Quantcast


Review: Soul of Darkness

2:00 PM on 07.12.2010   |   Tony Ponce

Review: Soul of Darkness photo

If gaming were a religion, it would vary in practice and observance from person to person. In my case, I'd model it closely to the faith with which I have the most experience, Catholicism. I'd recognize my own Holy Trinity of Gaming -- the triumvirate of Mega Man, Contra, and Castlevania, three distinct franchises that encapsulate all the values I hold dear.

So strong is my reverence that that it trickles down and extends to all the other games that have been directly inspired by the Trinity. I've kinda made it my mission to seek out these disciples and judge whether they are true prophets or self-serving pretenders. There's really a fine line between hat tipping and straight-up ripping off.

Soul of Darkness caught my attention when it appeared on DSiWare last week. A Castlevania-lite for five bucks was too good of a deal to pass up, any game preaching from the Book of Belmont deserved at least a minute of attention. Too bad it ended before its minute was up.

Soul of Darkness (DSiWare)
Developer: Gameloft
Publisher: Gameloft
Released: July 5, 2010 
MSRP: 500 Nintendo DSi Points

Like all of Gameloft's home console releases, Soul of Darkness is a port of a mobile game, specifically a slightly enhanced, two-year-old cellphone game. The total domination of the iPhone in the mobile space has forced app development into high gear, turning the hardware into a robust platform. When it comes to vanilla cellphones, however, there are still many roadblocks that keep gaming in the ghetto. Even if these titles find new life on dedicated gaming machines, many of those limitations will fail to be addressed.

Such is the issue with Soul of Darkness, a game that shows great promise but ends too damn quickly. I wouldn't have been as nonplussed had the roughly two-hour playtime been extremely feature-packed, but it blows what little load it carries before the end of the first half.

You are Kale, a vampire hunter on a quest to rid your amnesiac girlfriend Lydia of her nightmares. A bad ol' vamp named Ritter who claims to know Lydia personally suddenly swoops in and kidnaps her, and thus your adventure begins. It's a bare bones framework that recalls the simpler days of 8- and 16-bit Castlevania before the timeline became a convoluted web of hasty retconning.


Borrowing much from the post-Symphony of the Night era, the sprite and background art are rich in color and detail. There are a few enemies that look and behave exactly like their Castlevania counterparts, including imps and succubi. You break statues and secret walls to uncover items. The bottom screen display's the current stage's map. Even Kale's movements are animated similarly to those of Alucard or Soma, right down to the delayed body turn when changing direction.

All the humanoid characters sport what I like to call the "Konami Mannequin Head." In many of Konami's sprite-based games including Metal Gear and Contra, the small size of character sprites meant that facial features would be hard to distinguish and thus were not added. This design quirk wasn't unique to Konami, but I most associate it with that company and in particular Castlevania, a series that for the past two decades has maintained a relatively unchanged aesthetic.

The game teases a grand skill set but doesn't deliver. You start with a flame sword and later gain an ice spear, then you enhance their strength and magic attributes by infusing them with purple souls from fallen enemies not unlike Onimusha or God of War. There are no other weapons aside from these two, making the enhancement system feel underused. You also have the ability to transform into one of three monsters but only in rare designated areas, another unfortunate waste of potential.


On the other hand, the focus on small set of moves keeps the game running at a brisk pace. The eleven levels are surprisingly varied -- there are water spouts that you freeze into ice platforms, laser traps that you navigate by blocking the lasers' paths, and a forced scrolling level during which you ride on an angelic swan. Hell, a couple of boss battles feature cinematic quick time events! Imagine that! Normally, I'd be up in arms over QTEs, but they are used here sparsely and to great effect.

For a laugh, you can use the DSi's camera to paste your face over any of the character portraits used in cutscenes. The camera also comes in handy at special booths that reward you with souls, health, or magic if you take a photo that is predominantly red, green, or blue respectively. This latter function is a bit temperamental, requiring perfect lighting conditions -- I took a close-up photo of a house plant and the game wouldn't recognize it as green! I found that the best way to cheat the system is, if you have access to a computer, fire up a paint program, use the bucket tool the fill the whole screen, and snap a shot. BAM! Suck it!

Though progress is swift, jumping is floaty, enemies lack agility, and all action in general feels sluggish. I'm positive that this is another holdover from the game's cellphone days. Considering how cumbersome it is to play anything on a keypad, the game would have to be tailored with awkward button placement in mind. Apparently, the code wasn't properly adapted to the DSi, and the challenge is lower than it should be as a result.


The game is just way too easy. As in Castlevania, levels are split into rooms that are a few screen lengths in width or height. Should you die, you will be sent back to the start of either the current room or the previous one. The enemies you killed return and your soul count drops to pre-checkpoint levels, but your health and magic are restored. Since you have unlimited lives, death is essentially free of any consequence. In fact, if you are running low on health or if you made a room's puzzle impossible to solve, you can select "restart" from the pause menu to insta-kill and rejuvenate yourself! It's an invitation to brute-force your way through the adventure.

After a disappointing final boss who doesn't even have the courtesy to whip out a second, more beastly form, you are given the option to replay the game on so-called "hard mode." The enemies deal slightly more damage, but since you are allowed to carry over your leveled-up weapons and health/magic upgrades, the net challenge increase is zero. With no other rewards of features to speak of, you are done. How unbelievably anticlimactic.

UNOFFICIAL OFF-BRAND GAMES SCORE

You are holding a Nintendo DSi in your hand. You have access to three real Castlevania games, all available used for less than a twenty spot and packed with more than ten times the juice. Why should you bother with crumbs that provide no nourishment when there's a feast waiting in the next room? Are those unused DSi points burning that deep a hole in your pocket?

Empty calories, people. Empty calories.

The Mortal Kombat Scale of Palette-Swapped Create-A-Ninjas:

OFFICIAL REVIEW SCORE

In all honesty, Soul of Darkness is a decent game that adequately captures the gothic spirit of the Castlevania franchise. Unfortunately, its failure to expand upon promising game mechanics, its criminally short playtime, the absence of any real challenge, and the lack of compelling replay value make it hard to recommend. I wouldn't give it the time of day if it was priced any higher, but for five bucks, it's a nice diversion for a lazy afternoon.



Final Verdict:
6.5

Alright: 6s may be slightly above average, or simply inoffensive. Fans of this genre will still thoroughly enjoy them, but a fair few will be left unfulfilled.













More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Tony Ponce (aka megaStryke) is a culturally confused, Canadian-born Puerto Rican who grew up in Japan and South Florida ... yet can only speak English. He specializes in writing features and maintaining an immaculate goatee. Likes: Any and all things related to Mega Man, Contra, Castlevania, 2D, PB&J sandwiches, applesauce, and candy corn. Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

23 comments | showing # 1 to 23
prev next

HEL105's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 14:05
HEL105
If it wasn't so easy, I'd still give it a try. The more difficult these kinds of games are, the more I like them.
KingSigy's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 14:23
KingSigy
I do believe that Eccelsia was a bit too hard, but these games being easy makes no sense.
Sæglópur's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 14:25
Sæglópur
What the hell? You mean this isn't Castlevania? Easily one of the biggest clones I've seen to date.
Happy Chainsaw Man's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 14:59
Happy Chainsaw Man
Thanks for the review! I was just thinking about checking this one out. Now I don't feel too bad about saving my points.
JQM78's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 15:09
JQM78
Love this game......great deal for five bucks......finished it twice already......i have to admit, it's better than alot of games out there right now, especially for dsiware....hoping for a sequel......
AshxMFxKetchum's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 15:10
AshxMFxKetchum
So a two hour game with 11 levels is too short for five bucks. Who are you again?
BenelliM4's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 15:22
BenelliM4
As long as it's nothing like Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia, I'll take it.
Springsteen's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 15:33
Springsteen
Hey, Ecclesia was great! Difficult as hell, specially early on, but it had great, varied and costumizable gameplay. I liked it better than Portrait of RUin, but it falls short compared to Dawn of Sorrow. But the freshness is as welcome as it could be.

@AshxMFxKetchum: The fact of the matter is that there are 3 GREAT CAstlevania games that offer way deeper gameplay than this one to be found for not that higher of a price. But having finished said 3 games, I'll give it a try.

Besides, I like better the scores based on quality and not on value. The latter is way too subjective, and I'm getting fed up with AppStore and its shallow iterations of browser games.
AshxMFxKetchum's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 15:52
AshxMFxKetchum
@Springsteen - Um, no. This isn't a full retail release, and it doesn't matter if three games like it that cost more money do exist. People who are looking to download this clearly aren't looking for the full version - they are looking for something that's wroth $5 and would be fun for when they load it up here and there. For that, this game is worth it. If you like Castlevania, FOR FIVE DOLLARS, this game is a nice two hour chunk of time that has solid gameplay mechanics and is fun. The end.

I don't argue review scores, because I'm not an idiot. I understand that he's entitled to his opinion. However, the art of writing a review is to review THE PRODUCT YOU ARE REVIEWING. Telling us we can spend more money on the full versions (while promoting used games) is just stupid in general. I have no issues with used games... but if I'm looking on a digital download service I'm clearly not looking for those.

It's called common sense.
AshxMFxKetchum's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 15:53
AshxMFxKetchum
@Springsteen - Um, no. This isn't a full retail release, and it doesn't matter if three games like it that cost more money do exist. People who are looking to download this clearly aren't looking for the full version - they are looking for something that's wroth $5 and would be fun for when they load it up here and there. For that, this game is worth it. If you like Castlevania, FOR FIVE DOLLARS, this game is a nice two hour chunk of time that has solid gameplay mechanics and is fun. The end.

I don't argue review scores, because I'm not an idiot. I understand that he's entitled to his opinion. However, the art of writing a review is to review THE PRODUCT YOU ARE REVIEWING. Telling us we can spend more money on the full versions (while promoting used games) is just stupid in general. I have no issues with used games... but if I'm looking on a digital download service I'm clearly not looking for those.

It's called common sense.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 16:30
Jonathan Holmes
Yeah, I liked the game too, but it is short, and highly forgettable. Still, it was fun while it lasted.
DaedHead8's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 17:43
DaedHead8
I'll probably give this a spin. Good review.
pl0x kthanxbai's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 18:35
pl0x kthanxbai
i played this on my cellphone

it was short even for cell phone standards




but it was fun
Tony Ponce's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 18:43
Tony Ponce
@AshxMFxKetchum

Nothing exists in a vacuum. If it looks and plays like Castlevania, you better believe I'm gonna compare it to the actual Castlevania games on the same system.

And the $5 price tag is the only reason this game got a 6.5 instead of, like, a 4.
StepTangent's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 18:54
StepTangent
Please tell me you shopped in that girl's face.
AshxMFxKetchum's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 19:17
AshxMFxKetchum
@Tony Ponce - Well, if there is no downloadable/digital Castlevania, then the comparisons shouldn't carry over to a retail release, besides saying that they are similar gameplay styles. I just feel that if people are on DSiWare they are looking for something quick and easy to pick up and play... not go through the rounds of purchasing a retail title. I guess that's just my opinion, though.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 19:29
Jonathan Holmes
@ AshxMFxKetchum- I'm not sure that's how it works. Just because a game is digital doesn't mean it can't be compared to non-digital games available on the same console.

That said, if you really want to compare Soul of Darkness to another DSiWare game, compare it to Dark Void Zero, or Mighty Flip Champs, or Chronos Twin, or X-scape, or Mario Vs Donkey Kong; all much better games than Soul of Darkness.
lewness's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 20:19
lewness
I could imagine Igarashi-san publicly denying this game to be part of Castlevania then suddenly "Just-o kidding-uh! This is actuary Castrevania!"
AshxMFxKetchum's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 20:57
AshxMFxKetchum
@Jonathan Holmes - because to me, it should be compared to its competition and its "platform". In this case that would be DSiWare, not retail releases. Your examples make more sense, regardless of genre, but even then. Two hours is short for five bucks? Please. Dark Void Zero, your own example, is about an hour long tops. It may be a better game, but I just don't see how using length at $5 makes any sense... especially comparing it to retail versions of a game like it. That's all.
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/12/2010 22:16
Jonathan Holmes
@ AshxMFxKetchum- I can't speak for Tony here, but I played Soul of Darkness as well, and I wouldn't have cared that the game was short if it were packed with great stuff. Sadly, it wasn't. It's instead packed with mediocre stuff, with a few notable highlights spread throughout.

Length doesn't matter. Fun and memorable moments do matter. Other than a few nice surprises, a few of the songs, and a couple of the boss fights, Soul of Darkness was almost completely forgettable.

That leads the game to feel shorter than it actually is, because you look back on it after playing it and can't even remember what happened.
grafkhun's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/13/2010 00:31
grafkhun
If I had a DSi I'd pick it up. 5 bucks for a semi-decent CV-ish romp? I'll bite.
lv99ron's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/13/2010 14:30
lv99ron
Damn ti. I don't have a DSi, and I see no reason to buy one because my DS treats me just fine, but I do want to play this.
Excel-2011's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/17/2010 12:24
Excel-2011
So was anyone else put off by the fact that Kale's sprite is essentially a male Shanoa at first glance?
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!