You spelled "Bulletstorm" wrong.
http://gaming.icrontic.com/article/nea-video-games-are-an-art-form/
You can thank me later...
But i love that Zelda appeared in every category it could, lol.
Like... Marble Madness??? I mean, I own that game and everything. But it kind of sucks.
Sorry for posting so much, I'm just confused and a little excited.
Oh well, they got some good picks for the most part, and first and foremost I'm happy that they even took the time to do all of this.
And the categories make no sense: why is metroid echoes an action game but windwaker is and adventure game when they both have similar amount of exploration, killing stuff, and finding secrets? Why is the first metal gear solid an action game while the second is for some reason a strategy game? Most of all, how is Diablo II a "target" game? Yeah I guess you have to aim your mouse, but if that is what you find challenging about it you are going to have some serious problems.
Other than those two, not a terrible list. I'm excited for video games to get their chance to shine in a different light!
I really don't think that this should have been put to a public vote. I believe it should have been up to "experts" in the field, like long time game devs and editors for magazines or something. This same BS happened with the top 50 game characters in Guinness World book. Carl Johnson, are you friggin' kidding me? Over Tommy Verceti? I have lost faith in America. I believe that's the 178th time now :)
Also, a couple of other choices really bug me, such as Sonic Adventure over Jet Grind Radio, the original Star Fox over Gradius III, and Tomb Raider over NiGHTS Into Dreams. This was more of a popularity contest than anything.
Sorry, but the best game Clover Studios made is already included on that list. No need for them to have Viewtiful Joe 2.
Yep, because it'll teach people the nuance of the highly addictive rage quit.
While I'm tempted to agree I have to ask if you took part in the large poll that got the games picked, picked?
I did and it was pretty clear that while the Smithsonian is making a great effort to showcase gaming, it has little idea on how to handle this based on some of the games that made the poll lists and the groupings some of them were placed in. There was fairly big discrepancies made with some games, one particular instance I can remember was MGS1 being placed in one category in one generation while the largely similar MGS2 was placed in a completely different category in the following generation and there was no reasons given as to why that was.
God dammit.
imo they should have asked a large pool of game journos to do this.
If so, would someone mind shooting me in the face? Please?

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow


























follow