Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home Controversy updates

Rockstar owes you $35 over Hot Coffee

4:38 PM on 11.08.2007, Hamza CTZ Aziz 26 comments

Rockstar owes you $35 over Hot Coffee photo
     Controversy

The Class Action lawsuit with Rockstar has been settled and if you were one of the many "victims" over the Hot Coffee incident, then you are entitled to some retribution. Rockstar will owe people either $35 or an updated copy of the game (which retails for $20 new). 

Now for people to receive the $35 or the updated copy, you have to prove that you bought a copy of the game before July 20th 2005, you were offended by the ability to do the modification of the game, that you wouldn't have bought the game had you known about the mod in the first place and that you would have returned the game if possible upon learning about the mod. Take-Two is ready to spend at least $1.025 million on settlement benefits. More details of the full settlement will come later in the month but once the settlement receives final approval from the United States District Court, Take-Two and Rockstar won't have to ever admit to any wrongdoing.

What's interesting to note is that Take-Two believes that they could have won the trial had they continued to fight instead of settling:

"If the case had continued, we believe the court would have agreed that Take-Two was not liable for consumers acting independently to modify their games with third-party hardware and software to access normally inaccessible content," said Ben Feder, Chief Executive Officer of Take-Two. "Nonetheless, we believe it is in the best interest of the Company to avoid protracted and costly litigation to prove our case and to finally put this matter behind us."

Do you think they could have won? Actually, does anyone even care about Hot Coffee anymore? In any case, we're getting $35 out of all this which is totally going towards my purchase of GTA IV ... whenever that comes out.


Next page: More Take-Two stories




nowherekid03's Avatar
nowherekid03 at 11/08/2007 16:46
Yeah Shadow, I had the same problem at EB, they would not take my copy. I dont have the receipt anymore so how can i prove it so i can get the $35 bucks?
GrayFox's Avatar
GrayFox at 11/08/2007 16:54
I have a copy that was purchased before then but there is no way in hell I can prove it.
Joe Burling's Avatar
Joe Burling at 11/08/2007 16:55
I want an early copy of the game just to own it. Make a contest and give it to me. =)
RskimB's Avatar
RskimB at 11/08/2007 16:55
Aint nuthin wrong with a lil bit of bump n grind.
ShadowXOR's Avatar
ShadowXOR at 11/08/2007 17:17
I think all you have to have is the game to prove it because they can tell which are the old version and which are the new I believe. I didn't read it though, but if you need a receipt that would be retarded. Who has a receipt from two-plus years ago?
luvmysegadc's Avatar
luvmysegadc at 11/08/2007 17:24
Like Hamza said, this is all that matters now:

"Actually, does anyone even care about Hot Coffee anymore? In any case, we're getting $35 out of all this which is totally going towards my purchase of GTA IV ... whenever that comes out".
Im OK's Avatar
Im OK at 11/08/2007 17:24
If they thought they could win, why the hell did they settle? Wouldn't having a judge or jury or whatever agreeing with you that you are "not liable for consumers acting independently to modify their games with third-party hardware and software to access normally inaccessible content" be better than the implication that you are liable for it that settling brings, even if you don't have to openly admit it? The settlement itself is a form of admission in its own way, at least in my eyes. If they had fought this and won, it would have gone a long way to keeping retarded lawsuits like this from happening in the future with other games. If nothing else, fighting this would have kept them in the news, and Take-star is all about the controversy, aren't they? You'd think fighting this thing would've been right up their alley.

Also, to all the "victims" in the lawsuit: IF IT OFFENDS YOU SO MUCH, DON'T FUCKING USE THE MOD. It's that simple. You have to work to get at this stuff. It's not like it's just, BAM, right there in your face and you can't do anything about it. Frivolous lawsuits FTL.

I wonder how long it will be before all the Jack Thompson-wannabes out there start touting the news of this settlement as a "win" for their side?
MrFudge's Avatar
MrFudge at 11/08/2007 17:31
I put my reciepts in the game boxes. that's a novel idea.

Doubt it applies in Britain, and even if it does, I've traded it in already.
boatorious's Avatar
boatorious at 11/08/2007 17:32
Consumer class action suits are a joke. Consumers get ten bucks and lawyers get millions.

And the consumers are just getting screwed in the long run, since the lawsuit money is going to pay for a yacht for some lawyer instead of being used to develop games.
brad drac's Avatar
brad drac at 11/08/2007 17:37
Anyone who claims this $35 back but disagrees with game censorship is a goddamn hypocrite. By asking for that money, you justify all the utter bullshit surrounding this issue, and the scumbags who used it as a political vehicle. Just don't do it.
Samit Sarkar's Avatar
Samit Sarkar at 11/08/2007 17:44
Well, I have the game box and the disc, but I certainly don’t have the receipt...and I got this game on launch day.
ShadowXOR's Avatar
ShadowXOR at 11/08/2007 18:02
Honestly I think this is a bunch of crap but I'm not about to turn down $35. Some internet man calling me a hypocrite doesn't hurt my feelings so I'm going to take the money and run.
IceMax's Avatar
IceMax at 11/08/2007 18:25
were do i get mah monies?
vexed alex's Avatar
vexed alex at 11/08/2007 18:38
Don't do it if you have the game. brad drac said it so truthfully. Did you have fun with that game? Probably so. There. That's enough of a reason not to be an exploitative ass (even if this is a giant company we're talking about). You'll only feed the fires that people are offended by these games.
nowherekid03's Avatar
nowherekid03 at 11/08/2007 18:46
well considering how much of a douchebag rockstar has been lately i have no problem taking the 35$ and putting it down for the next GTA which i will do. and to agree with shadow i dont really care what some guy on the net says.
ShadowXOR's Avatar
ShadowXOR at 11/08/2007 18:48
vexed alex: Anyone who does not want their $35 feel free to deposit it into my PayPal account, thank you.
sloganpwns's Avatar
sloganpwns at 11/08/2007 18:51
To all the people that want that $35 dollars, you are a dick.

First of all you aren't offended. If you are then you are a pussy, but I don't know if you can be a dick and a pussy at the same time so just pick one.

Secondly you are just fucking the company even more. Take-Two has been sued enough and lost a ton of money from people that hate video games. Now the people that actaully play games are going to screw them too.

And finally, who wants censorship in their video games? This isn't directly realated to the $35 but censorship is just bullshit in general. There is a rating system to videogames and it works for the most part but if something is rated 'M' then put whatever the fuck you want in the game because ITS A GAME. Its not real so who cares? (rhetorical question, don't answer)
ShadowXOR's Avatar
ShadowXOR at 11/08/2007 21:03
sloganpwns: If you send me $35 I will not request my $35 from Take Two. The choice is yours, and yours alone.

Good luck.
Volomon's Avatar
Volomon at 11/08/2007 21:58
I have to agree accepting the $35 would eat at my soul and conscience as a patriot in America. By the way they settled because its far far cheaper 1mil compared to up to 6 million in defense is bullshit. Plus you can't be guaranteed to win then you have to pay the other 1 million or more on top of the 6 mil you already put out
Mxyzptlk's Avatar
Mxyzptlk at 11/09/2007 01:13
I'll take my $35 in "heath upgrades" from the ladies in the red light district.
Im OK's Avatar
Im OK at 11/09/2007 14:36
@ShadowXOR

I know you obviously don't care what people think of you and are just in this for the money, kinda like Jack Thompson is you know, but yeah, way to be a dick, just as sloganpwns said.

The choice is yours, and yours alone.

No. No, the choice is yours and yours alone not to be a dick over a paltry $35. *shrug*
Purringturtle's Avatar
Purringturtle at 12/10/2007 19:34
This reminds me of a song...

You've got to stand for something,
Or you'll fall for anything,
You've got to be your own man
Not a puppy on a string.

Never comprimise what's right
and uphold your family name.
You've got to stand for something, etc...

(Aaron Tippin)

so anyway, I'm with the group that believes that you should not ask for it unless you are actually offended. We as gamers are tired of being stigmatized, and talked about as though we were all mentally deranged-prepubescents.

Really people expect that particular demographic to act in one of two ways,

A. try to get everything they can, whether or not they have any right to, or

B. try to protect them and bring up further censorship issues while having more precedant behind them. Personally I hate what this game is, but I will protect Rockstar's right to be absolutely awful.
prev next

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39702 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

Retroforce Recap: so what about those dirty games, now?











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006