The majority of reviews of your personal character on display here state you are a tool. By your logic reviews are FACT, ergo, YOU ARE A TOOL.
I just reviewed you're comments.
You are a TWAT.
I'd say it's just my opinion, but apparently reviews are fact.
Either way I'd say pretty much everyone here would agree with me anyway.
The only flaw I found in this game is that it is sometimes too easy, but everything else (presentation, music, sidequests, racing, fishing, etc) were a lot of fun. I'm not a huge fan of review scores, and this is certainly no 10/10 masterpiece, but throwing out a 4/10 on the internet these days is (sadly) throwing an undeserving game under the bus as anything below 7/10 = 0/10 in the eyes of the FPS-loving casual gamers of today.
Nice write up. I'll be sure to avoid this game.
To keep it brief, I'm left with the impression that you were not playing a game so much as trying to meet a deadline. The exaggerated complaints, the rather copious name-dropping of other games - it just seems like desperate filler for a game you didn't take your time with.
A couple comparisons are fine, but that Half-Life one just made me go "Wut?"
I'm not convinced either way, particularly with so many other people seeming to love the game. Not everything has to have a scaling challenge. I mean, a chimp could play through Mass Effect 2 and look at how many people love that. All I ever do there is make a choice and then its back to duck and cover through some on-rails areas.
If you believe that you are NOT a tool, then you must admit that the opinions about your character and thus the review of Solatarobo are thus NOT based in FACT. You can't have it both ways, honey.
I think a lot of these gaming news sites who fall back on the "we're just a blog" defense fail to realize just how much persuasive power they have over the easily molded minds of the collective internet.
You should feel bad the trolling started with you. When you couldnt handle I didnt like the review. I didnt make it a personal attack show. You did
Good job guys.
And back to the Stealth thing, he didn't even say anything that offensive and we have an editor jumping on him too. Lay off and do your job how about that.
So a single negative reveiw is going to make sure you don't get it? While stealth is....stealth, he does have a true statement. Other sites, blogs and magazines are giving it high praise, and in my opinion their reviews give it justice.
While I am not saying Allistar is wrong, I do not agree with this review.
Are you thinking that I was personally attacking the 3DS by pointing out that it wasn't selling as well as Nintendo expected, and that devs were canceling or delaying games for the thing? Do you think it is possible to personally insult a inanimate object? Just curious.
I agree with you about Nier but I disagree about how you think the 3DS is being unfairly treated by the gaming press. Funny how opinions and views work, eh, Stealth?
Um, those are cats. Every animal in the world is either a dog or cat. Now I'm even more convinced the reviewer didn't allow himself to become absorbed in the game and just rushed through it for the sake of reviewing it.
Actually Stealth was all like "Bullshit review" or some shit and was getting all angry over the reviewers opinion then started getting more angry because people didn't agree with his opinion.
Also that's because the review were done by different people, some who share similar tastes others who don't.
No game has been so utterly charming and fun to play in a long time. You said you beat it in 5 hours, you do know theres a 2nd story thats just as long after the credits right? You didn't say anything about the side quests and how developed the characters are.
Sure its opinions but this review is utterly ridiculous to me.
NOW, I WILL COMBIE FURRIES WITH STEALTH BEING 12!
YES
ITS WORKING....
....
OH DEAR GOD!
I'VE DONE IT!
ITS SOOOO BEAUTIFUL!
@Stealth
You're a 12 year old furry.
False
I was angry over the final score. If you actually read my second comment. And I never got angry over anyone not agreeing with me. Please dont make things up
"Most sites give it a 7,8,9,10 because those are the scores it deserves."
"Fuck off dude. I am allowed to have an opinion. http://www.gamerankings.com/ds/991480-solatorobo-red-the-hunter/articles.html And I believe all of them over this"
"Dont put words in my mouth. I never said his opinion is bullshit. Hes welcome to it. I just dont agree with it. I have no reason to write a review. When theres plenty of others out there."
"A review is not an opinion dipshit
Definition :A formal assessment or examination of something based on fact.
Opinion Definition: 1. A view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge."
***note: not one of the 20+ definitions listed by google contains the word "fact".
"You should feel bad the trolling started with you. When you couldnt handle I didnt like the review. I didnt make it a personal attack show. You did"
And many more gems the likes of which you can only find here!.. and gamefaq.
Okay then you got angry because you think furries deserve a higher score.
And actually you did get rather aggressive over other people not agreeing with you.
"Fuck off dude. I am allowed to have an opinion"
Which is quite hypocritical considering you act like the reviewer isn't allowed an opinion.
@ Stealth- "I was angry over the final score." and "And I never got angry over anyone not agreeing with me." =

I didn't "personally attack you" I merely told you to shut up. And you didn't listen.
And if everyone is coming at you calling you 12 and saying your stupid. Maybe just maybe it's the way you come across in your comments, just saying. If you only comment negatively in every post expect negativity back in return. You know treat thoughs how you would want to be treated? That kinda thing?
Even as a man who fucking loved this game, I must say that I agree with almost every single criticism you had especially when it comes to the games difficulty/balance. Upgrading the DAHAK is a breeze since the p Crystals used to do so are literally just scattered on the floor for you to pick up. The fact that Reds health increases each time you level up, and the fact that levelling up in itself is so ridiculously easy, makes it almost impossible to die in the game. Oh, and the puzzles were retarded. Thank god there were so few of them.
On the other hand, I cannot help but disagree about your thoughts on the side quests. It is true that most are about "fetching" things but they rarely felt like fetch quests to me. It's mainly because in most of the fact that the game presents each side quest as a sort of mini story, not some boring objective. There is a lot of dialogue intermittent during the quest to keep you engaged at all times and the characters (most the times) aren't just some generic town folk or enemies. They are given their own names, clothes and personalities. It's one of the many reasons while I fell in love with the Shepard Republic.
The combat is indeed quite repetitive but I kind of found it fun in a sort of silly way. Yes, it's a pretty primitive combat mechanic to just grab things and throw them in a variety of ways, but I did find it quite enjoyable. Plus, the game does help break the monotone of the combat by introducing some jet pack sections, a nice (if also a bit primitive) fishing mini-game and some cool air racing.
By the way, are you guys getting the bonus free DLC we Euro dwellers have been drip fed these past few weeks?
I thought the game looked good (I don't care about furries, what's the big deal about hating them? All I see is a cartoon-like RPG, isn't that suposed to be fun?), so the review surprised me. All I can say is that it's making me more curious about it. Hey, a review that's not saying the same stuff that the other reviews does, that's why I'm on Destructoid. I don't have to follow blindly what's said or be some opinion nazi.
Why in gods name is it impossible to have any sort of civilised and well mannered discussion about actual videogames in the comments section of a review, especially in so called bad and/or negative reviews?
It's always the same exact routine, every single time. Some people disagree and decide to get all angry and claim the reviewer and it's reviewer are rubbish while others decide to hound and call out said negative nancies and everything just dissolves into some pointless dribble about semantics, "proper reviewing" and the human condition or something...
I'm guessing there is about 100+ comments by the time I post this, and not even half of them will have anything to do with the actual videogame. This is getting really silly.
re·view /rɪˈvyu/ noun
1. a critical article or report, as in a periodical, on a book, play, recital, or the like; critique; evaluation.
crit·i·cism /ˈkrɪtəˌsɪzəm/ noun
1. the act of passing judgment as to the merits of anything.
judg·ment /ˈdʒʌdʒmənt/ noun
1. an act or instance of judging.
2. the ability to judge, make a decision, or form an opinion objectively, authoritatively, and wisely, especially in matters affecting action; good sense; discretion: a man of sound judgment.
3. the demonstration or exercise of such ability or capacity: The major was decorated for the judgment he showed under fire.
4. the forming of an opinion, estimate, notion, or conclusion, as from circumstances presented to the mind: Our judgment as to the cause of his failure must rest on the evidence.
What do I win?
If you have the money to buy any game you think can be even remotely good have at it. I don't have that kinda money though.
Im happy for you. :)
Reviews are supposed to be copy/pasted text from the back of the box along with a number you think people want to hear(subject to change depending on how much money the check is for.)

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow


































follow
