surf dtoid with 
Rising (10+)
People you follow
I would've thought BLIZZARD of all people would realize the basic screen 3d is complete garbage. Hopefully Valve doesn't try this else I lose all hope in the video game industry?
Why Starcraft in 3d? It's not a bloody shooter and there won't be stuff flying at you? What's the point Blizz???
Why Starcraft in 3d? It's not a bloody shooter and there won't be stuff flying at you? What's the point Blizz???
Yeah, the page went down a bit ago. Before it went away, it changed to:
http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h59/TJF588/20100704-StarCraft2-5Dollars-Coming.png
"Coming Soon", whatever exactly is meant by that (my guess is, "Our actual offer is coming soon; hold on while we damage-control."). Still, wouldn't it be awesome if they own up and let it slide for whoever got in during that miraculous window?
http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h59/TJF588/20100704-StarCraft2-5Dollars-Coming.png
"Coming Soon", whatever exactly is meant by that (my guess is, "Our actual offer is coming soon; hold on while we damage-control."). Still, wouldn't it be awesome if they own up and let it slide for whoever got in during that miraculous window?
@GoodGuyA: 1) The phrase "basic screen 3D" is nonesense. 2) If you don't want to play it in 3D, play it in 2D and quit whining about it. Problem solved.
Anyone else getting tired of the "Nothing is more american than ---"?
Take that repetitive crap to 4chan, that's all it is now.
Take that repetitive crap to 4chan, that's all it is now.
uhm . . . how does 3D work on strat games? I mean its a top down graphical view so by nature the graphics will be in 3D anyway right? maybe I'm wrong but if someone could enlighten me that would be awesome.
@tjf
i dont know anything about american retail law, but in the uk, you're breaking the law if you dont sell at the advertised price.
to the point where if a product is on the wrong shelf, but the price says something else, you have to give it at that price.
i dont know anything about american retail law, but in the uk, you're breaking the law if you dont sell at the advertised price.
to the point where if a product is on the wrong shelf, but the price says something else, you have to give it at that price.
@Courtney Roberts
sadly all retailers reserve the right to cancel when it's a preorder.
I preordered GT5 from Amazon UK when it was listed at 25 and they cancelled it within a week :(
and that was a year ago, damn you Polyphony Digital XD
sadly all retailers reserve the right to cancel when it's a preorder.
I preordered GT5 from Amazon UK when it was listed at 25 and they cancelled it within a week :(
and that was a year ago, damn you Polyphony Digital XD
@kytherno I am, too. I just don't like to mention it because if you don't like something the staff does in this site, it's like blasphemy. :P I kid, I kid.
really, there would be no point to SCII 3-D, but if they want to implement it, why not.
really, there would be no point to SCII 3-D, but if they want to implement it, why not.
The Nvidia kit doesn't require the game to support 3D. Just needs DirectX and you're golden. So why would Blizzard need to patch it? Unless they've made the game and stuck in something that breaks Nvidias 3D drivers?
I don't care if a game has optional 3D. I care if a publisher has diverted significant resources from other areas of development to implement it.
StarCraft II was on sale on Bwt Buy.com for $5.00. Not pre-order price, but final price. "You save 54.99 type dea. Finally got it cause of that. Hopefully they respect the error lol.
Yea, I disagree with the "Well, if you don't want 3D, don't play it in 3D. Problem solved." logic. If the company could've put the resources to good use making a feature that isn't a load of shit, then I got shafted in the process. As well as you!
I love how so many people are violently against this "3D gimmick", and yet very few have actually played a game in 3D.
Skepticism is one thing (Hell, even I'm skeptical), but you guys are acting like 3D killed your family.
Skepticism is one thing (Hell, even I'm skeptical), but you guys are acting like 3D killed your family.
Assuming that they use DirectX, all NVidia 8800 and higher cards *already* have anaglyph 3D built into them. ATI recently implemented it through their drivers as well.
I just love this whole "adding 3D" bit for the Windows side of things when 3D has been optional on all DirectX games with varying degrees of success for quite some time.
Oh, and you people who keep calling this a "gimmick" really, really need to get over yourselves.
I just love this whole "adding 3D" bit for the Windows side of things when 3D has been optional on all DirectX games with varying degrees of success for quite some time.
Oh, and you people who keep calling this a "gimmick" really, really need to get over yourselves.
@the7k: 3D did kill my family. And I was almost done grieving but here you had to remind me. You bastard. :(
But seriously.
I understand it's rather foolish to give an opinion without being properly educated on the subject (that is, actually playing a game in 3D) but I can honestly think of no beneficial reason to have Starcraft 2 boasting 3D. Then again, I feel the same with roughly everything 3D. I don't even watch films that way (partly due to added cost, but I really don't care for the thing at all). What would 3D do for the game? Maybe you'll see places considered high terrain closer, but...eh. I really hope it's not something like "unit dies and explodes, sending corpse-bits/shrapnel at player."
It's just, all of a sudden, EVERYTHING is having needlessly tacked-on 3D. You hear enough people complain about Sony's move to incorporate 3D with specialized TV systems and the costly glasses, though there are just as many people apathetic about 3D elsewhere, though I've no idea where to cite in specific. I don't want 3D all over the place.
Regardless, tl;dr: I don't need to do X to know I dislike X.
@everyone getting this for $5: Yeah, I'd be very surprised if BB honored that. Best of luck regardless! =P
But seriously.
I understand it's rather foolish to give an opinion without being properly educated on the subject (that is, actually playing a game in 3D) but I can honestly think of no beneficial reason to have Starcraft 2 boasting 3D. Then again, I feel the same with roughly everything 3D. I don't even watch films that way (partly due to added cost, but I really don't care for the thing at all). What would 3D do for the game? Maybe you'll see places considered high terrain closer, but...eh. I really hope it's not something like "unit dies and explodes, sending corpse-bits/shrapnel at player."
It's just, all of a sudden, EVERYTHING is having needlessly tacked-on 3D. You hear enough people complain about Sony's move to incorporate 3D with specialized TV systems and the costly glasses, though there are just as many people apathetic about 3D elsewhere, though I've no idea where to cite in specific. I don't want 3D all over the place.
Regardless, tl;dr: I don't need to do X to know I dislike X.
@everyone getting this for $5: Yeah, I'd be very surprised if BB honored that. Best of luck regardless! =P
I don't really mind the inclusion of 3D (I'd prolly try it out...in ten years when it's cheap/affordable), but I agree with the motion my friend carries that if there's other things to be fixing (according to him, Battle.net IIRC), why are they effectively wasting time with an add-on instead of the core mechanics? Also, I'm really not sure how 3D will really benefit something with the vantage point used in StarCraft. The game may as well be rendered in 2D for all the judgment-of-space that goes on (would high ground really be hard to figure out in sprtie-forme?).
We have many nfl jerseys in stock, if you need ,you can open nfl jerseys site.
We produce a variety of nfl jerseys .Welcome to buy!
We produce a variety of nfl jerseys .Welcome to buy!
follow
