Quantcast


Warner Bros. now owns most of Batman: Arkham Asylum dev photo

Here's what happens when a third-party developer makes a successful game for a publisher -- that publisher acquires them.

Such is the case with Warner Bros. and Rocksteady Studios, the developer of last year's critically and commercially successful Batman: Arkham Asylum. Warner Bros. has announced that its acquired a majority stake of the UK-based developer.

Interestingly, Rocksteady studio director Jamie Walker hints at other projects beyond Batman saying "The Rocksteady team is very much looking forward to creating more great games based on widely recognized Warner Bros. brands like Batman."

What those widely recognized brands could be is anyone's guess. The studio is currently working with Warner to bring the sequel to Arkham Asylum to retail, which is rumored to be shipping in 2011.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

21 comments | showing # 1 to 21
prev next

CRKFIEND's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 10:34
CRKFIEND
Good stuff. What happened to Batman: Arkham Asylum in October 2010?
Alex N's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 10:37
Alex N
Great studio is now in stable financial hands. Nothing to be sad about.
UttiniDaKilrJawa's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 10:42
UttiniDaKilrJawa
Great studio is now in stable financial hands, until they make one bad game. Then, they're history.
Corak's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 10:48
Corak
Good news. Usually when the original creators of the media take over its better, see Marvel and the Iron Man movie.
Themightylebeau2009's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 10:55
Themightylebeau2009
@ Corak - I saw that movie for the first time last week, dont think I expected it to be that good but I really enjoyed it. Even the seqel looks cool.

Anyway, yes, can we have a JLA game? Written by Grant Morrison?
SirKicksalot's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 11:04
SirKicksalot
Mortal Kombat. Fuck yeah.
Arttemis's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 11:05
Arttemis
As long as Rocksteady isn't strong-armed into rushing sloppier games because their biggest share holder wants shovelware cranked out...
Astalano's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 11:10
Astalano
This can't be good. :S
Monodi's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 11:16
Monodi
WB gave a lot of great material to Rocksteady to work with. I feel like this is actually a good thing.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 11:26
Xzyliac
I hope Monodi is right. I feel iffy about this.
timtheterrible's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 11:43
timtheterrible
Fuck all that noise, give me Urban Chaos 2.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 11:45
Holyetheline
i need to play with teh batmengs.
Cowboy TTop's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 12:01
Cowboy TTop
I have mixed feelings about this. As a good example, you only need to look at Disney buying Black Rock Studios. Pure was an awesome game, that didn't sell well.

Disney are about to get a great game hit in the form of Split Second, but are already scaling back to focus on Wii/DS games (Go figure). That's not a good kind of creative environment to be in, when there's not enough creative balls and patience, and too much money and pressured expectation flying around.

Warner Bros could end up wrecking Rock Steady, by pressuring their creative juices and getting them to shovel film and comic license material, when that's not what Rock Steady should be about. These big cats hate risk, so Rock Steady may loose out. At least EA and Activision understand the market. Warner have a lot to learn, but I guess there's nothing like a baptism of fire.

The possibility of MK in fresh hands scares and excites me, though. That series needs a super major reboot, for any of us to take it ever as a serious fighter, like SFIV or Tekken 6. If Rock Steady could co-produce it with Capcom, Arc System Works or Namco, and something interesting might happen with it.

I'll try to keep an open mind.
Oatmeal lover's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 12:23
Oatmeal lover
@ corak

In movies specifically, is seems that recently Marvel has gotten it's act together as far as being more careful with script approval and assembling good production teams (Spiderman 3 not withstanding). DC/Warner however, has been floundering around with it's comic book properties for while until Christopher Noland and his team made Batman Begins. After that, very mythicly strict picture, he was given a lot more freedom for Dark Night, the third sequel, etc.
Now they want him to reboot the Superman franchise, too!

They have pinned all their hopes on one production team, and now it sounds like they are trying to do the same with Rocksteady! I loved B:AA and I hope for the best, but you can only get so much milk from a cow. Hopefully, they will understand how long it takes to make a great Batman game, as their current portfolio doesn't seem to suggest they do.
killatia's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 13:10
killatia
Header pic surprisingly fits the story well.
BoomingEchoes's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 13:37
BoomingEchoes
welp say goodbye to Rocksteady then because WB will in fact load them down with so much DC and Movie tie-in shit that they'll never be completely able to make another quality game again..
Drakengard's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 13:48
Drakengard
This could be great. And it could also be bad. I'm not worried about Arkham Asylum 2, but beyond that is definitely in a much denser fog now.

So long as Warner doesn't suffocate the team and just provides stable financial support this is a completely win.

Hear that Warner? Keep you hands away from the machine cogs! Keep the machine lubed with greenbacks but DO NOT TOUCH, OR CHANGE ANYTHING!
ryuken's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 16:20
ryuken
Drakengard has it spot on, don't fuck it up WB just keep the money/drugs/hookers flowing and you will not be disappointed in rocksteady... not to say that the team needs any of those things except brilla of course.
Bigjig's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 18:20
Bigjig
Rather it be WB than fucking square enix
Kalmah's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 21:22
Kalmah
Hmm... maybe a decent Superman game? I'm trying REALLY hard to forget about Superman 64 ever existing.
pentimento's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/23/2010 23:17
pentimento
If Rocksteady can do for other WB franchises what they did for Batman, this sounds pretty good to me.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!