Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.

The Witcher 2's system requirements are reasonable photo

Polygamia has the scoop on the system requirements for CD Projekt's highly anticipated The Witcher 2, a game that impressed me at Eurogamer and made Samit forget about sports in New York.

Recommended specs:
Processor: Intel Quad Core or AMD equivalent
Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce 260, 1 GB memory / Radeon HD 4850 with 1 GB memory
Memory: 3 GB for Windows XP / 4 GB for Windows Vista and Windows 7
Hard Disk: At least 16 GB of free space

Minimum specs:
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2 GHz or AMD 2.5 GHz equivalent
Graphics Card: Nvidia GeForce 8800, 512 MB memory or ATI HD3850 512 MB
Memory: 1 GB for Windows XP / 2 GB for Windows Vista and Windows 7
Hard Disk: 8 GB for the game installation and 8 GB for bonus materials

They look reasonable enough. Most mid-range rigs should be able to run it, but if you were thinking of what kind of new PC to build, the recommended specs do make for a nice guideline. While the recommended quad core processor didn't include any model or speed, it's safe to assume you'll be fine with an i7 920 or something like that.

[Update: The Witcher 2's newsletter has some more info on the AMD/ATI specs, which has been added to this post. We have not yet received any reply to inquiries about what kind of "quad core" or reference resolution is assumed]

Znamy wymagania sprzetowe Wiedzmina 2! [Polygamia]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Maurice Tan Maurice Tan does his Associate Editing from The Netherlands in a reality-shattering time zone. After working as a university lecturer in Psychology and Communications teaching game studies and the merits of Keyboard Cat, he now spends most of his time posting news, previews, reviews, and features about industry stuff or all things PC and strategy. He is also a connoisseur of licensed games, as long as they have achievements. Likes Deus Ex, Colonization, Mass Effect, TIE Fighter, and his iPod Touch. Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

47 comments | showing # 1 to 47
prev next

Epic-Kx's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:05
Epic-Kx
MAAAAAXX INPUT!

I've secrectly have had this game under my 'PC HYPE?' Radar, can't wait to pick it up.
MathewRD's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:07
MathewRD
Minimum specs:
Memory: 1 GB for Windows XP / 2 GB for Windows XP
Ehhhh
Ilostmycookie's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:10
Ilostmycookie
Surprising considering how good the game looks.
Astalano's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:11
Astalano
Holy shit those are some relatively high recommended specs. Quad core? Hmmm. My 6870 should max this out I hope, although I'll need another GB of RAM soon.
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:14
Maurice Tan
@MathewRD:

Fixed, cheers :)
ajaxender's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:15
ajaxender
^ not sure if you've got a full understanding of your pc there, dude... yeah, your 6870 is gonna max it out easy, if a 260 or 4850 is recommended.
Jawmuncher's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:15
Jawmuncher
I'm good to go at recommended awesome
Bobthecatlol's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:19
Bobthecatlol
I have a Quad Core so I'm fine, but I'd hardly call it a reasonable system requirement.
Astalano's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:19
Astalano
@ajaxender

I mean the card should act as the bottleneck, considering I'm lacking the quad core and recommended doesn't necessarilly mean max. Getting max settings and only getting under 30 FPS would suck for me too.

Anyway, hooray for The Witcher 2, can't wait for release. :)
Astalano's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:24
Astalano
To put this into perspective, Crysis and Crysis 2 don't even recommend a quad core, although I don't know if that is a good comparison.
ricochetguro's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:24
ricochetguro
I can't wait to update my pc in October(birthday) as mines quite old now. I'm just above minimum specs as of now so I'll probably be able to run most settings on high.
This is my most anticipated goty, May can't come soon enough!
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:25
Maurice Tan
Keep in mind that recommended specs for this are likely to be the DirectX 11 requirements, with everything on high or highest. Compared to what you needed for the first Witcher, anyone who bought a decent new PC in the last 1.5 years should have no problem running it decently.
Kanten's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:28
Kanten
Oh jeez, I really need to replace my C2D/8800GTX rig relatively soon.
Sir Unimaginative's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:38
Sir Unimaginative
Why don't these things ever include a resolution?

I meet the recommended specs pretty much precisely, but I'm sure as hell not going to get flawless performance at 1080p.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 16:54
Klarden
@Sir Unimaginative
A very VERY good point, btw. I guess, the norm for writing specs today is 1680x1050 OR 1280x1024 So, no, i also think full 1920 will not be flawless performance with exact recommended specs.
thehoytman's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 17:04
thehoytman
damn, I'm a bit under the minimum. damn you, aging XPS!

I hope this comes out for consoles.
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 17:05
Maurice Tan
+1 for having a reference resolution in specs!
3ofDiamonds's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 17:11
3ofDiamonds
Dammit, those specs are pretty high. Mainly the quad core. I really don't want to replace my LGA775 setup...
bmart008's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 17:18
bmart008
Too bad that my quad core doesn't even run the FIRST witcher, with how buggy it is. What a waste of money :(
Spaz's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 18:06
Spaz
I was thinking this is a little high myself. Then again though Battlefield 3 specs are going to be fucking monstrous.

+1 rep for saying devs need to start including what screen resolution they did this on.
Spaz's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 18:11
Spaz
Ow shit I just read the pre-view and how you could import your saves O.O. I need to get up off my ass and beat this game.
IdlePye's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 18:32
IdlePye
These actually seem quite high, i cant get the witcher 1 to run decently on my gtx275 how will this game?
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 18:42
Maurice Tan
@IdlePye:

The Witcher ran on the Aurora engine (Neverwinter Nights 2), which made it ridiculous hard for PC's to run it properly at the time. Witcher 2 has a new engine that is platform agnostic, and a lot more optimized.
Nevi's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 18:58
Nevi
I remember Witcher 1's requirements as being unreasonable when the game launched, similar to Crysis. My rig could barely boot it, it was not playable. I ended up not playing it through until Enhanced Edition came out.

I don't agree with anyone who complains that Crysis 2 or Witcher 2's requirements are too low; those first games' specs excluded a lot of people.
Wedge's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 18:58
Wedge
For a PC only game, that seems appropriate. The only having 512 of RAM on my "old" video cards kinda bothers me these days, but whatever.
Psihomodo's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 20:07
Psihomodo
I can confirm that Crysis 2 on max, 1920x1200 resolution works very comfortably (alas because of the motion blur that makes it feel like faster) at 40-50 fps on:

AMD Phenom II X4 965BE 3.4 GHz (stock speed), 4 GB (1600) RAM and an ATI 5870 1GB. So very high detail experience on not top noch HW.

And W2 won't be that demanding because of lack of chaos on screen in C2 :)
Xeo's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 20:51
Xeo
Man, I want this game so badly, but my video card JUST meets the minimum required. That scares me into thinking it'll run like shit.

I hope it eventually comes to PS3, then I can run it without fear. I'm a console gamer, but I LOVED The Witcher, even read the US translated novels.
Maurice Tan's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 21:32
Maurice Tan
I can just run it on my 2 year old C2D 3.0GHz, 4GB ram, ATI 4830/512MB rig, which runs Crysis 2 at 1920x1200 pretty decently. Probably will be replaying this after a future PC upgrade for all the DX11 eye candy though. :)

They are still planning on a console release and haven't ruled it out, but I wouldn't expect it before 2012. One can hope of course!
Caffeine Knight's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 23:02
Caffeine Knight
Intel Quad Core....hmmm, yeah, pretty reasonable...
hantsolo's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/25/2011 23:55
hantsolo
Has everyone been watching their cpu core temps while trying to push max res?

I'm running a 6600 quad with a GTX460 SC. I could run almost any game at 1680 x 1050 without any problems. I recently got a larger monitor with 1920 x 1080 native res. My rig can still push the higher res, but my cpu core temps have jumped up considerably. Scared the shit out of me when they went over 80C once. No such problem when I lower the res back down to 1680 x 1050, but that res looks like shit to me now. I guess you can never go back.

Been playing Borderlands at max res and get temps around 70C. I've decided to go with liquid cooling. I've already picked up an H50, but have been to lazy and a bit paranoid about installing it. Anyone here have any experience with the H50?

Anyhow, The Witcher ran fairly well on my machine (at 1680 x 1050), and am looking forward to The Witcher 2. But probably won't try to play it until I get my temps under control.
ArrestedDeveloper's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 00:49
ArrestedDeveloper
I got a new computer with an even newer PSU and GPU that are going to rip that up.
Blitzard's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 01:46
Blitzard
E8400 CPU, HD 5830 GPU and 2GBs of ram... My rig stands somewhere between the minimum and recommended specs, though I guess my RAM will be tha main problem. DX11 is kind of out of the picture tho :(
sofik88's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 03:54
sofik88
i built my PC for less than 800$ from scratch and i have i5 760, Radeon HD6870 and 8GB Ram(including new windows) if i used spareparts from my older pc i probably would built entire thing for less than 400$. it really isn't that expensive guys considering the fact that this type of machine will last for the next 3-4 years easilly.
ChronicusPr1me's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 03:57
ChronicusPr1me
aww, too bad i only have 2.0gz dual core cpu.
sakmidrai's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 07:29
sakmidrai
all good.
Sir Unimaginative's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 08:36
Sir Unimaginative
@Caffeine Knight

OR AMD EQUIVALENT. You can get an Athlon II 640 for a hundred bucks, and your motherboard's probably too old for a modern Intel quad anyway.
PrinceHeir's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 09:19
PrinceHeir
looks awesome :D

but i'll probably wait for the console version since i don't have a gaming rig(mainly used it for interenet, anime, and other "stuff")

still nice to see they developed this as a PC game from the very start. though it doesn't play like the traditional PC games(point and click) so i think there's a fairly chance they'll port this to consoles(they even keep mentioning it in every interview)
MetalGod's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 10:01
MetalGod
I'm just over the recommended specs. I hope I won't need to drop any settings. We'll see.
Justin Villasenor's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 10:22
Justin Villasenor
Looks like max specs for me!
PalinRMA's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 11:31
PalinRMA
The specs look low to me, I got my first Quad Core three years ago. My new computer will crush this game.
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 12:36
Jon B
Woo, I'm over the recommendeds on everything. Awesome.
Still gonna grab another HD5770 and crossfire for BF3 though, so I might grab one early just to crank up AA by another notch.
The Tingler's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 14:51
The Tingler
With Dragon Age II being so disappointing, this could be the fantasy story-driven RPG to beat this year (with Skyrim not being so story-driven, of course).

@bmart008: I think you must've got the unpatched original version. CD Projekt worked very, very hard to update the game. The current Enhanced Edition has no bugs and should run much, much better.
NoBodysGamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 15:15
NoBodysGamer
too low, i hope the graphics wont suck
EternalDeathSlayer's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 18:52
EternalDeathSlayer
I've got myself the i7-920 Maurice mentioned, a 5870 1 GB, and 9 GBs of DDR3.

Can I run this on max? The original Witcher was one of the games, along with Crysis and Crysis Warhead, that made me bother to get a gaming capable PC. That was a few years back. Last year I got the i7-920 PC, for the futures....

Oh yeah, BTW, I spent a decent amount of cash to play the first 2 Crysis games, and I wasn't really happy with the gameplay regardless of the visuals.

So basically all my PC has been used for is The Witcher and my wife's WoW playing. Back to playing Xbox 360....
DAVYDOCK's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/26/2011 21:09
DAVYDOCK
Ive got an xbox.
Genius's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/27/2011 16:39
Genius
Anybody whining about these requirements was never a PC gamer to begin with.
Rob Howard's Avatar - Comment posted on 03/28/2011 08:19
Rob Howard
Think I'll be waiting for the rumoured console port...
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!