games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Ubisoft demands high Assassin's Creed 2 review score? photo

We hear about these situations far too much, where a publisher is accused of attempting to broker a guaranteed favorable review from a press outlet. The latest to face such allegations is Ubisoft, having been named and shamed by German magazine Computer Bild Spiele for demanding a high score for Assassin's Creed 2. SCANDAL!

"Our reviews are tough, but fair. We will not give up our independent scores for the sake of a timely review," explains the magazine in its latest issue. "This holds true for Assassin’s Creed 2. The publisher asked us to guarantee the score 'sehr gut,' otherwise we would not receive a review copy, thus we will publish our review in next month’s issue. We’d be more than glad to give the game a ’sehr gut’, but only if it deserves it."

Sehr Gut is essentially Computer Bild Spiele's version of an A-grade, meaning that Ubisoft was only willing to trade a game copy for an incredibly positive review. Of course, asking an outlet to guarantee something like that before they've played the game is asking them to trade in every ounce of integrity they've worked to build, and if these allegations are true, it's a shame that Ubisoft felt the need to barter against someone's self respect like that.

In any case, Computer Bild Spiele has probably ensured that it won't be getting any more games from Ubisoft. Good for them, and let shame rain down on any writer that actually agreed to such shenanigans.


Continue: More Ubisoft stories





prev
next 50 comments

95 comments | showing # 1 to 50

Los255's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:06
Los255
Wow. You'd think with all this work they're putting into the game after all the criticism of repetitive gameplay in the first one, they'd like to earn it.
whatthi's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:06
whatthi
saw and played the game in a recent convention in Melbourne and i have to say i dont think its that far off from the original, sure graphics might have been better, new gadgets are added, etc..
but i felt like i was playing the first AC which IMO wasnt that great from the start...man AC1 had so much promise until it was killed by repetitious gameplay..
psycho terror2's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:07
psycho terror2
this pretty much makes any good review of AC2 before release worthless.

well done UBI, this game has now slipped from a probable "day 1 purchase" to a "wait and see" for me.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:12
Xzyliac
I'm waiting for the day a huge Game Informer scandal breaks. I was subscribed to GI for the last bit of it's "good run" and once they started trying to flashy up the 'zine they convienently started handing out 10s to every hyped game in town.

I've been meaning to resubscribe just because I did like the excessive amount of previews and occasionally there was a good editorial but god do I hope those reviews have been toned down.

Recap: Paid off reviews bad! Grr!
Monodi's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:18
Monodi
Well, I DEMAND THEM to make a good game without buggy bullshit if they are going to make ports.
Diogo Ribeiro's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:20
Diogo Ribeiro
It's also the German's way of saying "very good", by the way.
bjornandreas's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:25
bjornandreas
wtf? this is unheard of. I completely lost all my respect for ubisoft now.
Grande C's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:27
Grande C
It's unfortunate, but they wouldn't even bother to attempt stunts like this if there were no reviewers acquiescing. Specifically Jim.
Havoc Fang's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:28
Havoc Fang
Aww. Now the only reviews of AC2 that can really be paid attention to are the bad ones. -2 To Trust, Ubisoft.
reindall's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:29
reindall
Something similar probably happened to FIFA 10 (PC). But here EA probably knew how shitty the game is and blocked all reviews regarding it, so people get fooled with PS3 and 360 review scores into buying it.
D-503's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:30
D-503
Woah, just had an Arkham Asylum flashback!
BattyAdroit's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:33
BattyAdroit
game reviews are serious business.
Booerns's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:34
Booerns
@ Xzyliac

I wonder if it's just the power of suggestion, or the Kane and Lynch review firing BS, but I feel like Gamespot, which used to have tough as nails reviews for even big budget games, also hands out 9.0-10.0's like Chickletts anymore. I remember back when Tony Hawk 3 and Zelda were the only 10's. It's only a matter of time before the huge grain of salt that I need take when reading GS reviews raises my blood pressure to the heart attack zone...hio?
njsykora's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:42
njsykora
I still have my preorder as like D-503 said this same thing happened with Arkham Asylum, which turned out to actually be good. It's certainly a shame that they feel they have to do this though.
carg0's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 09:52
carg0
well, despite the fact that the first one sold several million copies it was an overrated, mediocre title at best. the polarizing scores (as low as 50%) say it all. the marketing team saved ubisoft's ass and they know it which is why they're afraid gamers won't flock to AS2 prematurely, like they did the first one.

it doesn't surprise me at all that they'd try to buy some scores here and there. Ubisoft's got a ton of money invested in AS.
Mace's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:02
Mace
This happens relatively often. But I do not really see it as being a big issue.
Quite often the games in question are really good anyway and will likely be getting a high score (Batman: Arkham Asylum is the last game that I recall something like this happening with). When the games in question are not good, it does not exactly take a genius to notice that the game has been reviewed by some outlets much earlier than others and that the early reviews are far more favourable.
sheppy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:08
sheppy
Here is the saddest part. Having the Assassin's Creed review means shit for their bottom line. But now that they've "taken a stand" and "all teh blogs be wif us," they've now sold more copies of their magazine, increased "street cred" by calling out Ubisoft.

It amuses me that publishers still attempt this tactic. It's immoral to begin with but gaming fans do so love the "righteous stands" and all they've accomplished is making a villian of themselves and a madre of the magazine.

Hell, I remember the greta Kotaku Sony Blacklisting. They reported on someone breaking embargo, Sony asked a pull, Kotaku refused, Sony blacklisted and demanded a return of debug kits, and it was all "Poor Kotaku, Sony is teh evil." Meanwhile, to this day, Kotaku regularly pulls content under the request of outside parties. But sure, Kotaku sure is Teh Hero thanks to that. Lik_Sang! LIK-SANG!
Ball Buster's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:14
Ball Buster
Sounds a lot like the Dirge of Cerberus incident with Famitsu. They delayed publishing the review for that game because of pressure from Square Enix. They couldn't have people knowing that the almighty creators of FF7 can make a game that gets an unspeakable 7/10.

More power to Computer Bild Spiele though. Imagine a world where a game's success depends on its gameplay, not the number of zeros in its marketing budget.
KrazyKraut's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:26
KrazyKraut
lol^^ i dont like thís magazine so much, but thats awseome what they did.
Onlineatron's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:29
Onlineatron
Not getting the game till Christmas but I feel bad for all those who have based their purchase decision (next week) on potentially false reviews
GoldenGamerXero's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:36
GoldenGamerXero
That's an Edios move. I expected better from them.
Mazed's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:40
Mazed
This isn't the first time they've pulled this.

Back during the run of Electronic Gaming Monthly, they didn't give a shiningly perfect review of the first Assassin's Creed.

Ubisoft blacklisted them. They never sent them any games to review again. EGM stood by it. I'm still sad that magazine's been canned.

It's absolute bullshit. Ubisoft makes decent games, and I want to like them. However, I can't do that when they pull this sort of crap. There is absolutely no excuse for it.
SPNKr's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:45
SPNKr
@ Mazed

I do have to agree with you on the absurdity of what they do with reviews but it has not kept me from enjoying Assassins Creed 1. I will most likely not be getting AC 2 as it appears to be more of the same with a guy that dresses just like Altair.
Threaded's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:54
Threaded
Gaming consultant here, maybe you should make good games so you don't have to worry about poor reviews Ubisoft. Now where can I pick up my check for this genius consultation?
Brlito's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 10:54
Brlito
Haha, now I want to buy this game even less. Preorder getting cancelled.
hjd uk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:00
hjd uk
Right, Fuckem. I haven't bought the 1st and now I definitly wont buy either of them, ever.
Comrade Snarky's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:04
Comrade Snarky
Ubisoft always seems to do this kind of crap.

Anyway, the first game was great as a Third Crusade-era Jerusalem/Acre/Damascus simulator, but horrible as a videogame. I've yet to see anything that suggests Ubisoft learned anything about making a half-decent game since the first one ("ZOMG 2 hidden bladez! lol!!1!")
Spike941's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:10
Spike941
I knew the low IQ commenters would jump all over this. You think your sale matters more than a low Metacritic score? Get with the fucking times and learn what sells games these days.

P.S The game will probably suck.
Mazed's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:12
Mazed
@SPNKr

Honestly, it actually looks like it'll be a genuinely better game, with a lot of better thought-out gameplay and an environment that looks way more interesting to explore. The character's costume seems designed that way just to maintain a recognizable motif--all reports say he's got a different personality and motivation, for what that counts for.

But, yeah. It still doesn't excuse that...boycotts really have no power beyond effectively consoling one's own sense of integrity, but it doesn't feel right to feed that kind of egotism. There's a lot of nonsense throughout the game industry, but we don't need more of it.

What REALLY bugs me about this is how truly senseless it is. As said, Ubisoft's games aren't bad. Not PERFECT, but all their big-name titles are consistently worth a go. If they made consistently mediocre games, reading news like this would feel different--it'd be a laugh. But Ubisoft doesn't NEED to bribe/threaten the press for good reviews, given their good track record, yet they do--why? There's something inherently slimy about it.
hjd uk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:13
hjd uk
My sale matters, especially if they are going to such lengths to GET said sale.

And BTW im pretty sure Eidos had nothing to do with this, I feel bad for the devs that the c*** publishers are giving their work a bad name.
Primee133's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:22
Primee133
Gotta love how everyone's hating the game now because the developers are acting like dicks. My opinion on the company may have changed, but not on their game quality. I'm still definitely getting the game. After all, Steve Jobs used to be a dickhead back when he worked with Atari, and people still bought his stuff regardless.
Bioautographical's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:26
Bioautographical
@Primee

I'm pretty sure the pubs are the one with the problem here, not the devs. Maybe splitting hairs a bit, but I'll hazard a guess that the developers wouldn't feel the need to stoop to this level, probably because they feel they HAVE made a game that can score well on its own merits.
Cyber Altair's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:28
Cyber Altair
Seeing as how the PR heads will go off should they get one bad review I see where they and every company come from. Still not cool.
Spectreman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:28
Spectreman
* Not a surprise. The same thing happenned with AC1 and EGM. Ubisoft and Aidos/Square-Enix are too much dickheads.
Im OK's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:32
Im OK
I usually take stories like this as an indication that the game in question sucks horribly. For example, while I didn't play Kane and Lynch myself, I heard it legitimately licked some fetid fecal follicles*.

However, the first Assassin's Creed game was actually pretty good, despite the naysayers, so I don't see the second one suddenly sucking either, and so I don't get why they'd even need to do this shit.

Also, Eidos supposedly pulled this same crap with Arkham Asylum, and yet that game ended up rocking utterly. So, I'm not sure what to think.

Bottom line, I guess, is that if you want good review scores for your game, how about you, oh I don't know, perhaps make a good game and one that isn't some stanky ass? Trying to buy good review scores will only fuck you up in the end, if^H^Hwhen the news gets out, whether your game actually ends up being worthy of the scores or not.

* - Dingleberries.
MCChampaignMillionaire's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:33
MCChampaignMillionaire
Well I think they want this good review score to keep the series alive...anyways COMPUTERBILD SPIELE Reviews suck ass...
ShadokatRegn's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:33
ShadokatRegn
Ouch - way to go Ubisoft! So much for credibility on behalf of publishers and reviewers.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 11:54
Xzyliac
@Booerns
Yeah I remember being a part of the GameSpot community and they started dishing out 10s. The thing that sucked about that was after they started being more lenient about their reviews a whole new influx of fanboys rushed into the forums to brag. It sucked. Even user controlled boards weren't safe and they didn't have nearly the amount of mods to handle it or the right system in place to promote mods. Even mods were dicking around in flammatory arguments.

I have to say regardless of this story I'm still looking forward to AC2. Ubi has one hyped title this holiday season AND it's going up against MW2. Not saying I condone their actions but I'm not in the least bit surprised.

Like Im OK said even with Arkham Asylum they tried to pull this and that was an epic victory. Publishers don't know much about the quality of their game like a hands-on dev does. Publishers just know they need it to sell well. I don't think this move is Ubi saying it'll suck. Just Ubi saying they need the sales.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:27
Elsa
eh... I don't trust early reviews anyway. I'd far rather wait for the game to come out and hear what real gamers have to say - people with no stake in a review. If I want to buy a game on launch, well then I take my chances...
Gee-Man's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:37
Gee-Man
Eh, maybe it's just the cynicism, but I'm not too outraged by this. Ubisoft knows that AC2's release is right next to Modern Warfare 2's, and even though the games are completely different, thye know that there's a lot of competition in the form of just one game. If I was the head of a company that was in direct competition for the holiday season, I'd do my best to ensure good reviews. AC2 was never going to be a first day purchase for me, I'll just be a little more cautious until more reviews come in.
WarZombie's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:42
WarZombie
INTEGRITY.

Some people don't know the meaning of the word, but I'm glad to see that someone had the balls to say "Fuck You" to Ubisoft. However, you would think that after talking about the game as much as they have, that Ubi would like to see that work pay off with some good reviews, but apparently even they aren't that confident in their own game.
Kaspar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:43
Kaspar
How much longer will it take before the evil publishers die?
Dexter345's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:45
Dexter345
I have to wonder what publishers are thinking when they pull stuff like this. Like, you're offering an advance copy of a game, which may improve magazine sales, marginally, and expecting in return a high review, which almost certainly results in high game sales? No.
Dan CiTi's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:46
Dan CiTi
Yeah, this game seems to be like the original on better tech and with a different setting.
Solidus187's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:51
Solidus187
It's funny how when you post footage of the game, people are all over it and love the steps they took to make this one different (read: better) than the first. Yet, when you post something that the developer told some reviewers, everyone abandons ship. Does this really have that much of an effect on you guys? Really? Business is business. The game itself is what you should be here for.
marktime's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 12:58
marktime
It's a sad state that publishers blacklist reviewers for giving a less than good score. It's why I find it near impossible to trust game reviews. You'll be reading a review and the way it's written indicates the reviewer doesn't like it much, then it gets an 8. There something is seriously wrong with that. I'm not saying implying they were paid off, just that they were afraid of giving it a low score out of fear. Games shouldn't be rated on a 6-10 scale.
Shadowiii's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 13:14
Shadowiii
So pretty much I have to ignore any review that comes out before or on the release day?
Shame on you, Ubisoft! I'll stick with my Destructoid review, thanks (can't wait to see Anthony throw a fit about it again :P)
capitan's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 13:22
capitan
the problem is that a lot of game magazines now take the lazy route. they don't even play the game and then review it for the sake of getting paid not for doing their actual job.
Projectexodus's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 13:46
Projectexodus
I guess it's safe to say that I'll wait for the Destructiod review of the game.

But I am nonetheless optimistic about this game. I liked the gameplay in Assassins Creed, but what made it suck so much was it's repetetive open world structure. It seems like they're fixing that in this game. Hopefully it also has subtitles this time.
ace of knaves's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 13:48
ace of knaves
Wow, a story involving Germany and video games where I strongly support what the Germans did. Way to go Ubisoft, you made it happen.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos


    Win this!
    Dive in! meetup+play for a chance to win a PC

    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Assassin's Creed 2 review
    Crossfire Remote Pistol review
    Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles review
    Left 4 Dead 2 review
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reflex review
    more reviews
    Driver
    Avatar
    GT Racing Motor Academy
    Bad Company 2 beta dishes out meaningful experiences
    Legend of Zelda Spirit Tracks
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 51001 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Ashley Davis: Badass of the Month Club: Terry S. Taylor





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more






















    Team Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Colette Bennett
    Tom Fronczak Brad Nicholson
    Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
    Conrad
    Zimmerman
    Chad Concelmo
    Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Will Maddock Matthew Razak
    Dyson Joseph Leray
    Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
         
      Dexter
    Adam Dork
    Daniel Lingen
    Hollie Bennett
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Stella Wong

    Josh Tolentino




     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006