I sure hope Fallout: new Vegas turns out good.
You act as if I was more than half as insulting to him as he was to me.
Now I am worried about Fallout: New Vegas. Don't screw this one up, Obsidian...
"This game was just an absolute failure of production, and it's no wonder that so many of the developers left the company, even after the 40% staff layoffs. I am still happy about some of Obsidian's other current projects, New Vegas included, because they are going pretty well. Their big unannounced project is looking great and is already much better than AP ever was, and that may end up being the game that everyone was looking for with AP."
{full comment: http://www.joystiq.com/2010/05/28/alpha-protocol-game-review/3#comments}
I hope he is right about Obsidian getting their shit together. I enjoy their RPG's a lot and really want them to succeed.
That right there sounds like an angry troll more than an angry dev.
But I guess they could both be one in the same? ;)
"Its a pity the game ended up being so bad. I was kinda excited about it until reviews started appearing.
Now I am worried about Fallout: New Vegas. Don't screw this one up, Obsidian..."
+1 Dissapointed. Anyway, New Vegas can't be screwed: they just have to copy Fallout3 to make a great game.
I hope that Bethesda will scrutinise New Vegas' QC. They don't want all the goodwill towards the franchise that Fallout 3 generated being extinguished by a bad release, surely they won't publish a turd? Then again, Bethesda did publish Wet and Rogue Warrior...
KotOR II says hi. It was the same situation as New Vegas. They had all of Bioware's tech, and still produced a buggy, unfinished game, irregardless of Lucasarts being unwilling to move the release date.
Obsidian is yet to demonstrate that they can compentently plan and execute on a game. Here's hoping New Vegas breaks that trend, but I'm less optimistic now after AP.
Jim /= everyone.
Play the game yourself and form your own opinions, maybe?
Anyway, it does sound like an angry dev on the troll's path. But meh. This sort of thing is (unfortunately) not too rare in the gaming world, and at a certain point the game just needs to be released to make SOME money back on the investment.
That said, (while I am yet unable to play it myself) reading the reviews on the game, the shitty parts are the action, AI, etc. which are the traditional parts that we know can be polished. By all appearances, the only thing stopping AP from being a really good game is a solid layer of polish. So, I can't fully believe him when he says "it was obvious 2 years ago that this game should have been scrapped". If I had to guess he's just fuming at the mismanagement - and it could very well be mismanagement that is preventing Obsidian from really taking off. That would explain the missed deadlines and spotty quality of Obsidian's games.
@StingingVelvet- That was a stupid thing to say
@Jim Sterling- That was a perfect answer to a stupid thing to say
@glitznglam-style- Nothing wrong with that, enjoy it.
I'm not sure why i'm replying to people who aren't talking to me.
What's I've seen (Giantbomb's playthrough) and read (reviews) makes me think I'll enjoy AP by overlooking the awful AI and other elements, but not for full price. Or half price for that matter.
Can't the set it up so they dine even see them if they really dislike his voice?
I mean really. It's sad.
People seem to te this stuff so personally. Why?!
Compound that with inept management (really? Sega's inept at something? NO!) and...I think we can all see where this game went downhill, fast.
As for the reviews, it makes sense. Destructoid judges games based on how disappointed or...appointed you'd be if you were excited about it; the games are compared to themselves. Alpha Protocol is about 20% of what we imagined it could be. Other places compare it to other games, and also have review scores normalized around a higher number; for, say, Gamestop, a 60 (what they gave it) is more like a 3 or 4, because they give everything 80's.
Every single game they've released has been poorly optimized, bug-ridden, barely finished (if at all), and clunky.
Alpha Protocol has been hammered by a ton of outlets. I've seen reviewers inflate review scores, but I've never seen reviewers (of relatively larger size, not fan blogs)knock a game for shits and giggles. Publishers tend not to be so free with the ad money when you dump on their games, so I highly doubt a bunch of professional review sites are pissing down SEGA's back just for the hell of it.
FFXIII was a sappy, over-blown piece o' mediocre. That's not 'controversy' to point that out.
When I was a kid, we used to bitterly argue over SEGA vs. Nintendo. I remember the shame of having to face my pro-SEGA friends when Nintendo changed the blood in Mortal Kombat to 'sweat'. Oh, the humanity. Console fighting was what you did at 12, I understand it. For the life of me, I don't get at all how today's kids go nuts defending individual titles like it was life or death. What do you care if Alpha Protocol sucks, other than being disappointing on missing out on a potential good experience. Islamic Jihad had nothing on the rage of Capcom fanboys when it was pointed out RE5 was a mediocre, forgettable experience.
Jim Sterling 'Hey look at me I'm cool independent thinker #96767454545 who knocks religion on teh internets!!! = Not so great.
Treating knocking religion like it was new, different, or special got old around 1800. When Karl Marx writes a book in the fucking 19th century about how played out knocking religion is, I think it's safe to say it's a bit stale. I guess this Tim Minchin is the new Patton Oswald in terms of ambrosia for the 'Real Serious' internet crowd.
Protip: If one is 'over' religion, then you're just over it. It doesn't dominate your intellectual pursuits. If one feels the needs to constantly publicly talk about, then essentially you are religious. You just replaced the role of a reanimated carpenter (who may or may not eat brains, I didn't get the far in Catholic School) with your own ego.
Oh well it is what is.
Not having played Alpha Protocol I don't have an opinionon it. But I am looking forward to Fallout New Vegas so I hope Obsidian is up to task. KOTOR 2 while not a bad game, was less polished than the original.
I dare say, Jim, I Lol'd. In a good way.
Taking this "1up gived Alpha Protocol a B" and some older replys on AP review about "no credibility because DTOID gived Deadly Premonition a 10"
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3178205&p=4
LOL?...
1up gived Deadly Premonition a B, what a coincidence!!...
Oh!... Game Informed gived Deadly premonition a 7.75!!... Want more credibility?...
DTOID GIVED THIS GAME A 10...

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow


