Raven know how to make quality Shooters, just look at Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast, the greatest Star Wars FPS.
I had no idea what this game was about when I bought it, and heard nothing about, thought it was actually another Wii shooter...
I was pleasantly surprised....and by the end...I was just astounded at how fucking good it was.
Speaking of the ending....
Best. Ending/s. Ever. ;)
Yeah that's a review.
sheep those people are.
I would however like a sequel with more creative use of the abilities and a stronger narrative.
I always respect a review where the individual writing it has the balls to stray from the 'average' and say what they really feel.
Metacritic gives you the 'at-a-glance' impression of what a range of people thought about a game, but to be honest, more than half the review 'sources' used in Metacritic's averages are trash.
I can at least count on Jim and the rest of Dtoid to speak their minds - any game site that is prominently featured on the XboxLive Marketplace CANNOT BE TRUSTED for objective reviews - I'm looking at you IGN...
For you, objectivity means copying the work of others to fall in line and make sure you don't rock the Metacritic averages. What a miserable, pathetic, thoroughly dishonest way to go about reviewing a game.
You'd make an awful reviewer, what with completely lacking a spine and everything.
As for this:
"you dont give games scores (or written reviews for that matter) according to their merits, you give scores related of what you personally think about them "
That's probably the funniest thing you've ever said. Shame the humor's unintentional."
@Jim
oh jim always so classy
regarding "unaccurate" it was my understanding it was synonym of inaccurate, english is inst my native language so despite my broad understanding of it, little mistakes like that one are inevitable
with that pityful attack of yours out of the way, let me tell you
"You're also implying that I should score my games based on what everybody else has scored it?"
no, i never said anything like that, i just said, a proper review score shouldnt be far from the average, that is you shouldnt copy everyone elses score just for the sake of it, your score simply has to be an accurate description of the game, whats the best way to decide that? look at the metacritic average
its called statistical inference and sampling
yes jim those are words
"my opinion of a game isn't accurate?"
thats the problem
a review isnt an opinion jim, a review is supposed to evaluate a game based on its merits, its supposed to be relatively impartial
tell me, if reviews are supposed to be opinions, whats stopping you from writing "singularity is a stupid name, this game gets a 0/10" i mean, its just an opinion, its just as good as any other, and get this, if reviews are opinions, then tecnically i can write a review of a game without even playing it
afterall i dont need to play a game to formulate an opinion about it, i can find a game boring, fun or even offensive but simply looking at videos or screenshots
"You'd make an awful reviewer, what with completely lacking a spine and everything."
and you are a good one?
sorry i said i wouldnt, but given the fact you arent even able to speak to me with the respect any member of this community deserves:
Tournament of Legends:
metascore: 45
your score: 75
assasins creed 2:
metascore 91
your score: 45
final fantasy 13:
metascore 82
your score: 40
crackdown 2:
metascore: 71
your score: 45
singularity
metascore: 76
your score: 90
you must be living in jimmyland, becuz i cannot conceive any other place where being wrong all the time means your doing things right
Dont you have better things to do w/ your time? What dont you fucking understand about Sterling's stance on reviews? This is like the third time I'm seeing your hollow claims following a "review" on this site. Nobody gives a fuck about what your claiming. Dtoid obviously doesnt. Do you think they are going to change their approach because you cant sort out the "subjectiveness" of a review? Personally, this is my first stop to get some enlightenment on a game I havent touched myself. If you feel differently, simply fuck off.
Those arguments are so full of logical fallacy and the complete lack of understanding of what a informed subjective review is I am down right boggled. You simply can not use statistics as a litmus test for the validity of review. What you are attempting appears to be some sort of hitherto unknown Inferential statistics to ascribe value to the entirety of Jims reviews based on a set of numbers that represent subjective data. Subjective data that by its own nature can then only be assigned value based on each individuals opinion. Your argument seems to be.
"I hate Jims reviews, other people hate Jims reviews see look at X other review and how he is so far from the bell curve. He is Wrong"
This is Argumentum ad populum. Appeal to the people. It is a fallacy to use as the crux of an argument and as such carries no weight other than to show you agree with a group of people.
On a side note the Idea that you can create an opinion on a game you have not even played that is true. However this borders on willful ignorance when you hold this view up as more valuable or even equally valuable as someone who has formed an informed (game played) review. Without augmentation how are you to refute or argue that we should be swayed by your ideas?
Furthermore the crack about "singularity is a stupid name, this game gets a 0/10" you just invoked a Straw Man fallacy by taking the idea of informed/constructed subjectivity and removing all rational processes. Hence are you accusing Jims review of being tantamount to uninformed POV like FUCK that game its name is stupid?
Argument
Jim's opinion is subjective but informed many enjoy pondering this and comparing to our own Ideas.
(Voiced by people here already in various forms.)
Counter
Jim's review is subjective and so tantamount to any pointless claim. We should ignore it. <--- YOU (Bad)
I almost wonder with these arguments should we ever even post since options are so vacuous, but I digress I'm standing awful close to the slippery slope on that one.
Feel free to elaborate if you have some evidence or logic backing your claims? I hope to god you are just a troll that hates the Shift Key and his second language is English (nothing wrong with that just accounting for the interesting word choice).
UNaccurate = INcorrect."
@jawshoeuh
well english is not my native language so little mistakes like that are more or less expected
and i dont really think that makes me the worst human being alive
even then id say my grammar is far superior than most people around here
@ZetA RE UP
Dont you have better things to do w/ your time? What dont you fucking understand about my stance on reviews? This is like the third time I'm seeing your hollow claims following my comment on this site. Nobody gives a fuck about what your claiming. i obviously dont. Do you think i am going to change my approach because you cant sort out the "logic" of my comment?
god that was easy
now really i find it amusing that Jim and the people that have come out to critize me are far more vocal than ive been to Jim regarding this review
i mean, ive been called the worst human being alive, ive told to fuck off and even Jim himself tried to make fun of me
and yet the only thing i said was that Jim should change the way he reviews games, simply becuz he ends up giving the customer the wrong idea about the product
hell if you can offer me a valid counter-point ill stop commenting, really
i am open to your arguments
finally a well stated argument, now if only you could be a little polite
look, lets start by the basics, what is the purpose of a review?
the purpose of a review is simply to give an informed view of any given product to the customer, with that in mind a review must offer an evaluation which should reflect what the customer is likely to think about the product, thats why the closer the review is to the common consensus the more likely it is to offer an accurate evaluation to the customer
in layman's terms, if 90% of the people that played the game loved it, its very likely that ill find the game amusing too
the average score simply reflects that percentage by taking samples out a given gamer population
id be just as effective to make a survey for each new release, but of course thats no very practical
now you say that subjectivity is that card taken that crumbles the castle that is the reviewing process, that the fact that a level of subjectivity is involved makes any analysis or statistical conclusion worthless becuz science cannot possibly explain opinions
and thats not true, i mean the fact that a game is liked by 90% of the people that play it, means that there are patterns that we can follow, its not an aleatory result its not like flipping a coin, there are specific things about that game that people like, the games merits from which our opinions are build upon
a review must offer an accurate description of the assets of a game
look, i think you are ignoring something, ones opinion is just as good as anyone elses, therefore yes i can formulate my own opinion of a game by just looking at screenshots and gameplay videos, hell i could make one by just looking at the title and noone could say it is an uninformed opinion, becuz there is no such thing, by my own terms, by my own view of logic there is no better opinion than mine, and thats why youll never see anybody saying "geez dude your opinion is way better than mine"
so thats why im asking, Jim, whats stopping you from saying "singularity is a stupid name, this game gets a 0/10"?
and then is the question "is subjectiviy involved in the reviewing process" yes, yes it is, its inevitable, we are humans, however saying reviews are mere "opinions" is just plain stupid
I think we are just gonna have to agree to disagree at this point. A single reviewer is really only beholden to give a accurate account of what they believe the game was like. The kind of parallel you draw is to a company like Consumer Reports, Meta-Critic or Rotten Tomatoes, these provide a summary of the reviews then the end user can make a statistically informed choice. The Idea of Common Consensus adherence in reviews infers that we would need a base from other reviews before we could even start our own. The data to ascertain if the game is well received couldn't come into being with out the reviews first. Since I'm sure your not suggesting an a priori relationship we would have to define certain reviewers as the primaries for which the rest should follow. If this was a review of our friends above amazing electric toothbrush we could state that it runs or does not run, it jitters so hard it knocks my teeth out etc. This is akin to the mechanics or bugs part of a review if the game is simply unplayable that is something that is most concrete and like that broken facesmashing toothbrush. However other topics such as story and enjoyment that are not planted ease of operation, fall much more subjectively. At this juncture I hate quoting the dictionary but Opinion
"a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty."
"a judgment or estimate of a person or thing with respect to character, merit, etc."
Hence the qualifier of informed or not. The definitional ambiguity combined with a healthy dose of cynicism is most likely why we do not refer to reviews as opinions.
What stops Jim from making shallow comments like a jab at its name as a ground for a low score, is both we wouldn't take him seriously and its a empty and silly suggestion. If however he backed this by informing us that it had a better working title but got replaced by something worse. See Bioshock why the hell couldnt we have called it Rapture debate. This would be something of substance. Its really about the strength of argument behind a reviews claim that gives it credence, since we all interpret these arguments differently we come across reviews that we agree with that are outside the norm as well as vice versa.
I think you have some sort of mental problem that causes you to care way too much about something way too insignificant. And yes, a review is a mere opinion, and I'm not stupid for thinking that.
But, review the score of the review! REALLY?!
Sometimes I think some gamers are paid to make all gamers look bad.
tl;dr. You suck, sir.
@PunisherLH
Seriously? Three comments whining about the review?
@ Jim Sterling
Someone needs to invent a device that lets you slap people through the internet, and you deserve to have the prototype.
No matter what the haters say, I hope you never change how you review games, Jim. I count on you to give me a viewpoint that's different from the ones repeated over and over on other websites.
A review should be reviewed on its merits, but I believe that a game's merits can be purely subjective. For example, a game's artistic direction or control scheme. Some may like a certain game's artistic direction or control scheme, and those two things would be merits to the game, in their opinion. However, another reviewer may believe these two parts of a game are bad, and they are not merits in that reviewers eyes.
Take this game, Singularity. Elements from other games have been taken for this game, sure. Jim obviously doesn't mind that the ideas were copied, and thus considers taking good ideas from other games a merit. However, other reviewers may be of the opinion that this is unoriginal. So in their eyes it's not a merit.
Merits, or assets (whichever term you prefer), can be viewed differently from person to person.
Only thing 'imbalanced' about the MP is the big spider things are pretty weak considering they're supposed to be the tanks (weak as in there HP is weak).
This game is underrated. Get it folks, I've tried it myself!
Seal of approval by Gorescream, etc...
Does not work with Steam version though, you need a boxed version. If you buy it on Steam you're screwed. (Isn't even available on Steam here in the UK anyway.)
If you are trying to decide whether to get it for console or PC... PC version is usually much cheaper (I got it for £22.99 from Coolshop, while I couldnt' find a console version for cheaper than £35), so PC version saves you money. I played it on PC and enjoyed it fine. There aren't any extra cool graphical effects on the PC, the only advantage to playing it on PC is higher resolution and playing with a mouse. And it plays perfectly well with a controller too... I'm replaying it in hard mode with xbox 360 controller, the vibration effects on the guns are good. (But it just says "Press pad 4" or "Press pad 6" rather than "Press X" or "Press B", etc.)
The game is pretty easy in normal mode, and I'd suggest playing it in hard. All hard mode does is increase the damage that enemies do to you, and with all your awesome weapons and time powers it is hard for enemies to get close enough to hurt you! Except those damn phase ticks are BRUTAL in hard mode. It's like a crazy difficulty spike a third of the way into the game, and if you don't trap those phase ticks in time bubbles then you will definately die. I spent half an hour trying to get past the first room with phase ticks. And you can't change difficulty setting mid way through the game.
Other than the first area with phase ticks, the game is well balanced for hard mode.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow























follow


