'm trying to convey over the past couple of articles is that while both pen and paper and console games can give a rewarding experience, they do so in very different ways. My preoccupation has always been with the story, and how the game manages to achieve it.

With pen and paper RPGs, the story is almost completely up to the player -- it's the original, and best, sandbox environment. The characters can be completely original and you gain such strong attachments to them, mainly because you've completely made the character yourself. At the same time, players might create characters that are utterly flat and two-dimensional, and the system can sometimes reflect life too realistically, screwing the players over mercilessly.

Console games lock you into a single storyline, but instead of giving players total freedom in a realm, they instead lull you into acceptance of the role that you're playing by using tricks and telling the story in such a way that you become emotionally invested in what goes on. In the end, you've become attached to the character, although it might end up in a different way. In the end, it really is more like reading a book or watching a movie -- yet I think more emotional attachment occurs. An RPG is most likely to be the first title to come out as a proven "games as art" title, simply because of such a strong storyline that's present in whatever the game might be.

What can these two systems draw on from each other, since they're inextricably related to our want and desire to hear and tell stories? Well, console RPGs are working in, somewhat slowly, the ability to take care of things in a not so linear order, giving players more freedom. If it affected the outcome (but no "true ending" BS, please), then all the better. Hopefully in the coming years, developers will take advantage of downloadable content to give new content -- or to even change the storyline at certain diverging paths (taking advantage of background downloading).

Pen and paper is a little tricky in terms of borrowing from consoles -- the reason being that there's complete transparency in how the system works. While not exclusive to video games, having common themes running throughout campaigns, whatever the setting may be, is a sign of familiarity that helps create an attachment. I'm thinking in terms of the Final Fantasy stuff -- chocobos, Cid, moogles, etc. Whatever the incarnations may be, you take extra care to pay attention for those items.

A little hidden motive of mine has been to convince you all to give pen and paper a shot. Hopefully you actually will at this point. So, what'd you think of the articles? I'll actually respond in the comments this time!

Comments not appearing? Anti-virus apps like Avast or some browser extensions can cause this.
Easy fix: Add   [*]   to your software's white list. Tada! Happy comments time again.

Did you know? You can now get daily or weekly email notifications when humans reply to your comments.

Review: Pillars of Eternity photo
Review: Pillars of Eternity
5:00 PM on 03.26.2015

Review: Fossil Fighters: Frontier photo
Review: Fossil Fighters: Frontier
10:00 AM on 03.24.2015

Role-Playing Games

12:15 PM on 03.26.2015
XSEED: Ys VI: The Ark of Napishtim coming to PC

Ys VI: The Ark of Napishtim is coming to PC for the first time in the West, XSEED just announced. Nihon Falcom originally put out the action role-playing game on PC in 2003, but it didn't arrive in North America or Europe unt...more

10:30 AM on 03.26.2015
Final Fantasy: Record Keeper is out today, and it kicks the crap out of All the Bravest

Final Fantasy: All the Bravest was a travesty. It played itself, it was pretty abrasive in its pandering, and the microtransactions were so pushy that it was hard to enjoy it without feeling like you were constantly being sold something. Final Fantasy: Record Keeper is another free-to-play game in the same vein, but it's a much better effort that doesn't feel straight-up insulting to fans.more

2:30 PM on 03.25.2015
Cut 25% off Pillars of Eternity prior to Thursday's launch

On Thursday, March 26, Obsidian Entertainment's new RPG Pillars of Eternity releases on PC for $44.99. Pre-ordering before launch will not only get you a few in-game digital bonuses, but you can save about $11.25 of...more

View all Role-Playing Games

Back to Top

All content is yours to recycle through our Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing requiring attribution. Our communities are obsessed with videoGames, movies, anime, and toys.

Living the dream since March 16, 2006

Advertising on destructoid is available: Please contact them to learn more