VIDEO.DESTRUCTOID   |   JAPANATOR   |   TOMOPOP
Destructoid is obsessive about gaming news.
Home #Monthly Musing


The wrong thing: Being evil should be more like sex photo

[Editor's Note: We're not just a (rad) news site -- we also publish opinions/editorials from our community & employees like this one, though be aware it may not jive with the opinions of Destructoid as a whole, or how our moms raised us. Want to post your own article in response? Publish it now on our community blogs.]

Sitting next to you is a girl you’ve known since you were a young boy. You were in the same school district, and somehow you kept being placed in the same classes. You hung out throughout school, other than that awkward high school phase where you joined the cheerleading squad and she got way into writing Twilight fan fiction.

Yet now, here you both sit, and something has changed. As you watch Mansquito on the SciFi Channel, you notice that she’s sitting closer to you than normal, no doubt feeling a bit sexy thanks to the super-sexy images flashing on the screen. You’ve always wondered what it would be like. As the buzzing from the Mansquito intensifies, your eyes meet hers, and you know that you’re about to find out.

She’s gone before you wake up, leaving no clues of her presence whatsoever. You try to call her, but there’s no answer. So you sit alone wondering if what you did last night was a good idea. It sure was fun, but at what cost? Will it ruin your friendship? Did you use a condom? Did she notice your third nipple?

Being evil in games should be more like this.


 

Flirting with danger

There’s always a build up. Sometimes it takes years, sometimes it takes a matter of moments, but before the clothes come flying off in a tornado of awkward stumbling and confused pulling leading up to your realization that she uses a front-clasp bra, there’s a lot of wondering. What would it be like? How would it all end? What’s the right way to approach the situation? It’s a time of uncertainty, where you know what part of you wants, but your brain tries to talk you out of it.

Choosing to do something evil in a game should have the same buildup. Most of us aren’t evil, so why is it that we so often decide to do evil before the opportunity is even upon us? Usually, this seems to happen because games lack a period in which we’re allowed to flirt with evil. We have no reason not to jump in head first.

What should hold us back here? The possibility of terrible consequences. We don’t need to know what they are, but the simple knowledge that taking a dark path might be a road that we can’t get off of is enough to make the buildup meaningful. Then, we have the opportunity to flirt with evil, wondering what it would be like to see it in all of its intimate glory. It would probably be bony and desiccated, but you never know.



The dirty deed

Oh baby. Those bedroom eyes have never been more obviously directed toward you, and while distinguishing between her bedroom eyes and her mad dog stare is something you could work on, you manage to break through the ambiguity of her stare and decide to act on it. You’re alone. No one’s watching (other than Tom up in that tree, but he has seen worse). It’s time to make your move.

And boy howdy is it glorious. The sense of excitement is unmatched. You’re truly lost in the moment, enjoying every moment of this wonderful …

Uh oh.

Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.



So, what does the actual act of sex have to do with being evil in games? What, besides them being terrible ills of this world?

Well, both of them are supposed to be fun (unless you live in Tennessee). That’s what motivates so many of us to have awkward, pale encounters like the one described above. We’ve heard of the fun experienced by others, and the promise of experiencing it for ourselves leads us to become such evil, evil fornicators.

But being evil in games isn’t always fun. Much of the time, it’s not the actual act of being evil that we’re enjoying -- it’s just the same thing we’d be doing otherwise. For instance, what’s the difference, really, between running over a pedestrian for no reason in Grand Theft Auto IV and running over a gangster in a mission? Nothing other than a different skin on the character. We don’t run over pedestrians because we’re drawn to the evil of the act, we do it because hitting stuff with cars is silly and fun.

Making an evil act fun because it is evil would feel a lot different. Imagine, for a moment, swindling a child out of his family’s last bit of money just to see his family fall to pieces because of it. I’ll leave the details of how this would work up to you. But either way, it’s messed up in a way that we can’t even imagine, and finding the aftermath fun would be even more messed up. But that’s what evil should be: fun because it’s evil, and if you’re not evil, it shouldn’t be fun.

Just like sex. Yeah …



The morning after

Boy, that really tuckered you out. A puddle of drool lies upon a pillow that is not yours, and a haphazard mixture of male and female clothing lies upon a floor that is far cleaner than your own, lit by the morning sun flooding in through the open window. You wonder if the neighbors heard. She was a lot louder than you expected…oh, wait, that feminine shrieking was you.

You sit up and notice that she’s not in the room. This is a bad sign, you tell yourself. You think of all of those movies where the girl is not in the room when the guy wakes up. It’s always because she regretted what she did last night.

Now that you have the perfect opportunity to think about it yourself (apart from the concerns about the size of your equipment), you begin to worry. Should you be regretting it too?

Just how big of a mistake did you make? What will the repercussions be? How many people will it affect?

Hopefully this is starting to sound like a discussion of consequences in games. Indeed, the biggest thing missing, in my mind, is the overall effect of an action on a meaningful part of the game. This has to stretch beyond unlocking an achievement, getting a certain ending, getting more or less money for a quest, or whether NPCs hug you or spit at your feet as you walk by. These are essentially meaningless.

What is far more meaningful is how you come to understand your actions, and how those people important to you (relatively, of course, since we’re talking about a game) react to your decisions. After the fun is over, the real business begins.

Remember that family that you just ruined? Well, good job, asshole, because the mother just hung herself in the closet, leaving her children orphans. The son, of course, is going to blame himself for the rest of his life, never being able to force the image of his mother hanging in the closet out of his mind. His sister will blame him, too, and the tragic story will end in a murder-suicide that no one except for you truly understands.

This is really fucked up, and typing it made me genuinely uncomfortable. But guess what. This is evil. This is what makes an act one that spawns from the depths of hell itself. It’s not what is done in the moment, but what results from it. And if we never see those results in games, how are we supposed to experience evil?



The emotional scarring

You decided to sneak out the window rather than confront what used to be your longtime friend. The pain from the three-story fall still surges through your body, masked somewhat by your distracted mind. You feel broken in more ways than one. You’re nearly certain at this point that you’ve destroyed something great.

The next day, you hardly acknowledge each other in the halls. She obviously told her friends, as they stare at you across hallways as if you’re somehow to blame for what has happened. Maybe you are. Joys that you used to share become annoyances, and songs that you used to listen to together sound like the moans of copulating raccoons. You’ve lost something, and you know that there’s no way to get it back.

You’re changed forever by your desire for pleasure.

Will this always happen? No, it won’t. Different personal circumstances might mean that there are no repercussions at all. But an event of this magnitude rarely leaves no lasting effects. Sometimes, they will be good, and other times, they will be quite terrible.



When we’re evil in games, it’s hard for those actions to create lasting effects in the game. After all, we’re only going to spend a certain number of hours with a game, and it’s hard for a developer to script lasting effects for every decision.

Therefore, those lasting effects have to be created in us, and that’s not going to happen unless the magnitude of evil is turned up a notch. We should remember not only the evil deed that we did, but also just how horrible it made us feel. This feeling shouldn’t go away in an hour or even a single playthrough. Days later, our minds should wander to it, and we should feel regret.

There are plenty of incredibly evil scenarios that have yet to be explored, whether it’s the player, a villain, or even something as simple as an NPC being evil. But so often we see the same situations, or new ones that are poorly developed in terms of their lasting effects.

Every part of the experience here is connected. Without context, being evil will fail. Without fun, being evil will fail. Without meaningful consequences, being evil will fail. And without lasting effects, being evil will fail. There’s obviously a lot to manage, and consequently, I don’t think evil in games is likely to reach the level that I’m referring to any time soon. And how many of us truly want it to?

Thank god that sex is more fun than this.


Continue reading: More Promoted stories stories





31 comments | showing # 1 to 31
prev next

Tony Ponce's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 10:40
Tony Ponce
Okay, be honest. This is based on actual events, right?
Andrew Kauz's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 10:43
Andrew Kauz
@MegaStryke: Eleven of them, actually ;)

Although it was actually her with the third nipple. Wasn't as cool as I expected. At all.
Andrew Kauz's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 10:44
Andrew Kauz
Mostly because it was shaped like Florida.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 10:56
Elsa
Great blog! (and an interesting comparative!!). I definitely think that consequences should play a bigger role in being evil, and that evil should seem to be fun. Both of those aspects are so often lacking in video games (and better consequences than everyone hates us and will randomly attack us).

They need to rethink the whole "evil" thing in video games!
Anonymouse's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 11:01
Anonymouse
Good blog, as always.

One thing I hated in Fallout 3 was that if I blew up Megaton, I instantly became the most hated man in the Capital Wasteland. However, I could sudenly become the saviour of the Wastes just by giving some water to a begger. That always seemed silly to me.
walkyourpath's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 11:20
walkyourpath
Out of all the lacks you mentioned, the lack of consequences is the one that sticks out to me the most. Not just physical or societal consequences, but also emotional consequences. The emotional consequences are often the most compelling in sex as well!

Like you stated, it will be some time before games reach the point where the writing and design can support such an experience, but I certainly look forward to awkwardly experiencing it for the first time!
kjohnson1585's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 12:34
kjohnson1585
I guess the question would be, how would you program "consequences" in a game? How can you really measure guilt, and make it so that guilt effect the game play? The narrative is one thing. The gaming experience is another. Granted, I'd LOVE to see that in action, I'm just not sure how.
Andrew Kauz's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 12:44
Andrew Kauz
@Kjohnson: Yeah, I don't know that they can be programmed, so I'd have to suggest that it has to be created in the player. But I do think it's possible to create something so powerful that it's almost guaranteed to bring about a major reaction in a player. It's just a matter of figuring out how. But I think if it were good enough, it would make the player start playing the game differently. After all, if you do something that you truly regret, you'll want to avoid similar situations in the future.
walkyourpath's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 13:03
walkyourpath
@kjohnson -- The only way I can think of is through focus groups and play testing. If the writing and execution elicit a guilt response (or whatever) from that small group, then you can roll the dice on it and see how the masses react.
Zodiac Eclipse's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 13:08
Zodiac Eclipse
I've always thought your party members were responsible for dictating your conscience in games. At least this seems to be how the programmers intend to point out that what you just did was wrong. The problem with this scenario is that even if the NPC's following you decide that you are the scum of the earth they will still fight by your side. An even greater problem is that without these NPC's you don't have anyone to tell you that what you did was wrong. Evil just isn't bad if nobody cares, it's just another means to drive you to the end of the game.

Great write-up.
wanderingpixel's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 13:15
wanderingpixel
Reading this was like having sex with you, Kauza. You wore protection, right?
CptnMayhem's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 14:32
CptnMayhem
Fantastic write-up, kauza. The dichotomy between the evils you discuss and the pleasure sex provides is as uncomfortable as it is brilliant :)

The lack of consequences is one I agreed with the most. Making a choice between good and evil as simple as inFAMOUS does (and I really enjoyed that game), is something that should be fixed. Life is not, for the most part, black and white and when a game is able to firmly explore those areas of gray, gaming will change drastically.
callmeAlex's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 21:10
callmeAlex
Good use of analogy to describe things. I would love to see this kind of thing brought to games in a big way eventually. I think we've some watered down examples so far though.


While not an evil act, as I was reading through I couldn't help but think about the end of Prince of Persia (Spoilers ahead.)

Whether or not you thought the Prince saving Elika at the end was selfless (because he cared about someone other than himself) or selfish (bringing her back because HE wanted her back, screw the rest of the world being safe from Arhimin even though that was what she wanted), you gotta admit there was a pretty heavy consequence in there by releasing the evil god from the tree that you just worked the entire game to prevent from happeneing!

You see some of the that consequence in the Epilogue, but I'm sure we'll see it in full in the inevitable sequel. I for one like to believe that the Prince is a flawed character and brought her back for selfish (which could be seen as a light form of evil) reasons. Heck, I was the player wanted to bring her back too. So in doing what I wanted to do, and screwed the world over in doing so. There's consequence.

I know I probably read way more into that ending that I should have, but get offa me. I'm feeling analytical tonight!
callmeAlex's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 21:13
callmeAlex
^ Ahh, grammatical errors galore in my post!
CelicaCrazed's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 23:00
CelicaCrazed
Haha great post! I'm sure that someday all of these good and evil decisions will be able to be better portrayed in video games. It seems like it'll be awhile till they progress past what developers are doing now though. Oh well, it gives us something to look forward to in the future. The next big gameplay innovation!
Everyday Legend's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/12/2009 15:27
Everyday Legend
Damn, dude. Gotta hand it to you on that one - you wandered off into the metaphysical stream-crossing for a few minutes there, but I thoroughly enjoyed the trip.

I've had a few like that too, buddy. It sucks.
Sex makes great friends hate each other. It's true. However, if actual love is on the line, it's the ultimate gamble, especially if you end up winning.

For real. Totally worth it.
maxman14's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 18:00
maxman14
this would still not be enough for me. I get little to no satisfaction from being evil. the only way to get me to do evil is to make me hate someone. if you can get me to hate someone then you don't need to push me to be evil it will occur on its own.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 18:00
Holyetheline
You jumped out of a chicks window after you banged her and woke up in her room alone?

Sex is good.
Johnny Justice's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 19:05
Johnny Justice
Over the course of reading this, I've developed an unexplainable urge to wear a condom, right now!
Lunacy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 19:07
Lunacy
Was this as good for you as it was for me?
ninjalegend's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 19:25
ninjalegend
Dude, that sucks. It seems you equate casual sex with worry, fear, shame, and embarrassment. Equate it instead as a hard fought sport between two lovers, for the love of the sport. I think if I felt like that, I would swear celibacy.
Letters numbers and spaces are ok's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 19:34
Letters numbers and spaces are ok
sex = evil. thank you for that lesson.

anyway, Chrono Trigger for me was really the only game that ever got a choice system right... the game ACTUALLY changes (even though no doubt you'll revisit certain areas, just at different points, etc), and actions you thought were meaningless actually mattered
Andrew Kauz's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 19:34
Andrew Kauz
@ninjalegend: No worries, this post doesn't in any way represent how I really feel about it. I cast it in that light for the sake of comedy.
Preacher747's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/13/2009 22:23
Preacher747
Are you saying that as sexual taboos disappear and the negative consequences of casual sex diminish, sex will eventually feel like a video game?
AKillingJoke's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 02:24
AKillingJoke
So, what you're saying, is Infinity Ward knows some tricks in the sack?
KingSigy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 02:35
KingSigy
I love how you compare evil with sex, but being that I'm a pathetic 21 year old idiot, I can't really put myself in the situation. I've never really done anything inherently evil and I've obviously never touched a woman outside of moving a magazine at 7/11. While that does sound sad, the fact is that I cannot relate to this.

Anyway, great blog. You definitely bring me into the picture you are painting and make some great parallels. I just wish I could understand the situation better.
Brolsen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 02:58
Brolsen
Stereotypical gamers having sex does not add up. Thank god I don't play WoW.

Speaking in terms of technology, of course it's already possible to create a truly evil experience. There just aren't any gamedesigners that have been able to pull it off as you descibed it.
Being evil in Fable for example doesn't work for me at all. Yeah you start to look badass at a point but that's all. Nice blog!
Lunacy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 04:19
Lunacy
I kinda want to write a counterpoint of sorts arguing that being good should be more like being "just friends," except it ends well after all your hard work and the douchebag getting the glory.

But, I'm really lazy. So it might not happen.
Everyday Legend's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 10:02
Everyday Legend
@ Lunacy
It's a great idea for a videogame. It's based on my life, in a sense.

See, I tried doing the right thing. I tried being the nice guy. It got me nowhere for a long, long time, to the point where I met a wonderful, beautiful girl and was completely enamored with her, to the point where even as she was catching the flirtations from the biggest doucheflap I'd ever met I stood idly by as the one knight in shining armor still around when those assholes would inevitably let her down.

I didn't care about the chances of romantic exploits with her after that, I just gave up on trying anymore and decided to live my life and pursue other interests (pertaining to the opposite sex). I remained friends with her, but at this point, I returned the "just friends" stance with this beautiful blue-eyed angel while I went and walked on my own path without her as my partner of choice. I was sure that my princess was in another castle at that point, so I went on a journey to find her.

Through all of my travels, all I ever found was disappointment and mere retainers.

Eventually, I crossed paths with the blue-eyed angel again, as we still ran in the same social circles. It was about a year later, and she had been hurt too many times by the douchebags and other assorted dickheads that ran rampant in my major-university-based hometown. I had just been hurt deeply by a romantic exploit who ran into the arms of another total macho meathead after spending a magical month in the shiny arms of my knight's armor, and had decided at long last to live alone, as that would ensure my happiness and inability to be hurt from the lack of return on an emotional investment. She was feeling the same way, even though I didn't know this at the time.

Long story short, we got together about a month later.

Even longer story made shorter, 5 years later we were married, and we're still happily-ever-after to this very day. We're hoping for our first child next year.

I guess the point is this: being a good guy doesn't pay off initially, but when it finally does, the rewards tend to completely outshine what collective short-term gains being evil would garner you.

End rant.
catsithx's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 11:20
catsithx
Man that was deep and funny *in a weird way * at the same time
Lunacy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/14/2009 13:51
Lunacy
@Everyday Legend

Dang, yo. Way to be inspirational. Fits almost to a T. Here's to hoping I get the last bit after the walking our own paths bit.

I had actually just been thinking I wouldn't want her to read a perverted take on our relationship in a style of humour she doesn't exactly share, regardless of how much the internet would enjoy reading it.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 



see all
Splinter Cell: Conviction - GameStop Promo
BlazBlue: Continuum Shift
No More Heroes 2: Desperate Struggle - Euro
EVE Online: Tryannis
Majin & The Forsaken Kingdom
Naughty Bear - Aliens Spoof
Transformers War For Cybertron: Matt Tieger
Need For Speed World: Marc De Vellis
Fullmetal Alchemist: To the Promised Day
Destructoid 4th Anniversary Party
Try our new video site: vToid.com





Heavy Rain Chronicles, Chapter 1: The Taxidermist
by Samit Sarkar
Final Fantasy XIII
Pokemon HeartGold / SoulSilver
Calling
Sonic and Sega All-Stars Racing
God of War III
Mega Man 10
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Review Recap: February 2010



Why you need to be excited about SpyParty
by Anthony Burch
Cute chaotic robot ninja explody fun with Plain Sight
Need for Speed World: Race
A mindbending with Poto & Cabenga
Pocket Creatures
Easy Piano
inXile's Hunted
Resident Evil : Zombie Infection (iPhone)
Star Wars: The Old Republic
Frobot




Call for entries

New posts Expand all

New to the c-blogs? Read the survival guide
- The Dtoid Army is 60588 strong -







What classic IP should Sega resurrect?
The hidden truth behind game reviews
Counterpoint: God of War III is too long, boring
The joys of being a videogame reviewer
Gather around old man Niero: Destructoid turns four
The most immature thing we've ever done: The Name Game
Get me results: How to solve the JRPG Grind






tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, El Jefe
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Joseph Leray Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Samit Sarkar
Hollie Bennett Daniel Lingen
Mikey Turvey
   








 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006