He's obviously laying the blame on the hackers. He's just saying Sony will put more effort in piracy prevention and less in actually improving its service, which ultimately hurts the honest consumer.
To be honest, I'm not too sure about this point of view. Aren't Sony supposed to be doing internal research on this kind of thing in the first place? If a hacker exposes a hole in the system which Sony can patch, isn't he just doing free work for Sony?
While I'm a proponent of open systems and in favor of consumers being allowed to do what they wish with the products that they purchase, the simple truth is that it's up to each designer to decide what works best for their system. The people who are at fault here are the ones who have taken it upon themselves to ignore that decision and do what they wish without regard to how it will affect people on a larger scale.
Now, the Ubisoft now-canceled DRM scheme...That was bad. That punished legitimate consumers.
Sony owns the network that the product in question connects to. That means they are within the right to deny access to units which do not conform to a standard which Sony determines. That standard exists to protect Sony's interests in regards to not only piracy but ensuring that all users of the network have a homogeneous experience.
When you break it down, these sorts of firmware updates do not actually violate the freedoms of the consumer to use the product in whatever way they choose. But just as you would lose any claim to warrantied services by performing maintenance or upgrades on any product produced by any manufacturer anywhere, in refusing to conform to the standard that the network requires you lose any claim to make use of that network.
That said, this Firmware locks out the Piracy devices, nothing else.
I wouldn't consider people using them "honest" customers.
They're protecting their assets.
You lock your front door.
Are you screwing "Honest" burgulars. Extreme, and not fully applicable example. But I have no problem with them protecting their own assets.
The other OS thing was bullshit, Thanks Geohot.
This isn't removing previous functionality from your console, this is protecting themselves.
This is exactly what i expected to happen.
You call the police (paid by your tax dollars). You call your insurance agent (who then raises your rates). You call that phone sex operator because she's the only one who can soothe your sense of loss ($2.99 a minute buys a lot of healing).
The point being that there are all sorts of expenses that Sony would otherwise not incur were it not for the actions of these people. Maybe it's a few hours spent by a programmer. And then there's the time of the people who have to test the update to make sure that there's absolutely no unexpected impact on the rest of the network. And then there's John Koller, some of whose time is now spent informing users of the upgrade.
These expenses are passed down to the consumer in one way or another. All consumers, not just those who decided they didn't want to play by the same rules as everyone else.
Its not like you have to run the update ? Doesn't it give you the option to decline and run it later, so you can play your game now?
And who cares if it lasts 15-20min updating ..... do people really sit there staring at the progress bar? I dunno about you but when something is going to sit there doing nothing while it does something for a while, I'll go do something else to pass the time.
Now, I've never used OtherOS and I won't because I simply don't have the need to do so but many others used it and the got screwed for the completely wrong reasons.
And the homebrewing scene is much more interesting on an iphone. Usually you always have your iphone with you so someone with a jailbreaked iphone has much more opportunities to try a homebrew project. Now on a PS3 on the other hand, who uses homebrew projects? Noone? Because every sane person is using a pc? PS3 jailbreaking is just for piracy, noone can really argue with that.
The only thing where jailbreaking the PS3 could be interesting is when move is released. Geeks love to play around with new hardware. But with no drivers released this could take a while.
Now, I don't know all of the specifics and I'm not much of a user of Apple's products. Without having researched, I never received the impression that Apple was in a position to do a whole lot about jailbreaking, except to deny iOS updates and remove functionality for some apps, which seems counterintuitive for a device which users were just taking to other networks anyway. It appeared that their only recourse was to challenge consumer rights in a court of law, which ultimately hasn't worked out for them. None of which should make iPhone piracy acceptable, but there's relatively little Apple can actually do about it in the current situation.
But it will still cost consumers in spite of the fact that Apple doesn't have this recourse. While it's hard to imagine Apple products being reduced in price simply if jailbreaking never existed and therefore they never lost money on the deal (before counting lost revenue from pirated Apps, I bet the legal expenses alone would make us crap our pants), I bet we'd all have better iPhones for our money, even if in a marginal sense.
That's not the position that Sony is in, however, and they're exercising their right to prevent users from using PSN who violate the standard. They have to do so to protect their bottom line from multiple fronts.
The only thing I think you haven't covered is the potential for LOST money if they DON'T try to fix the mod-chip issue.
If this thing truly is as easy to use as the R4, then I think it's impossible to deny that it could cause Sony (and other developers) SERIOUS money down the road if they leave it be.
All of which ultimately adds up to hurting consumers who paid for the same product as a troublesome minority who have decided that they're better than other people because they want to have their cake and eat it too.
Make no mistake. If everyone who jailbreaks their PS3 elects not to receive this update and not to circumvent it to use a service for which they have effectively given up any privilege to -- if there's a magnanimous outpouring of personal responsibility and accountability and both parties can agree now to go their separate ways without further intrusion -- we don't really have a problem. But we both know better, don't we?
The Playstation 3 is a value added hig tech console that has a robust free online system and doesn't need to be jailbreaked.
As a gamer, i am dissapointed to hear thse words from you. You are a Playstation 3 owner right? Then you should support Sony on this. Jailbreaking is nothing but piracy, regardless of what machines it is on. I hate to say this but you don't deserve to own a Playstation 3 and a shame to all Playstation 3 owners.
Check sonys website and you will see this is true.
Hell, if Sony wanted to they could brick your console for breaking the terms and conditions of usage.
I know that there are people who have the means and interest required to purchase a product and then choose to pirate it instead. But what method do you use to determine such a thing? The industry parades numbers in regards to the number of times a game is downloaded as if it could ever be a concrete indication of revenue they otherwise might have earned. They can't account for multiple downloads by the same person, people who download the game and then decide to make a purchase or users physically distributing copies of the game.
Would these numbers make a considerable difference? Perhaps not. What I do know is that, from my experience in retail, the average person shoplifts simply because they have the opportunity to do so and often does so with little regard for what it is they are stealing. I can't imagine human nature to be so different in a digital environment.
u mad?
@Romo Metaxxas
are you working for sony or something? you are taking this way too personally
me·di·o·cre
–adjective
Of only ordinary or moderate quality; neither good nor bad; barely adequate.
Doing the above, would also spare sony from having pissed off people with legit reasons to circumvent their hardware. Once they removed the Nix support on the phat PS3's, they begged for the PS3 to be blasted wide open.
Are you still here? You're overtly brainwashed view of Sony is sickening.
Just because patriot disagreed with you, he isn't entitled to a video games console? Thats just dumb dude.
Maybe I'm old fashioned, but if a game isn't worth paying for, it isn't worth playing either. Yeah, I can't wait to jailbreak my PS3 just so I can play free copies of Kane & Lynch 2, Mafia 2, HAWX 2 and all the other utter dreck that passes for entertainment these days.
I Fucking knew it. Everything that dude writes is like being indoctrinated. He makes sexual chocolate look like a 360 fanboy.
Where's the ban hammer?
I'm not on the modchip side, however. As someone who knows how to program potentially malicious code, I'm against putting suspicious objects in my USB ports.
That's what she said.
Mine nev3er take that long, 5 mins here, maybe 7/8 mins there. No biggie.
It's especially not a biggie when my PSN+ subscription automatically downloaded this in the middle of the night, i got home for my lunch break, set it installing (PSN+ usually installs stuff for me, but it seems, not FW updates) which took all of 5 minutes and bam, updated PS3, back to mah gaming.
Gamers are such a whiney bunch.
My point is, is it really going to be worth it? Is it really going to be worth it to pay $200+ for another PS3 just to get a bunch of free games that very likely won't be worth it?
I remember when I had a SwapMagic'd PS2, I just ended up playing games like the various GTA spin-offs and the other sub-par titles that were available at Blockbuster until I realized, "Why the hell am I playing these games? There's shit. The ONLY reason I'm wasting my time with them is because they're 'free', but they aren't even worth that."
I used to pirate hard on the PS2, which meant I BOUGHT very few games, if any at all (all downloaded and burned to the HDD, or rented and copied) sure Sony lost out on any game purchase i WOULD have made for the PS2.
But on the other hand, now I have a PS3 I have a habit of wanting every fucking game that comes out! now my only way to get them is to BUY them.
So it kind of worked as marketing, there are a number of games i wouldn't normally consider buying but after downloading the originals on PS2 I'm buying up the sequels on PS3, not to mention the habit of needing so many games that it created in me.
Ever since the PS2, every console I've had, well, consoles, phones, everything has been 100% legit. I even have a hombrew friendly PSP1000 which has up-to-date firmware and is fully legit.
I'm a bit of a hypocrite though, because I'm fully against game piracy, it's bad, it's wrong, it hurts the industry and the gamers and is generally douch-tastic.
However, I haven't paid for music since the 90's.
Game piracy - BAD, evil and cuntish
Music piracy - Perfectly fine
But i'm against piracy and what this hack is doing to the Playstation 3 is piracy plain and simple. You don't have to be a Sony supporter to see that piracy is bad. You just have to be a gamer and love gaming.
@Patriot - Word up dude, I just got your PM, will add you up tonight (if you can still get on PSN that is!) ; ) i have your name on a post-it.
@ epic-koryuken Dude, music piracy is ALWAYS right.
Ahh, it's good to be back guys, I've just had a week off work hence my playing games rather than arguing about them over the last 10 or so days.
I'm going to side with the Internet on this one. I hate being a statistic.
if people were pirating they didn't care at all about playing online anyway, so blah blah blah to most of the comments.
everyone just play games instead of complaining about what others are doing with theres/how much the game you love but won't play is selling. Trust me its WAY more fun.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow