If such a thing exits, do not tell me.
...shit I just lost again. And so does everyone else reading this comment.
EDIT: After carefully rereading the entry bit, I see that I was not promised any such thing.
I play games for fantasy, besides, virtual women have their pluses over real ones, such as being far less expensive, requiring less maintenance, and you don't have to change their litter boxes nearly as often.
...wait...
Another inaccuracy is Oblivion never had any files to unlock, the texture you see on the underwear IS their skin. However the "HOT COFFEE", is what actually triggered Oblivion's rerating as this was near that time. ESRB apparently had no idea this stuff could happen and for the PUBLIC'S SAFETY (or their's more likely), they rerated it even though it technically had no nudity in it, later on in fact they say they rerate it purely for the violence and it had nothing to do with the nudity (ya right) this is just a cover up as to prove that they make no mistakes (which never makes any sense considering the situation). It also was no more intense than anything found in any GOW game (which denotes another sinister notion behind ESRB it doesn't care much about what Sony/MS does it's everyone else who has to worry).
Also the history of gaming shows that nudity has been in games since it's birth.
This is an old Atari game called Custer's revenge. Which features Custer trying to get revenge by raping Indian women.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_3TbKBbkQs_A/SI1UXdeAzeI/AAAAAAAAAHQ/zjMZBkXYv8I/s320/custersrevengegame.png
The only thing preventing the freedom of nudity is the license holders Sony/MS who themselves will use it on a constant basis and I can only speak from Sony's side (GOW, Heavy Rain, uh ok so I'm drawing a blank how about this http://www.gametrailers.com/video/this-is-playstation-3/20297) Anyway point being when someone else does it they get the stick by the ESRB.
Even in this newer version the sex is still some what tame, in the notion you never see any physical sex organs, it's something you would see in softcore porn. It's easily comparable to what you would see in GOW. It is definitely not worth the AO rating, the AO rating is given to games the ESRB wants to die. It's not necessarily given because the game deserves it all the time, it's used as a threat and punishment as well.
Anyway point being nudity isn't new, the limitation on it is what is new, and that started with Nintendo's Official Seal crap, they worked new grounds for limited systems from being published by JUST anyone, but now have to be approved by the console developer.
1.) I never stated that the nude mods for Alyx Vance were only made after Garry's Mod came out. The paragraph was saying how the popularity of the nude mod and subsequent nude mods made increased with the release of Garry's Mod now that people had the ability to freely manipulate Alyx.
As for when the first nude mod of Alyx came out, I believe it was around July in 2005. It was made by Digital_Utopia who then went on to make the hi-def skins for Half-Life 2 and a bajillion nude skins for Alyx Vance after that for some reason.
2.) Actually, Oblivion did have files to unlock. All the information about the ratings change can be found at this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESRB_re-rating_of_The_Elder_Scrolls_IV:_Oblivion
Before writing this I checked as many articles as I could to make sure I wasn't being factually innacurate with that paragraph. According to what I've read, Oblivion did have hidden files that the nude mod for it unlocked.
3.) I specifically avoided talking about games that already had nudity in them without hiding them because they were not the focus of the article. I am well aware of the existence of Custer's Revenge, as I am both God of Wars (I own God of War 1 and 2). There are quite a few games that show nudity and I could make a rather large list of them, but I won't because those games are irrelevant to what this article is about. People modding games for nudity and games that had nudity from the very beginning are two completely different things, and I chose to write an article about the more unusual of the two, nude mods.
4.) My mention of Hot Coffee in the article was brief and was for the purposing of setting up a time-frame for when the Oblivion mod came out, explaining why it's release would be such a big deal.
I also never mentioned God of War in this article whatsoever so I don't really know why you're going off about it. As for why Hot Coffee was such a big deal whereas God of War's wasn't is because of the fact that God of War never actually showed the act of sex in the game. You would have the women topless, and then the camera would pan away to something else as the sex happened off-screen. Grand Theft Auto's Hot Coffee mod actually showed the act.
Hot Coffee in the end wasn't really that big of a deal. Most of the controversy came from overreaction on pretty much everyone's part and, quite frankly, I do believe a lot of the controversy could have been avoided had Rockstar never lied about the content in the first place (when the mod first surfaced, Rockstar claimed that the content was never in the game and that it was all a user-made mod rather than explaining that it was content that was specifically locked away on the disc to not be used).
5.) I really don't know where the stuff in your third post came from, so... yeah.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow















follow