Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home Sony updates

The PlayStation 3 price cut reactions

10:12 PM on 07.09.2007, Brad Rice 63 comments

The PlayStation 3 price cut reactions photo
     Sony

The Internet has been all abuzz with the news about Sony's $100 price cut on the PlayStation 3. I'd like to take a quick look at all the talk that's been going on and what this might mean for Sony and the rest of us.

First, let's start with the news from those close to Sony -- namely, ThreeSpeech and PlayStation.Blog. ThreeSpeech tries to keep itself apart from Sony, and only has a short blurb and a link to GamesIndustry. PlayStation.Blog, though, has quite a bit more, with a more filled out explanation on what everything is in the package. Of course, there's not a ton of explanation behind these motives. So, where do we go for that?

Mr. N'Gai Croal, actually. Being all fancy with his Newsweek job and such (I <3 you, N'Gai!), he managed to sit down with Jack Tretton to talk about the price cut and such. Not surprisingly, Tretton continues to tout the "it's a great bargain" line with the fact that the machine is packing Blu-Ray under it's hood.

One of your main competitors, Microsoft has a number of the same features, but not all, in the Xbox 360. You don't think that the messaging that they put out would have primed the hardcore gamer to understand the PS3's potential value? At this point, I'm not sure what the total is for North America, but I believe that for this year, according to NPD, you guys have sold around 667,000 units, in addition to what was sold last year following the launch. So presumably, you're still talking to the early adopter and the hardcore gamer, who I think has the ability to understand this stuff. Then you've got Microsoft, which was already on the market with a lot of the same messaging. They didn't have a next-gen DVD drive built in, but they have downloads; the 360 SKUs that are really selling are the ones that have hard drives in them; it does video; it does pictures, etc. So I'm still not sure about how much of the reluctance from consumers stems from complexity of the message versus the price.

A little harsh, I'd say. Let's continue on and discuss this some.

Tretton, trying to take the question in stride, keeps up the Sony lines, this time with the "it's good for 10 years" line. Microsoft, meanwhile, is making you cobble together a next gen system with all these attachments and add-ons, that will ultimately look like a Frankenstein monster, and will only last about four years before bursting into flames (and throwing a small girl into a lake).

For the rest of the interview, it was a bit of smoke and mirrors, with Tretton trying to stay vague and give PR talk about the PlayStation 3's success with this new price cut. Now, the next step is fairly obvious: what did the fans have to say? 

One thing I found particularly interesting was a poll going on in the CheapAssGamer forums. The poll asked if CAGers would be willing to pay for a $500 PS3. The result? About 25% said they'd be willing to do so. I don't know if this includes those who already own a PS3, but if not, then it shows some positive signs for the system.

If you take a look at the comments on the PlayStation.Blog post, I found it interesting the criticism of overshadowing the price cut with the announcement of the 80GB model. This is something I'll get into later,

What's more, Amazon gave us even more uplifting signs for the system. As Jim mentioned, the PS3 sales have gone up 700% since the price cut was announced. Also, as you can see below, the PS3 has jumped quite a bit in the Amazon sales rankings (however much that means to you is debatable):

Finally, there's the reaction from the competition -- namely, Microsoft. As of yet, there's been no comment from Major Nelson (although pay attention to the podcast, I'm sure he'll say something there). We've heard word of the 360 getting a price drop of it's own, due to the fact that the 65nm chips will soon be making their way into the consoles.

IGN also had some words from an unnamed Microsoft representative:

"We're not surprised by Sony's reaction to the market," a Microsoft representative told us. "We'll see if it makes a difference. It's interesting to note that they've significantly dropped their price in the first eight months while Xbox 360 has continued to sell well at our launch price for more than a year and a half. We're right where we want to be right now -- it's all about choice and bringing the best games and entertainment to homes around the world."

So, now that we've got all this information under our belts (and it really is quite a bit), let me dive into what I think this all means for Sony.

Essentially, this is a gigantic boon for Sony. Already there's been an increase in sales for the PS3, and this is only going to shoot up if there are strong PS3-exclusive games announced at E3. Here's my situation, which I think might mirror some other peoples' positions: right now, I only own a Wii. I've been saving up for an Xbox 360 Elite, which would come in at $479. Now, Sony has suddenly lowered the 60GB PS3, which I've considered to be plenty, to $499, a mere $20 above the 360. Now, it suddenly becomes a much more attractive offer. I know I want to buy Metal Gear Solid 4 and Final Fantasy XIII for the PS3, and if there's anything that gets me excited at E3, then I won't mind putting down the money for this console.

Sony really needs to push this price point, since it's so close to that of the Elite. If anything, they should let the higher 80GB PS3 sit off to the side as reserved for those who want to go into heavy downloading of movies and digital content, much like MS is doing with the Elite.

Does the announcement of the 80GB PS3 overshadow the price cut? I certainly don't think so. It's not like the Xbox 360 Elite is the only version of the console worth buying, and Microsoft realizes this. Sony needs to create more of a gap between the two systems, though. I really don't think that upgrading the HD by 20GB and including Motorstorm justifies a $100 increase. Microsoft increased the HD by 100GB and gave us HDMI ports for $80. Sony, you need to step up your game on this one. Even just some PSN points thrown in there would make it a little less painful.

I'm going to hold my thoughts on any reactions from Microsoft, because their E3 announcements will certainly shift the landscape some. At this point, though, I don't think a price cut from them will shift the market drastically. They've gotten gamers willing to spend just about $500 for the Elite, and so they've just opened the floodgate for Sony.

Sony just needs to take the aggressive and flex its muscles. In the N'Gai Croal interview, Tretton mentions that Sony has a strong first-party studio -- and they need to exploit that more. Some great games have come out of SCEA's development teams (Legend of Dragoon is a personal favorite), and if they unveil some new titles at E3, or give us some strong leads later on in the summer, it'll turn into more sales of the conosle.

So, is this going to turn things around for Sony?


Next page: More PS3 stories




ZombieLifeTaker's Avatar
ZombieLifeTaker at 07/09/2007 22:23
well well well, it looks like the big dogs back in the game...for know.
ZombieLifeTaker's Avatar
ZombieLifeTaker at 07/09/2007 22:26
*for now

damn this crappy keyboard!
Civnerd's Avatar
Civnerd at 07/09/2007 22:40
Wow so now it's just an arm and a leg! My other leg thanks you!
Trevor McGee's Avatar
Trevor McGee at 07/09/2007 22:52
Still not even close to being worth buying in my opinion.
mrsamuel's Avatar
mrsamuel at 07/09/2007 22:55
Software, software, software.
iliketuna's Avatar
iliketuna at 07/09/2007 22:56
hearing all these sony marketing guys try to bs their way out of stuff is real damn funny. its like watching fox news or something
drewt003's Avatar
drewt003 at 07/09/2007 23:09
I own both a 360 and a ps3. I think a lot of you people that don't believe there are amazing exclusives coming to the ps3 are either slightly slow or living under a freaking rock. To me the PS3 at even $599 is a much better value than the 360 at $399. Its all about the games and sony knows how to deliver unique and fresh experience. Microsoft jumps on and delivers bandwagon games over and over again. I bought a 360 for gears and am hoping bioware can pull a justification out of my expensive purchase.
donkeykong's Avatar
donkeykong at 07/09/2007 23:13
Still too expensive for me... but I was thinking about getting a 360 eventually. Now I'll have to see which games are around for each system when the time comes.
dormido's Avatar
dormido at 07/09/2007 23:22
Not to brag or anything, but I've got all three systems; bought at launch price; and I think they were all justified in their pricing. However, if I could do it all over again, I would have skipped out on the 360 since all it's been doing is playing SOTN and collecting dust. Out of all three systems, my Wii has been getting the most playtime.
Milofo's Avatar
Milofo at 07/09/2007 23:34
I don't own either a 360 or a PS3 but the PS3 seems to be more enticing to me. The reason is most of the game library for the 360 is FPS and/or are on PC where the PS3 seems to have more variety. Don't get me wrong I would like to get some of the games on the 360 right now but in the long run I feel like I can get a more complete gaming experience with the PS3.
Zoex's Avatar
Zoex at 07/09/2007 23:57
This is it, Sony will fall hard if they don't get off their back.

I always liked the pure game companies far more than the giant corperate company with money to throw around. I kinda feel like Sony is driving for the games more than the tech now, and feeling the pain of the transition.
iliketuna's Avatar
iliketuna at 07/10/2007 00:12
how does the ps3 offer more value @ $499 than the elite @ $479 when elite has better exclusives, xbox live, and the superior versions of multiplatform games? as a gaming system the ps3 is just potential, just like duke nukem forever. who knows if that potential is ever going to fulfill itself.

unless you're talking about blu-ray... then ya, the ps3 is a damned good value as a movie player.
JJ Rage's Avatar
JJ Rage at 07/10/2007 00:15
It really is too bad for Sony that MS will announce a price drop for all three 360 packages. Gonna be pretty hard to pimp that 80GB PS3 when the Elite is going to be $200 cheaper.
908peruvian's Avatar
908peruvian at 07/10/2007 00:27
@DREWT003
"I own both a 360 and a ps3. I think a lot of you people that don't believe there are amazing exclusives coming to the ps3 are either slightly slow or living under a freaking rock. To me the PS3 at even $599 is a much better value than the 360 at $399. ITS ALL ABOUT GAMES AND SONY KNOW HOW TO DELIVER A UNIQUE AND FRESH EXPERIENCE."

DO YOU HAVE THE SAME PS3 THE REST OF THE WORLD HAS?
OR
ARE YOU FROM THE FUTURE OR AN ALTERNATE TIMELINE?
Joe Burling's Avatar
Joe Burling at 07/10/2007 00:32
I've been hearing a lot of people compare the PS3 to the Elite as though that is Microsoft's only SKU. IMO, the 360 is still $100 cheaper with a much larger software library and Live (it's biggest selling point).

I think when the PS3 is able to produce great games (that are actually on store shelves), then the PS3 will be a great value. Considering it is suddenly $100 cheaper, it does seem like a great value. However, it's still a $500 console.

It's not that I'm hating on the PS3. I do see so much more potential in it than I did a few months ago, but it's still losing exclusives, expensive to program for and own, and doesn't do as much for the consumer in the now.

In spite of this, I do think a lot more people will be willing to buy one. Let's not forget that the 360 has been on the market for almost two years, with a $400 price tag, better games, and Live and still hasn't sold as well as one might think. Price is still a huge barrier of entry and the sales of the PS2 tell that story all too well.

Many people will probably buy a PS3 at the newly discounted price, but will most? I'm going to say "no". I feel the same way about the 360. Most people will buy a console once it hits that magic $200 price point. Until then, we are all early adopters in the grand scheme of this generation.
Joe Burling's Avatar
Joe Burling at 07/10/2007 00:36
SuMizzle, as for "better exclusives", that really remains to be seen.
cbebop007's Avatar
cbebop007 at 07/10/2007 00:56
For me, it's all about the games. And, for me, 360 has them right now...PS3 doesn't. I don't own a HDTV, and being a college student, probably won't for several years. Blu-Ray honestly doesn't mean shit to me right now.

I mean, this is what I, being a 360 and Wii owner, know I will play in the next few months:

Bioshock
Mass Effect
Halo 3
Rock Band
Guitar Hero III
GTA IV
Call of Duty 4
Metroid Prime 3
Super Smash Bros. Brawl
Super Mario Galaxy

On PS3, what would I want to play?

MGS4...probably
FFXIII...maybe
Drake...maybe
Killzone 2...maybe
Burnout Paradise (also on 360, though built for PS3, so I'll put it here)
Heavenly Sword...probably

Is all this worth putting $500 down? If any of those games don't look great...no

Even if all those games look great...no. I'd still be fine with my 360.

If the PS3 drops to $400 at least, MAYBE.

Sony, let's talk in another year.
Holyetheline's Avatar
Holyetheline at 07/10/2007 00:57
Xbox 360 will have assassins creed.

PS3 will have something neat?

I can't wait for SPORE.

Who cares about anything when Spore will be out sometime before I die... hopefully.
cbre88x's Avatar
cbre88x at 07/10/2007 01:12
It's good that Sony is finally getting good press. The price cut comes around the same time as they did the first PS2 price cut I think..

I still think it's too expensive, but I'll still buy it. Infact, I never bought my PS2 until 2002 or 3..about 2 or 3 years after launch.

I'm just curious as to how people think Live is a selling point though.. I wouldn't want to spend $50 dollars a year just to be online..I already pay my fuckin' ISP for DSL..why pay for a seperate online service? I just like Sony's position of making it free.

I guess I'm a tightass when it comes to financial decisions. As my father has always told me, "If it's free, then it's for me."

Wow that's a long post.
Joe Burling's Avatar
Joe Burling at 07/10/2007 01:18
2,500 Wendy's chicken nuggets, but I lost count after 71. I'm still not sure if there even is a number higher than 71.
Mxyzptlk's Avatar
Mxyzptlk at 07/10/2007 01:18
Price has always been the biggest issue with the PS3, and this is a step in the right direction for Sony. If they had gone even further and dropped it $200, MS would be shitting bricks right about now.
cbre88x's Avatar
cbre88x at 07/10/2007 01:24
@ cbebop007

Some of those titles you listed are also on the PS3. Here's a list of titles that are worth mentioning for the PS3 (so far). And they aren't all necessarily exclusives, but here's what I'd buy if I was a PS3 owner.

Resistance
Socom Confrontation
Lair
Warhawk
Heavenly Sword
Grand Theft Auto 4
Half-Life: Orange Box
Guitar Hero 3
Call of Duty 4
Assassin's Creed
Rock Band
Timeshift
Army of 2
Brother's In Arms: Hell's Highway
Kane and Lynch: Dead Men
Haze
Metal Gear Solid 4
Final Fantasy 13
Final Fantasy 13 Versus
Alone In the Dark
The Darkness
Unreal Tournament 3
Ninja Gaiden Sigma

Should I keep going. I think the software drought for the PS3 is close to an end. And I believe that a lot of the bad press and bad mouthing is because of company and service preference. And after E3, I bet that with everything that will be announced..the PS3 will be worth the buy..especially for those without an Xbox 360.
Joe Burling's Avatar
Joe Burling at 07/10/2007 01:29
cbre88x, you forgot about Uncharted. ;)
cbre88x's Avatar
cbre88x at 07/10/2007 01:30
That being said..the PS3 is still expensive right out of the box, but it isn't in the long run. Xbox 360 owners will pay more in long run by paying for a Live subscription.

Sony's "10 year product plan" doesn't seem so bad when you look at it from that perspective.
cbre88x's Avatar
cbre88x at 07/10/2007 01:34
@Buck

Shit, I totally forgot about that game. I remember reading about it in EGM a few months ago..

Zoex's Avatar
Zoex at 07/10/2007 01:41
Think of it like this. I may have made this observation before.

The Wii is the Japanese economy car, you can drive the shit out of it, have fun, and it will hardly ever give you problems, but that 4 cylinder engine won't win you any races.

The 360 is the American Muscle Car, built in some guys garage by some teenagers and a blast to drive, but always needs work because somthing is always breaking, and lets not even touch on gas mileage

And the PS3 is a god damn semi-truck. Big, expensive, and slow to take off. But when (if) it does take off, it can crush anything in its way.
cbre88x's Avatar
cbre88x at 07/10/2007 01:50
Niiice
Mister Disco's Avatar
Mister Disco at 07/10/2007 02:11
Analogies and fanboyism aside, I personally can't justify paying for a PS3. I really want the PS3 to be a good machine. I want it to entice me to purchase it. Even though I really want to like it, I just can't bring myself to shell out the cash for one, at any price. I have every current gaming system except for the PS3, and a decent gaming PC. I have enough games here that, if I never bought a PS3, I might shed a tear or two for MGS4 or FFXIII (or even LittleBigPlanet), but I'd be fine in the long run, much like I was fine without owning an original Xbox.

The PS3 will be a contender. It will do well... eventually. But personally, as a gamer, it is far on the backburner, and only after futher price drops and incentives will I consider it worth my dollars, particularly considering my cup is already overfull.
cbre88x's Avatar
cbre88x at 07/10/2007 02:22
Like I said..it depends on what your preferences are and if you already own an Xbox 360 or a gaming PC.
ceark's Avatar
ceark at 07/10/2007 02:42
you know, I just noticed most of the people who bitch about the ps3, or xbox, or wii (from any direction really), don't own the opposing console. If your working at some disposable job not making enough to own all the consoles that's cool (I've been there), but it just seems odd that so many people have such heated, stubborn, overly biased opinions on something they don't own and thus haven't truely had enough face time with it to really "review" how good it is. That even goes for alot of the blog reviewers (not just dtoid, but alot of gaming blogs). I don't know why that doesn't seem bizarre to anyone.

Honestly, I own all the consoles. They're all good consoles, they all have great stuff coming to them, they're all worth buying. (well, my 360 is currently bricked, but the games are good. I look forward to the 65 nms cause I think those will be much more reliable).

All things aside, I think this is good news for the PS3. It's a very good reliable console, easily the one best built console I've owned thus far (with nearly the durability of the n64, and that thing was friggen tough). And honestly, the PS3 comes with all the parts right out of the box and doesn't nickel/dime you for add ons. It's a good system and I don't regret buying it.
synce's Avatar
synce at 07/10/2007 02:46
I have a PS3 and my best advice to everyone's who's considering buying one is WAIT. So far it's been nothing but a huge disappointment. The only game I'm enjoying on it is Ninja Gaiden Sigma, even if I've beaten it a dozen times on the original Xbox as Ninja Gaiden Black. Unless you're really into HD movies, wait another year or so. If you can't wait and care more about games than movies, buy a 360 instead. Online is infinitely better, there's a much bigger choice of exclusive games, and a lot of them are actually good (Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Gears of War, DOA4, etc etc). The only exclusive PS3 games I'm looking forward to in the next few years are Heavenly Sword and MGS4. Otherwise it's a shitty console, honestly. I'm reminded of my Gamecube purchase.
schnodder's Avatar
schnodder at 07/10/2007 03:00
ps2 had a pric drop after 8 months .. so it's nothing new from sony.
Brock_Dainjer's Avatar
Brock_Dainjer at 07/10/2007 04:14
Also as an owner of all three consoles, I'd have to say wait a year or so for the PS3. The PSN's poor design and useflessness completely justifies spending 50 bucks ever 365 days for the convenience and awesomeness that is Live. The only reason that we got a PS3 was to bask in high-def "Rescue Me." I also live with two other guys who were on-board with setting up the sickest entertainment center we could, so we've got the TV and surround sound to make good use of it. Out of all the consoles in our apartment, we have 1 rarely used Wii, 1 PS3, and 3 360's. Playing Gears or Rainbow co-op is sick, and is incredibly easy to do on the 360. Live is clearly the most next-gen thing about the 360, and is much better than anything that PS3 has going for it. Especially with their magically dissappeary exlusives. Being a impartial owner of all 3, I can't recommend buying a PS3 to a casual or even hardcore gamer, unless that person has a disposable income.
some_dude's Avatar
some_dude at 07/10/2007 04:53
I think the price drop will allow the PS3 to get a bunch of fence sitters over the next couple of months but thats about it. I fully expect the 360 to drop at least $50 in the next few days. If M$ is smart the 2nd gen 360 elite will add integrated wifi and sell for $400. If M$ adds the wifi the only thing Sony has in the box that the 360 doesn't is Blu-ray (yes I'm aware of the card reader, but who needs a card reader on a console that can pull stuff directly off your computer?). It will be interesting to see what Sony and M$ announce at E3. Overall I think PS3 needs to drop another $100 before it will really start to close the gap with the 360, but it will always be $100 more if M$ is smart.
xenon's Avatar
xenon at 07/10/2007 05:53
As an overpriced-stuff-hater, I have to point out the following. After this move, you can have a 60GB HD PS3 for 500$ or an 80GB HD PS3 for 600$. 600$-500$=100$. 100$ is the price of a standard 160GB 2.5" hard disk on Newegg. What kind of game are we playing? Screw your customer? Well, I say screw yourself.
And don't try to weigh in the bundled Motorstorm in the equation at more than 10$. Yes, I saw you trying. ;)

Note: The same is obviously true for Microsoft with their Core/Pro/Elite bullshit).
brainderailment's Avatar
brainderailment at 07/10/2007 06:46
wow, this is extreme to the max. Freestyle edition.
Stringbean's Avatar
Stringbean at 07/10/2007 07:07
Why is it when people list the games that are coming out for the PS3 they have to mention games that are already out for the 360, Wii, or the computer? If you guys haven't noticed, the PS3 is having a lot of repeat releases for other systems and it is still more expensive. Couple that with the fact that it is losing a number of its exclusive titles makes any price that is above the 360 kind of steep. I have grown up on Final Fantasy and Metal Gear Solid like the rest of you, but I am not willing to pay $500 American, I am Canadian so it is more, for two titles. I would end up waiting until the system is cheaper and playing those games later. and, btw, I am much more interested in Metal Gear that FFXIII, XII just wasn't worth it.
whackmushrooms's Avatar
whackmushrooms at 07/10/2007 07:26
nice recap .. really really nice (especially for someone who owns a Wii, which blows my mind that you dont own all the systems .. minimum wage must suck)

this weeks numbers will look like launch numbers x 1000 because of all of the stock of the ps3 available (laugh now suckers), i think alot of people out there sat on getting a ps3 because of the price not the games that are not out yet or tentative exclusives, that is not how the mass market thinks ... they know msg4 and ff13 are coming out on the ps3 .. for most everything else is just a bonus.

however if things cool down significantly after the next 2 weeks i would think twice about buying sony stock, but IMO i really think this move is sony's bounce back into the race hardcore .. if they shift less than 1 million units before the end of the month i would be very surprised, but most importantly because its summertime every ps3 sold = a 360 not sold in the short term and thats how races are won.
fetusmilk's Avatar
fetusmilk at 07/10/2007 08:21
one thing i never seemed to like about my 360 is that i cant download while im playing a game. im not to impressed with live. it does all the same as ps3 network but a little less. it has multiplayer online (so can ps3)or talk to people(so can ps3) download demos(so can ps3) arcade(also on ps3) download movies(why would you want to? cause your dvd player is broken? worthless feature) and no browser(ps3 has one, come on psp has one). why do pepole think live is so good? i know its easy to have people join games or what not. but its nothing special.
xenon's Avatar
xenon at 07/10/2007 08:43
"download movies(why would you want to? cause your dvd player is broken? worthless feature)"

It's not that you want to. It's that they want you to. Sony Pictures - BluRay stuffed down your throat - media convergence - Playstation as a "hub"... That sort of stuff.

As far as I'm concerned, I would like a unified console system that only plays its games. I have a PC to do everything else (and I guess I'm not the only one), I don't need my console to try to clumsily replicate that.

Xbox Live is good. It's just that it should be the norm, but people have adapted to low standards and see it as a divine gift (not quite a gift, I know).
BluDesign's Avatar
BluDesign at 07/10/2007 09:45
@fetusmilk

Multiplayer is supported by MS, not the developer. I'm sure you've seen or heard of games that get shelved after 4-5 years of being around because the developer wants you to play their new game. Imagine what would happen if Blizzard shut down Battle.net servers to get people to buy WoW 2. That would result in faces getting curb stomped.

If you let a free publisher run network exist, you run into that potential issue. Otherwise your options are to let the publisher charge for game access (as was the case on some of the PS2 online games) or strip out online (Like Sega and VF5).

And who the hell needs a browser on their TV that badly? I only got the one on my Wii because it was free. I never use the damn thing because it's faster and easier for me to surf the internet on my computer.

As for watching streaming video, trust me, if you knew how to rip and dump your DVD collection to a 300 GB HDD and make it accessible over a network to your game console, you'd do it. Because, there's no greater joy in being able to switch between killing zombies in a mall, and then 30 seconds later, being able to watch Dawn of the Dead, all without having to get off your fat ass to change discs.

With my 360, I have a full media server streaming HD resolution content from my iMac onto my TV. It's quite exquisite. As for downloading, I don't like to rent anyway. I'd be interested to hear your complaints about this feature after Sony announces their own media download service this week.
robotplague's Avatar
robotplague at 07/10/2007 10:08
I purchased a pretty nice HDTV last year in November. I already own a Wii and I just recently got a 360. The 360 has a pretty generous library that I don't have enough time to enjoy as is. The PS3 didn't really interest me at first. The only thing (as of now) keeping me interested in getting a PS3 is blu-ray winning the next gen format war. I want to see HD content on my tv, I don't own a blu-ray or hd dvd player. So if I'm going to go out and get something, it might as well be a PS3, which will no doubt get some great games eventually. Even with Metal Gear Solid and the next Final Fantasy I still won't get one. It's going to take another price cut or a handful of titles I can't live without before I purchase one. Or until blu-ray movies are as cheap as DVDs.
deanhatescoffee's Avatar
deanhatescoffee at 07/10/2007 10:16
My dad bought us a 3DO back in 1995. The original MSRP for that lovely piece of machinery was $700, but we got it "on sale" for $500. I thought it was the bee's knees back then but, looking back, it only had 2 great games - Twisted and The Incredible Machine. That's it. It was both ahead and behind its time, as it did have a CD-ROM, expansion slots, and a truly unique controller setup*, but the 3DO flopped because the "early adopters" never showed up and moved in favor of the PS1.

Here's hoping another console doesn't share the 3DO's fate.

It seems as though this generation's early adopters have already bought their PS3s. A $500 price point for the PS3 absolutely makes it more attractive, but that doesn't mean it's worth the price yet to the average gamer.

*There was only one controller port on the console, while extra controllers plugged into the controller ahead of it. Very strange indeed.
owenkun's Avatar
owenkun at 07/10/2007 10:45
I wonder if I could take my PS3 back for a refund then re-buy it for the new price.

Though I know price cuts are always a possibility for general market items, generally they come in $20 to $40 at a time, not a full $100 off.

As a Sony supporter (and supporter of Microsoft and Nintendo, I own all three consoles), I have to admit that such a drastic reduction in price really hurts.
owenkun's Avatar
owenkun at 07/10/2007 10:46
@deanhatescoffee:
Man, daisy chaining controllers! Thanks for the trip down memory lane. :)
Hagar the Horrible's Avatar
Hagar the Horrible at 07/10/2007 11:37
for me playstaion is still playing on brand and undying commitment from PS2 fans. The potential is great for the PSŁ with exclusives like MGS4 and FFXIII. Thats the future but what about now...? What can I play to justify the outlay?

To me, at the moment very little, and less when you consider that my gaming needs are already being met by games that are here now; real not potential. As this situation goes on the relevancy of the PS3 becomes less and less.

There are some games that do appeal to me and they "may" be Sony exclusive but for those few gems the cost is still to high. They will remain games that I respect, but maybe just will not get to own.
Hagar the Horrible's Avatar
Hagar the Horrible at 07/10/2007 11:37
for me playstaion is still playing on brand and undying commitment from PS2 fans. The potential is great for the PSŁ with exclusives like MGS4 and FFXIII. Thats the future but what about now...? What can I play to justify the outlay?

To me, at the moment very little, and less when you consider that my gaming needs are already being met by games that are here now; real not potential. As this situation goes on the relevancy of the PS3 becomes less and less.

There are some games that do appeal to me and they "may" be Sony exclusive but for those few gems the cost is still to high. They will remain games that I respect, but maybe just will not get to own.
Hagar the Horrible's Avatar
Hagar the Horrible at 07/10/2007 11:38
sorry the PSŁ was a mistake... damn no edit :(
prev next 50 comments

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39770 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

How Pokemon Red is blatantly better than Pokemon Blue











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006