Well, I would miss Twisted Pixel. *sigh*
These cards will sport thin OLED screen on them that will double as a kind of modern day VMU. Once the game has been beaten a preset number of times, a number dictated by a tiered pricing plan for all future games, the OLED screen on the front of the card will display hardcore all male sex scenes, making them impossible to resell. Apparently, Microsoft is finally embracing its bigoted fan base by using these anti gay sentiments to curtail used sales.
This is where those anti-used game hardware rumors originated a month ago.
Imagine how much larger the new games will be in size and then how long it would take to download.
If they scrap it and go online only then they are beyond stupid as not everyone has a solid and constant internet connection.
If it does, they'd better ship the fucker with at least a 1TB HDD...
Digital Distribution is the future and it's a goddamn sweet one if Steam is anything to go by. However it's not a future that will be good under Microsoft.
Secondly, A discless system would, as Andy pointed out, require a much larger hard drive. I don't know if I want a purely digital system. Maybe if there was a price drop but dammit I like my cases and my discs and my shelves with things on it. We shall see. At the very least they will be moving forward with more digital content on the next system.
SSD or other alternatives are way too expensive to print in high numbers. They can push out BluRays with 50gb capacity way faster for under a dollar each.
@OneRed
You just won the internet.
Blue Ray is not proprietary Sony tech, it started as a joint venture between Sony, Phillips, and Pioneer. Sony was the first to release a prototype, but there were like 8 companies involved in its development initially. The BDA "owns" the Blue Ray tech.
Besides that, Sony and Microsoft have long been partners. They're not often in direct competition outside of gaming, I'm pretty sure all of the Windows 7 commercials prominently displayed Vaio computers.
Even Steam still supports setting up disc based versions of games onto their system.
MS wouldn't be able to pull this off in a way that would (or at least should) make people actually want to own their system. They're already charging people for an online component that should be entirely free. Do they honestly think people will roll over and allow them to take out the used game market in one sweep of the arm?
I really hope humanity hasn't fallen quite that far into the tar pit of stupidity just yet.
And honestly, I wouldn't really have a problem with it so long as they managed to run it the way that Valve runs Steam. I mean, if the digital pricing was handled in the same stupid manor that it is now by MS, I wouldn't ever even CONSIDER buying one as I would literally have to cut down the number of games I buy by about half.
At the same time, I can't ever say I've been left wanting for games on Steam. Reasonably priced games are a dime a dozen and sales are plentiful. Worst case scenario with their model is that I wait a month or two to buy a new game.
To disregard those consumers would be a very, very stupid decision on Microsoft's part.
However, if the next Xbox does turns out to be all digital, it can kiss my monkey ass! :D
It also makes sense. I don't think anyone doubts we'll eventually be seeing entirely digital sales at some future point (similar to the fate of PC games) and having some form of portable digital storage device in the interim makes sense for those with poor internet connections or bandwidth caps.
- Sigh. -
Hard to say because I'm hardly an expert on such things but Blu-ray was developed by a consortium, it wasn't simply only Sony's bag of tricks.. Yeah, they came to the market with it first, and they;re amongst its founders, but they're hardly the only company at the table. So, Microsoft can still very well use Blu-ray discs and it doesn't have to be Sony's technology.
@Andy
Yeah, thats what I was going to say, and I'll add that the HDD better not tack on $300 simply because they can...
You would have thought that in the past, but as the industry has proven they only care about what money they can coerce from the buyer. They have excuses and will continue to use them such as "piracy" as just one example. While a problem granted it is and always has been largely blown w-a-y out of proportion. If you have not noticed with digital distribution outside of Steam like say from both Sony Entertainment Network, or Microsofts own Xbox Live - they price gouge just for the sake of making money. Even though there is no physical property or material the digital distributed product is usually higher in cost, and even slower to decrease in said price too. Honestly if the industry is willing to bite the many hands that feed them such as GameStop, and other like stores, and corperations that dabble in used, and third market products; then one must be willing to see they will do as they wish without concern of the consequences. They simply do not care as long they are free to rape the consumer of both money, and rights. Well, that and the fact that ElectronicArts has willingly stated they are conditioning their buyers to buy "new" only, and they even aim to bring an end to phsyical distribution. They are a devious, and manupilative organization, and should never be trusted.
Oh, well. Not like anyone will listen to the truth.
Different terms apply to lots of business models when you purchase something.
There's the simple solution, its called not buying it. That way you lose nothing.
Incidentally, do you OWN a game if you download it off Steam? If Steam hit the wall would you have anything to show fur your money?
Like who, with what system? Only ones I see that have remotely done that recently has been Sony with the Vita, and they still give you an opinion at getting many of your PSP games back, its just not in a way people want that system to work. Last time I remember seeing a real lack of backwards compatibility that I can remember was when Nintendo jumped to a disc format on the gamecube. Those N64 carts never stood a chance...
I've said it before (maybe not here, but elsewhere): Backwards compatibility is a privilege, not a right. They don't have to bother with it at all. I mean, look whats the first thing to go when companies make the "next iteration" everyone claims they want more then the first gen, and it gets cut out due to "engineering space and project budget" to make it cheaper and smaller. If you didn't get in on that first generation of any given system then too bad: its either backwards compatibility or a price cut.
@BomberJacket
I don't know if you're just acting stupid or you forgetting that Microsoft has steeper competion than any of those digital providers you've mentioned. As long as they're are third party studios and Sony/Nintendo are around, MS can't have a monopoly.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow








































follow












