So, we reviewed Hydrophobia this past week. You may or may not have heard what happened in the fallout of certain Hydrophobia reviews, and the behavior of the game's developer, Dark Energy Digital. You can read an excellent article on the debacle here. Needless to say, the situation hasn't been pretty.
This week's Jimquisition takes on developers who are doing injury to their industry by acting like brats about review scores, and the recent accusations of reviewers not playing games "properly." It's a pretty emotive rant, so put on your seatbelt and prepare for a bumpy ride.
Also, if you don't like this video, give me your phone number so I can call you up and tell you how to watch it correctly.
Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize.
Likes
PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3
Meet the rest of the team
| BBcode help |
| [b]Bold text[/b] |
Bold text |
| [i]Italic text[/i] |
Italic text |
| [url]http://www.dtoid.com/[/url] |
http://www.dtoid.com |
| [url=http://www.dtoid.com/]Web link[/url] |
Web link |
| [img]http://www.example.com/robot.jpg[/img] |
 |
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
Comment with Facebook
Click connect and comment instantly!
|
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds
|
162 comments | showing # 1 to 50
|
Comment with Facebook
Click connect and comment instantly!
|
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds
|
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!
loved it Jim
bwahahaha
I seriously cannot wrap my head around it. Logic has been seriously defied here o_o;
also I wonder how many "reviewers" get paid to give "10s". (quotations for sarcasm)
No. You're criticizing my professional opinion, basically calling me stupid, and then asking me to give your manuscript another chance? Ridiculous.
Bravo, Jim. I'm with you 100%.
That being said, you're right to rant. It's fucking demented.
Anyway, that was another great Jimquistion. :D
I got about a minute in and it crashed my flash plugin, reloaded, other videos work fine, but this one won't play?
I think I'm trying to watch it wrong.
It could be over the tone of the review? I haven't seen the IGN or gamespot reviews but the gametrailers one seemed positive overall and a little nitpicky, I'm usually able to guess the score with a .1 - .2 margin of error before the video ends but I was way off on theirs. Guess it was less positive than I thought.
The graphics were on par with an Xbox original title, the story was trying way too hard to be interesting and politically oriented, the voices were worse than a localized JRPG title, and the whole water bit just felt forced and really didn't even look that impressive. Blood Wake on the original Xbox showcased an almost exact replica of Hydro's water physics.
I've disagreed with Jim reviews many times, but this one was spot on in every regard. It pains me to see devs turn into whiny little children the minute people don't like their game. When the primary selling point of your game is a water-based physics engine, you know your game is lacking in the most important part, gameplay.
Mind you like I said I take reviews with a grain of salt because I realize that their take on the game might not necessarily be my own...... but to call and demand a re review.... that's just sad.
As much as I love Shaffer -but can care less about Dark Energy Digital- that's pure and utter crap that implies that the developer didn't think over every possible way to play their games, and when people, reviewers in this case, play it that abstract way (which ends up being the logical way, since it seems many people are playing it that way?) they get all up in arms and throw a fit...
It's retarded bordering on lazy..
The livestreamers comment at the end was "what a POS" if you'd like to call him I can see about getting a hold of his number.
I'll certainly agree that the developer is out of line, but I don't believe "experience" as a gamer precludes them from fucking up or missing something the developer communicated within the game quite clearly.
Good example would be PN03 on Gamecube. That game got raked over the coals by reviewers and it explained everything, the controls were spot-on and I totally had a blast with the gameplay and enjoyed the rich visuals.
Yet it was almost universally panned. I saw more than one reviewer see some serious forum backlash and it wasn't about the score, it was about the misinformation. It was like they weren't even playing the same game the reviewer did.
A reviewer is responsible just as much for the facts as he is for his opinion when reviewing a game. You might not owe a developer the scores they wish to see, but you do owe your readers the closest portrayal of the truth you can provide.
It also boggles the mind. Did THEY even playtest the game? Anyone can tell that game is shit.