Quantcast


The Guardian to the anti-games lobby: 'We've already won' photo

The ever-lovely .tiff sent me a link to this amazing Guardian article addressing the politicians and writers who have spent a great deal of time enjoying their sneering and condescending attacks on the games industry. Columnist Richard Bartle doesn't mince his words, telling the anti-games set that we have won and they have lost, and it's high time they learned to accept that. I think this guy and I might be related:

According to the UK Statistics Authority, the median age of the UK population is 39. Half the people who live here were born in 1969 or later. The BBC microcomputer was released in 1981, when those 1969ers were 12. It was ubiquitous in schools; it introduced a generation to computers. It introduced a generation to computer games.

Half the UK population has grown up playing computer games. They aren't addicted, they aren't psychopathic killers, and they resent those boneheads – that's you – who imply that they are addicted and are psychopathic killers.

Next year, that 1969 will be 1970; the year after, it'll be 1971.

Dwell on this, you smug, out-of-touch, proud-to-be-innumerate fossils: half the UK population thinks games are fun and cool, and you don't. Those born in 1990 get the vote this year.

Bartle's article is as brutal as it is beautiful, and is the second feature to be published by The Guardian that presents the pro side of the games debate. I have been really impressed with The Guardian's approach to covering this ridiculous faux-controversy, as it has really shown that not every mainstream paper has to be part what Bartle calls "the ever-more-distant past." Clearly the paper recognizes which way the balance of power is shifting, and realizes that clinging onto the ever-decaying relics that are terrified of change is a surefire way to turn off new readers.

I urge you to read this article, because it's ostensibly all true. We HAVE won. No matter how much Jack Thompson screams his head off, no matter how many posters FOX News manages to have torn down, and no matter how much The Daily Mail urges government to "BAN THIS SICK FILTH," the games industry will continue to grow, and the so-called "murder simulators" will continue to succeed, doing only what they were intended to do ...

Entertain the millions that buy them, and will buy them for many years to come.






Contests Official Rules



No Purchase Required to Enter or Win

1. Eligibility: Destructoid.com contests are usually provided by sponsors who, due to customs and shipping costs (yay budgets), often limit participation to individuals who are legal residents of the fifty (50) United States (unless otherwise stated) and are 12 years of age. We encourage our overseas friends to be super sneaky and make a friend in the United States who can receive your prize, and then you two figure out the customs/logistics. Be cautious about who you trust, obviously. Employees of destructoid.com, their advertising or promotion agencies, those involved in the production, development, implementation or handling of Contests, any agents acting for, or on behalf of the above entities, their respective parent companies, officers, directors, subsidiaries, affiliates, licensees, service providers, prize suppliers any other person or entity associated with the Contests (collectively “Contest Entities”) and/or the immediate family (spouse, parents, siblings and children) and household members (whether related or not) of each such employee, are *not* eligible and will be fired and publicly beaten if are caught participating. All U.S., federal, state and local and regulations apply.

2. Agreement to Official Rules: Participation in the Contest constitutes entrant’s full and unconditional agreement to and acceptance of these Official Rules and the decisions of the Sponsor, which are final and binding. Winning a prize is contingent upon fulfilling all requirements set forth herein.

3. Entry Period: The start and end dates/times of each Contest (the “Entry Period”) will be posted on the applicable Contest site.

4. Entry: To enter a Contest, follow the instructions on the Contest site. Submission will result in one (1) entry. The number of times you can enter the Contest will be posted on the applicable Contest site. The use of any agencies or automated software to submit entries will void all entries submitted by that person.

5. Drawing: At the conclusion of the Entry Period, we will select the names of the potential winners in a random drawing of all eligible entries received during each Entry Period. The number of winners to be selected in a specific Contest will be posted on the applicable Contest site. The odds of being selected as a potential winner depend on the number of eligible entries received during the Entry Period. Potential winners will be contacted via email and will be asked to provide their full name, age and mailing address within a specified time period. If a potential winner does not respond within the timeframe stated in the notification email, we may select an alternate potential winner in his/her place at random from all entries received during the Entry Period. Limit one (1) prize per household per Contest.

6. Requirements of the Potential Winners: Winners will be notified by the e-mail address associated with their account on destructoid.com.com and/or receive a Private Message on destructoid.com.com or through a Twitter Direct Message/Facebook message. Winners have five (5) days from the original message alerting them of their winnings to respond and claim their prize. If no winner comes forward within five business days, the prize will be forfeited and raffled again where Destructoid's hardcore fans are most active (forums/community blogs/facebook group).

7. Prize(s): The prize(s) (including each prize’s approximate retail value) available to be won in a specific Contest will be posted on the Contest site. No cash or other substitution may be made, except by the Sponsor, who reserves the right to substitute a prize with another prize of equal or greater value if the prize is not available for any reason as determined by the Sponsor in its sole discretion. The winners are responsible for any taxes and fees associated with receipt or use of a prize. Prizes will be mailed between 1 to 45 business days after winners have replied with their required info.

8. General Conditions: In the event that the operation, security, or administration of the Contest is impaired in any way for any reason, including, but not limited to fraud, virus, or other technical problem, the Sponsor may, in its sole discretion, either: (a) suspend the Contest to address the impairment and then resume the Contest in a manner that best conforms to the spirit of these Official Rules; or (b) award the prizes at random from among the eligible entries received up to the time of the impairment. The Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to disqualify any individual it finds to be tampering with the entry process or the operation of the Contest or to be acting in violation of these Official Rules or in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner. Any attempt by any person to undermine the legitimate operation of the Contest may be a violation of criminal and civil law, and, should such an attempt be made, the Sponsor reserves the right to seek damages from any such person to the fullest extent permitted by law. The Sponsor’s failure to enforce any term of these Official Rules shall not constitute a waiver of that provision. In case of a dispute as to the owner of an entry, entry will be deemed to have been submitted by the authorized account holder of the screen name from which the entry is made. The authorized account holder is defined as the natural person who is assigned to an e-mail address by an Internet access provider, online service provider, or other organization responsible for assigning e-mail addresses for the domain associated with the submitted e-mail address.

9.Release and Limitations of Liability: By participating in the Contest, entrants agree to release and hold harmless the Contest Entities from and against any claim or cause of action arising out of participation in the Contest or receipt or use of any prize, including, but not limited to: (a) unauthorized human intervention in the Contest; (b) technical errors related to computers, servers, providers, or telephone or network lines; (c) printing errors; (d) lost, late, postage-due, misdirected, or undeliverable mail; (e) errors in the administration of the Contest or the processing of entries; or (f) injury or damage to persons or property which may be caused, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from entrant’s participation in the Contest or receipt of any prize. Entrant further agrees that in any cause of action, the Contest Entities’ liability will be limited to the cost of entering and participating in the Contest, and in no event shall the Contest Entities be liable for attorney’s fees. Entrant waives the right to claim any damages whatsoever, including, but not limited to, punitive, consequential, direct, or indirect damages.

10. Disputes: Except where prohibited, entrant agrees that any and all disputes, claims and causes of action arising out of, or connected with, the Contest or any prize awarded shall be resolved individually, without resort to any form of class action. All issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, interpretation and enforceability of these Official Rules, entrant’s rights and obligations, or the rights and obligations of the Sponsors in connection with the Contest, shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law rules (whether of the Commonwealth of Virginia or any other jurisdiction), which would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the Commonwealth of Virginia.

11. Contest Results: To enter the contest without needing to buy/sell anything or request a written copy of the name of the winners, send a self-addressed stamped envelope (stating the specific Contest you are requesting the winners for) to destructoid.com Contest Winners 260 King Street Suite 883, San Francisco California 94107. We run many contests, so please be specific in what you are requesting. Winner requests must be received within thirty (30) days from the end date of the applicable contest (they're always posted on our site though). Winners are usually posted the day following the contest on our contest section.

Lastly, Destructoid has the right to kick your ass and take away your prize if you are a total dickhead, so be cool and don't kick any puppies on your way to victory. Have fun with our contests and be a good sport when you win or lose. Remember: First you get the power, then you get the money, then get the baby.

 




More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

48 comments | showing # 1 to 48
prev next

Parabe11um-swe-'s Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:05
Parabe11um-swe-
We came, we saw, we conquered...

Nice read.
Simon's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:06
Simon
That awesome, i'm glad some people have sense.
Sky-Face's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:10
Sky-Face
And that...is how the faux-war of the new media was won
MechaMonkey's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:11
MechaMonkey
I saw a GTA4 ad on a NYC bus yesterday and laughed.

FLAWLESS VICTORY!
Macarello's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:12
Macarello
This is glorious.
Jamie McGinn's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:12
Jamie McGinn
I can't wait for history to repeat itself when the next new craze hits the scene.

Holographic Porn perhaps?
Twosixteen's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:15
Twosixteen
@ Parabe11um-swe-
We game, we saw, we conquered...
AgentMOO's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:29
AgentMOO
Sweet



By the way did the Destructoid editors have a meeting and decide as lime green as standard for the snarky captions?
Excel-2011's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:29
Excel-2011
@Twosixteen:
We game, we chainsaw, we commanded and conquered.
Sam Spectre's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:31
Sam Spectre
How does it feel to loose Jack Thompson!?

@ MechaMonkey:
I saw a ton of GTA IV ads in NYC while I was visiting a friend. One of them took up the side of a whole building. Victory indeed!
Aerox's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:33
Aerox
I love Richard Bartle. The man invented MUDs, and for that I thank him.
Tiff's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:37
Tiff
Yeah seriously. The man who invented MUDs deserves mad props, yo.
MaxVest's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:38
MaxVest
Now that we've won, we all have to ask ourselves: what will we unjustly oppose when we are older, primarily out of fear, ignorance, and unwillingness to learn?

We'd better decide now or we're just going to default to the next form of media to emerge. If it suck, we're stuck with a crappy cause.
Rifter01's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:40
Rifter01
Hay, but iz like sick filth! It is a dark day indeed if a man can't have his filth!
bleep's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:41
bleep
Whoa this guy's got some sledge hammer size nuts and he doesn't mind slamming them down on people.

At moo: Yes, Yes they did....


PS: MUD's are EVIL
Cataract's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:41
Cataract
What makes this so much better is that right before I went to Destructoid and saw this at the top, the orchestrated Overture theme to Dragon Quest started playing.


How very fitting.
Chris Morris's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:47
Chris Morris
Beautiful article.
Spartacus's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:55
Spartacus
The words on my screen, and I'm not kidding, just jumped out, started glowing gold, proclaimed themselves to be the messiah, and then rode off on a pterodactyl to do good and kick the asses of the stupid.
Y0j1mb0's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 14:59
Y0j1mb0
A newspaper with a sensible view of gaming in general?

Wow.
KyleGamgee's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 15:10
KyleGamgee
Using keen logic in a newspaper article?

Why, THAT'S SENSASIONALISM!
Kaspar's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 15:10
Kaspar
Godly.

*Love*
naia-the-gamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 15:33
naia-the-gamer
That was actually intelligent and reasonable. I think my head is going to asplode.

So what are the odds that the general public will ignore it?
Technophile's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 15:35
Technophile
People fear what they don't understand but the ones that fear are getting very old.

It's all a matter of time as she said. Just like radio, TV, Elvis and comic books before it.
solarmystic's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 15:37
solarmystic
@MaxVest

Props to your comment; I fear that when we become old farts ourselves we'll start to lose that sense and become bitter old husks like the many JTs of the world, blaming this or that for some crimewave etc etc without sensible RnD...

We need to break this vicious cycle of blaming the unknown fad of the future on the bad things that're happening.. The current older farts in charge don't GET gaming; it confuses and confounds them, thus making for a viable target of opportunity, will we become that way too?
OrangeGoblin's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 15:43
OrangeGoblin
I was really impressed with the article (which I half-arsedly cblogged earlier today) and with The Grauniad for publishing it. More please!
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 15:50
mix
It took the microwave like 20 years to catch one as no one would buy them, now they are afraid of video games....wha?

@MaxVest
Great question.
I hope I don't follow the path that is suggested with aging but I guess I will never truly know until I get there.
Ferros's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 16:00
Ferros
I think generation Y and younger have a much better chance than any generation before us of adapting to new trends, and not freaking out when the next big thing comes along. We've grown up with massive leaps and bounds in technology and lets be honest, the internet has made us a jaded, cynical, practically shock proof generation.
BluFire's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 16:18
BluFire
So true. Too many people play video games now... it's an unstoppable juggernaut.
Maserati's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 16:27
Maserati
Speaking of Jack Thompson...

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080428-jack-thompson-targets-gta-iv-with-an-unlikely-ally-ign.html
Twosixteen's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 16:35
Twosixteen
@ The-Excel
Bricfa's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 16:36
Bricfa
Good read, but doesn't seem very professional. It should have just stated the facts and drawn logical conclusions, but without the insults. (however deserved they were.)
Harkonnen's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 17:09
Harkonnen
Games and gamers won before the battle even started. These pathetic rants don't come from "moral" issues, as they'd make you believe. That's a masquerade, a façade, for their true fear. Videogames are on their way to render TV as we know it largely obsolete, and Hollywood with a minor share of the entertainment pie. If I am not wrong, the videogames industry is now bigger than the film industry. I, for one, would rather surf the internet for hours at a time than watch the stupid reality shows they play on TV. And I know for a fact that I am not the only one.

Each time something threatens the "stablishment", people benefitting the most from it disguise themselves as moral champions and begin their fear-based campaigning. Sadly for them -- luckily for us -- they are the only ones oblivious to their utter stupidity.

Which brings me to my starting point. This battle was won before it even started, because the "stablishment" started battling when they felt threatened. And they were just so high on their own thing that they neglected the threat until it was simply too late.
Samit Sarkar's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 17:48
Samit Sarkar
I want to have that man’s babies.

Also, MaxVest brings up a very interesting point. I’m only 21, but already, I find myself confused by what the kids are up to nowadays (I sure didn’t have a cell phone when I was in middle school). Young people always like to think they’ll never be like the older generations, that they’ll always be accepting of new media and new things in general, but they’re deluding themselves. Inevitably, we’ll one day find something to hate on.
Blackhat's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 19:01
Blackhat
Didn't we 'win' this argument back with Jazz music? Seriously, doesn't this same thing repeat itself every few years? Jazz, blues, rock, metal, rap, fucking books, all of it targeted at one point.
njsykora's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 19:44
njsykora
Ladies and gentlemen I give you The Guardian. The last bastion of fair and balanced reporting and the only actual physical newspaper I'm willing to chuck down 70p on everyday.
Crackpot360's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 19:54
Crackpot360
Newspaper's name reminds me of that "killed by the Guardians" Halo glitch. Prophecy or coincidence? lol
Boolean's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 19:59
Boolean
Take it, take it right in the face!

This artice makes me happy.
PrinceofCannedPeaches's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 21:29
PrinceofCannedPeaches
Falconnnnn WIIIIIN!
niacin's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/28/2008 22:19
niacin
I remember back in the late eighties/ early ninties when they were blaming everything on VHS but now no one would ever dream of blaming a murder on chuckie. It will be the same for games in a few years... well as long as they find something else to blame.

Oh god I hope they decide to blame celebrity culture
JustLikeBuck's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/29/2008 03:14
JustLikeBuck
Richard Bartle :| It takes a legend of old school computer games to hand the old school of television, their asses.
Seth338's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/29/2008 05:05
Seth338
*tear*
Not everyone in england sucks after all.
catsithx's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/29/2008 08:48
catsithx
well like they said people are old enough to vote now who grew up in the video game age. It's our time to shine and control who is in and who is out
infinity's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/29/2008 09:53
infinity
So we've won: accept it. Huff and puff if you must, but your audience grows smaller by the day. Your views are mortally wounded, and soon they will be dead...and so will you.

fixed.

seriously though, this article wins.
mistic's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/29/2008 11:43
mistic
great article :-)
Optional's Avatar - Comment posted on 04/29/2008 11:46
Optional
@Samit Sarkar

Yes, but it's how we choose to express that dislike that's important; if, by the time we reach old age, we face the future with the intelligence, humour and wit we exhibit now, society as a whole would benefit greatly.
piegreatiner10's Avatar - Comment posted on 06/14/2011 17:46
piegreatiner10
not till that moment known that tears were on my cheek, but I felt cheap nevirapine
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!