Do some research. DS already has wi-fi online multiplayer and so does the 3DS. Resident Evil: The Mercenaries has it and even a shit title like Asphalt 3D is gonna have it. They're pushing online with 3DS and if this is true you won't need to go through some ad-hoc bullshit to get online (though if they carry over friend codes its just as bad if not worse).
If 3DS can secure a Monster Hunter title I don't see a single reason to get PSP2 for a very long time. DO IT CAPCOM!
Still, losing Monster Hunter exclusivity would definitely hurt the PSP brand in Japan.
All I want is to lock on and strafe, it seems the competition does this. I don't get why MH fans put up with such a decrepit control scheme.
I mean, sure, good for Nintendo when they get it, but I'd like better controls for Monster Hutnter (and a load of other fixes) before I'd consider playing the series again. Til then, I'll wait to see how God Eater Burst works out. Lord of Arcana has a few better ideas, it just sadly lacks the online multiplayer part.
So until then, Phantasy Star Portable 2 for me.
I think he meant online multiplayer for the game itself. The portable iterations of DH only had local play.
The 3DS is becoming one gaming's biggest juggernauts and it hasn't even been released yet.
The 3DS sounds so great is almost feels like a dream
Don't be an ass. Online multiplayer in one game doesn't guarantee online multiplayer in all games.
Aaaah. I see. Fuck I feel like a dick now.
@The Silent Protagonist
I've only ever played MH with CC and I thought it was fine. It was other little things like animations and item management that could be fixed imo. I played MH a little on PSP but couldn't get into it until Tri so I'm willing to give it another shot doesn't matter if PSP or 3DS. (I'd play it on PSP but I got it stolen. TWICE!)
Ha! Well now I don't. Its not 1 its 2. And the significance is that one is a quality title (hopefully) by Capcom and another is likely a shitty game that would be stripped of Online on Wii and DS but they the fact that they even bothered to include online is a a big deal. At least I think so.
Perhaps instead of that, theres a sort of compromise - a little bit of 'auto-aim', sort of like what Batman AA has, except much less extreme (I dislike the extent to which that game does it - I feel detached and more like I'm watching than playing). Your attacks would home in on the area you're aiming at, and could also look more specialized to where you're attacking rather than just generic swings. While reducing the skill ceiling a little, it retains the most important parts of the game, that I feel would be lost with the ability to lock-on; correctly positioning yourself to both attack and defend/dodge against what you're fighting, and aiming at the best parts of the monster to attack.
But even just changing the animations to make them a bit quicker and cleaner, and much faster to recover from would make a huge difference. I think the core gameplay is fundamentally pretty good, just needs a fair bit of tweaking. The engine could do with updating too, but hey, thats why they're sticking to the handhelds, as far as I can tell (and now its been so successful...).
Nintendo have never tripped over others to get to exclusives, look what happened with Rare. They simply dont possess aggressive "buy all the exclusive shit we can" attitude, ala Microsoft, which certainly improves their stance in terms of like-ability.
By that logic, Nintendo should have included online multiplayer with New Super Mario Bros Wii because Super Smash Bros Brawl and Endless Ocean had online multiplayer as well. They're all Nintendo developed games, New Super Mario Bros Wii is their flagship game and its not like 2D gameplay is hard to netcode for.
That said, I certainly wouldn't mind a 3DS Monster Hunter. Considering Tri was my first and only experience with the franchise though, I'm not sure how ready I am for the infamously bad handheld control scheme.
what's up with your sony hate lately? sony this sony that, really? do you really hate that company so much?
if this was true(which is likely since 3DS can now handle Monster Hunter) i wouldn't be surprised if the big 3 stays on the top(Pokemon, Dragon Quest, and Monster Hunter) and other games like Love Plus's downwards. certainly Monster Hunter is not exclusive to sony(Frontier and Tri) it might dealt damage to Sony's PSP but it will remain the same. PSP2 has a Monster Hunter game, DS has a Monster Hunter game. now everyone is happy.
Costs, the same reason why they developed Tri in the Wii instead of the PS3 as it was announced. Developer time for multi-platform costs, a lot. And you cannot spect that Capcom will deliver for both consoles at competitive dates because of rights exclusivity and profit.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow














follow