Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home console war updates

The inside story on the PS3's game installations

5:26 PM on 04.02.2008, Samit Sarkar 45 comments

The inside story on the PS3's game installations photo
     console war

Mandatory installations of certain PlayStation 3 games (e.g., Devil May Cry 4, Hot Shots Golf: Out of Bounds) have become a point of contention among gamers. We’ve certainly seen that happen here on Destructoid in a few c-blogs where things got heated at times. The typical explanation that gamers have been given is the PS3’s 2x Blu-ray drive, which has a much slower maximum read speed than the 12x DVD drive in the 360 (72 Mbps vs. 126.6 Mbps).

Blame it on Blu-ray, right? Well, not entirely — according to some research done by Patrick Klepek over at the MTV Multiplayer blog. Apparently, Capcom wasn’t expecting the required 5 GB installation in Devil May Cry 4 to become as big of an issue as it did. (They’re going to consider that reaction in the future.) When he pressed Capcom, Sony, and Ubisoft for more details, he didn’t get much. But he posted what little he obtained, and you can check it out (along with my analysis/commentary/whining) after the jump.

[Editor’s note: Just so you know what you’re getting into, I own a PS3 and I do not have a 360.]

[via MTV Multiplayer]

Everything comes back to the developer putting resources into Blu-ray’s “unique characteristics”. But Blu-ray and DVD are fundamentally different technologies in the way that their respective discs are read by their drives, as Klepek tells us:

The issue arises from differences in the reading techniques of DVD and Blu-ray. By nature, the outer and inner parts of a disc move at different speeds while a disc is spinning, regardless of format (CD, DVD, Blu-ray, HD-DVD, etc.). While DVD drives can read data at those differing speeds, Blu-ray reads at one speed. Combine that with the extremely large size of Blu-ray discs, and simply dumping existing DVD data onto a Blu-ray disc will inevitably result in longer load times.

There are a few different solutions that developers are using. For example, Bethesda Softworks is simply putting the same data in multiple locations on the Blu-ray Disc for Fallout 3. That gives the drive more areas in which to find the same data, of course. Other devs are improving streaming systems. I still think installations should be optional, like in Epic’s Unreal Tournament III, so storage-strapped gamers can still play without having to delete other stuff off of their hard drives.

PS3 HDD

But as far as I’m concerned, just because the 360 has a much larger install base than the PS3, developers shouldn’t be “picking” one platform over the other. Some of these installations spring out of the fact that developers of multiplatform games optimize those games for the DVD medium, and then simply plop the data onto a Blu-ray Disc. And as Klepek mentioned above, that’s a problem.

However, don’t give up because you have to actually put some work into optimizing code for the PS3 and Blu-ray. I get the feeling that that’s what developers are doing because it’s cost-effective (i.e., the PS3 version isn’t worth the effort because they’ll make enough money by selling copies of the 360 version). That’s the kind of stuff that I find very irksome.

And while I’m bitching, it’s also unfair for PS3 owners to have to suffer through shoddy, second-rate ports of games that look and play better on the 360. I mean, here are five AAA titles that are essentially identical on both platforms (in terms of the gameplay experience): Guitar Hero III, Call of Duty 4, Rock Band, Burnout Paradise, and Devil May Cry 4. If Neversoft, Infinity Ward, Harmonix, Criterion, and Capcom, respectively, could pull it off for those games — then why can’t EA Tiburon, for example, ensure that Madden runs as well on the PS3 as it does on the 360? That’s what engenders a vicious cycle:

1) Many multiplatform games look and play better on the 360 than on the PS3.
2) People would rather buy a 360 than a PS3 in order to try and ensure that they’ll get the best gaming experience for multiplatform games.
3) The PS3 continues to have a significantly lower install base than the 360.
4) Developers aren’t willing to put the time/money/effort into making games look and play as well on the PS3 as they do on the 360.
5) Repeat steps 1-4 ad infinitum, or until the developers actually man up and give it their all.

DMC 4: PS3/360 comparison shot

Of course, I understand that I’m being very idealistic here. At the end of the day, videogames are still business, so developers and publishers are going to do what makes the most fiscal sense. I mean, during the last console generation, no one gave a damn that Xbox games looked much better than PS2 games; that was expected because the Xbox was simply a more graphically advanced machine. The differences between Sony’s and Microsoft’s gaming systems are much more subtle this time around, so why is it so damn hard for the gaming experience to be similar on both platforms?

As a final note, I beg of you: please don’t let this descend into fanboyism. That’s exactly what happened in the comment thread of Klepek’s original post. While I’m not naïve enough to think that Dtoiders are above such sophomoric shenanigans, I’d like to think that we could make it happen with some effort. In fact, here’s my favorite comment from the Multiplayer blog thread:

Matt says:
April 1st, 2008 at 4:43 pm

All this whining.
Its funny that each of you (myself included) spend about 20-30 minutes a day reading articles, and occasionally writing responses to them.

I’m glad my DMC4 loads like butter, and I’m glad I spent the 20-30 minutes it took to install pleasuring my girlfriend so she wouldn’t bother me for the next few hours while I played.

You’d think that his words would’ve shut people up, but they just kept going. I have faith that we’ll be able to keep things civil...right, guys?

 


Next page: More PS3 stories




Takeshi's Avatar
Takeshi at 04/02/2008 17:31
That was about keeping it civil.
MaxVest's Avatar
MaxVest at 04/02/2008 17:34
On a technical note, I believe that a 12x DVD drive transfers data at a theoretical maximum of 126.6 mbps; this would be attained when the drive is reading data at the very end of the disc. Data at the beginning of the disc, however, might be read at less half that rate. From what I understand, BD reads at a constant 72 mbps.

That's of course why DVD data is placed where it is, but it does seem like on a larger game, at some point the data transfer speed advantage would level out.
Darkknight37's Avatar
Darkknight37 at 04/02/2008 17:37
I'm starting to think the PS3 is a hydrogen car with no hydrogen stations w/ frozen coke venders. They said that it was definitely ahead of its time, and it appears so. These developer clowns who can do the Macarana while coding for other consoles, but somehow have seizures when it comes time to develop a PS3 game, seem to not be ready for the next gen.

It's not shocking that the exclusives are the games that can play with no problem, but multi-platform games need flux capacitors to even limp on a PS3.

And I just saw Captain Obvious fly by...
Magesx's Avatar
Magesx at 04/02/2008 17:38
Simply put, I don't mind, and I don't see how people can mind to the point of foaming mouths, etc.
Samit Sarkar's Avatar
Samit Sarkar at 04/02/2008 17:40
@MaxVest: Yes, that’s true. As Klepek said, the outer edge of any disc will spin faster than the inner portions — that’s just physics. Theoretical maximum = something that’s usually not achieved IRL.
Justice's Avatar
Justice at 04/02/2008 17:41
Interesting article dude, it's pretty bad that the PS3 get's treated this way (with games costing more on the system anyway), but you're right. It's just 30 minutes.

READ A DAMN BOOK.

I suggest Catcher in the Rye.
SoopaFly TNT's Avatar
SoopaFly TNT at 04/02/2008 17:41
Agree with Mage... not to big of a deal. I have heard worse.
Raven CDN's Avatar
Raven CDN at 04/02/2008 17:42
I don't mind installing games, although I also done not download movies or music to my consoles, thats what a computer and lots of hard drives are for, just stream that stuff or find a alternative solution.
MaxVest's Avatar
MaxVest at 04/02/2008 17:53
@Samit: I was a little confused when I read the original article a few days back. He says that BD reads at a constant speed, AND the disc spins at a constant speed? That can't work. Something's got to give.

Either the 2x standard is variable, representing a theoretical maximum (I don't think this is true because BD movies are supposed to have 54 gbps of bandwidth), OR the disc drive motor speed itself is variable, but I don't see a way both can coexist.
DrNutt's Avatar
DrNutt at 04/02/2008 17:57
I'm just foaming at the mouth fanboy blarrrrg.

Naw, just kidding. I honestly do get the impression that the PS3 was maybe a little ahead of its time when it came out, because of the Blu Ray and the price point, but for a gamer like me, it just means that I'll be picking up the PS3 a little later. I just hope by the time the PS3 comes out, these things don't seem like much of an issue.

One thing that disappoints me about this current generation of consoles is that there isn't that much difference between Sony's console and Microsoft's, which means that it's harder for me to justify spending almost a grand to own both systems. I'm honestly disappointed in myself that I'm probably going to drop 500 dollars for what initially will just be MGS4.
junkie's Avatar
junkie at 04/02/2008 18:17
If the difference between a 360 and a PS3 game is so little that you can basically just dump the code onto a PS3 system, then is there really a difference at all between the consoles (in terms of graphic and hardware capabilities)? That's the story I'd like to know about - if we could run games on either system if only the two companies would play nice with each other. This whole fanboy thing where one group thinks they're better than the other is really silly in light of this...
MaxVest's Avatar
MaxVest at 04/02/2008 18:19
OK, I'll answer my own questions and then stop threadjacking your post:
[i]BD-ROM/R/RE are currently read and written using Constant Linear Velocity (CLV). As is the case for CD and DVD, Constant Linear Velocity (CLV) maintains an even data transfer rate as the optical head of the recorder, drive or player reads or writes from the inner (ID) to outer diameter (OD) of the disc. At 1x, the rotational speed of a BD disc decreases from roughly 1957 RPM to 810 RPM (ID to OD) to maintain a constant linear velocity of 5.280 m/s (23.3 GB disc) or 4.917 m/s (25 GB disc).[i]
[http://www.emedialive.com/articles/readarticle.aspx?articleid=11404#iiib][Source][/url]
MaxVest's Avatar
MaxVest at 04/02/2008 18:20
my bbcodes... they fail so hard.
[Source]
king3vbo's Avatar
king3vbo at 04/02/2008 18:23
CIVILITIES FTW
EternalDeathSlayer's Avatar
EternalDeathSlayer at 04/02/2008 18:28
That picture is perfect, Samit. Perfect. I Lol'd, actually.
Drksan's Avatar
Drksan at 04/02/2008 19:00
I know what you mean DrNutt. Im in the same situation. Next time I just gonna stick with one console. Hopefully more games like Final Fantasy will go multi-platform by then.
Villanx1's Avatar
Villanx1 at 04/02/2008 19:12
The installs really don't affect me much, when i first got DMC4 i put it in pressed all the buttons to get it to the install and then watched the little reminder of whats happed so far and then switched my TV to satellite and watched Top Gear while it installed
Crunshii's Avatar
Crunshii at 04/02/2008 19:15
/mouthfoam ( (o )_________( O) )
mix's Avatar
mix at 04/02/2008 19:18
I don't remember people complaining about computer games taking of space.....hrm Oregon Trail takes up .5mb? Fuck that shit I hate life! I see where people come from but as of right now unless you bought a 20 gig you should be fine as there are not many (great, great) games that require a DL onto the HDD.

I plan on upgrading my HDD when the time comes so I can toss on movies and shows and what not. Plus I will be ready if more games require a DL. Once they actually make load times extra fast (ZOOOOM) I see no down side.
brainderailment's Avatar
brainderailment at 04/02/2008 19:29
Sony is the only one who can keep the console out of that vicious cycle. They -must- put out extremely good exclusive content in order to grow their install base so that developers don't shun the console. That said, keep 'em coming Sony.
zanpher717's Avatar
zanpher717 at 04/02/2008 19:30
This doesn't bother me at all. I have been playing PC games for years and have never had a kick ass system so install times took longer.

Just grab a joint out of the fridge and smoke a Pepsi, take a shit and you will be ready to rock.
BlackSunEmpire's Avatar
BlackSunEmpire at 04/02/2008 19:39
I think this thread could have been the end all of fanboyism. Its obvious from your article that one console is clearly better than the other and anyone who disagrees with me is a total fanboy loser. Too bad we shouldn't discuss it, I guess fanboyism will have to live on to fight another day.
brainderailment's Avatar
brainderailment at 04/02/2008 19:41
BTW, I opted to install UT3, and I'm glad I did, the load screens are freaking short. For that physical proof, I say bring the installs on.

Also, lots of oXBOX games had mandatory installs. You didn't see an install screen because they simply installed it while the opening sequence played and you weren't able to skip it. This is nothing new. SEE: DOOM3
jerrt's Avatar
jerrt at 04/02/2008 19:44
matt is a smart smart man. awesome post matt!! then after you get done with a few hours of play, it is time for round number two.
Volomon's Avatar
Volomon at 04/02/2008 20:42
Have to agree with the Article and I like the slow but surely eventual PS3 devoted direction that Detoid is taking.
bipolar beers's Avatar
bipolar beers at 04/02/2008 20:43
good post. im getting a larger harddrive for ps3 just because i got my warhawk and getting socom and grand turismo off the ps3 network so i really need more harddrive space for installing games. although this is a drawback for now soon it wont even be a problem.
Y0j1mb0's Avatar
Y0j1mb0 at 04/02/2008 22:00
Nice Write up Samit..as someone who's already upograded their Hard Drive already..It doesn't bother me the installs. The shoddy ports are a different matter.
flabzilla's Avatar
flabzilla at 04/02/2008 22:36
PS3 owners now know how GC owners felt :(
Professor Pew's Avatar
Professor Pew at 04/02/2008 23:18
I wouldn't mind the installs that much, even if installing a game on a console is heresy. It's more that you would have to choose between games at some point. If I finally go back to an unfinished game, it better not take 30 minutes before I start it!

And no, I don't feel like buying a bigger hdd when I get a PS3. Unless they create a HDD-loader, then the hdd can't be big enough ;)
Professor Pew's Avatar
Professor Pew at 04/02/2008 23:36
I wouldn't mind the installs that much, even if installing a game on a console is heresy. It's more that you would have to choose between games at some point. If I finally go back to an unfinished game, it better not take 30 minutes before I start it!

And no, I don't feel like buying a bigger hdd when I get a PS3. Unless they create a HDD-loader, then the hdd can't be big enough ;)
tkyy's Avatar
tkyy at 04/03/2008 00:09
It's pessimistic trying to justifying the time of installation by doing something else...

But I can live with installation times, as I can live with the PC happily.
HarassmentPanda's Avatar
HarassmentPanda at 04/03/2008 00:30
Honestly, stick a 1TB drive in there and just completely install all of the games on there. I'd love to turn on the system and choose my game from a list. Switching discs sucks.

Really great write up on this issue, Samit.
Necros's Avatar
Necros at 04/03/2008 02:55
I thought that we knew this already? I suppose some people just didn't realize that Blu-ray drives were slower.
hjd uk's Avatar
hjd uk at 04/03/2008 05:20
"it’s also unfair for PS3 owners to have to suffer through shoddy, second-rate ports of games that look and play better on the 360"

Its unfair that PS3 developers have to put up with difficult hardware, an underpowered graphics card and a shoddy API when all they want to do is get it done.


"1) Many multiplatform games look and play better on the 360 than on the PS3."

The XBox360 has a better graphics card. Fillrate ( essential for current-gen post processing and frame buffer effects) is better on the XB360

"2) People would rather buy a 360 than a PS3 in order to try and ensure that they’ll get the best gaming experience for multiplatform games."
Xboxes are cheaper, more numerous and have an excellent online service.

"3) The PS3 continues to have a significantly lower install base than the 360."
Lack of games, too expensive.

"4) Developers aren’t willing to put the time/money/effort into making games look and play as well on the PS3 as they do on the 360."
time = money, money = money, effort = stress&money. In the eyes of the PUBLISHER its not cost effective / Developers will end up with the same time and budget to make both versions, with the PS3 version taking much longer to write and optimise - hence comprimise.

"5) Repeat steps 1-4 ad infinitum, or until the developers actually man up and give it their all."
If its expensive, time consuming and unprofitible why should the PUBLISHERS bother paying for PS3 games? Developers work bloody hard to kick the PS3 into shape as it is.

And yes, I do have a ps3 devkit under my desk.
bhive01's Avatar
bhive01 at 04/03/2008 07:52
Even though I hate to say it, hjd_uk is right too.

Samit's complaints are ones I've had since purchasing my PS3. Flat-out we've had shoddy ports of 360 games since the beginning and only the biggest budget titles have received the kind of attention required to make the game look and run the same on both systems.

Yet, I can see that cell and the relatively weak NSX graphics could be a difficult combination. Likely, once APIs get worked out and people find out how to best utilize them the games will run better on the PS3 simply because there is more hardware underneath. Notice I didn't say look better. I don't expect them to look better. I expect that we'll see better AI and physics on future PS3 games than the 360 is capable of.
Robbo the hood's Avatar
Robbo the hood at 04/03/2008 08:38
I think people are being to easy on the PS3 here. If you're "ahead of your time" aka properly using your hardware isn't economically feasible, then Sony should either create initiatives to produce software for developers to help remedy this, or educate them in some other way to help them work on their platform. The developers don't "have to" do anything with their PS3 efforts if the system isn't generating appropriate return. If Sony wants to sit back and have things come to them, then I don't think they deserve to ever have equal multiplatform games. Nintendo has the same problem, they shouldn't just sit around and show developers that they're the only ones who have ideas for the Wii controller. Although the Wii is in a better position to lead by example because control schemes are much more apparent than how a game's code is optimized or whatever. Anyway, point is that if Sony has no interest in helping developers learn their new technology, then the developers can shovel 360 ports on there. Sony made their bed, and unless they get their head out of their ass and help developers code for it then they're going to be waiting. Their new technology creates a really stupid problem (Can't adjust read speed to match the disc speed? D'you think this tech might not be ready to come out of the oven yet?), it should be their responsibility to help fix it or get around it. Good luck doing that now that they don't even have a competing format anymore though.
Holyetheline's Avatar
Holyetheline at 04/03/2008 08:43
That's fun. Pleasure your girl when you install a game... haha
Psycho_Babble's Avatar
Psycho_Babble at 04/03/2008 09:19
Put Skittles in your PS3 and a rainbow will come out. DO IT
brad drac's Avatar
brad drac at 04/03/2008 09:23
I'm not sure that vicious cycle is quite accurate. Noone but the hardiest of the hardcore would chose one system over another because some of the games available run slightly better on another system. The only thing this favouring the 360 tends to perpetuate is the 360's attach ratio utterly dominating the PS3's, and that's not a trend I see going away any time soon(as the 360 has always been the avid gamer's choice anyway). The way I see it, the more casual gamers(as in people who just play madden/pro evo and GTA) are how the PS3 is going to make up the distance between it and the PS3, if only because of brand recognition. For a game like DMC, it's probably going to sell more on the 360, because hardcore gamers are statistically more likely to buy it on the 360, and such it is understandable that development would be prioritised thusly. I would suggest however that rather than being pissed that the PS3 version is ever so slightly worse, be happy for multi-platform releases.
xenon's Avatar
xenon at 04/03/2008 09:28
This is the stupidity of having hardware engineers working hard to make diverse and powerful machines and then having software developers fighting hard to counter the engineers work and make the platform difference transparent. Before it was: you have to paint on paper, you have to paint on cardboard, make it look more or less the same. Now it is: you paint on a wall, you paint on a metal plate, make it look exactly the same. How stupid and pointless is that?
Samit Sarkar's Avatar
Samit Sarkar at 04/03/2008 13:11
@hjd_uk, brad drac: Yes, I should’ve definitely mentioned publishers in my write-up, since they’re the ones footing the bill. It’s a joint issue, to be sure. Regardless, I’m just annoyed that I get screwed over with many multiplatform games (again, see Madden NFL 08) just because I happened to pick the PS3 over the 360. Personally, I don’t ever plan on getting a 360 — there’s not really much that’s 360 exclusive that I want.

And again, I’m tired of the old “the PS3 has no games” argument. It simply isn’t valid anymore. And it will likely have completely gone out the window by the end of this year.
TheDespised's Avatar
TheDespised at 04/03/2008 13:37
Very old news when posted...Sammy needs to try harder next time.
prev next

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39719 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

The best and worst '4th' videogames EVER!











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006