Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 



Why haven't I posted about Futuremark Games Studio's self-published, FPS-in-space Shattered Horizon?

That's a damn good question, really. As a lover of Dead Space and all things similar in nature to that game, I'm required by law to tell you about Shattered Horizon. Unbeknownst to me, it went up on Steam on Wednesday; apparently I am alone in this, because it's sitting in the top ten sellers section.

The main draw here is easily the zero gravity gameplay. Imagine a multiplayer session with 32 people in deep space. More specifically, on an asteroid. Bingo! Sounds sexy, huh? FGS shot us over a new video about Shattered Horizon's other neat feature called "silent running."

Yes, there is no sound in space. By default, your character's suit simulates audio to make the game more enjoyable. But with silent running, you can turn all audio cues off, meaning "a stealth advantage while sacrificing radar, HUD, and maneuverability."

I need a DirectX 10 graphics card, and I need this game.


Continue: More video stories





prev next

25 comments | showing # 1 to 25

GamesAreArt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 23:37
GamesAreArt
Why not Directx11?
prolifikstudio's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 23:44
prolifikstudio
this would be amazing in a 360 degree screen room and a plastic gun.
peachboy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/06/2009 23:46
peachboy
not only has my xbox red ring-ed but my pc started emitting the scent of burning plastic recently...but damn i want to try this game out.
Ali D's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 00:11
Ali D
It does look interesting, but I feel releasing a multiplayer FPS game at this time of year that's not MW2 is commercial suicide.
mourning orange's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 00:17
mourning orange
Thanks Grim...I had no idea this game existed...just bought it :)
Threaded's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 00:22
Threaded
@Ali D

It's PC only so I'm pretty sure it's safe from MW2.
DustyBlue's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 00:52
DustyBlue
I like it!
Misanthrope's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 01:10
Misanthrope
@Ali D

Yes it looks bad but its $19.99 and it probably has at least the option for dedicated servers so you never know.
AfroWalrus's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 03:15
AfroWalrus
@Ali D

But this game features 16 v 16 matches. Also outer space.
KaL YoshiKa's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 05:19
KaL YoshiKa
Also I'm under the impression that this game supports only Vista/Win7 so you'll need that as well - I would love to try this but I'm not upgrading my OS yet and I think this game will probably be dead in the water given its release time and strict requirements.
ninjikiran's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 05:35
ninjikiran
The game is also going to have free extra maps and the such. They plan on supporting the game for a while with free content.

There is a possibility of a singleplayer campaign to go along with this game but that is not anywhere in the near future.
Baleur's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 07:01
Baleur
@Threaded & Ali D

I'll be getting MW2 on my 360, but I still want to give this game a go on my PC.
As one of you said however, its quite a bad release date, even if I get the game for its low price, I'll probably stop playing it once MW2 comes out (in a few days).
Midir's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 07:35
Midir
To all of you out there considering this game, PLEASE re-think buying it. I played in the beta (up until pre-release) and this game is not fun or intuitive. The (single) gun is very difficult to use and very inaccurate, even when scoped. The 360 degree gameplay means you can be shot from anywhere with little or no warning, leading to frustrating deaths, and it runs pretty badly even on low detail.
You can seriously tell it was made by a benchmark developer, not a games developer. I can elaborate if people want more info.
Alkemdah's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 08:40
Alkemdah
@Midir

Sooo.. your complaint is that you suck with the gun, your mad because you keep getting shot from all directions, and your computer sucks?

Hmm...
whateverthismeanstoyou's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 08:49
whateverthismeanstoyou
What's wrong with the trailer? The basic physics 101 failed. Under the thin veil of space shooter with freedom of movement, everything looks like a total failure (no reaction to the shooter when the projectile leaves the guns, sound of gun, etc.) I like to see a bit more reality based space shooter. That would be interesting.
Solgrim's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 09:29
Solgrim
Why does my PC suck?
Palidi's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 10:42
Palidi
I was interested in this, but didn't know what to make of it.

Anyhow, I'm sold now. Just...may be a little while before I get it...
Im OK's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 11:16
Im OK
There is no support for Windows XP or DirectX 9.

They really wanted to limit their player-base didn't they?

Also, multiplayer only?

Yeah.... no. I don't think I'll ever be playing this game, even if my poor WinXP machine could run it.
readbigwordsisgood's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 12:28
readbigwordsisgood
"no support for Windows XP or DirectX 9"?

I really wish that system requirements info was the first sentence of the review of a "PC" only game.

My Athlon 3200 may be at the end of it's life for running games - but it runs the L4D2 demo fine.

But this game is somehow more demanding?
D-Nez's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 13:14
D-Nez
Like whatever said, it would be cool to see a high production zero-g FPS. I'm not sure how you handle sound in a vaccum and still keep it interesting.
Midir's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 16:37
Midir
@Alkemdah

Have you played the game, your post makes it sound like you haven't. I digress. Anyway, my PC can run Crysis on very high, 1920x1200, x2AA. Guess it sucks right? I would not have complained about the poor performance had it not been obvious that the game was poorly optimised, given it's quite bland detail.

Additionally, to your other points, I 'suck' with the gun for the reason that the gun itself is counter-intuitive. The game rewards you for unscoped blanket fire, being able to kill somebody in five or less shots, and punishes you for taking the time to aim, as the only scoped fire mode (burst) is beyond inaccurate. This is completely counter to pretty much any other FPS.

Finally, my other complaint about 'getting mad about being shot' is validated by the above reason, again, rushing in guns firing wildly is the way to play. The 'silent running' seen in the trailer is useless, as nobody will stay still that long. People will jet around everywhere, the map design can range from straightforward to warren-like in complexity, and you cannot possibly keep an eye on all routes at once, making the 'control point' mode rediculous.

I realise that my original post may come off as whiny purely for the sake of it, but I did beta this game for a number of weeks, as gameplay improvements were being made, and as it was about to go retail, I saw no clear change in the base mechanics that would suggest that Futuremark were interested in making a more accessable and 'fun' game. This is a shooter purely for those who like to be mercilessly challenged both by their guns, environment, and the other players.
RoboLeader's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/07/2009 16:46
RoboLeader
@readbigwordsisgood

The game is more demanding due to things such as it's open environments. In a game like L4D, you may be approaching a building, but the engine won't render what is inside until you actually get there, cutting down on rendering time by simply not rendering what you can't see yet. In a game like Shattered Horizon, the gigantic open areas do not allow for optimization techniques such as that.

As for the DX10 only thing, as the first game for the studio, it makes sense. DX10 is much easier to work with than 9 is, with fewer instructions needed to perform the same functions. DX10 not only adds more to the potential visuals, but allows developers do more with less.

That, and it's the first game made by a company that creates PC benchmarking software, so that may have something to do with it as well.
James Freeman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 08:37
James Freeman
Personally, having played the RELEASE game, I think it is really good, all the features such as silent running, and the different grenades are really well implemented and fun.
Locke's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/08/2009 19:13
Locke
we need to support development like this to keep the PC scene healthy. games like this are done by developers that are fiecre enough to be different. this is the kinda of think that is rarely seen on american developed console games. the jap console games are a bit better, but still love to play up on bad sequels.
Dan French's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/09/2009 10:08
Dan French
Well said, Locke. From their behavior in the beta, it sounds like Futuremark is very dedicated to this game and it's players.

Also, gee, how strange to see that people hate this game with a fiery passion, love this game with, well, a fiery passion, and also complain that their computer won't run this game. It's almost like people have different opinions on stuff! And are cheap!

I think this game is extremely fun, yes there ARE recoil reactions but only when your suit electronics are off (which is explained in the video, thanks for watching). The suit compensates for recoil, and generates sounds to orientate the combatant. Also, until you've played it, you can't understand how awesome the atmosphere (har har) is... Everything is eerie with no sound in silent running, you fire a frag grenade and get blown clean out of the asteroid... You drift a bit while your suit electronics come back up and see a huge arc of asteroids orbiting a gigantonormous and beautiful Earth...

This game is neat, haters.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 

   Got news?   tips@destructoid.com   |   Dtoid Twitter

New Videos

more videos


Reviews & Previews
BioShock 2 review
Dante's Inferno review
Chime review
Hustle Kings review
iPhone Review Round-up: January review
more reviews
Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
Metro 2033
A trip to the racetracks Days of Thunder Arcade
Double the pleasure, double the fun with Darwinia+
Wizarding world in plastic Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4
more previews


- The Dtoid Army is 56750 strong -

Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

Call for entries: the Areas of my Expertise

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals
Jim Sterling: How Aliens are blatantly better than Predators





















More Destructoid Originals




We are Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, Big Boss
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Will Maddock Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Joseph Leray
Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
     
  Adam Dork
Daniel Lingen
Hollie Bennett
Joe Burling
Mikey Turvey






 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006