Quantcast


Unreal Tournament III needs the Blu-ray legroom photo

Following in the confused footsteps of PGR4, good old Mark Rein of Epic Games has suggested that Unreal Tournament III needs the extra boost provided by vitamin Blu-ray to provide the full experience. Speaking at the Edinburgh Interactive Festival, the Epic vice president said that some cuts may have to be made on the 360 version of UTIII in order to fit it onto DVD.

"We'll compress some things," Rein stated, before adding, "But you know, we may have fewer maps on the 360 version ... Blu-ray has definitely given us a lot of legroom." 

As the generation wears on and games become larger in terms of scope and ambition, could this become a recurring trend? How long will big-thinking developers continue put in the extra effort required to squash their sprawling titles onto DVD as the PlayStation 3 gathers more steam?  Or will Mark Rein do a turnaround like Bizarre Creations did? Tune in to find out, same bat time, same bat channel.

[Rishi be providin' the tipsauce]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

38 comments | showing # 1 to 38
prev next

Remz's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 07:57
Remz
take the maps out and offer them as downloads... retards.
lwesquire's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:13
lwesquire
I give it five minutes before quest and hells 666 turn up and make this thread a splode.

If I planned on buying this game I'd probably say something smug about mah blu-rayz, but meh.
AKK's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:16
AKK
If Mass Effect can fit on one disc, then UTIII can fit on one disc.

Mark Rein was paid off to say that!!!!
Malleus's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:29
Malleus
Compression algorithms get better and better. I wouldn't worry about it. Obviously you can't argue that more space is better but I don't think it is really going to limit the 360 this generation. Like Remz said, if it becomes that big a deal put a code in each retail package to downlod the multiplayer maps, big deal. Everyone should have a hard-drive by now that plays online anyway. Having one disc be the multiplayer disc and another be the campaign is also perfectly valid. There are methodz ppl!
Doomtrain's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:31
Doomtrain
DEE EL SEE
Malleus's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:34
Malleus
er what I meant was "Obviously you can't argue that more space isn't better"
jerrt's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:35
jerrt
remz has probably the best solution to all this. do you think MS would make them charge?

still, i was buying it for ps3 so i don't really care.
gamesronlygames's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:47
gamesronlygames
Its the way of the future. At least for the next few years anyhow. But if MS was smart they would bring our the pheonix zephyr schmeckle 360 version with an HDDVD drive. If they were really smart they would incorporate the bluray drive instead of HDDVD. THat would steal Sony's thunder.
twincannon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:52
twincannon
They could always just make an install disk and a play disk. And if it's just maps, you could even make it optional fairly easily I think.
Boolean's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 08:54
Boolean
"We'll compress some things"

Wait, how about you compress...THE WHOLE GAME! I'm a freaking genius I tells ya.

And in the wise words of Remz:

"take the maps out and offer them as downloads... retards."

ANOTHER GENIUS. You know, it almost seems that within 10 seconds people on the internet can solve these huge mountains of a problem caused by the lack Blu-ray. Maybe that should tell us something.
Taicho's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:01
Taicho
People have to realize that this generation, games will need more storage. The suggestions of making the content downloadable or installable on a seperate disk instantly limit your user base to people who chose to purchase a hard drive and or people who will buy the dlc as well as pay for a subscription to live. Even then its a costly solution to the average gamer.

Every generation, we have seen a change in the storage medium as well as an actual increase in storage. NES cartridges were tiny. Then the SNES ones weighed in at close to 8Mb. Then we moved on to 32~64mb carts for the N64 and CDs for the PSX. Then to DVD. NOT ONCE has a company used the same media for 2 generations in a row. Those that say DVD is fine and BD/HDDVD is not needed are perfectly happy playing prettier versions on last-gen games.
LordRegulus's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:03
LordRegulus
GYAARRRR!! BLOATED SOFTWARE MAKE REGULUS ANGRY!!

DTOID SMASH!

...*cough*

And Boolean, nice avatar. Cox FTW.
Nyteshade's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:20
Nyteshade
@Taicho - So can you tell me what defines a "next-gen" game?

Can people stop using terms that have no real meaning... If the game is on a 360, it's NEXT GEN, because it's not on a Xbox. I have yet to see one game on the 360 or PS3 that made me think games were evolving... If anything, God of War on "last-gen" was better than anything I've played that's "next-gen."

They all look like the same FPS and sandbox (GTA4 looks so... the same) games to me... When they show me something that deserves the "next-gen" title I'm all for it (Bioshock maybe).
brianunfried's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:23
brianunfried
You can't get a true HD experience from DVD. Textures and sound will have to be compressed for DVD, HD uses uncompressed audio and would fill a DVD alone. I doubt game companies will increase production costs to add a second disc. Many games were never released on Gamecube because of the small disc size.
Taicho's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:36
Taicho
@Nyteshade: I never used the term next-gen but that's ok. Wanna see examples, that's easy. A next-gen game is something that is not possible on any of the previous gen's hardware. Here are some examples of gen-defining games:

FFVII on the PS1 (no way to fit on a cart)
MGS2 on the PS2 (No way the environment intractivity or AI could be done on PS1 or N64)
And you already said God of War.

See. Gears of war on the 360 as well as Ninja Gaiden Sigma on the PS3 could be done on the Xbox1 and PS2 just with crappier graphics so no those are not next-gen games. We have yet to see any games that can ONLY be done on current hardware, though Bioshock looks very promising. Maybe UTIII will be it.
deanhatescoffee's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:41
deanhatescoffee
brainderailment: "I just wanted to say that IMO, user created content is going to be focused on more this generation."

I think that's gonna happen in the next gen. No, not this next gen, the next next gen. ;)
RTYPE1124's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:42
RTYPE1124
@gamesronlygames

Goes to show why your only blogging and not making corporate decisions. Adding an HDDVD drive into the 360 would alienate the existing 360 owners forcing them to shill out an additional $400.00+ for a newly upgraded system. If MS incorporated the blu-ray drive that wouldn't steal Sony's thunder that would actually make Sony very thrilled. The reason would be that for everyone of those systems that are sold Sony would get a chunk of the profits and thus proving that "yes" they were right all along that blu-ray was needed. So try to think a little before posting asinine uneducated comments please.
BluDesign's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:49
BluDesign
@brianunf

You smoke too much stupid, man. Like 2 hits too many of the stuff. HD gaming refers to the graphics, not the media. We've had "HD" games for years on the PC. Anything that scales above 480p resolution is officially HD compliant. So that stretches back to... 1995 or so.

DVD is the storage medium, not the content quality. I hate to break it to you, but even Blu Ray uses compression on both video and audio. Dolby Digital is compressed. And the video you're watching is compressed as well. Full blown 1080p uncompressed video (not film, which runs many TB's per hour at 4K resolution, IMAX quality) is slightly less than a Terabyte per hour, far below BluRay's capacity, so don't end up looking like a stooge claiming HD isn't DVD.

You're way off your math jumping to conclusions about texture size and audio compression. An hour of uncompressed WAV format audio is 700MB. that's less than an 1/8th of a full DVD-9 disc. Most people can't hear the difference between uncompressed PCM 5.1 and DD5.1, and even fewer people have the equipment that supports it. In fact, Dolby is such a common household name, people are more likely to seek out the Dolby audio over another option because they think the quality is going to be better than PCM. And Dolby mixes tend to be about 1/10th the size of the original audio.

As for textures, animators for YEARS have cheated visuals in high resolution. You can use smaller textures and replicate them, do sub-surface lighting to add a more realistic look to the texture, and a whole host of other cheats to get the look they want. You're also forgetting that they can cut the visuals down from 1080p resolutions to 720p resolutions and they'd manage to probably be able to scale their storage needs down by more than half without having to even touch anything else. It'd still be HD.
brianunfried's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 09:55
brianunfried
Taicho made a good point. What if the PS2 or Xbox was released with a CD-ROM drive instead of DVD. Would they reach their full potential?
brianunfried's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 10:10
brianunfried
Hey dvddesign, I quit smoking but I might start again after reading that reply. Settle down, why are you so angry? I play games and watch movies on an HD projector and I can tell the difference. HD uses very little compression compared to DVD. Last time I read the back of a Blu-ray movie it said uncompressed audio.
iliketuna's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 10:35
iliketuna
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

... so i guess ut3 is coming to pc on a blu-ray disc? lawl
Yurimasa's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 10:38
Yurimasa
!Taicho made a good point. What if the PS2 or Xbox was released with a CD-ROM drive instead of DVD. Would they reach their full potential?"

Well, PS2 did have those blue CD discs in the beginning, before more and more DVD games came. There were some ok games on those discs, I mean, I still think the first SSX is one of the best games for PS2.

Maybe it'll be the same with DVD and the 360? I mean, it's possible to do great games on DVD, ofcourse. That's already proven. But when an equivelent to the PS2's GT4 or MGS3 comes for the "next-gen", maybe DVD just won't be enough. Look at the original post for an example...

And as a comment to the people saying that you should just compress everything even more. Hell, why did we even get the next-gen consoles. I mean, a PS2 or a Xbox should be just fine. They just needed to compress the shit a bit more right? -_o
Rosseh's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 10:38
Rosseh
Pussies, use Tech 5 with MEGATEXTURE technology! Extreeeeeeeme
gamesronlygames's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 10:41
gamesronlygames
@RTYPE1124
Always so nice to strangers. Like it or not it would solve a lot of problems for MS. Cheers Mr. friendly.
anonuser's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 10:45
anonuser
brianunfried: DVD uses MPEG2 at a low-ish bitarte, BD uses MPEG2, MPEG-4 part 10 (H.264) and the VC1 codec based on Microsoft's WMV format. Just at a tad bit higher bitrate. What do you mean uses far less compression? The the DVD resolution is much smaller than that of the 345,600 pixels (720×480) vs. 2,073,600 (1920x1080) pixels. 600% more information. On a medium that isn't 6x bigger. Just how do they do it? Compression. No TV or consumer grade HD medium has support for real HD. It's always compressed. Don't believe me, go grab a fancy new HD camera. Plug it into a fireware port and begin capturing. You know what the output will be? More than likely an Mpeg2-TS stream (Transport stream, it's to enable fault tolerance on the stream make's it more friendly to dropping the signal without the format being corrupted. read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-2)
Rockwell's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 10:49
Rockwell
UT2K came with 6 CD's...this at a time when most PC games could still fit onto one. If you think Epic needs the extra space because they're incompetent, and not because of the astonishing amount of content they give you, then you're nothing but a nub.

Keep in mind that this title contains both a SP campaign and the usual MP, a first for a UT game.

From BeyondUnreal review of UT2K4, "UT2004 is overflowing with gaming goodness, so much so that it would take you almost a whole day of solid gaming to spend just ten minutes in each of the title’s excessively-detailed maps."
Holiday's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 11:03
Holiday
I wouldn't mind going to a multi-disc format for larger games on the 360. Sure it's a pain to swap discs but not that big of a pain. I wonder if you could have a two sided game disc and a subsequent dual reader for the Xbox 360.

At any rate it looks like Sony is doing a "We told you so" right now.
Squeewupiwupi's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 12:19
Squeewupiwupi
What MS needs to do is make the HD-DVD drive able to read/play game discs, With that in place, Sony would really have nothing on the 360, Since the 360 is already graphically supperior system, allowing HD-Disc space for games would make it "T3h R0x0rz" for "Mah B0x0rz"
SniperFodder's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 12:21
SniperFodder
Everybody needs to quit getting all of their information from Wiki and calm the fuck down. This is a non-issue. Most people don't care, or even know what teh bloo rayz is...
Monte's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 14:13
Monte
@Squeewupiwupi
problem is that it would kind of put an end to the concept that the 360 lets a person choose wheather or not to have HD-DVD/Blu-ray. With a game enabled HD-DVD drive, more and more developers would put their games on HDDVD, and that would alienate anyone who doesn't get the add-on. Also, there's the fact that the add on would add an extra $200 to the price of the 360 which would make it close to the same price as the PS3. Not to mention how royally pissed off consumers will be, since there are quite a few who already bought the non-game enabled version. hell we can even point on that between the HDDVD and blu-ray, it so far seems like Blu-ray is the one that will come out on top; and if the HDDVD format does die out it would mean some serious shit for the 360 (personally i think part of the reason MS didn't include the HDDVD drive is not only to lower the price, but for damage control should the HDDVD format die... MS can always release a blu-ray add on)... frankly, the 360 would probably suffer some serious backlash from such a move...
frygar's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 16:47
frygar
I'd just like to be the first to say to every nay-saying douchenozzle Sony / PS3 / Blu-Ray Disc-hating fanboy on this and every other gaming site...

HA-HAAA!!! /nelson

No, seriously. What did you fucking expect? Blu-Ray holds more, therefore it only makes sense that devs will utilize this technology. As far as MS releasing a gaming / BR disc add-on, well, that'd be hilarious. GG and all.

Props, Epic.
h3lios's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 17:08
h3lios
frygar's got a point, if the tech is available, they will make use of it. And if i remember rightly, Lair or Heavenly sword (not sure which one), made full use of current BR capacity of 25GB.
RWarrior1CO's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 18:26
RWarrior1CO
How about load times? Can anybody with both a 360 and PS3 say which system's games load up more quickly? Having eighty billion zigabytes of space is great, but if it takes two weeks to access it, well...
frygar's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 19:05
frygar
I have both systems - I really can't tell the difference in load times between the PS3 and 360. Actually, in the case of Oblivion, it loads faster on PS3.
Squeewupiwupi's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 19:19
Squeewupiwupi
@Monte

Here's one of the cool things i've been thinking of to remedy this issue,

As many who are keeping up with the two formats, the one thing that HD-DVD really holds above the Blu-ray Disc is it's Combo Discs, DVD on one side, HD-DVD on the other. Now think of the applications this can have on dev choices Since most games can still fit very nicely on one standard DVD, using this combo format would allow for Things like Epic's cut levels, Bonus content/video, game demos, and other space wasting content can be placed on the HD-DVD side. Creating a fully playable Game w/o the HD-DVD drive, and bonuses for those with one. I don't think this would be a very ballsy move for MS either, There are games that content cannot be used w/o owning a premium 360 with a HDD, so certain Blockbuster games like UT3, GTA IV, and Burnout: Paradise can have this combo format while others will still remain DVD only.
Squeewupiwupi's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 19:25
Squeewupiwupi
And i don't believe it would have to be a totally separate unit, Most likely just a firmware update for both would be sufficient
HighPSi's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/15/2007 19:59
HighPSi
I'm glad to see a developer who doesn't limit the PS3 version by the lesser console. Hopefully this will become more of a trend soon. With EA using the PS3 as lead console the next iterations of Madden maybe we'll see twin discs on the 360 or triple as textures and HD audio go up. It's a great time to own a console no matter which it is.
mustang's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/05/2007 19:49
mustang
Blu-ray offers enough space to use this technique, which objective is to provide more detailed scenarios without big impacts in system reources at the expense of disc space. Sure the 360 can pull great games without using this, but for sandbox games like Mass Effect, GTA, etc, using the technique in the 360 is impossible.

Blu-ray is no more than a tool for developers, if they will use it wisely, to improve their games is up to them. If some of them manage to use it in a fundamental way, impossible of being done somewhere else, then other platforms could be in trouble.

Good to see developers aren't overlooking blu-ray advantage because of the small installed base.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!