Quantcast


Shocker: Heavy Rain only possible on the PlayStation 3 photo

If all of what we’re seeing and hearing is accurate, Heavy Rain: The Origami Killer will be one hell of a powerhouse title for the PlayStation 3. This is especially good news for Sony, considering the game is slated as an exclusive for the system. But even if the developer, Quanitco Dreams, wanted to jump ship at any point, it sounds like they wouldn’t be able to. Heavy Rain’s director, David Cage, doesn’t think the game is possible on the Xbox 360.

“I think this game can only be done on Playstation 3. We used all the SPUs,” Cage told NowGamer in a recent interview. “I think to do the visuals, and all the stuff we’re doing would be too difficult [on the 360]. There are amazing physics there, and stuff with crowds that you just couldn’t really get."

Again, judging by the screenshots and video we reported on or received, it seems like Cage is right on target with his assessment. Plus, you know, he’s a developer. He knows these things.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

45 comments | showing # 1 to 45
prev next

trueb7ue's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:06
trueb7ue
idk about you, but i really wouldnt want rain on my 360...


water + system is just bad.

and first comment woot!
hood_954's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:07
hood_954
Out of shape Dan Akroyd is the Origami Killer: CONFIRMED.

"Use my likeness in Ghostbusters will ya?! Over my dead body!"
Milestailsprowe's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:10
Milestailsprowe
Meh Lies imo its just that they didn't try cause it was a exclusive
Daxelman's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:12
Daxelman
That's what they said about Crysis and the PC.

Then CryENGINE 3 came out.
Shirley Temple's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:18
Shirley Temple
@Daxelman

Well, it's true. It's not possible on consoles. That's why they had to redo the engine so that it WAS possible on consoles.
SuitcoatAvenger's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:22
SuitcoatAvenger
"powerhouse title"? Mmmm... dunno about that. Indigo Prophecy didn't rock worlds, exactly. The graphics may flex many-a-muscle, but I doubt John Q will show much interest when they find out that you can't teabag.
Toneman's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:23
Toneman
I don't even really care. From what I've seen, this game is a lot of "push this button at the right time" stuff.
Wedge's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:26
Wedge
Yes that is most likely what it is Tony. Did you ever play Indigo Prophecy? It's a real-time adventure game basically.
10BobMarleys's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:27
10BobMarleys
I don't see why a lot of you guys find it hard to beleive this. The PS3 is a more graphically powerful machine.
007's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:27
007
MGS 4 + Omega

That is all.
Corak's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:33
Corak
Yup shit all over it being a PS3 exclusive people, its ok. A game trying to go a new direction in interactive storytelling in the gaming medium while pushing the graphical prowess of a game console sounds good to me. Maybe if it was an FPS it would garner more support from the 360 crowd. Although I think that it would be possible on the 360 its just that they are not developing the title for it.
Daxelman's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:39
Daxelman
Corak: Don't get me wrong, I loved me some Indigo Prophecy, even if it was a complete mind fuck.

But this "You can only do it here" BS is really getting old.
Chronic Logic's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:41
Chronic Logic
Meh, I don't really care about this game, I lost interest in this game LONG ago. Let the PS3ers have it. I'm just waiting for Omikron 2, but if they release that exclusively for the PS3, there will be hell to pay.
SuitcoatAvenger's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:47
SuitcoatAvenger
Chronic Logic wins thread for bringing Bowie into play.
AgentMOO's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:49
AgentMOO
Does the title of the game come from the heavy man in the screenshot raining on you? eww
Black Nexus's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:49
Black Nexus
@ Daxelman
I thought that at first too but this is like the 19 dev we have heard say this, so I'm guessing there's some truth to it. I know some do it for shameless advertising , but that can't be everyone, SOME honest people have to exist in the industry.

that or I'm just being an optimist again, and everyone is a dirtbag.
TOEmastro's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/15/2009 23:50
TOEmastro
Crazy frenchies!
Kalmah's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 00:33
Kalmah
It's pretty obvious David Cage is a bias PS3 fanboy.
falinter's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 00:35
falinter
I'd hit it.

The game interests me. I feel like it might try something newish.
I've played Indigo Prophecy.
Reginald's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 00:36
Reginald
as time wears on, the technical differences between the ps3 and 360 will become increasingly apparent. it takes a lot of time to learn how to milk a multi-core system, and the titles should be getting increasingly more interesting in the next few years
rushtodeath's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 00:37
rushtodeath
Put Heavy Rain on PC then. I'm sure PC can handle it.
hpv's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 01:14
hpv
I can't believe anyone is actually surprised that PS3 is (significantly) more powerful than 360. Hopefully Microsoft won't be able to force the next generation of consoles before we get to see that power fully utilized. I don't have any interest in buying another console until at least 2013.

And Indigo Prophecy kicks ass! It's got some rough spots but really interesting story telling, smart use of controls, and quick-time events that are actually good for the most part. From any other developer I'd have written this off as going to suck a long time ago, but with their track record I'm pretty excited.
Los255's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 01:24
Los255
Why is it that every big PS3 has a case of "LOL MEGABYTES?" Talk gameplay, not processing power.

I think this will redefine cinematics in games. Everything is high consequence, so the game will shape out interestingly.
oshiee's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 01:57
oshiee
I am so desperately looking forward to this game and Dragon Age. I hope both aren't epic fails and actually live up to the hype.
Takeshi's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 03:24
Takeshi
Not going to defend anything or anyone here but he didn't arrange a press-conference solely about his game only being possible on the PS3. It's just that NowGamer made a whole article about one excerpt of the interview. Bunch of page hit whores if you ask me.
PhazonYoshi's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 05:04
PhazonYoshi
Dax, take a look at the CryEngine3 trailers, and then some actual footage of Crysis, there's quite a difference in lighting and distantLOD.

As for this, sure, I believe them. I don't know why anybody's taking it as a slight against the 360, it's a fact the ps3 has more brute force to throw around, and physics, AI, are complex and expensive.
KamikazeTutor's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 06:53
KamikazeTutor
Because changing those QTE button symbols is such a pain.
hjd uk's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 07:58
hjd uk
Hmm im not sure thats right, the XBox360 and PS3 are comparable in power, just that their architectures are different. If they created an engine that handled the data and jobs in a similar way to the PS3 ( multiple separate tasks handled by the SPUs) but instead allocated them to the hardware threads on the XB360 im sure CPU-wise the game is more than capable of running on the XB. The only real advantage the PS£ has is the capacity of the storage medium.
If the game has hours and hous and hours of audio and video (that wont fit on a DVD) then i guess that would be a stumbling block for ther XB.

Oh and BTW, the current PS3 will never have games that graphically look significantly better (*) because the XB360 GFX chip is better - more fill-rate so nicer shaders are possible and post-processing and screen-buffer effects are easier to get into a 'frame'.
grasslunatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 08:21
grasslunatic
What he's really saying is we can't be arsed porting it.
LsTr Of SmG's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:02
LsTr Of SmG
@ grasslunati, no.

What he's saying is that the experience would be compromised and I can believe him - particularly on the physics side of things. Fact is the PS3 has more brute processing power to throw around. End of.

As PhazonYoshi says it shouldn't be taken as a slight against the 360, as hdj uk said the 360 has a better graphics chip for example (not hugely more powerful but it has a far better architecture), but for physics and AI the PS3 has the upper hand. I love my 360 but I'm not going to begrudge my PS3.

However unlike what hjd uk said the 360's graphics chip is not nearly comparably more powerful than the PS3's that it could take up the extra workload that would be required to offset the 360s lower processing power. Unfortunate but true. Yes Heavy Rain would theoretically be possible on a 360 but, using the Crysis example from earlier, things would have to be compromised (as they have been somewhat in CryEngine3).
JACK of No Trades's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:05
JACK of No Trades
@ hjd uk

Im willing to take the the game developers word over some asshurt 360 owners.
Robbo the hood's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:05
Robbo the hood
If it can't be done on the 360 in its current form I highly doubt a toned down version for the 360 would yield earth shattering differences. Why does a full-length QTE need complex physics anyway? Everything is completely scripted. Hell, from what I've seen, you could just put a bunch of high def video on there and play clips based on your button selection. I hardly find this to be much in the way of "interactive" storytelling either, let alone some bold new direction we should embrace and explore. This is pretty much the minimal level of interactivity you could sell for $60. I'm interested and will play this game, but back off Sony fanboys, people are hating on this game because Indigo Prophecy was polarizing, not because it's a PS3 exclusive.
JACK of No Trades's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:09
JACK of No Trades
@Robbo

WRONG! People are hating the game because it is PS exclusive. Any game that is PS3 exclusive, 360 owners try to find a fault and put it down.
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:26
Jon B
@ JACK of No Trades
Seriously, look up the tech comparisons of the two. They're strikingly similar in ability apart from the storage medium, hjd uk is indeed correct.

Also, exactly what is the excuse for it being "only on PS3"? Stuff with crowds? Look at Dead Rising. Stuff with shader operations? Look at the Cry3Engine. This could be ported to 360 fairly simply, I just put my money on Sony paying big bucks to keep it exclusive. Although if it's intended as a heavily story based game, it should be best if they focus on that rather than porting to every single console under the sun.

Also, PC version PLZKTHXBAI.
VisMortua's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:36
VisMortua
"Also, PC version PLZKTHXBAI."

Appropriately will have to say, YSPLZ.
CRAZYAPE69's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:48
CRAZYAPE69
Is PS3's new tactic to get money back on consoles becoming buying exclusivity rites? Seems like it to me.
Magesx's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 09:50
Magesx
If everything works out, this might shape up to be GotY material.
D-Nez's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 11:09
D-Nez
And some developers say its harder to code for ps3 and some don't. Whatever until someone tries it, it doesn't matter. I've yet to see something on my ps3 that blows my mind and makes me think its procesing power is worth the hype. Bit whatever, it's the only place for ps3 exclusives so I'll keep it
Naim Master's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 11:22
Naim Master
@chronic logic
Enviouuuss !
HiddenAHB's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 12:01
HiddenAHB
As always, the Sony bitches had to rub it in everyone faces.
[/mad_faboy=OFF]
Sick B0y's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 14:44
Sick B0y
Wait wait.... Nvm i dont care all these retarded statements for any system can blow it out the ass
Skribble's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/16/2009 20:51
Skribble
Holy shit it's like gametrailers up in this bitch.

Don't comment about the limitations of consoles if you do'nt know what the fuck you are talking about.

It make you look like a douchebag.
wonky360's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/17/2009 04:28
wonky360
I have never seen any "Can only be done on.." games which I actually believe to be true. There is a balance between xbox and ps3 and where one falls down the other normally makes up elsewhere. The 360 nearly always comes out better because of the nature of the most popular games. The important line in this article is "David Cage doesn't think.." Hardcore proof of the merits of a particular machine, NOT.
Greylocke's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/18/2009 17:35
Greylocke
lol, everyone is getting so uptight.
Mr Shizzlo's Avatar - Comment posted on 05/29/2009 13:32
Mr Shizzlo
Listen guys,

First off, I wouldn't get so full of myself as to righteously claim whether or not this game could be made possible only on PS3. If you have ever developed games for 360 or PS3, THEN I will listen to you. Otherwise, I figure you just googled PS3 vs. 360 and saw some stats and then crowned yourself king of knowledge.

Secondly, why hasn't anyone brought up the fact that some top scientists who are studying stars and black holes billions of light years away, are using PS3's as alternatives to supercomputers for their advanced processing power, and not 360's? I think that is something to consider in these power struggles...
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!