Jim Sterling: "Duke Nukem Forever 2 is a miserable, lifeless, grotesque little game. Also, I'm old."
They won't have that for the next game.
They won't have that for the next game. Gearbox is happy because I'm sure they didn't have to sink any real money into it, but the next game will have to stand on its own, and from the looks of all the reviews of DN:F, it won't have much to stand on.
Again DNF is not as bad as you make it out to be. It's not a masterpiece by any means but it's still entertaining.
Though, we have known about Duke Begins since 2009, before Gearbox even started working on Duke Forever.
I am also in the minority that loved me some Duke Forever. People bitching about bad catch phrases and misogyny towards women have forgotten who Duke Nukem Forever was. If I read one more review that mentions "Duke doesn't treat women with respect, he goes over the line" and being serious about it, I am going to snap. I can't believe how out of touch reviewers are today.
you all have your heads up your asses
look at all the shitty games out there compared to the mediocre amount of good games
yeah sorry but just cuz a franchise has a clean slate to work with doesnt mean its gona turn out good
just cuz you fail once doesnt mean your immune from ever failing again
This. As much as (the demo for) Duke 4 made me want to kill myself and never play another videogame ever ever again, I hold out hope that, given an empty canvas from which to start, Gearbox can deliver something worthwhile.
Can't wait to come get some more Duke! Hail to the king, baby!
I've been a Duke fan since D3D like most people. I LOVED Duke Nukem Forever. I do not agree with the bad reviews at all. It was fun, funny, and had balls of steel. Old school run and gun gaming at its finest. Multiplayer is also a blast just like Duke 3D. A fast paced frag fest.
Got Alice MR instead. Vastly superior choice. :D
It pisses me off when the game critic community trip over themselves to throw out perfect scores for games like Black Ops that is a very boring single player game built around a multiplayer game that is almost an exact replica of the previous CODs, yet these same people find it necessary to crush Duke Forever. Duke was actually FUN and humorous, something long dead from most shooters today.
Oh yeah, I forgot, trashing Duke is what gets the page views...nevermind, carry on 'journalists.'
@Black Nexus well they are gonna want to develop a whole new game engine and then there are some serious improvements to make on the DNF gameplay, so maybe 4 years?
So yeah, I'm all for a Duke reboot, and I think Gearbox would do a far better job than a bunch of dirty old creeps pounding out code in a kitchen.
Just because you hate it doesn't mean everyone does, Jim. I'd say the numbers are 50/50 at least, if not higher in favor of the final product. I, for one, am loving DNF. Running through a second time on the brutal difficulty and trying to nab the remaining achievements. The multiplayer is pretty entertaining too.
This is great news -- now if they can just get rid of that moronic 2 weapon limit.
Gearbox has been successful in the past, so I won't judge the future of Duke based on this latest game alone...but damn, you're going to have to impress me. Start by making Duke less of a prick.
Gearbox has been successful in the past, so I won't judge the future of Duke based on this latest game alone...but damn, you're going to have to impress me. Start by making Duke less of a prick.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow



























follow












