surf dtoid with 
Rising (10+)
People you follow
Wow... And here I thought I was the only one who remembered Red Ninja: End of Honor. I know I was only one of maybe ten people who really liked it.
Seeing as how there is going to be time travel in the game, it might be a hoot to see them slip in a reference to Red Ninja, maybe a flying squirrel-person ninja in a little gi-dress thing like Kurenai (or Kohaku from Inuyasha) would wear in their feudal Japan stage.
So would crow Tengu for that matter.
Clockwerk's return would not be a hoot,however.
So would crow Tengu for that matter.
Clockwerk's return would not be a hoot,however.
If I get one version when buying the other, I'll get it and love the feature. If they want to double-charge me they can go to hell.
Glad to see this hitting the Vita. I probably wouldn't have picked it up on PS3, but I can definitely see myself playing it as a portable title.
"If they have both copies, presumably" I would like to know who is stupid enough to buy both versions (PSV and PS3)of a game, any game for the cross-platform shit?
This is a good idea in theory, and I'd like to see it done with more games. But charging twice for the same game is pretty ridiculous.
The whole "transfarring" idea was neat until companies decided it was just a new way to double dip and get more money out of the consumer. I'm just not interested in shelling out twice for one game and I don't think it will succeed the way its being done now.
At this point, I just want full support for PS1 AND PS2 classics on Vita and for Vita to otherwise be its own thing with its own exclusives.
At this point, I just want full support for PS1 AND PS2 classics on Vita and for Vita to otherwise be its own thing with its own exclusives.
So it's ridiculous if you have to pay for a game twice if the game's on 360/PS3, but when it's on two Sony platform's, it's ludacris?
@Propelled -
1) Ludicrous not "ludacris." One is a word, the other is a rapper.
2) PS3 and 360 naturally would not have cross platform compatibility.
Cross-platform play for Vita and PS3 had the opportunity to add value to having both platforms, but that was abandoned the moment greedy executives realized they could charge a premium for both versions of the game and have people buy it twice for two platforms.
1) Ludicrous not "ludacris." One is a word, the other is a rapper.
2) PS3 and 360 naturally would not have cross platform compatibility.
Cross-platform play for Vita and PS3 had the opportunity to add value to having both platforms, but that was abandoned the moment greedy executives realized they could charge a premium for both versions of the game and have people buy it twice for two platforms.
Not enough people wanted almost-PS2 games on the PSP because it was better on the PS2 they already had. I doubt this will change with the Vita but hopefully developers realize it sooner this time.
Is that actually true though tea? The best selling games as far as I can remember were the more advanced ones such as Crisis Core, Monster Hunter, etc. I also think the gap between systems is much smaller this time and the huge problem of the missing right analogue stick solved.
I'm pretty excited for this, will more than likely get this on Vita now and I think It'll be a great fit.
I'm pretty excited for this, will more than likely get this on Vita now and I think It'll be a great fit.
so sony's idea of supporting Vita is to flood it with ps3 ports. yeah, that makes sense advertise the system to ps3 owners and then only release the exact same games they've already played, but uglier and crappy spin-offs of games they already own and are much better than those cashgrabs. yeah, they will definitely spend those 300$ just to play inferior versions of games they already own.
Is it a port in the sense you refer to if it comes out the same day? Just another option really.
@Master
Easily remappable to the back/front touchpads?
@Master
Easily remappable to the back/front touchpads?
I am pro, the vita and ps3 getting its own exclusives, especially from sony.......
if they want the vita to bounce back in sales, its going to need as much original content as it can
thats all i have to say on this matter.
if they want the vita to bounce back in sales, its going to need as much original content as it can
thats all i have to say on this matter.
sony handhelds always will fail compared to Nintendo products if sony's only idea is to produce the exact same games for both consoles and handhelds. Nintendo figured it out long time ago with first gameboy and provides different catalogue of IPs for handhelds and consoles, because people who play on mobile devices expect different type of experience. even games based on the same IP have different design and gameplay on handhelds and consoles from Nintendo.
@Stealth
Sofik88 has nothing nice to say about Sony and you actively defend handhelds. How can this work out peacefully?
Sofik88 has nothing nice to say about Sony and you actively defend handhelds. How can this work out peacefully?
@Stealth,
looking at Vita, they didn't.
we've got again a cutting edge hardware that is priced ridiculously high and doesn't make profit.
sony is also pushing for high end big budget core games that copy their console portfolio, pushing smaller games and devs along with typical handheld fanbase out which automatically kills their hardware. in the end they're left with the audience that demands every game to be GTA or Call of Duty - those big budget titles that don't sell too well and it completely cuts smaller devs because their games aren't technically advanced enough.
i knew Vita would fail the moment they showed it for the first time - they were repeating the same mistakes, and they keep doing it.
looking at Vita, they didn't.
we've got again a cutting edge hardware that is priced ridiculously high and doesn't make profit.
sony is also pushing for high end big budget core games that copy their console portfolio, pushing smaller games and devs along with typical handheld fanbase out which automatically kills their hardware. in the end they're left with the audience that demands every game to be GTA or Call of Duty - those big budget titles that don't sell too well and it completely cuts smaller devs because their games aren't technically advanced enough.
i knew Vita would fail the moment they showed it for the first time - they were repeating the same mistakes, and they keep doing it.
i only see it as a failure if it sells no more than 10,000 units. the vita is not failing. its failing compared to nintendos sales yes, but who cares about that? oh yeah, fanboys.
@fetus, would you not say that 6k sales in a week in japan is not failing?
@sofik
well the vita story has not been finished yet
@sofik
well the vita story has not been finished yet
something tells me that there won't be many new Vita games at e3... just ps3 ports.
Basically, the conference will be what has been revealed up to this point, and the big deal of it all is that the vita will get all of these games as well.
Basically, the conference will be what has been revealed up to this point, and the big deal of it all is that the vita will get all of these games as well.
@stigmeyer
Well, there's the keiji inafune Vita game that was just announced for Japan. It will most likely be an e3 announcement, under the title "Forsaken Souls"...
http://www.siliconera.com/2012/05/16/sony-register-domain-for-forsaken-souls-in-north-america/
The game looks like MonHun/demon souls. You play as a wizard who sacrifices items to cast spells, and body parts for really powerful attacks.
I'm pretty sure the Dark Souls team is behind it(Sony Japan)
Well, there's the keiji inafune Vita game that was just announced for Japan. It will most likely be an e3 announcement, under the title "Forsaken Souls"...
http://www.siliconera.com/2012/05/16/sony-register-domain-for-forsaken-souls-in-north-america/
The game looks like MonHun/demon souls. You play as a wizard who sacrifices items to cast spells, and body parts for really powerful attacks.
I'm pretty sure the Dark Souls team is behind it(Sony Japan)
Why is having more game options a bad thing? Why are so many people opposed to getting ps3 ports AND original games? Most of you commenters are fucking pathetic...
I'm happy about this. I'd rather play this game on the go. I have enough home console games. Now I have an option. Yet people are constantly complaining.
And to the people whining about the Vita "just having console ports" what about Gravity Rush? Or the new Resistance game? To me it seems clear that Sony is trying to bring both full console games to the Vita as well as custom tailored experiences specifically made for the handheld. It's pretty childish to look at one game being released and then make wild assumptions about sony "only" releasing that kind of game in the future.
And to the people whining about the Vita "just having console ports" what about Gravity Rush? Or the new Resistance game? To me it seems clear that Sony is trying to bring both full console games to the Vita as well as custom tailored experiences specifically made for the handheld. It's pretty childish to look at one game being released and then make wild assumptions about sony "only" releasing that kind of game in the future.
follow
