That said I think it's equally irresponsible to be so flippant and dismissive of the notion that mature video games could harm (or at least effect on some level) impressionable children. There's a reason why anyone with common sense doesn't expose their 7-year-old to a Saw movie marathon, black metal concerts and porn. Children are impressionable. Every parent likes to think their child is a special snowflake who is smart and mature enough to handle anything, but the fact is the vast majority of little children will not handle constant exposure to that sort of content in a mature fashion.
Now, I know everyone likes to take things to extremes, so I'll clarify here and say I'm not talking about a kid playing Grand Theft Auto for five minutes and suddenly he takes to torching buildings and sneaking out of the house at night to murder prostitutes. But just because things aren't going to complete extremes does not mean there isn't a problem. No, I do not believe that video games are, in and of themselves, going to turn someone into a serial killer or a rapist or a heavy drug abuser or whatever else. But it is absolutely ridiculous to deny there being any problem with young children running around their playground ''playing'' GTA and apparently having trouble separating what happens in a video game from reality (and the majority of children of that age do still have some difficulty separating reality and fiction).
Buying Call Of Duty for your 8-year-old and letting them sit in their room all day and night swearing at strangers over XBL as they line up another headshot is irresponsible, that is neglect, there are problems there that need to be sorted out. These teachers are not wrong in this sense. They, just like so many people, are simply looking for a fix in the wrong place.
Really what it all comes down to is we live in a world where you can tell people to not drive such inefficient cars or to change their diet or use less electricity, but tell them to pay more attention to their fuckup kids and you've got a riot on your hands. These teachers are doing a good job paying close attention to their students' behaviour, but they need to have the freedom to take the problem to the parents, not make a scapegoat out of the product.
Fact of the matter (in the States anyway, not sure about in the UK) is that half the teachers I've met are narcissistic underachievers who didn't get into teaching for the kids, they got into teaching because A) They wanted summers off and/or B) They weren't skilled enough to actually enter the workforce.
Then when we get old we can be ignorant about the Spacecataz 4D Murderistic Rape Machine that I'll assume will exist to an extraordinary degree of popularity in 2040.
Great.
When the tories got in power - it's not been re written yet. Current OFSTED inspectors guided by government want a return to 50's style education :- I.e teacher belts out 'facts' and children repeat them back ad nauseum .
As with the teachers... The ignorance hurts me.
The simple truth boils down to this, prevent the sale of "mature" games to kids, and allow the parents to decide whether they feel their child should play a violent video game that they are too young to buy. Understand that not all video games are created equal and that video games can actually have a positive role in a child's life. Ultimately, the parents must educate themselves and governments/teachers/the religious/etc. must understand that they should not ban everything simply because we do not want children to be possibly exposed to the thing in question. I mean what would that leave us with?
DynamoJoe and Tarvu will receive their honorable mention awards in the mail.
I talk to my students about games all the time. They love the fact, that before I became a teacher, I was a store manager at EB for a few years.
Albert Bandura's experiements with bobo dolls in 1961 showed that children are likely to imitate and mimic acts they see. This is hardly new stuff. There have been similar outcries in the past, over Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon and The Power Rangers TV show.
The article is correct though. The onus is on parents to follow ratings and be responsible about what their children play.
I play games with cartoony violence like Smash Brothers and Skylanders with my 5 year old son. I've educated him, that you only punch and kick in games and not re-enact these on people in real life. I wait until he's asleep before I play something more graphic like Skyrim / Bioshock / GTA.
I mean, kids are going to pick up things from whatever media they consume. The fear of video games is ignorant, they're as dangerous as music, television, cinema and their own goddamn parents.
Or they used to, at least.
Also the ATL are only the 3rd larges teaching union they dont represent the opinions of the majority of teachers also i'd love a game which actually has graphic blood spurts and people flying out of cars cos I dont think such games are actually that violent. I blame 9/11.
Bwah? I'd say there is much more of an even split between parents who think their kids are mature enough to handle things like this and those who don't. The problem, IMO, is that parents aren't paying enough attention to exactly what their kids are actually playing, as Fraser said.
I think it just comes down to negligence on parents' part, where they aren't involved enough in their kids' hobbies.
Parents should spend more time with their children. But spending time with your children ist not what our system wants parents to do. Our system wants father and mother working 8hs. (mostly more) a day to produce income and spend money on stuff. Mostly it is not the parents that are broken, but the system they have to live in.
I used to work in Gamestation and would regularly ask people with kids if their child was going to play the blatantly '18' rated game they were buying. If they said yes I would then go on to explain to them what the age rating means and why their child should not be going anywhere near the game. Pretty much each and every time the parent would say 'oh it doesn't matter, He/She likes it, All their friends are playing it and they'll be left out' and then even after protests, buy the game.
I always thought it was the ever widening wealth gap and how UK schools don't really prepare kids socially, where they focus almost purely on academic needs.
Man, I was SO wrong.
I do agree parents (in any country) act stupid and are too lazy to educate themselves on rating systems.
Anyone who has been taught by me will know about my passion for video games, the hundreds of hours sunk into Skyrim, my high scores on Dungeon Defenders and my placating of the fight between Battlefield and COD.
A few's ideas does not represent all, and as teachers from younger generations like myself bleed into the system, these silly ideas will fade.
That is not to say that there cant be excessive use of videogames (even by myself) and I am constantly battling with lack of immediate imagination and effort linked closely with pupils need for instant gratification and content-lacking stimulation.
A good game is greater than any other medium. A bad one makes you less intelligent, just like shallow TV
Maybe I should have started with "I don't believe all teachers are pantomime villains." I just thought that was a given.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow















follow