Quantcast


Surprise: Dragon Age: Origins sold well photo

It's not much of a secret that EA has enjoyed solid Dragon Age: Origins sales, but we didn't have a number on it until this afternoon. In a press release blasted after the jarring EA conference call, it was revealed the old-school RPG has sold over 3.2 million units according to EA estimates. That's, uh, a lot by most standards.

EA and BioWare are releasing a full-featured expansion for Origins this March and apparently whipping out some sort of new DA title in fiscal 2011. We'll try to figure out what the latter is while also taking stabs at what made so many people want to buy Origins. We're guessing it was Manson. Or the fact that the game rocked. Either way, we're happy.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

29 comments | showing # 1 to 29
prev next

ifyouseekaaron's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 19:32
ifyouseekaaron
I dont know what it is about this game but it really seems unappealing. Feels.. half-assed.
HEL105's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 19:35
HEL105
It took a while to grow on me, but I ended up loving this game, flaws and all. Bioware just kicks ass, plain and simple.
shanetothepast's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 19:37
shanetothepast
I actually loved the game, the fact that there were so many choices, and the diffculty really made me come back for more. Just finished the first playthrough which was 110 hours.
whateverthismeanstoyou's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 19:45
whateverthismeanstoyou
simple.

This is what happens to a multiplatform title. ME2 would have sold three times more if it was on PS3 as well.
Ryan J Murphy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 19:49
Ryan J Murphy
good game, me2 MIGHT be better but it was far less bang for your buck when compared to doa
slayer the player's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 19:51
slayer the player
ME2 would have sold three times more if it was on PS3 as well.
lol
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 19:59
Xzyliac
Still don't like it. Sorry Bioware. If I wanted to play KOTOR I'd play KOTOR.

That said if that many people enjoyed it good on them. It's better than alot of what tops the charts recently.

@whateverthismeanstoyou
I doubt it. I don't think the PS3 only crowd is that large.
EternalDeathSlayer's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:00
EternalDeathSlayer
@ whateverthismeanstoyou: Actually, considering there are more 360 owners, it's almost impossible for the game to sell 3 times better just because of a PS3 port.

Still, you have to figure they could have sold a considerable amount of copies if they'd have ported it. Question is, would they make more money doing that or taking a check from MS for being a 360 exclusive?
Zeta Crossfire's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:05
Zeta Crossfire
this was my GOTY for 09, I love this game so much.
fishbone walker's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:07
fishbone walker
@EternalDeathSlayer

I don't even know about "considerable amount". Like Xzyliac, I don't think the PS3 only crowd is that large. If I decide to buy the PS3 version instead of buying the 360 version, Bioware hasn't gained an additional sale.
SBC Slam's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:22
SBC Slam
@The Legendary Star:

I felt the same way all the way up until I played it. It really is a great game.

@Xyliac:

Comparing it to KotOR is unfair.
Gyrael's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:25
Gyrael
@Xzyliac

Um.
Genebeef's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:34
Genebeef
@whatever: mass effect 2 so far sold over 2 million within the first week. i doubt the ps3 audience is even significant with Dragon Age; if you took out ps3 sales it would probably just be 3.1/3.0 million. certainly not enough to cover the cost and effort put into the ps3 version.
Drakengard's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:42
Drakengard
I won't lie. Overall the game is still pretty average. The game lore is rock solid. The characters were interesting and, I guess, fun to talk to [though by talk I mean listen to monologues while my silent character looks on with a dumb face].

The battle system really really needs less close up and more of a Baldur's Gate isometric feel or something. It was trying way too hard to be fast while being tactical and it just sucked due to controls and menus feeling and behaving really sluggish.

I'd give the game a C+, but like Mass Effect 1 [which too me was pretty messy execution too from the looks of it] I think the next game will be incredible and I do eagerly await it despite my lackluster experience with the first.
bwonk's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:52
bwonk
@ Drakengard

Harsh. But I know what you mean. I played through on the PS3 and it suffered with poor visuals in battle and bad menu/shortcut systems. Even for a berserker, 6 shortcuts wasn't enough. Also I had to leave the AI and tactics on default because it was the only way people would do things logically.
CoKy14's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 20:54
CoKy14
Good I guess... The bad is that because of this they're making a sequel... Never should have been released on consoles... The game really sucks on 360 at least... ME2 from Bioware is 1000 times better than this crappy port.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 21:05
Xzyliac
Drakengard makes a good point. ME1 wasn't without it's major problems and ME2 fixed a lot of it. Maybe DA2 will do the same. Here's to hoping.
Dizzy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 21:16
Dizzy
I've gotta agree with Drakengard in all except the grade. I absolutely love this game, and can't wait for them to expand upon it. That being said, the DLC so far has been ass.
Infamy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 21:58
Infamy
Like you guys have said, I don't know WHAT THE FUCK whateverthismeanstoyou is talking about. DA:O sold horribly on PS3 compared to 360 and I highly doubt BioWare cares about the minuscule number of sales a port would have provided, nor if it would even cover the costs.
Knight Templar's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 22:29
Knight Templar
whateverthismeanstoyou

Triple the sales you say?

Normaly PS3 sales are slightly below 360 sales, not by much but still enough that crazy statements such as yours look fanboyish.

Shame ME2 isn't on the PS3, I can talk with one of my friends about DA:O but not ME2 which is a pain for both of us. Mostly him I would think.
mrplow8's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 22:40
mrplow8
No surprise here. Dragon Age is really "a peeling." That would be hilarious if Dragon Age had anything to do with bananas, so pretend that it does.
RIMoonlight's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 22:50
RIMoonlight
I quite liked DA:O, thank you. It was flawed yes, but overall I thought the game was pretty amazing.
And I don't get the KOTOR comparisons, considering all things. As far as BioWare RPGs, the only thing farther from KOTOR comparisons than DA:O would be Baldur's Gate, which would of been a more appropriate thing to compare it to.
True Axiom's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 23:11
True Axiom
Yeah. The comparison to Mass Effect 1 is very apt. Except that while I loved the ideas (and even the execution) behind that game, I didn't like a lot of Dragon Age. I think, above all else, there's this big world saving quest and I hated all the characters except one. That's...not the best ratio.

Glad it sold well, though. Bioware do good work, most of the time.
sandorasbox's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 23:15
sandorasbox
I'd like to know how well it actually did on the PS3. If it did well, I'd like to think that would be reason enough for EA to bring Mass Effect 1+2 to the console, which would be wonderful.

Larger audience = more money and more people playing a great game.
Infamy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2010 23:28
Infamy
@sandorasbox

It did significantly worse than 360/PC, and the worst. I don't think BioWaare is ruffling their features about minuscule ales from a port, nor doubt it's even worth the time and effort. Not to mention Microsoft developed ME1 and owns the rights for that game at least, and also has an exclusivity deal for the trilogy as stated by BioWare numerous times.
Elzam's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 08:03
Elzam
I love the "It's just KOTOR recycled" argument that everyone throws out for every Bioware game. Aside from actually choosing your responses, the new series of Bioware titles are very distant from KOTOR.

Tell you what. Modern Warfare 2, Battlefield, and every other shooter based in modern setting? They're all far more alike than any two Bioware titles (save KOTOR v. KOTOR2, of course) and I don't see you guys ragging on them.

It's like if you see party/squad based gameplay where you choose your decisions, it's automatically KOTOR. ME2/DA are great steps forward for gaming in storytelling, and while DA at least may have a few functional gameplay flaws, it told a great story with moral ambiguity; the only thing I actively hold against it is not using Tim Curry's voice more.
Heojaua's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:06
Heojaua
Funny how nobody mention Neverwinternights.... or Jade Empire...

I would compare Dragon Age: Origin more like NWM but more action... At least on the PC Version.
Heojaua's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/09/2010 11:07
Heojaua
Meant Console Version...
Anna Hannah's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/11/2011 09:20
Anna Hannah
I've gotta agree with Drakengard in all except the grade. I absolutely love this game, and can't wait for them to expand upon it. That being said, the DLC so far has been ass.
Best regards, Anna, CEO of iscsi for linux and itunes
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!