Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Staying dry in a sea of spoilers is a matter of building a boat photo

[Editor's Note: We're not just a (rad) news site -- we also publish opinions/editorials from our community & employees like this one, though be aware it may not jive with the opinions of Destructoid as a whole, or how our moms raised us. Want to post your own article in response? Publish it now on our community blogs.]

This post may contain spoilers of spoilers and nautical navigation.

Gamers are like horseflies. They’re drawn to sh*t. Just as the horsefly seeks out the stinkiest, most putrid piles of crap in which to lay their eggs, gamers seek out the most ridiculous, embarrassing topics to roll around in like a proverbial pile of mind feces, diving in headfirst as if they’re Scrooge McDuck going for an afternoon swim in his money bin.

This is nothing new to the sane gamers here, but there’s still one thing that has the power to get nearly all of us riled. It’s not dedicated servers or any other recent debate, sane or not. It’s something far more Keyser Soze, if you’ll allow me the indulgence of using a proper noun as an adjective.

It’s the plague of the spoilers, which seem to be coming like a swarm of locusts lately, filling your favorite social network with angry posts and warnings not to watch videos or use any of those Internets. But are spoilers really that bad, and why do they seem like a far more troubling problem in games than any other storytelling medium? It’s because we’re too damn neurotic. If you want to sail the seas, but you don’t want to get wet, you’d better learn the fine art of staying below the poop deck. 



Think back to the last major film spoiler that you experienced. If you’re anything like me, you can’t actually remember one. Sure, CNN spoiled an episode of House for basically the entire country, but aside from that, nothing much comes to my mind. And no one liked Kutner anyway. He’s got the expressiveness of Nicolas Cage and the likability of a radroach.

The last gaming spoiler, however, is probably much fresher in your memory. Perhaps it was even just this week. A particular level in the new Modern Warfare? Something related to Dragon Age? True story: while writing this paragraph, someone “spoiled” something for me in Gchat. They seem to be an unavoidable no matter what you do. When faced with a sea of spoilers, what do we do to remain among the ignorant for as long as we want to?

The reality is that people like us can’t do much. We are part of a site that discusses videogames. A presence here mixed with an expectation of avoiding all spoilers is truly like suggesting a nice dip in the Atlantic Ocean without the expectation of getting wet. There’s no way.

Unless, of course, there is. The ancient world realized that walking took too damn much effort, and swimming was even worse, so why not build a boat? It does all of the floating and moving for you, and you stay dry up until the point that you vomit down the front of yourself.

Avoiding spoilers in gaming is much the same, only with less regurgitation. “Building a boat,” in this insanely stretched metaphor, has to do with learning to navigate and staying afloat.



The stars serve as guides for navigators even today, allowing a sea captain to know the direction that he’s heading even if no other clues are present. Similarly, gamers need to be aware of the navigational clues that will allow them to avoid spoilers if they choose to do so. Much of this is not a matter of expecting others to do the work for you. People are probably going to discuss the story in the official thread of this year’s biggest game, and if you aren’t expecting this to happen, you’re kind of a lame duck. No matter what, someone’s going to say something that you haven’t learned yet, and they may or may not realize that this could be a spoiler for you.

So, if spoilers are that atrociously damaging to your enjoyment of a game, consider how you navigate the Internet. Even sailors must deal with the occasionally wave that crashes against the hull, sending a fine mist of seawater onto the deck. You’re going to have minor things spoiled for you, and if you’re not prepared to have that happen, then maybe clicking on that gameplay video or reading that latest preview isn’t the greatest idea.

Staying afloat is simply a matter of your attitude, not letting the occasional spoiler fill your lungs and deprive you of oxygen. It’s a matter of attitude here; not every spoiler needs to be fuel for your nerd rage. I recently made a satirical Twitter post about how upset I was about learning the massive “spoiler” contained in this whole Modern Warfare 2 terrorist debate. And you know what? People thought I was 100% serious.

It speaks to just how overboard people go when it comes to spoilers. Unlike films, we consider settings, weapons, character appearances, and the most minor of game design elements to be spoilers. We wouldn’t get angry at a trailer for Iron Man II because it shows Iron Man in a public restroom, would we? Then why get pissed when a game reveals a new level in a game? I acknowledge that there’s a sense of wanting the game to be totally fresh, but there’s an even larger disconnect here in that games involve interactivity, whereas movies do not. Even if we see a gameplay video of a new level, we don’t have the experience of playing it yet. We have no idea what that’s going to be like unless we sit through the whole thing, which would just be stupid.



For instance, did anyone get pissed at Uncharted 2 for revealing the falling train section so early? If you ask me, it’s the most thrilling part of the game (which the developers seemed to realize since they make you play the damn thing twice), yet it’s also present everywhere in the coverage of the game—even on magazine covers. Oh, spoilers, by the way.

The benefit we gamers have is that we get to experience something in a way that’s deeper than just the look of a film or the plot contained in a book. We may learn that Drake dies at the end of Uncharted 2 (he doesn’t, it’s just a spoiler-free example of a spoiler, which is totally anti-meta), and, yes, this would suck a bit. But we also have an entire game to play through before this event -- plenty more to learn, and many reasons to become attached to this character that we’ve inhabited for however many hours. How much, then, is the impact of this changed by the fact that we know it’s coming? Somewhat, I concede, but it’s not the enjoyment-ruining work of the devil himself that some make it out to be.

So, should we start throwing spoilers around like water chestnuts in a cheap Chinese restaurant’s poor excuse for moo goo gai pan*? Absolutely not. The desire to avoid spoilers is a good thing, as anything that could potentially increase a person’s enjoyment of a game is a worthy pursuit indeed. But I think a paradigm shift in the way that we react to those inevitable spoilers would do us a lot of good. It may not be easy, and we may still want to rage a little, but over time, we might be able to learn to accept spoilers when they do happen, and simply avoid them whenever possible.

*this is the most ridiculous comparison I have ever made.


Continue: More Promoted stories stories





prev next

30 comments | showing # 1 to 30

Cartman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 13:36
Cartman
@ Mk

What foruma?


Dated destructoid memes aside, I will say that some people completey overreact when it comes to spoilers. Then again, if someone had spoiled something like the bioshock twist for me, I would have never experienced the true awesomeness of that game and it would not be as good of a game to me.

Also, ATLUS IS FONTAINE.
Blasto's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 14:02
Blasto
Proverbial mind feces
Isay Isay's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 14:07
Isay Isay
Still being a generation behind in terms of games (I'll get through my PS2 backlog on of these days), I've run into spoilers for pretty much every current gen game I would want to play. Will that deter me from playing those games? Of course not. To go along with your ship metaphor, sometimes it's not about the destination, it's about the voyage to get there. If a crazy plot twist is the only thing you game has going for it, maybe it wasn't a good enough game to begin with.
DaedHead8's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 14:20
DaedHead8
Funny that you should have a picture from the Sixth Sense as that was the last movie that was spoiled for me that I can remember. As for game spoilers, I just prefer not to hear about shit from the last half of the game. I know how to avoid it and when it get's me anyways, I don't complain. Like you said, it's the internet, you will be spoiled eventually. Good blog.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 14:44
Holyetheline
When I played the original Fable I went in to the experience with the game without knowing anything about it.... It made for one of the most memorable and exciting gaming experiences in my gaming past. Now that I spend all day at work on Destructiod I go into games knowing wayyyy to much. It's not even anybody's fault other than the fact that there are too many spoilers these days in ads and articles that are given out by developers and publishers... They need to stop this madness and figure out how to make a game look fun in the AD without giving away the whole point of the game. I fucking hate those movie trailers that cover the intro climax and ending to a movie too. Why must so much be left out in the open lately?
kauza's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 14:52
kauza
@Cartman: ATLAS IS FONTAINE

@Isay Isay: Yeah, that's definitely a problem with having a backlog. I, of course, learned everything about Final Fantasy VII before really playing it. But I've still never actually seen how they go about it, so once I finally get to that point, I think I'll still enjoy it.

@DaedHead: I actually spoiled that movie for myself about 20 minutes into it. I thought: Oh man, Bruce Willis is totally dead. I think once you see one M. Night movie, you can predict the twist of all the others.

@Holyetheline: I think it's just a matter of sales, trying to make sure the most awesome stuff is apparent so a studio has a chance to make another game:

Here's an interesting thing that you made me think of: I think maybe we get more upset about non-ending spoilers as gamers because game endings so often suck anyway. I mean, I wouldn't give a crap if the ending to Bioshock was spoiled for me, but there's plenty about that game that I would have been upset if it were spoiled. I think if games had better endings, we wouldn't get so mad about regular old spoilers because we'd know something cool was still coming at the end.
Stevil's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 14:55
Stevil
He already killed John G...oh wait, sorry. DAMN!

I don't mind trailers showing off new levels, but it's when they show a certain tidbit like Modern Warfare 2's space sequence, that I find the suprise practically de-fanged. I mean there's several moments in the last two trailers that make you piece the story together and it's just far too much compared to a cinematic trailer. I know there's going to be a military coup now and the impact is gone.

Okay, I know that it's not going to be the most amazing story ever, but I enjoyed the suprises in the last game enough to care about this one. Uncharted 2 got away with that train sequence because it 10 or 20 other set-pieces that were just as good. Seeing that bit didn't spoil anything.

I wish more games took the Alan Wake approach though (although not the same extreme) and just held off on the extra special moments. If your game is good enough to give small amounts away, then there's no point going the whole hog.
walkyourpath's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 18:34
walkyourpath
Spoiler Alert : Kauza's gonna write some more good blogs over the next few weeks. It always ends with fapping.

Anyway, I agree that if you spend any real amount of time pursuing info on games, dealing with the occasional spoiler is just the nature of the beast. Usually, once I know I'm going to get a game for sure -- I do my best to avoid posts related to that game to ensure that the experience is fairly fresh. There is definitely a middle ground to be had.
grafkhun's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 19:21
grafkhun
Wub joo kauza, excellent work as always, and it's always a pleasure to read your blogs.
Zodiac Eclipse's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 21:03
Zodiac Eclipse
See this is where I totally have it over you people with disposable income. Since I've pretty much given up hope of ever buying a game when it's first released I generally accept the fact that by the time I play it even the best kept secrets of any game will no longer be considered spoilers and as such have been made known to me months ago.

It's not always so bad, since it's like watching any M. Night Shamamlamadingdong movie in that you know you have to be watching for certain things and when you see them you get excited because you know it will mean something later. Unlike this comment, which has steadily decreased in coherency as it progressed.
Toadofsky's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 23:41
Toadofsky
First rule of spoilers, YOU DO NOT TALK ABOUT SPOILERS...

Sorry, saw that Fight Club picture, and just had to make a bad joke...
kauza's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 23:58
kauza
@Zodiac: Actually, his name is M. Knife Shantytown.
Qalamari's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 06:51
Qalamari
Wait... Kutner... DIED?
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 10:58
Elsa
Great blog... but I find that rarely do spoilers affect my enjoyment of a play through. For the most part, I do manage to avoid many of the big spoilers... I didn't know that Atlus was Fontaine even though I played the game many months after release! For the spoilers I am aware of, I don't know why, but it just doesn't have much impact - I still enjoy the game and sometimes it's that "spoiler" that was the reason for me buying the game.
Gyrael's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 00:50
Gyrael
NO KUTNER
xaliqen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 17:43
xaliqen
*spoiler*

Rosebud's real name is MacGuffin.
TheBigFeel's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 17:54
TheBigFeel
I like fake-spoiling things, like your "Drake dies" bit. It keeps people on their toes and seems to be the best way to actively counteract the pandora's box effect that spoilers have. If you seed disinformation (amongst the occasional truth), people stop knowing which spoiler to trust.

PS I heard Kutner comes back this season and wins a Nobel Prize in medicine for reanimating the dead.
TheBigFeel's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 17:54
TheBigFeel
I like fake-spoiling things, like your "Drake dies" bit. It keeps people on their toes and seems to be the best way to actively counteract the pandora's box effect that spoilers have. If you seed disinformation (amongst the occasional truth), people stop knowing which spoiler to trust.

PS I heard Kutner comes back this season and wins a Nobel Prize in medicine for reanimating the dead.
eggdog14's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 18:06
eggdog14
I have to wait a month before i play MW2.

A WHOLE MONTH.

I'm gonna know every detail about the game by the time i play it, even if i don't click on a single thing relating to MW2. I guess i'll have to just avoid the internet... hm.
xaliqen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 18:15
xaliqen
*MW2 spoiler*

You kill things.
RenagadePanda's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 18:21
RenagadePanda
Foolproof plan to avoid spoilers:

If a post contains the name of your game, don't read it.

Repeat until release date.
Arkhon's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 18:34
Arkhon
@TheBigFeel:
Haha, I did that to my brother when he was reading Lord of the Flies. I told him Piggy died, which he does, and then I told him that Ralph died, which he doesn't. When he got to the part where Piggy dies, he assumed that everything I told him was the truth.
Quisling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 19:31
Quisling
MW2 spoiler that no one else caught: In the first one Gaz got shot in the head. But it was in the face, not the brain, and that's why ghost wears a mask.

MIND = BLOWN
Nightrain117's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/11/2009 23:47
Nightrain117
I can't believe that Bruce Willis wasn't aware that he was a ghost the whole time
Bigmoose85's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/12/2009 04:55
Bigmoose85
Overrated header Pic is Overrated
The Amazing Shenazin's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/12/2009 05:07
The Amazing Shenazin
I fucking can't stand spoilers, it may very well be the thing I hate most about the internet

I had Half Life 2 episode 2 spoiled for me on 4chan's /v/ once, I was so mad I wanted to punch a wall, ever since I make sure to avoid that place when there's a new game out I don't want spoiled

fuck people who spoil to ruin everyone's fun, FUCK THEM!
Atlas's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/12/2009 16:55
Atlas
ATLAS!!!!! NOTICE IT IS NOT ATLUS!!!!!!
kauza's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/12/2009 17:08
kauza
I've now seen the word Atlas too many times in a short period, and it looks totally meaningless to me.

So you are now known as Salta.
gains's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/20/2009 12:31
gains
I had a boss who routinely spoiled things. You'd tell him what you were watching and he'd tell out in one sentence what happens in the last scene. Same thing with books. His daughter mentioned she was enjoying the novel Anna Karenina and he immediately spouts "Oh! She _verb_s herself _adjective_ a _noun_ at the end." (madlibbed for spoilers.) I don't know if he hated mystery or just wanted to prove he'd finished reading/watching all these stories, but I always kept away from telling him what movie I was looking forward to or what book I was reading.
hbl's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/20/2009 12:51
hbl
"Eggs are laid on stones close to water on plant stems or leaves until they hatch. On hatching, the larvae fall into water or moist earth, feeding voraciously on invertebrates, such as snails and earthworms, and small vertebrates."

Captain Pedantic to the rescue!

Also, my flatmate came back from seeing the Sixth Sense in 1999 or whenever it was that it came out, and in telling me whether it was good or not, and knowing full well that I was going to see it later in the week said, "yeah, turns out Bruce Willis is a ghost the whole time." I said, did you just give away the twist ending, to which he replied, "oh no, you see him get shot right at the beginning." Brilliant.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 

   Got news?   tips@destructoid.com   |   Dtoid Twitter

New Videos

more videos


Reviews & Previews
BioShock 2 review
Dante's Inferno review
Chime review
Hustle Kings review
iPhone Review Round-up: January review
more reviews
Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
Metro 2033
A trip to the racetracks Days of Thunder Arcade
Double the pleasure, double the fun with Darwinia+
Wizarding world in plastic Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4
more previews


- The Dtoid Army is 56753 strong -

Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

Call for entries: the Areas of my Expertise

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals
Jim Sterling: How Aliens are blatantly better than Predators





















More Destructoid Originals




We are Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, Big Boss
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Will Maddock Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Joseph Leray
Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
     
  Adam Dork
Daniel Lingen
Hollie Bennett
Joe Burling
Mikey Turvey






 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006