While I'm sure it's not going to be quite up to the level of the 720 and PS4, there's no way in hell it's going to be behind the current gen. NO one is that stupid.
Wii-U will come out and people will laugh at it because it's on par with the tech standards of 6 year old systems. Then Nintendo will put Mario on it and it will sell fuckloads, because Nintendo.
You can find Decent Mid-high end GPU's for like 80 bucks.
I hope I detect sarcasm because otherwise this is the same Nintendo that put out a current gen system that was more or less on comparable to the PS2 and Xbox, and decided HD wasn't important enough. Nintendo is that stupid.
Graphic whores here and there: I think that would be the greater bad.
Seems they have quite a bit in common.
You have to consider 1) economic factors that make people way of buying a new console 2) Nintendo's controller itself potentially being quite expensive.
Given that the main games they showed off were Arkham City using stock 360 footage, well, we really don't know what the Wii U is going to be when it comes to specs. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if this turned out to be true at all.
I'm just curious if people will be dumb enough to buy it just so they can keep playing more Mario/Zelda/Metroid. If that's all the reason for the Wii U's existence, why does Nintendo even bother to release hardware beyond the handheld market? They could just as simply produce their games for both the SONY and MS consoles and have the exact same success without all the hardware finagling.
As for the WiiU's success? I think it will be to the Wii what the 3DS is to the DS.
It'll do okay, but not quite as well.
Epic: “It will do things current HD consoles simply cant do its going to be a powerful box.”
Crytek: “WiiU devkits are very powerful,the specs are very good”
Vigil Games: “We had the game at the same level as high end pc version in a matter of days and a few lines of code got the game up and running on tablet in 5 mins.”
EA: “Wii U is not a transitional platform, it is a true next generation system.”
i love how some sites reports "rumors" from unknown "source" that we know is bullshit shits on Nintendo, all websites make news out of it yet when actual developers who work on Wii U titles are talking about Wii U's power it's not a news. from what some are saying that "anonymous source" are simply some internet trolls.
If you don't understand by now that Nintendo is supplemental console and its handhelds are the hardcore side, then you've not been paying attention for three generations and have no right to be frustrated with what Nintendo does.
http://www.destructoid.com/e3-darksiders-ii-on-wii-u-might-be-the-best-version-203165.phtml
http://www.destructoid.com/ea-wii-u-won-t-be-transitional-will-get-online-play-208328.phtml
Here's some positive Wii U comments on Dtoid, for the unpaid PR guys in this thread trying to claim we never posted them.
What message did Nintendo get from the Wii other than bargain basement hardware and controller gimickry will get you 3+ years of great hardware sales?
This is just bunch of BS and nothing else
It would not surprise me if the hardware in the Wii U is a bit lacking but that is not the way to explain it.
I know my folks, my aunt, my uncle, and many of my friends did. in fact, I don't personally know ANYONE who still uses their Wii, but almost everyone has (or has had) one.
I very much doubt it will happen again and can see the WiiU being Nintendo's final home console.
I'd love to be wrong. But I think they're about done with home consoles. I reckon they'll just stick to portables in future.
Lazy porting. The OLED is leaps and bounds better looking, and the innards are more impressive.
I can easily tell that when I put my two devices together and compare Uncharted: Golden Abyss (a launch game) to anything the 3DS has (the best of which, graphically, is RE: Revelations right now, IMO). I'm not referring to technical limitations/firmware.
"The graphics are just not as powerful."
A vague and meaningless statement from someone who has little mastery of technology or English.
*goes back to already next-gen PC system*
I agree. The Wii-U's new technology won't mean anything if it's something with which only Nintendo and not third-parties want to play around and experiment.
The DS did well with consumers and professional game companies alike because it wasn't -complicated-. The DS allowed for traditional game controls from the get go, and never forced game developers to use touch control if they absolutely didn't want to.
For the most part, I can't quite say the same for the Wii and even Nintendo started to realize it too with major franchies like Donkey Kong, Kirby and Metroid taking on NES style controls for the sake of avoiding gimmicky frustration.
This friday, i'll be playing Xenoblade on the Wii and will be happy as can be with the creativity of the art and lovely non-HD visuals.
Ths argument about GRAFFIXX is only for dudebros that dont know anything about gaming, or young kids that are basically retarded when it comes to every opinion they have.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

















follow