Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.

THQ 'following suit' with WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011 online pass photo

In an interview at a press event for WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011 this past weekend in Los Angeles, the game's creative director, Cory Ledesma, lamented that used games are "an issue for the [videogame] industry." This was in the context of explaining that SvR 2011 will be subject to a lockout of online features behind a pack-in code like the publisher's mixed martial arts game, UFC Undisputed 2010, which launched in May. Similar to the EA Sports Online Pass, UFC 2010 included a one-time-use code on the back of the game's manual that had to be entered into the main menu in order to use the game's online features.

But whereas THQ charged non-new buyers of UFC 2010 a $5 fee for online access, the company is "following suit with other publishers" -- namely, EA Sports -- for SvR 2011: new copies of the game will come with a code for which renters, borrowers, and used-game buyers will have to pay $10 (800 Microsoft Points). At least this time around, THQ is being transparent about the process; when it came to UFC 2010, the publisher only confirmed the existence of an online pass after players of pre-release copies found out about it.

The code for SvR 2011 will also come with three pieces of downloadable content: WWE Superstar Chris Masters, a Kelly Kelly costume, and a Day of the Dead costume for Rey Mysterio. (Players who buy the code from the Xbox Live Marketplace or PlayStation Store will still receive the content.) And unlike with UFC 2010, THQ is joining EA in offering a seven-day free trial of online features for non-new buyers.

I'll have much more on WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011, including a full preview, coming later today.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Samit Sarkar is a founding Destructoid editor and go-to Sports guy. Samit was the son of the Duke of Knees, rescued from a burning village in the afghan desert by a golden condor. He is an ace Backgammon player and lost both legs in a whaling tour. He lives for free in a nursery in Scotland where he teaches monks how to capture butterflies without hurting them. Likes Confuse Ray, Feel My Blade A Mabari War Hound, Snot, Spiral Arrow, Argo, Dan Smith's critical hit bark, Rolling things up into my life Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

18 comments | showing # 1 to 18
prev next

Kakashi's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 02:29
Kakashi
Wow that's lame. I would agree with 5 dollars but 10? Hell no. From a developer's point of view I agree, as a gamer I disagree. We should boycott but the Madden drones will keep buying. Even though that crap is closer to identical than similar with it's past reiterations.
Bones00's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 02:31
Bones00
So once the original buyer uses the online pass, it's saved on his system or PSN account that he's used it?
Trevor McGee's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 02:32
Trevor McGee
I fucking hate where this is going...

Always trying to gouge the loyal consumers just a little bit more, they won't stop until your asshole is bleeding and you're curled up in a fetal position crying on the floor.
Lakitu's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 02:54
Lakitu
@Trevor McGee

Oh yeah, those loyal, used-game-buying customers.

Even if they were 'gouging' and not 'inconveniencing,' nothing is stopping you from not buying the game. If you don't think it is worth it, and you don't like paying extra, vote with your dollar. Being angry at a company for 'making you pay' more for a game is silly; you obviously think it is worth it if you bought it.
Hasney's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 02:57
Hasney
Yeah, won't be playing this online then.

Still, looking forward to the preview. The other couple of them I've read have talked about this new momentum (have to do light grapple moves and chain some together before doing stronger ones), interactivity within the moves (movement, press a button to follow up) and no need to be stunned to hit a finisher.

Also, WWE Universe mode where everything outside of RtWM is tracked to give you storylines, rivalries and friendships building up to PPV's. And if you don't like what the console has picked out for you, edit it yourself. Actually sounds incredible.
JohnGrisham's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 02:59
JohnGrisham
^^BOYCOTT!!!!!!!!!!1!

(jk, i wasnt planning on buying it anyways :p)

how IS the wrestling scene doing these days? havn't played one since WCW/NWO Revenge... now that was quality.
Themightylebeau2009's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 03:05
Themightylebeau2009
Day 1 buy anyway, and even if I dont I'll get the code when I rent it like I did with Alan Wake, you just have to be there for when the store opens.

I still dont see the problem with this online pass thing though, people should stop being so bloody cheap.
The Silent Protagonist's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 03:05
The Silent Protagonist
Any developer that seeks to punish consumers for obtaining games by legitimate means loses my business, period. Punishing the consumer because you can't do anything to the retailer is the wrong way to go about this.

The way I see it, sports titles - which only seem MINOR improvements from year-to-year - are not worth %60 a pop to start with. They're digital distribution material. This way you can update the game regularly instead of these asinine annual releases.They're just fucking roster update packs that rapidly depreciate in value anyway.

There is no passionate argument to make for physical media in the sports genre - you will be done with that game in a matter of weeks and its value is gone within a few months. You'll trade it in.

So why not just make such games a DD release? They can constantly expand, improve and add to the game and justify selling extra content along the way. And there will be not people undercutting you by buying used.

But that would be a better deal for the gamer. That would make sense. Publishers don't have a bit of sense.
Gol-D-Roger's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 03:20
Gol-D-Roger
I could see this working if it was only for the first couple months after release. When used game prices are only 5 to 10 bucks below new, I could see it persuading a few folks. But after that just seems stupid especially considering how fast sports games lose their value.
Samit Sarkar's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 04:12
Samit Sarkar
@The Silent Protagonist: "you will be done with that game in a matter of weeks and its value is gone within a few months"

I vehemently disagree on both points (well, more strongly on the former than on the latter). Let's take EA Sports' NHL 10 as an example.

Regarding the depreciation of annual sports games: GameStop is currently listing used copies of NHL 10 at $34.99, only five dollars less than the price of a new copy. Sure, they'll probably only give you $10 if you trade it in, but, well, the game has been out for 11 months. That's the market, and publishers are hamstrung by brick-and-mortar retailers.

This ties into your first claim: that people stop playing sports games "in a matter of weeks." I don't know how many sports-game-playing friends you have, but I play many of my annual sports games right up until the following year's iteration launches. (I've been playing the hell out of NHL 10 recently, because I'm so excited for NHL 11 to come out on September 7th. And I will keep playing NHL 10 until I have NHL 11 in my hands, which means that I will get 11 1/2 months of gaming out of NHL 10.)

Now, I happen to not play NHL 10 online very much, but imagine if I did -- and say I had bought the game used, the week after it launched. That's 11 months of (offline and) online gaming for which EA Sports doesn't see a dime -- 11 months of using their servers, of downloading patches. To be sure, it's unfortunate for gamers... but it seems only fair for publishers to try and get paid for their content.
Cyber Altair's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 05:35
Cyber Altair
I wouldn't mind this if the game had a decent netcode. I never was capable of playing a match without lag it's scary.
Shulamm's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 06:47
Shulamm
@Cory Ledesma "used games are an issue for the [videogame] industry."

The fact that two brand new games equals the cost of a brand new console is an issue for the videogame industry.
Hasney's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 07:32
Hasney
@Cyber Altair

One preview I read said they played a 6 man HIAC match without lag. Obviously as it's a preview, this could change in real-world situations, but if they pull it off, thank god.

@Patriot Snake

It doesn't. Thankfully, they used development resource for much better things.
Ray Tarded's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 08:29
Ray Tarded
"and say I had bought the game used, the week after it launched. That's 11 months of (offline and) online gaming for which EA Sports doesn't see a dime -- 11 months of using their servers, of downloading patches. To be sure, it's unfortunate for gamers... but it seems only fair for publishers to try and get paid for their content."


Your logic is completely wrong. It's not about who is using said disc (game), it's about the disc itself. If you buy it used, does that mean that the original owner AND you are online using EA's servers?

Absolutely not.

EA seen their profits from THAT DISC. It doesn't matter how many people handle it. It's still just 1 disc being used online at any given time. It's not like the servers have to handle the original owner and all used owners OF THAT SINGLE DISC all at the same time.

It's only 1 person per disc sold at any given time, and EA seen their profit from every single disc.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 08:41
Sexualchocolate
-WARNING-

DO NOT BUY UFC2010 NEW OR THE ONLINE CODE

The Online portion is fucking HORRIBLE, it's 1/2 the speed of the single player, which makes it really awkward to control (you press button, your opponent hits you, THEN your player does what you pressed) and it has trouble finding matches, let alone any kind of matchmaking to put you with someone of similar skill.

Seriously the actualy gameplay is vastly imporved since the last game, but the online is far worse.

It's not worth the "FREE" it costs with the new game, let alone the code price.
Psychoholic420's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 09:17
Psychoholic420
Lolz, the online for SvR has never been any good. At least this should drop the price on used copies. Thanks THQ!
Hasney's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 09:36
Hasney
@Psychoholic420

The only issue is, that code will be needed to download CAWs and stories :/
Sæglópur's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/18/2010 10:45
Sæglópur
And I'm "following suit" by not buying another rehash.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!