Most people didn't ask why "Steve Jobs" is relevant to gaming, or why an iPad or iPhone is relative to gaming, but why a FILM about Steve Jobs was relative to gaming.
As far as iOS, it is not a platform that demands respect from everyone. The fact that you have to demand respect on behalf of the platform proves this. This is the funniest, and most ironic part of all the biggest Apple fans. Their core mission is to convince everyone else to respect the brand, and the device. You see this in every social/mobile games article.
Why do you have to go so far out of your way to bludgeon us over the head and demand our respect? If the device was so amazing, don't you think we would already respect it? The truth is that there are countless reasons why many gamers don't respect it as far as they can throw it, and they're all ignored in this video. The vast majority of the games are complete shit, with a shovelware ratio that makes the Wii's library look like the Criterion Collection. There are very, very few deep games. The controls suck. I could go on, but the reality is, not everyone agrees with you on this one Jim! Calling them all stupid doesn't change the fact that there are dozens upon dozens of legitimate complaints with the platform, and the games. Keep ignoring them if you're happy with it, but don't act like we're bumbling fools who have no point!
Not even relating this to the video (which for some reason won't start) or the reasons why he's related to video games currently (maybe), but he was employed by Atari briefly in 1974 and almost got fired because he didn't work well with others. Atari even paid for him to go to India.
I think I just solved the "Seven Degree's Of Steve Jobs in one turn.
Your video though has shown me quite a few fun looking titles that I would love to play. The only thing is I would never buy an iphone because new versions are released o quickly that I would feel ripped off..
I am very excited for the new PS Vita however, and I have heard that it may have the option of playing similar style app/games like the ones on iOS devices. I am the type of gamer that really needs buttons and analog sticks so the vita looks great in that regard. Now I am hoping I can play some of these titles on it as well as big title games.
Thanks Jim
If there were news about a movie being made about Satoru Iwata after he died, would you expect a gaming news site to comment on it? Yes you would. So why not Jobs?
Snake was being played on Nokia phones before Apple ever had a phone out. Should blogs have posted about the birth of Stephen Elop's triplets?
Ralph Baer is often credited as the man who invented the video game concept and medium yet when he was inducted into the National Inventors Hall Of Fame, not a single video game blog posted about it.
Steve Jobs was the founder and CEO of a very large company, a very large company which has many divisions. Inside one of these divisions, a group of people - which did not include Jobs - came up with a device. The same or another group of people in the same or very possibly another division had the idea to put games on this device, in much the same way simple games had been put on mobile phones in the past; not a new idea by any stretch. Other video game developers and publishers noted the potential money to be made and together, with a section of the aforementioned large company, gaming on iOS was born.
Steve Jobs' input into the creation and success of gaming on iOS extended, at most, to looking over a few design propositions, saying "OK" and signing off on them, most likely alongside several other big wigs in a board meeting.
I do not debate for one second Apple's relevance to the gaming industry. But that's the key there: Apple. The company. Thousands and thousands of people. The iPhone, iPad, iPod, iPod Touch and gaming on iOS was not invented or pioneered by one man. To say Steve Jobs created gaming on iOS and grew it into the monster it's become would be akin to claiming that Bill Gates came up with the idea of playing games on a PC.
By all means, gaming sites should report on iOS gaming in all its forms. But reporting on Steve Jobs' death was, in all cases without exception, nothing more than a pathetic and insulting grab for hits; getting in on the gold rush before the corpse gets cold.
The more you know.
What's funny is that the same people that defended the wii from criticism are now criticizing iOS for similar things. And pc gamers criticized console controls. Then console gamers criticize touch controls.
Two sentences on a game website mean shit to Jobs anyways.
What are you talking about? I completely agree with the 360's pricing model of charging 5 dollars for a virtual pair of avatar pants.
As far as Steve Jobs dying, I agree that the media reaction was way the hell over the top. I didn't personally feel that Destructoid contributed much to that, but maybe I just wasn't paying that close of attention.
When that day comes, I'll be a happy iOS gamer. In the meantime, I'm not buying anything and will look longingly at the Xperia Play.
The frickin' Xperia Play!
It would be one thing if iPhone controls were just "limited". But they also "don't always work" and have you "covering the screen with your thumbs". I just can't stand it.
The games described as "deep" by the fans also usually fall short of that descriptor. It takes more than grindy RPG elements to have gameplay depth. Yes, I'm looking at you, Infinity Blade.
"Everyone hyperventilating, repeat after me: I am not defined by the products I buy. My computer is not a part of my identity. My computer is a tool. And like all tools, it's only useful if I make it useful. A brand is not a lifestyle. I don't owe gratitude to a billionaire I helped create. Steve Jobs was a business man who charged exhorbitantly for his products. He didn't do us any favors. He didn't make us. We made him."
Iwata is directly related to videogames. If a film were made about him, it would be about videogames as much as it would be about him. There is an absolute direct link.
A film about Steve Jobs won't be about videogames. Videogames are not why he's famous, not by a long shot. He was the CEO of a company that created operating systems and designed hardware, which other people used as a platform for games.
What people are saying is that Apple news in general is no more relevant to gaming in a specific context than general news about Microsoft or Sony would be.
Don't worry, it won't take over the consoles, the same fear was for TV killing radio and cinema, Internet killing TV, Gary Busey killing Internet. There's room for everybody.
Except Rovio. Screw those guys.
Well... I don't believe in God, cause he doesn't exist, but you're still awesome!
Then I can go home and play a real game on a controller.
There has been one new iPhone model per year, with most software support going back at least two generations. Compare that to Android, where at least a dozen new Android phones are released each month, the majority of which are deprecated from Android OS updates after a few months.
Choose the mobile gaming platform you want; it won't affect me (unlike most DTOID commenters, who take alternate platform choice as an affront to their existence!). But stick to justifiable reasons.
So yes, iOS is a major player in the gaming market, but apple almost stumbled onto that, it was the community that made it that way. Not apple, not Jobs.
Still, Street Fighter IV Volt is amazing and Infinity Blade is one of the best games of last year. Those are two reasons to have an iPad, aside from all of the integrated features.
Apple has become a giant in gaming, but people just won't take them seriously. Some developers are taking great interest in the iPhone/Touch and making quality games on them.
Like really, I'm just going to throw it out there...
Angry Birds is fucking awesome. And it's evidence, along with games like Infinity Blade, that iOS is capable of having games that rival those on the PSP, 3DS, and even on occasion, console games.
And with the whole Steve Jobs thing, he was a major part in Apple, and with that, he is relevant. Would people complain when/if people post things when Jack Tramiel, the founder of Commodore dies? No, they'll be okay with that.
I honestly don't know where I'm going with this.
Stop complaining. It's not very nice. It's bad, and bad is bad. You don't want to be bad, do you?
How is that trolling, the 3DS currently has no good (take note) original games, the psp is always kind of dry and if you keep up with releases than you don't have much to play on it, so all in all, there was no trolling in that comment.
My issue comes with the concept that these are surprisingly deep and quality games for cheap and that is true, for the price, they are surprising. But I'm sure a $25 recliner that manages to hold my weight is an amazing product as well. It doesn't mean it can compete with the quality of comfort I would find from a $400 recliner. The price of software is irrelevant to the quality of software and if all you're bringing me is "pretty good for a dollar" then I step away slowly. That's the crux of the entire argument, really. And before you claim me a hypocrit, please keep in mind I am constantly playing grumy grandpa on classic games too.
I really hope this changes in the future I mean I see no technical reason why a pc game or console game can't be a 1$ download.
yes you have sony microsoft and nintendo making it impossible to set these low prices but that doesnt mean they cant change or like I said earlier steam doesnt even have a minimum price or minimum amount of profit on the game so games can easily be made the 1$ of many smartphone games there. /rant out.
I can't fucking wait until these publishers wonder where the fuck all the good devs are. Fucking picks need to change.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

















follow