@ namelessted

your are a truly M$ fanboys and Crunshii is right put every add-ons on the 360 and it's more expensive then the PS3 like it or not.

Stop being so fanboy and accept the truth that the PS3 is coming out strong and will shut your little fucking mouth !

uh should i compress my msg for you ??? lollllllllll

MS fanboys love spinning their xbox 1.5. Sonys system is future proof for a good 5 years. The Bluray move was brilliant. The 360 will last for maybe 2 more years before MS fanboys have to shell out 4 or 5 hundred more dollars to keep up with sony. The BD drive will last the life of Sony's ingenious plan. Its like the tortoise and the hare-ms knew the sony had a monster up their sleeve a few yrs ago so they rushed out their red ring box with mainly last gen technology just to get a 13 month head start on Sony. NOW they are winning the software race but soon the limitations of the hardware will become more apparent as SOny's hardware power is realized and software is multiplied. Sony is now slowly chugging along like the tortoise but in a year or so MS will run out of steam as Sony passes them by with a nice smile-SOny's system will outlast 2 more MS systems in the next 5-7 years. Get ready to spend a lot of money 360 boys. Soon you will realize life exists outside of Master Chief's ass.

@Quest, do you have any idea what teh fuck you are talking about? I will admit up front that I like the 360 more than the PS3. But don't get me wrong, i have reasons, it is because the 360 is better. I can say the same fucking this about the PS3 and having to buy the add ons, if you want the PS2 memory card adapter, and the controller adapter, and the wireless adapter (if you bought the original $500 SKU), and the bluray watching remote control, HIGH DEF CABLES THAT DON"T COME WITH A HIGH DEF SYSTEM.

my point is, the PS3 starts off even more expensive than the 360, and if you want to, you can make it even more expensive than $600. I can give you plenty of reasons why I really think that Sony is going to have the smallest market share this generation with teh PS3 and those opinions are mostly unbiased. How many time in the history of games has a $600 system been successful? Sony is losing money on every single PS3 they sell (about $200). At this point, M$ is turning a small profit on each 360 they sell (but then you have to factor in the 33% that red light). The PS2 has sold over 120 million people worldwide. Unless Sony can get the PS3 down to a $200 price point in the next 2 years, then they will never be able to reach the same people. Trust me when I say that most of those 120 million people that bought a PS2 can't afford a $600 PS3, and then add in teh price of an HDTV.

I can go on, but this post is already too long. I didn't even want to get on teh subject of this as it is quite unrelated to the original subject. I just want you to know that I am not just some stupid fanboy, I know what the fuck I am talking about. And as soon as Sony does something good with teh PS3, i will continue to criticize them for it.

@thisissami - Quite certain about the 9MB/s figure. According to this page (www.blu-ray.com), a 2x Blu-Ray drive is noted as the minimum to meet the requirement of BD-ROM format movies of 54Mbps data transfer. The actual sustained rate of the 2x drive is 72Mbps. That's megaBITs per second - divide by eight. Nine megabytes per second.