I still think that parents should be the ones that decide what their kids play and that employees should enforce ESRB ratings when selling their products. His views are just way too socially conservative and personally intrusive to be reasonable for public policy.
But seriously, I'm surprised. That wasn't just tolerable, it was a good listen.
Thompson also wants employees to enforce ESRB ratings. One of the main disputes is how well they're actually doing. Mark Menth-a-whatsits thought that they were doing great, while Thompson thought they were doing poorly and needed government encouragement in the form of laws. I think we're all on the same page that employees need to enforce the ratings, it's just that Thompson's reactions are normally over the top and offensively wrong, instead of just making a reasonable point like in yesterday's debate. If Thompson is right, then we would need to consider ways to get them to enforce ratings at retail (and online, a loophole in general) if we don't want to go with his option to make laws.
Let's face it, if Fred Phelps, Eric Rudolph, or Osama Bin Laudin started acting reasonable or rational but still lied, deceived, and made the same irrational claims, should people start accepting them more despite their well established histories?
Only people above the age of eighteen were allowed into the Q&A or debate, which certainly helped limit the possibility of stupidity. Also, people were warned that inappropriate behavior would result in their being escorted out of both the room and the entire convention. So it was a pretty decent atmosphere all round.
I agree with him on that point, despite the fact its a tad annoying being 21 and getting carded for a 17+ game, not because I think that kids can't handle "mature" games but because I think their parents should decide if they think their children can.
Most people are -reasonably- well adjusted individuals. Playing things like Mortal Kombat and Goldeneye did not lead me to being a violent individual.
However, to my knowledge, my parents never did bat an eye at giving me a videogame I asked for. The issue was never if I was mature enough for it, but if I deserved the privilege of playing/owning it and we had enough disposable income at the time for relatively expensive "toys". Making sure the parent has at least a chance to be a control filter on what their kid is playing by purchasing it themselves is what should be done. If they turn around and complain about the games I think its their fault for not being their with their child to see what they are exposing themselves to. Legislating and becoming intrusive into people's lives will not only destroy personal liberties, but is also likely to create an even larger taboo and make more people want to do what they're told not to do and make the problem even worse.
If anyone is going to do something Columbine-esque that is inspired by videogames they probably were pretty unstable to begin with and the problem isn't the games but what is going on in their lives and minds to get them to that point.
In my opinion, I think it's just another way in which certain groups of people avoid taking responsibility for anything. It's so much easier to not have to worry about your life or future if you think some man in the sky is going to sort it all out for you. Dodging personal accountability seems to be a life goal of a great many people and this kind of thinking certainly helps.
Jack Thompson behaving nicely!?
Even though i disagree with his opinion about God i'm quite impressed with the debate yesterday, but we got to keep an eye open, we'll never know when he will stop the "save the children" attitude and come back to "video games are the devil spawn".
Just wait till another school massacre happens, he'll blaming Counter Strike again.
He said that some day there'll be a incident in America like the one in German and it'll be like the 9/11 for the Industry. If you think about that...this is not a so hard reality to see, the ero-game industry has just suffered a lot lately with the Rapelay shit that happened. If what he says end up happening imagine the shit...
No more God of War, Gears, Madworld, Left 4 Dead or even Resident Evil !
@Jim - Please allow people to hold their own religious beliefs without trying to rationalize them, thanks.
In every and any event...people are just people...they are just categorized for speaking up in certain manners. There's no need to hate someone but there's no need to instantly turn around and feel remorse for what we've all said earlier.
People react in different situations which is why I guarantee if you met ANY celebrity you REALLY hate on tv they'd probably be pretty human in real life put in a situation that allows them or forces them to be.
His name is Jack and he just happens to be a douchey douche a good 75% of the time. The other 25% he's just a person. Imagine that... ;)
I'd agree with him if it wasn't for the fact that while kids are stupid and "pop-culture" may indeed be the cause for their ideas of mass murder, the fact is it's not really the media, be it movies, video games or music that is ultimately responsible for the grizzly murders, it's the shitty parenting and the breeding of rednecks.
And personally I'm all for +18 games under the ESRB/MPAA/RELIGIOUS MORAL INSTITUTION RULES AND GUIDELINES FOR A BETTER SOCIETY to be changed into E for Everyone, and having it as the only classification. I played and watched many scary, serious, bloody, psychotic movies or games since I was nine years old, and would not have it any other way, stagnating both my development and view of the world with all its colors, because you've got self-issues with God and the Christ Almighty, your perpetual imaginary friends.
I think the idea is not trying to control things beyond your control, though I think it's more often used in the way you described.
It seems he's trying to tailor his lecture to his audience, but I'm shocked he made that joke. Sure he nice now that he lost all his power. Now it can't go to his head anymore.
Even Hitler had his good days.
@Post
Actually there's biblical text that says you should judge others as you would judge yourself (Basically don't be a freaking hypocrite) which is why I hate christains who make the rest of us look bad by only following parts of the bible when it suits them. You can't watch a film or read a book and say there's no problem with the murder and violence then go home and try to blame games on all your problems.
Weird how people constantly forget that religion isn't the problem over the people who worship it. Someone once told me for every true worshipper of God there's 10 others looking for an easy way of life. Never got that till recently but now I totally see what he meant. If you're a homophobic, science hating "christain" or an elistist atheist jerk then you're all part of the problem.
I was really surprised when I didn't hear any jeers or hooting from the other side of the wall. Kudos, guys. Show that butt how mature and respectful we are.
I am merely sharing my personal belief, as Jack has the right to share his.
Besides which, he was praised simply for politeness, but for being reasonable and articulate and even making some good points. I don't agree with everything he says, and I've had more than a few arguments with him in the past, but I respect that he had the stones to turn up and the ability to hold a really good Q&A.
Now all of a sudden he just wants videogame developers and ESRB to take a stance with the ratings instead of banning the games? It's just so odd.
But I have to disagree with him on having them take charge. They do their job. He should be launching this toward stores. Not companies.
It's good to see Jack Thompson being more approachable and open to reasonable argument. I don't particularly agree with his policy of heavier government involvement and that the ESRB doesn't help, but its better to see him cooperate than just listen to his complains.
I have a copy of GamesTM from a couple of years ago with a JT interview and he surprised me with reason and lack of rambling madness. But then he went back to being the monster we love to hate very soon after.
Could just depend on what arena he is in at the time. Or it could just be the Fox News editing team? Either way, it seems a lot of peoples preconceptions about him have been shaken, which I think is pretty cool work.
Glauxspeed everybody!
It's like everyone on Dtoid gets their point of view from Brian on Family Guy
:)
I have always appreciated Jack Thompson....just like I appreciate my Grandmother when she says silly things about violent movies being bad. Without SOMEONE holding pop culture up to a moral standard it'll plunge further into gratuitous exploitation than it already has.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow















follow