Quantcast


Ubisoft announces Ghost Recon: Future Soldier photo

Ubisoft teased that some "big" news was coming this week, and that news has finally hit. Announced via Xbox Live, a brand new Ghost Recon has been confirmed, Ghost Recon: Future Soldier

Boasting of "cutting-edge technology, prototype high-tech weaponry, and state-of-the-art single-player and multiplayer modes," Future Soldier will allegedly expand the series and provide a "fresh" gaming experience. A multiplayer beta has already been promised for this Summer, so if you need your Ghost Recon fix, you'll need to buy Splinter Cell: Conviction, as that's where the invites are being hidden. 

Ubisoft trademarked the name way back in December, so an announcement like this was expected. Yes, we all know you were hoping instead for news on Beyond Good & Evil 2, but this'll just have to do, okay?

LONDON – February 9, 2010 – Today Ubisoft announced that Tom Clancy™’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier™ is in development at Ubisoft’s Paris studio and is scheduled to be released worldwide Holiday 2010.

Created by the award-winning team behind Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter® and Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter® 2, the game will feature cutting-edge technology, prototype high-tech weaponry, and state-of-the-art single-player and multiplayer modes. Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier will go beyond the core Ghost Recon franchise and deliver a fresh gameplay experience, with an unparalleled level of quality that will excite long-time fans and newcomers alike.

Ubisoft is offering gamers a chance to be the first to play Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier’s Multiplayer Beta this summer 2010. This exclusive beta invitation will be available for a limited time to customers who purchase Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell Conviction™ for the Xbox 360® video game and entertainment system from Microsoft, which releases on 16 April 2010.

For ongoing updates about Tom Clancy™’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier, please visit: www.GhostRecon.com








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

42 comments | showing # 1 to 42
prev next

watermanx's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 06:46
watermanx
Seeing that it's a ghost town today. I would guess that the total amount of comments for this post will be around 25-50
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 06:54
Sexualchocolate
I may be in the minority, but I didn't rate the GRAW games.

Nor am I interested in future soldiers, high tech weapons and equipment hell I don't even like Raven in MAG, call me old fashioned but give me an AK47 anyday, something about the raw, gutteral power of a big ugly round launching from a wood and metal structure that floats my boat.

Carbon fiber and titanium just don't have the same appeal.

Persuade me ubi, persuade me!
LazyEyelids's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 06:54
LazyEyelids
Meh name. Predator sounds cooler.
Projectexodus's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 07:32
Projectexodus
I loved the Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter games! It was the only shooter games where I felt that tactical decisions mattered.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 07:53
Xzyliac
Okay that's cool. So where's the part where it serperates itself from other Ghost Recon titles of this gen?

I mean even "Advanced Warfighter" and "Future Soldier" are basically the same thing.
Fat Ryu's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 07:57
Fat Ryu
So is this a good thing then? I thought big announcements were supposed to matter.
JamnOnTheOne's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 07:57
JamnOnTheOne
Excellent. I'd much rather news about a new GR or R6 title than BG&E.
A Very Drunk Panda's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:00
A Very Drunk Panda
I actually haven't played a single Tom Clancy game with the exception of Vegas and Vegas 2, and I wasn't wholly impressed. So.. meh. I'll pass, methinks.
XGC TheDude's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:08
XGC TheDude
Its funny how launch titles stick with you. The first game I played on the 360 was GRAW and I remember that feeling of "This next generation is going to change everything!" I will be interested to see how they take the series forward and am looking forward to this title.

IMO it is better than RB6 but I had trouble getting into that game
Mr eX's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:19
Mr eX
I liked the first GRAW but I didn't get around to the second. This one could be good.
HEL105's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:29
HEL105
I cut my next-gen gaming teeth with GRAW; I love those darn games. This is now officially my third most anticipated game of the year.
Devils Theory's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:34
Devils Theory
Hey dont say that you will pass the game yet there is still too much we dont know
Kristian Miller's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:43
Kristian Miller
Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm already tentatively expecting this game to suck unilaterally. Why?
Firstly- Ubisoft takes knives to the hearts of franchises they purchased when they move development inhouse. So far they've gutted most of the Tom Clancy games, made a mockery of the original Far Cry , and made the single most visually hard-to-play game I've ever seen (James Cameron's Avatar). Given this history and the information they've provided so far it does not look promising.

Secondly - Future Soldier. This says to me everything bad about Scifi shooters, and they're going to try and take one of the last bastions of commercially viable tactical shooter franchises there. This does not end well for fans of either SciFi Futures or Ghost Recon.

Thirdly - Define Long-term fans, Ubisoft. There is no way that fans from the first Ghost Recon (not GR:AW) are going to be pleased just on the bare premise of the announcement alone.

Fourth - Ubisoft haven't respected a Tom Clancy Game since the first Advanced Warfighter by any definition of that word.

Thanks Ubisoft, but I'll try my luck elsewhere. Somewhere with Blackjack and hookers.
runtheplacered's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:43
runtheplacered
@ A Very Drunk Panda,

..... You can't be serious. Vegas and Ghost Recon games are NOT the same thing. You're passing judgment on this game already based on 0 information and some other series of games that is not related to this one.

I'm not sure you could possibly get anymore closed minded then that.
runtheplacered's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:46
runtheplacered
@ Kristian Miller ,

And now there's this guy. What the fuck are you talking about, you don't know anything about this game. haha, I have to laugh so I don't cry.

Gamers are some of the most judgmental weirdos one could probably ever meet. They know everything far before actual information enters their brain. It's amazing.
Canthari's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:03
Canthari
"Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Future Soldier will go beyond the core Ghost Recon franchise and deliver a fresh gameplay experience, with an unparalleled level of quality that will excite long-time fans and newcomers alike."


Why this line scares me so much? I thought the core of the Ghost Reacon games were the tactical aproach mixed with some Tom Clancy goodness, I hope they don't want to change any of that.

Also, 'Future Soldier'? c'mon! you can do it better.
Kristian Miller's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:16
Kristian Miller
@runtheplacered
I've been burned by Ubisoft press talk in the past, I'm incredibly wary now whenever they announce something. Especially considering it's one of one a few series I've been following for about as long as I've had a PC that are still going.

And no, I'm not being judgemental, I'm jsut laying out why I think the game tentatively is going to suck , based on only what we know and Ubisoft's track record.
RICHARD BLOCKER's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:17
RICHARD BLOCKER
I'm excited. The first GRAW was what made me buy a 360 in the first place. This is going to be great and all the haters can suck it.
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:26
Rammstein
Loved GRAW, didn't play GRAW2 but liked what I saw, so I await more details.

Also: FUCK YES! I was sold on Splinter Cell: Conviction by reading the book, so the fact that it comes with the next GR beta invite is win-win!
lastdual's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:26
lastdual
Considering what they're doing with Splinter Cell: Conviction, it's difficult to trust Ubi these days. They ripped the soul right out of that game, removing basic stealth elements like moving bodies and basically turning it into an action game for the brainless masses. Unfortunately, it's hard not to think that their "fresh, new" take on Ghost Recon won't do the same...
MCChampaignMillionaire's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:28
MCChampaignMillionaire
I really like the Ghost Recon franchise
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:32
Rammstein
Hey lastdual, who's the President in your future? 'Cause last I checked the game isn't out yet.

Douche.
rbzsfg's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:53
rbzsfg
AWESOME! SC: CONVICTION was a released day purchase for me anyway. Just another incentive to buy it.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 09:57
Xzyliac
@Rammstein
To be fair you you can see where he's going. No matter the quality of the title Conviction really is looking to be the Warrior Within of the Splinter Cell franchise. It may be good but still. To us Splinter Cell faithful Conviction it's looking like a bit of a slap in the face. :/
scrap's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 10:01
scrap
Ghost Recon co-op was excellent. My friends and I played through every mission numerous times. Color me excited!
Rammstein's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 10:11
Rammstein
Not you too Xzyliac?!? FFFFFFFFUU--What, the exclusion of Mercs v Spies? No getting rid of dead bodies required? Ubisoft peeing in long-time-fans' cheerios? What are they doing that's so bad? I've personally Googled, YouTubed and XBLMarketplaced as much media as I can get my hands on, that's how stoked I am for Conviction. I am frothing at the mouth at the mere mention of it, almost. I guess I just don't see where Ubisoft slept with my girlfriend. And as far as SpiesvMercs goes, I theorize they will add it later via DLC. Would be nice to have it on-disc, but DLC has been proven to extend a games shelf-life, hence, new(er) games with removed/less features to be added on later. :/

/rant
Schmo0zle's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 10:38
Schmo0zle
Well, I played GR:AW and liked it, sooo...I'm game.
beegzz's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 10:40
beegzz
What an ingenious marketing idea! I was already buying Conviction, now I get the beta for this? BONUS! http://gamezomb.blogspot.com/
SpeedNut's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 10:45
SpeedNut
@runtheplacered actually Kristian Miller got it pretty spot on. These were the games that the hardcore tactical FPS people loved during the original Ghost Recon, and Rainbow 6 up to and including Raven Shield. Then once Ubi took over and closed out / assimilated Storm Entertainment these games completely lost their identity, and on the PC side became infinite shovelware.
Ubersuntzu's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:02
Ubersuntzu
Conviction looks good, but it only looks good for being stylized well out of the realm of classic Clancy games. Some people are tired of the fact that the Clancy franchise is being run into the ground by doing silly, gimmicky crap that could probably be done better with a fresh IP. They did it with RS: Vegas, they're doing it with SC: Conviction, and now they're doing it with "Future Soldier." Advanced Warfighter was already pushing that envelope as far as it could be taken without being ridiculous. In order for them to make it even more "futuristicky" they'd have to add plasma rifles, future blouses and Garrus-style future monocles.

Which of course would be cool. In a game that's not Ghost Recon.
ZeeJayTL's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:10
ZeeJayTL
The sooner this is out, the sooner the rumored R6 reboot happens.
Ignominus's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:31
Ignominus
THIS JUST IN: The Rainbow Six series just announced that it is ready to shake things up with the new and improved Rainbow Six: Reno!
fetusmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:32
fetusmilk
i agree with zeejaytl


give me more RB6
brundlefly's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:40
brundlefly
A Rainbow Six reboot would be stellar. I want to play as Ding Motherfucking Chavez, not some chump noob like in Vegas. Though Ghost Recon would be nice as there's a serious void of hardcore tactical shooters right now. Regenerating health is for pussies.

Anyone else note that Ghost Recon had a perfect cover system sans button-pressing wayyy before Gears of War?
RenegadePanda's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:41
RenegadePanda
How modern are they going to get?

They already went Advanced twice, now we're in the Future? Given the theoretical and concept technology of GRAW, I can only imagine this one having laser weapons and space furniture.

They're running out of phrases to describe the future.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:45
Xzyliac
Sorry Rammstein. I think Conviction will be awesome but I long for the days of Chaos Theory.
Red TheHaze Veron's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 12:59
Red TheHaze Veron
Future Soldiers? Aren't those the kids who can't get into college and have to risk their lives for oil?


/troll/
Grandmas Boy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 13:24
Grandmas Boy
Holy shit I totally called this last week!!!!
/psychic.

Maybe in this one Canada attacks us. I tire of shooting Mexicans lol.
OWENR22's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 15:08
OWENR22
Colour me interested. I really liked the GRAW games, so this is exciting news.
KingSigy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 16:48
KingSigy
Figures. This isn't really "big" news, but its still neat.
Jas86's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 16:52
Jas86
Meh, they need to dump this whole 3rd person crap (and from Rainbow Six while they're at it) at it and actually make them into the semi-realistic war games they used to be. Which also happened to be more fun than the GRAW iterations.

Though split-screen co-op was a blast.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!