Sony is a dirty Wikipedia troll, edits Halo 3 article, loves online vandalism

Still getting Halo 3. Stop being jealous Sony, you have MGS...well never mind. But wait you still get Lair and Killzone! Now run along and play with your Final Fantasy figures and leave the big boy games to the big boys.

This is waaaaay to immature for a decision to be made by an official at Sony. Some quality control tester out there decided to hate on the best selling game evar and didn't realize that it would get traced back to him.

What on Earth DO Sony think about John Inverdale?

I hope for him it's not his real name...

Haha, this game will own software sales for a long time, whats the point of slagging it off when we havent seen the finished article?? Oh and how dumb are sony employee's??
Also, my mate bought his £450 PS3 last saturday....i picked up the controller and straight away felt satisfied to buy my xbox360...talk about cheap and nasty, no weight to it, no rumble and it was seeeee through!

foxhound, killzone 2 doesn't look any better than the original, either.

Wow, way to get busted there sony.

HAHAHAHAHA!

That was...

Hahahaha.

Silly Sony, don't they know you're only supposed to vandalize the wiki article on chickens?

@DolphGB. It won't though will it? Because it will have been omitted for being detrimental to the Wiki cause.

After reading this i predict:
Sue
Guy loosing job+car+house+dog+pstriple+rubber duckie+wife+socks

@Axle - then how did the guy who 'found' this find it in the first place if it's been suppressed??

This is a FAKE and that's that.

of course sony would get the blame if one of their employees was screwing around. who else would?

obviously they dont understand the halo crowd or hardcore gamers in general if they think only minor tweaks to graphics or gameplay is a bad thing.

I don't know where people get that Halo 3 doesn't look much better than its predessesor. After playing the beta, i played a little bit of Halo 2 MP and to me the difference was significant. The textures in Halo 2 were ugly in comparison. Halo 3's campaign image quality appears to have more depth; images in the foreground pop while the background is more muted. There's more detail in objects and what I have seen of the lighting looks great.

On top of that, some of the levels of thi game are open. Corridor games can afford to use more resources on textures and polygons because they don't have to worry about the player flying around the level in an ariel vehicle. Halo 3 looks like it may achieve a lot graphically especially considering Halo 3 will have some large open levels and ariel combat

At the same time, Halo 3 remains true to the Halo art style. It's not photo-realistic. It's kinda cartoony and more colorful than your Gears or Ressistance. But I don't think its appropriate to confuse artistic style with grapical prowess - there is a difference.

There's a chance I could be wrong, and once I actually play Halo 3 it won't seem as impressive. But from the little bit I;ve seen so far its looking great. Can't comment on the gameplay since my only experience was the beta. But if it play a little more like CE than 2 then I can't really ask for more. Well except maybe a team mode that incorporates Phantoms and Pelicans and protecting bases - but matybe that's asking for too muck

I agree.. sony guy shouldn't write it.

mr. Sterling.. where did you found the ip? if you don't mind telling...

Thank you, D-Nez, for saying what I was going to say. Are you perhaps my friend Sco Nex in disguise?

As for using Pelicans and Phantoms and stuff, play the Halo RTS, Halo Wars!

Looks like it was faked. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=187121&page=3

Are you kidding me? When are you going to mention how Microsoft got busted editing Wiki when it came to failure rates of the 360? Total fanboy hypocricy

http://www.maltastar.com/pages/msFullArt.asp?an=14323

- Microsoft tried to cover up the XBOX 360 failure rate

Oh shit!

$ony = EPIC FAIL. Nice find Jim.

hahahahahahaha

thats all