as i said a long ass time ago.
if it's an RPG and I hadn't heard about it. it's not worth knowing about.
I have not heard of this game before but it actually, even with that review, sounds like my GF might like it.
Shitloads of fun, despite a few problems. I heartily recommend it.
P.S. @Davy - Magicka is bloody brilliant!
You're getting it for free, its not like The Times where you have to pay subscription lighten up.
Bad review for not spelling right :L
Still, I love you anyway.
I was thinking the same thing.
More to the point, it's averaging a pitiful 44 or so if you average out the console reviews. I'm sorry, but when the best score anyone gives your game is a 7/10 across either console, you've made a shit game.
While it's probably enjoyable in a so bad it's good sort of fashion, I don't really feel like supporting a developer who just couldn't cut it when there are equally small teams of people making equally promising games which do.
@EggmaniMN
MOST the stuff that comes out of Europe ? Was The Witcher horrible ? Were the first two Gothic games shit ? Were the "The Dark Eye" games crap ? How about Two Worlds 2 ? I think you're really horribly exaggerating, though to be a bit fair, tastes differ greatly between Europeans and Americans.
Good review though, hope to read some more from you!
I think the points you bring up in your review are good, relevant, and thought out, but I'd recommend proofreading it first. It was pretty poorly written with a lot of run on sentences.
Thanks for the honest look at this game!
Dear god. Just...dear god. It's all well and good reading a review and seeing screenshots, but when you're actually playing it, seeing it struggling to run the starting village and dealing with that first fucking puzzle in that woodcutter's house...it's fucking miserable.
No, no they are not. Until you've played Venetica, you cannot make that claim. And if you have, you still can't because you'd know just how wrong it is. The only other game on Venetica's level that comes to mind isn't even an RPG (Sonic 2006); I haven't played any game this generation as bad as either.
Your last two sentences make it clear you're just an offended JRPG fanboy, though, so I'm not sure why I bother.
1) I disagree about Two Worlds 2. It's a rock-solid game and "generic fantasy shit" doesn't do it justice - but alright, different opinion, that's okay.
2) I actually admit that I didn't like the combat system of The Witcher and that the original version was pretty buggy. The enhanced version however (or the original version patched) was extremely good. And if The Witcher's combat was horrible we better not talk about a few other American RPGs...
3)Gothic 4 is shit. Hard to argue with that. The first two games however are outstanding RPGs (though they cater the German taste a lot more than the American).
4)Divinity 2 complete garbage ? The PC version definitely not.
5)Personally I'd also recommend e.g. The Dark Eye games as good European RPGs or Spellforce 1/2 as a pretty good European RPG/Strategy title.
Last note:
One has to keep in mind that many European developers focus on the PC version, considering that market is still pretty big in Europe. Usually the console versions are vastly inferior and often enough suck, see e.g. Risen.
Claiming that Western RPGs are played out in every way possible and far more than JRPGs is ... well let's just say I disagree with that.
Sounds like Dragon Age 2. HIT A BUTTON AND SOMETHING AWESOME HAPPENS.
Divinity II: The Dragon Knight Saga is great. Only the PC version is real. This game looks so so but kudos to the reviewer for applauding the devs ambition. Most Western journalists go too harsh or don't understand how different a lot of Euro rpg studios are compared to their NA counterparts. Not everyone has Bioware money.
A smaller studio, European or whatever, is more than capable of making good games. I think the people who made this game bit off more than they could chew. There are tons of good games out there made by people that "don't have Bioware's money"
I'm hoping for one of those games that are good for all the wrong reasons... Some good reasons would probably be just as helpful though.
Second: I have no idea why double line spacing has happened but I'm in work and can't correct it. Let's blame the Internet and it's many mysteries for that one.
Third: if you think it's only got comments because I'm female, please see my last review which got sod all comments despite me having a vagina for that one as well
Forth: if you don't think I have talent, take it up with niero.
Either way, thanks to those who commented with just being spiteful. It is always apprechiated and some of them made a good read. Western Vs Eastern RPGs is a pretty interesting topic to me.
Anyone who likes RPGs and didn't like The Witcher just has something wrong with them. That game is great, despite the occasional hiccup.
@Hollie
Obviously spelling > content. Duh.
Also, good review Hollie, to the point.
For what it's worth, I think it was a fine review. Kudos for giving them props at the end even though the game failed. Just curious though, does your browser not underline spelling mistakes when you type? Mine would have thrown a fit at that spelling of "appreciated" in your last comment.
@Hollie: Great review, ive been on the fence about this one for a while, was thinking about giving it a go with my next round of Gamefly rents. At least i know what to look forward to. Im the type to give any game a try, i loved Alpha Protocol and the original Two Worlds so i definitely have taste for what the mainstream considers "shit games".

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow



















follow

