Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.

Review: Shank 2

5:00 PM on 02.15.2012   |   Victoria Medina

Review: Shank 2 photo

Shank 2 continues the tale of a man named Shank by providing more killing, more death, and more over-the-top gore that was a staple of the original title. At its core, however, is a side-scrolling brawler reminiscent of old arcade classics in which addictive gameplay is seasoned liberally with brutal difficulty to keep kids feeding quarters into the machines.

This is no longer the age of arcades, yet punishing challenge remains a main ingredient in this type of game. Of course, there's no point in having challenge without making progress, so Klei Entertainment has tried to implement some changes to the formula.

Shank 2 (PC [reviewed], PlayStation Network, Xbox Live Arcade)
Developer: Klei Entertainment
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Released: February 7, 2012 (PC, PSN) / February 8, 2012 (XBLA)
MSRP: $9.99 (PC, PSN) / 800 MSP

Shank is an angry man who kills lots of things using varied and interesting methods. He is also a man who dies a lot. There doesn't need to be a reason for Shank to kill. The developers could have said someone sneezed on the hero, which sent him into a blind rage of murder and death. They didn't, however, and the result is a bit of back story to flesh out the character. Mostly though, this game is about killing lots of dudes.

To aid in the slaughter, you are given three attack types -- light, heavy, and ranged -- as well as explosives. Each weapon also carries certain bonuses, such as the sledgehammer, which deals 25% more damage to large enemies and 50% more damage to shielded enemies, or the pistols, which will deal an additional 20% damage to small foes.

On top of that, players can wield the weapons of those they've slain. If you want to kill dudes with a shovel or a large fish, that is an option. In case that isn't enough variety, there are several environmental kills as well. You can drop boats or crates on enemies, throw boxes of knives or blocks of ice, open up the floor so foes fall into giant grinding cogs or saws... the list goes on.


It is entirely possible to beat the game using only your basic abilities, which would be one way to challenge yourself. Using the additional weapons laying about will help, especially in areas where the difficulty level spikes ridiculously. None of the fights are easy per se, but there will be sections when it gets downright aggravating. At one point early in the game, you are shown how to grab and throw enemies. Following this, a number of more challenging enemies are sent your way, so not only are you forced to learn how to grab and throw, you also have to master it quickly or die. All while avoiding the instant-death hole in the floor, by the way.

You can also make fights less intense by utilizing counter attacks, which are triggered by grabbing foes when a big red exclamation mark appears over their head. Of course, this is often easier said than done. When you only have to deal with one or two guys, it's a lot easier to grab the right guy than when you are facing six or seven. There was more than one time when, while trying to perform a counter, the wrong guy was grabbed and then the rest of the enemies proceeded to destroy you. 

If killing and dying alone isn't enough for you, there is also a two-player survival mode, which replaces the co-op mode of the original Shank and which may be the best part of the game. Instead of playing through main levels with a friend, you are now tasked with surviving wave after wave of enemies who are trying not only to kill you but also to blow up three clusters of supplies. Between waves, you are given the chance to purchase items like health drinks, decoys, or heavy weapons, and the more waves you survive, the more items that become available. Each of the three survival levels also have unique items, such as harpoon guns or trap doors.


Should you die during survival, your partner can revive you, so the only way to lose is if both of you die or if all three supply caches are destroyed. The only enemies that can blow up the supplies are little demolitions experts who will set charges. You've only got a few seconds to attack and/or kill the demo men before they set their bombs, and a few seconds to disarm the bombs if they've already been set, all while contending with the regular enemies as well.

As far as the story goes, it's pretty basic -- this isn't an RPG, after all. Shank has to save someone he cares about while taking revenge on the ones who did the kidnapping. This brings us to the cutscenes, which are incredibly entertaining and over-the-top. In comic book/grindhouse-style animations, Shank causes even more devastation and destruction, all of which is rather satisfying and amusing. The same amount of detail in the cutscenes can be found in each and every chapter of the game, from the level design to the different enemies in each level.

It's only a shame that some of the fights are so frustratingly difficult. While one should expect some tough encounters, there should also be some balance, yet that balance was sorely lacking at times. Most of the areas were not incredibly hard, then there would suddenly be a near-impossible section that took quite a few tries, only to revert to far less challenging fights. These sections were even more brutal than the bosses, which seems a bit backward. More than once, I found myself stuck midway through a level, retrying the same goon battle over and over, only to beat the boss in one or two attempts.

Another fly in the proverbial soup was the controls. To be blunt, PC controls suck. Hard. If you have a controller but want to play on the PC, fine. Be warned, however, that things are going to get hairy when you're trying to play with a mouse and keyboard. It is possible to reassign key functions in the options, but even doing that, the mouse and keyboard felt so awkward that playing with the controller became necessary. Once the switch was made, things felt a lot easier, but there were still occasional issues. The biggest one is Shank's random turning in the wrong direction during attacks. In a slower-paced game, this wouldn't be an issue, but when you're in the middle of a combo or a brawl with three or four dudes, death happens -- needless death, the most aggravating kind.

Also, once you've played through the campaign, there isn't much reason to go back and play again aside from completing objectives to unlock new skins and costumes, and even most of those can be done in survival mode. 

The B-Movie theatrics are great but can become repetitive during the fights. The challenging gameplay is fun, but the fact that mid-level encounters are more difficult than bosses can leave a feeling of frustration instead of triumph. The only place where this doesn't apply is the ability to use items to kill, since they are varied and spaced well enough so as not to become boring. For what the game costs, though, it's worth a look if you enjoy brawlers. For the game's faults, the survival mode can be a lot of fun, plus the absurd destruction never gets old.

All in all, Shank 2 can be summed up as "fine." It isn't going to revolutionize brawlers or bring anything truly unique to the table, but it isn't a bad game either. Some of the strongest points also seem to be the weakest, but there are some places where they get done right.



Final Verdict:
6.5

Alright: 6s may be slightly above average, or simply inoffensive. Fans of this genre will still thoroughly enjoy them, but a fair few will be left unfulfilled.













More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

19 comments | showing # 1 to 19
prev next

shaxam1029's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 17:16
shaxam1029
Hmmm... interesting. I know people who loved the first game, and people who loathed it. It looks gorgeous, might just pick it up. Great review!
PhilK3nS3bb3n's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 17:31
PhilK3nS3bb3n
Great review, but I have to disagree with your assessment of the difficulty. It sounds like you are describing the first game more than this one. With the improved controls and more killing options I am having a far easier time in this sequel. Maybe because I played the crap out the first and am used to juggling all the baddies and my weapons... I don't know. But different strokes and all. Like I said good review.
Jinx 01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 18:26
Jinx 01
Enjoyed the first game, but never finished it as I got stuck on the final boss. Good fun, though.
sync99's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 20:38
sync99
TO put it simply,Shank 2 suck on the pc.The controls are simpley terrible and there is no way around that(maybe a gamepad).The worst thing is that the first Shank was great on the pc and it actually improved on the console controls.So yeah,good review,I definitely agree with your opinion on the difficulty,so annoying and frustrating.There goes another 15$ for a 2 hour headache.
Nintendan's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 20:43
Nintendan
I got to the final level of the first game and just stopped. Didn't like the feel much. Sounds like this is more off the same, will wait for indie bundle.
Wicket's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 20:51
Wicket
Enjoyed Shank 2. I don't think I had any problems with the levels, some cheap deaths but no problems. The major headache I had is some unavoidable damage that more than one enemy make, since the "avoid roll" is something that doesn't turn instinctive, just becomes spamable, you do it because you know if you don't do it you will die. The thrown knifes on the game made such damage that I didn't even tried melee on big enemies or bosses, you spam them at such speed and see the life goes away. Enemies that throw you is such pain, because you know you can punch the guy a few times and try to avoid the punch, most of times they do a grab move that if you're close you receive a mini-stun and receive the grab that deals great damage, something that needed to have a counter. When you do a counter move Shank performs a mini animation of kill, if some enemy attack you in this part you kill the guy but receive damage.
That is the problems I had, even the story that doesn't make much sense it's ok. Awesome review man.
TheOtherSuperMarioBro's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 22:15
TheOtherSuperMarioBro
Looks like a great game for the whole family!
Artemus's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/15/2012 23:13
Artemus
Sweet. I was looking forward to this review on DTOID... but a 6.5?! Are you outta your mind?! Are you outta your skull?! I know reviews are opinions, but this game deserves better.
The first one, above its minor control flaws, was an underrated gem in my book. This budget-priced sequel is even better. The controls have been tweaked and it feels even better to "shank". The game, to me, harkens back to old school games, when timing and skill is everything. Hell, I've been playing levels over and over again; the game is just too much fun.
Shank 2 is an above excellent downloadable game worthy of an 8. I suggest people give it a go and not miss out this time. It's a short, gory and fun ride. =)
CUDpwns's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2012 01:25
CUDpwns
Shank stinks so I'm just going to assume the second one does too.
rancor09's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2012 02:02
rancor09
I bought the first one and disliked it. I'm sure this sequel is more of the same. Great review!
Leviathan902's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2012 08:15
Leviathan902
Wow, couldn't disagree more with either the reviewer or the commenters.

While the game is certainly difficult, I never found it frustratingly so, as if I died or took a ton of damage in an area, it was because I didn't fight well enough, not because of bad controls, though I played on 360, not PC. Maybe that's your problem there.

I have found the combat to be deep, rewarding, fast-paced, fluid and incredibly fun. Makes me want to give the original Shank another look.

Also, I'm sorry, but the tone of the review is very dry and basic. I didn't feel the reviewer's personality coming across as is usually the case with Destructoid. I give the review a 5 out of 10, the game an 8.
NotoriousBIG420's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2012 11:57
NotoriousBIG420
@Jinx 01

I did the same exact thing. I want to play the first game over again and try to beat it this time but don't have the energy in me to play it over again. Shank 2 is miles better then the first game.
PhilK3nS3bb3n's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2012 12:57
PhilK3nS3bb3n
Hear hear leviathan and Artemis, well said.
Artemus's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2012 14:05
Artemus
@Leviathan902
Very well said, man! The controls, this time around, are near perfect(I'm playing on PS3)... If I died a few times on a level it was certainly my fault, not the controls. Like retro games of the past, you just have to memorize the level's layout and boss patterns and just play better. Too many games hold the players hands nowadays. It's a shame gamers are not as patient as they once were. =/
Anyway, great game is great and I hope more people give it a try.
Also, your review of the review is hilarious. Game on, Leviathan902!
BoomingEchoes's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/16/2012 14:58
BoomingEchoes
Most of this review, specially its negative points, can be waved away by the fact that "this is the type of game this is."

Story is meant to be flimsy -its themed on 80's movies cliches, just like its predecessor. No arcade brawler is all that deep. I really would hate to see how Double Dragon would be reviewed today, if this is going to be such a negative point.

Difficulty.. Its an arcade brawler. That pretty much sums up your entire difficulty issue before you even hit the controls. Its a throwback, and it says a lot about us if we don't know how to handle a tough game any more.

Controls.. What befuddles me the most is why this would even be reviewed on the PC, without a control pad. At that point you mine as well call this a fancy flash game on New Grounds. This really should come with a disclaimer saying a controller is necessary, in order to stave off negativity towards those who oddly decide to play it how it obviously wasn't intended to be played, because beyond that it just becomes a matter of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should".

Replay value.. Game gives you multiple skins, in fact I think it may give you more then you got in the first game -I can't remember- and each skin has different attributes from what I understand. But theres your replay value: trying the game with a different skin and forcing yourself to change up your play style -which, again, is a throw back to the games its tipping its hat too, because none of those games had replay value beyond trying the next character, and its playstyle. The idea that there needs to be oodles or re-playability isn't wrong in many situations in gaming, but its misplaced in this case.

Also, I wanted to add, and this maybe the thing that rubbed me the wrong way the most: I don't like the implication that just because a game isn't an RPG, that it can't possibly have a good, deep, story. This is a terrible sentiment for any writer to include in a review. For one thing, there's plenty of crappy stories in RPG's out there. But also, if that were the case, then the industry would be in some major trouble, and would have been a long time before this game.
Smo5000's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2012 08:31
Smo5000
Bought it, Love it. The only small gripe I have is the fact that there isnt a co-op story mode, I loved playing the co-op story of the first game with my wife.

For $10 this is a great game.
Morty's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/17/2012 11:07
Morty
I love it. The Survival mode is surprisingly fun and the diffculty appropriate (currently in Level 4 on Hard).
wulfskull's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/21/2012 11:37
wulfskull
Awesome game. I'd give it an 8/10 as well. Reviewer gets a 4/10.
UsedGamers's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/27/2012 11:20
UsedGamers
I am already half way through the game on the Hard difficulty and have yet to really die more than 5 times in a level. I don't understand how the difficulty is frustrating. I can understand the gripe with the counters but if you are in that situation, just roll past the baddies and continue to beat them up. The game isn't mind blowing but it is an absurd amount of fun. With the updated feeling to the combat system it is just so much better.

I am personally having a blast with this game. Grindhouse side scrolling brawler that handles well and gives you unlocks for you and your friend to use in a Horde multiplayer that DOESN'T get boring after the 5th wave, it's awesome.

If you even liked the first one, at least download the demo for the second one. Just so much damn fun to be had. Best 10 bucks I have spent on an arcade game in a long time.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!